Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2014) - Revision history

Jyoti: /* Defectors: the success rate in 2014 */

2020-10-18T22:07:22Z

‎Defectors: the success rate in 2014

2019-04-12T08:16:41Z

‎Results 2014

2014-05-28T23:07:32Z

2014-05-27T21:39:39Z

‎Results 2014

2014-05-27T21:39:12Z

‎Results

2014-05-27T21:38:25Z

2014-05-27T21:33:40Z

2014-05-26T20:45:18Z

‎Proportionate representation?

2014-05-26T20:43:15Z

‎Numbers

2014-05-26T20:40:45Z

‎Proportionate representation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 18 October 2020
Line 64:		Line 64:

	RJD gave a chance to four outsiders to contest out of 27 seats while Congres which contested on 12 seats allowed only two outside candidates.		RJD gave a chance to four outsiders to contest out of 27 seats while Congres which contested on 12 seats allowed only two outside candidates.
		+
		+	=The main contenders=
		+	==BJP vs. Cong in only 1/3 seats==
		+	[[File: The main contenders, rivals in 2014- It was BJP vs. Cong in only 1-3 of the seats.jpg\| The main contenders/ rivals in 2014: It was BJP vs. Cong in only 1/3 of the seats <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F19&entity=Ar01010&sk=680F5535&mode=image April 19, 2019: ''The Times of India'']\|frame\|500px]]
		+
		+	See graphic, ' The main contenders/ rivals in 2014: It was BJP vs. Cong in only 1/3 of the seats '
		+
		+	[[Category:Government\|E
		+	ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (2014)]]
		+	[[Category:India\|E
		+	ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (2014)]]
		+	[[Category:Politics\|E
		+	ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (2014)]]

	=Numbers=		=Numbers=

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:16, 12 April 2019
Line 129:		Line 129:
	=Results 2014=		=Results 2014=
	See the charts on this page.		See the charts on this page.
		+	=See also=
		+	[[Chief Election Commissioners Of India]]
		+
		+	[[Delhi: Parliamentary elections]]
		+
		+	[[Election Commission of India]]
		+
		+	[[Election expenditure: India]]
		+
		+	[[Election laws, rules. procedures: India ]]
		+
		+	[[Elections in India: behaviour and trends (historical)]]
		+
		+	[[Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2014)]]
		+
		+	[[Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2019)]]
		+
		+	[[India: A political history, 1947 onwards]]
		+
		+	[[Karnataka: caste, mutts and elections]]
		+
		+	[[Pakistan: Elections, 1937 onwards]]
		+
		+	[[Uttar Pradesh: Assembly elections]]
		+	==...and also==
		+	Indpaedia has
		+
		+	i) ''' ‘Political history’ '''pages, state-wise, and a page for India as a whole.
		+
		+	ii) State-wise pages on '''assembly '''elections
		+
		+	iii) State-wise pages on '''local bodies’ '''elections
		+
		+	iv) State-wise pages on '''parliamentary '''elections.

@@ Line 130: / Line 130: @@
 The simplest contests were in the states where two parties like BJP and Congres slugged it out straight, as in Gujarat, MP, Chhattisgarh, and Rajasthan. With its dominant support and vote shares, BJP swept them, decimating Congres. In Maharashtra, too, it was a similar situation except that on both sides were alliances.
 =Results 2014=
-See he charts on this page.
+See the charts on this page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 27 May 2014
Line 129:		Line 129:

	The simplest contests were in the states where two parties like BJP and Congres slugged it out straight, as in Gujarat, MP, Chhattisgarh, and Rajasthan. With its dominant support and vote shares, BJP swept them, decimating Congres. In Maharashtra, too, it was a similar situation except that on both sides were alliances.		The simplest contests were in the states where two parties like BJP and Congres slugged it out straight, as in Gujarat, MP, Chhattisgarh, and Rajasthan. With its dominant support and vote shares, BJP swept them, decimating Congres. In Maharashtra, too, it was a similar situation except that on both sides were alliances.
−	=Results=	+	=Results 2014=
		+	See he charts on this page.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 [[Category:Politics|E]]
 =Defectors: the success rate in 2014=
 ''' Election results 2014: High success rate of turncoats who joined BJP '''
@@ Line 40: / Line 69: @@
 =Numbers=
 POLLS, KING-SIZE
@@ Line 53: / Line 79: @@
 =Proportionate representation?=
 '''2014:(Once again) votes obtained do not proportionately translate into seats'''
 ''' Why parties got votes aplenty but zero seats '''
@@ Line 113: / Line 130: @@
 The simplest contests were in the states where two parties like BJP and Congres slugged it out straight, as in Gujarat, MP, Chhattisgarh, and Rajasthan. With its dominant support and vote shares, BJP swept them, decimating Congres. In Maharashtra, too, it was a similar situation except that on both sides were alliances.
 =Results=

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 [[File:k.jpg||frame|left|500px]]
 [[File:b.jpg||frame|500px]]
-[[File:t.jpg||frame|left|500px]]
+[[File:t.png||frame|left|500px]]
 [[File:rwj.jpg||frame|500px]]
 [[File:cg.jpg||frame|left|500px]]

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 =Numbers=
 POLLS, KING-SIZE
@@ Line 44: / Line 48: @@
 Elections can't get bigger than this.
 million voters spread across the country queued up to elect 543 MPs over a month and half. The polling exercise began on April 7 and ended on May 16, over nine phases and results were announced last Friday. Here's the poll carnival in numbers
 =Proportionate representation?=

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 RJD gave a chance to four outsiders to contest out of 27 seats while Congres which contested on 12 seats allowed only two outside candidates.
 =Proportionate representation?=
@@ Line 99: / Line 115: @@
 The simplest contests were in the states where two parties like BJP and Congres slugged it out straight, as in Gujarat, MP, Chhattisgarh, and Rajasthan. With its dominant support and vote shares, BJP swept them, decimating Congres. In Maharashtra, too, it was a similar situation except that on both sides were alliances.