View source for Food safety and standards: India

{| Class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/>
</div>
|}




=Food Adulteration=
==The extent of the problem==
===2018-19===
[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F07%2F10&entity=Ar01514&sk=C1596F47&mode=text  Dipak Dash, July 10, 2019: ''The Times of India'']

[[File: Convictions for Food Adulteration, 2017-19.jpg|Convictions for Food Adulteration, 2017-19 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F07%2F10&entity=Ar01514&sk=C1596F47&mode=text  Dipak Dash, July 10, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]


Almost one third of the food samples tested in 2018-19 were found adulterated or substandard with Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu leading the list where nearly half of the samples failed the test, according to government data. The share of failed samples during the two previous years was nearly 25%.

In a written reply, Union food and consumer affairs minister Ram Vilas Paswan told Lok Sabha on Tuesday that between 2016-17 and 2018-19, about 8,100 people were convicted for committing such offences and food safety authorities across the states had collected nearly Rs 43.65 crore fine from the offenders. He quoted the data supplied by the state governments. The tests are carried out on the parameters set by the food safety regulator, FSSAI.

According to ministry’s data, over 20,000 out of the total 65,000 samples failed the test in 2018-19. During 2017-18, over 24,000 samples out of 99,000 did not confor m to the nor ms and duing 2016-17, the number of failed samples was more than 18,000 out of the total 78,000 that were tested.

To put a check on the adulteration of food items, the government has also introduced the Consumer Protection Bill which mandates harsh penalty and even imprisonment for such offences.

=Silver leaf=
==Banned, if processed using animals==
[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=FSSAI-bans-silver-leaf-of-animal-origin-in-03082016011022 ''The Times of India''], Aug 03 2016 

Sushmi Dey

'''FSSAI bans silver leaf of animal origin in food items'''


The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has banned the use of any material of animal origin in silver leaf (chandi ka warq), commonly used in confectionaries and sweets like barfi for decoration and also in pan and packaged supari.

According to sources in the ministry , the move comes in the wake of concerns over use of intestines of cows and buffaloes in making these thin strips of silver. “The silver leaf is prepared by placing small thin strips of silver between the intestines of cows and buffaloes and continuously hammering these bundles for up to eight hour a day till desired thickness of silver leaf is achieved,“ an official said. He said the process was found to be offensive and unhygienic posing potential risk to consumers. Moreover, such silver sheets do not carry any green dot or maroon dot. Hence, consumers fail to differentiate between a vegetarian and non-vegetarian product.

There were also concerns that the silver leaf contained heavy metal traces such as nickel, lead, chromium and cadmium  which are harmful for health.

=Nutrition status=
==Packaged foods==
===Food and beverage manufacturers fail on nutrition===
[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31805&articlexml=Nutrition-Indian-cos-rank-low-15122016008033  Nutrition: Indian cos rank low, Dec 15, 2016: The Times of India]
[[File: Product profile ranking on the basis of level of nutrition.jpg|Product profile ranking on the basis of level of nutrition; [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31805&articlexml=Nutrition-Indian-cos-rank-low-15122016008033  Nutrition: Indian cos rank low, Dec 15, 2016: The Times of India]|frame|500px]]


'''Far Short Of Providing Nutritional Qualities To Fight Malnutrition'''

The largest food and beverage manufacturers in the country need to pull up their socks when it comes to offering nutritious products to consumers.
Research by the Netherlands-based The Access to Nutrition Foundation (ATNF) has found that food and beverage companies in India are falling far short of what they need to do to help fight malnutrition.

For instance, despite having the strongest nutrition and under nutrition-related commitments and policies, Nestle India, maker of Maggi noodles, scored the second lowest for nutrition qualities of its products among all the companies assessed under the India Access to Nutrition Spotlight Index. On the other hand, Mother Dairy scored the highest.

“India faces the serious and escalating double burden of malnutrition, with a large undernourished population, as well as growing numbers of overweight and obese people who are developing chronic diseases,“ said Inge Kauer, executive director of ATNF .“Food and Beverage (F&B) manufacturers in India have the potential, and the responsibility, to be part of the solution to this double burden of malnutrition.“

Factor this: India is home to the largest number of stunted children in the world -48 million under the age of 5 -while at the same time, childhood obesity is reaching alarming proportions. The obesity prevalence rate reached 22% in children and adolescents aged between 5-19 years over the last five years, the report said.

Under the index, companies have been scored out of a maximum of ten in two ways corporate profile and product profile. While the former assesses companies' nutrition and undernutrition-related commitments and policies, practices and disclosure in seven areas of their business, the latter assesses the nutritional quality of the products of all companies included in the India Index.

The leading companies on the corporate profile -Nestle India and Hindustan Unilever -with scores of 7.1 and 6.7 respectively -have done more than the other seven companies assessed to integrate nutrition into their business models.

==Nutritional benchmarks for PDS, midday meals==
[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=FSSAI-sets-nutritional-benchmarks-to-fortify-food-items-09012017012045  Sushmi Dey, FSSAI sets nutritional benchmarks to fortify food items for PDS, midday meals, Jan 9, 2017: The Times of India]



The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has released benchmarks to fortify the nutritional quality of food items used in social sector programmes such as ICDS, PDS and midday meals, such as rice, wheat flour, milk, edible oil and salt.

Food fortification helps combat malnutrition through staple food items. The government is trying to push such products through government schemes to counter problems like stunting, overweight and anaemia, which are the major causes of maternal and child deaths. The FSSAI standards detail specific measurements for fortification. For instance, any manufacturer that fortifies food would have ensure that the level of micronutrients does not fall below the minimum specified by the central food regulator.

The standards also make it mandatory for the manufacturers to follow certain fortification procedures.Fortified food items would also have to carry a logo approved by the FSSAI and mention the nutrient content on their pack.

According to the standards, fortified atta (flour) should contain added iron, folic acid and Vitamin B12. Apart from this, it may also be fortified with zinc, Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, and Vitamin B6.

A separate set of rules dictates how `maida' should be fortified -with iron, folic acid and Vitamin B12. Likewise, fortified rice should contain added iron, folic acid and Vitamin B12. The level of fortification has been specified as well.

The FSSAI standards would ensure that essential nutrients are appropriately added to foods for preventing or reducing the risk of, or correcting, a demonstrated deficiency of one or more essential nutrients in the population or a specific po pulation group. The regulator has also asked the manufacturers and packers of fortified food to give an undertaking on quality assurance, and submit evidence on steps taken in regard to fortification.

All fortified food, whether voluntarily fortified or mandatorily , should be manufactured, packed, labelled, handled, distributed and sold, whether for profit or under a government-funded programme, only in compliance with the standards specified under the provisions of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, and the regulations made thereunder.

=See also= 
[[Food and Civil Supplies: India]]

[[Food Safety & Standards Authority (FSSAI) of India]]

[[Food safety and standards: India]]

[[Milk: India]]

[[Revenue Department :India]]

[[Category:Cuisine|F 
FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS: INDIA]]
[[Category:Health|F 
FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS: INDIA]]
[[Category:India|F 
FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS: INDIA]]
[[Category:Crime]]