|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[File: Nuclear weapons in India, Pakistan and the world.jpg| Nuclear weapons in India, Pakistan and the world.i) Nuclear inventories in 2015. Ii) The number of years each country took between nuclear device development and weaponisation; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=14_01_2016_010_017_001&type=P&artUrl=STA-TOI-STICS-INDIA-TOOK-20-YEARS-TO-14012016010017&eid=31808 ''The Times of India''], January 14, 2016|frame|500px]]
| |
| − |
| |
| | {| class="wikitable" | | {| class="wikitable" |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> | | |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> |
| − | This is a collection of newspaper articles selected for the excellence of their content.<br/>You can help by converting it into an encyclopaedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br/>Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br/>and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br/> | + | This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/> |
| − | See [[examples]] and a tutorial.</div>
| + | Additional information may please be sent as messages to the Facebook <br/>community, [http://www.facebook.com/Indpaedia Indpaedia.com]. All information used will be gratefully <br/>acknowledged in your name. |
| | + | </div> |
| | |} | | |} |
| − | [[Category:India|N]]
| |
| − | [[Category: Defence |N]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Pakistan |N]]
| |
| − | [[Category: S&T |N]]
| |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| − | =Nuclear tests=
| + | [[Category:India |R ]] |
| − | [[File: India, Pakistan and the six other countries that have conducted nuclear tests between 1945 and 2015, The last row should probably read 2011-15.jpg|India, Pakistan and the six other countries that have conducted nuclear tests between 1945 and 2015, The last row should probably read 2011-15; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=STATOISTIC-EXCLUSIVE-CLUB-18092015009011 ''The Times of India''], September 18, 2015|frame|500px]] | + | [[Category:Politics |R ]] |
| | | | |
| − | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=STATOISTIC-EXCLUSIVE-CLUB-18092015009011 ''The Times of India''], Sep 18 2015 | + | =YEAR-WISE DEVELOPMENTS= |
| | + | ==As in 2021== |
| | + | [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2021%2F04%2F11&entity=Ar01709&sk=27CB96B1&mode=text Robin David, April 11, 2021: ''The Times of India''] |
| | | | |
| − | The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty aimed at banning nuclear tests is criticised as a tool of the nuclear haves to maintain their monopoly. Data shows that 2,045 of the 2,053 nuclear tests so far have been by five countries the US, Russia, France, UK and China. After its split from the Soviet Union, Ukraine signed the Budapest Memorandum (with the US, UK and Russia) and handed over its nuclear arsenal to Russia in return for a perpetual guarantee of sovereignty and territorial integrity. Experts argue that the 2014 Russian annexation of the Ukrainian territory of Crimea might not have happened if Ukraine had retained these weapons.
| + | Money begets power and power begets more money. Or at least that is what traditional logic says. But one of India’s richest politicians — Konda Vishweshwar Reddy— is now without party. He had joined TRS in 2013 and left it in 2018. He then joined Congress and left it last month. He is now hoping to launch a new political outfit in Telangana. |
| | | | |
| − | =India, China, Pakistan: nuclear arsenals=
| + | He was the richest MP in the country between 2014 and 2019 with assets worth Rs 528 crore after he won from Chevella in Telangana. He was the second-richest candidate in the 2019 elections with assets of Rs 895 crore. He lost the election that year on a Congress ticket. |
| − | ===India, China, Pak add to nuke arsenal===
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | Chidanand Rajghatta
| + | He has political legacy too. He is the grandson of Konda Venkata Ranga Reddy, former deputy chief minister of united Andhra Pradesh after whom the Ranga Reddy district has been named. |
| | + | And today, he is living in a world of contradictions. He is in the process of bringing small regional outfits together on one platform to create one mega regional party in Telangana. But he himself does not want to be involved in state politics. He prefers being Telangana’s representative in the Lok Sabha. He does not mind being called the ‘richest MP’ and ‘richest candidate’, but he cringes when you call him a rich businessman. Husband of Apollo Hospitals MD Sangita Reddy, he says, “I would like to be known as an academic, entrepreneur and researcher instead.” |
| | + | But being called a rich politician is beneficial in some ways. “Initially, I was concerned (about being called rich),” he says. “They would think, arey, ine paise wala hai. Ine aam admi ki samaysa jaante nai, and all that (He is a rich man. How will he understand the problems of the poor),” he says with a touch of Hyderabadi Dakhni. “But to my shock, it helped me a lot (in 2014). People started saying he is a paisewala (rich). He does not need to take bribes and is a potential winner. And by the way, I am the richest only on paper. Almost every MP in Telangana is richer than me. These people can buy me over 20-30 times. I pay taxes, they don’t.” |
| | | | |
| − | [http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=CAP&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI&Enter=true&Skin=TOINEW&AW=1393708348876 Times of India]
| + | State politics is like “wrestling with the pig in the mud” and he accepts that perhaps he is not cut out for it. “The level of politics is lower in assemblies. At least in Parliament, no one throws chappals at each other.”He admits that one needs to be a bit of a street fighter in state politics. “I am different. I entered politics in 2013 when I was 53. So, I am often thinking of things other than politics.” For instance, Reddy, who has a number of patents and copyrights to his name, adds that even at this moment he is working on a unique rice transplanting machine. |
| | | | |
| − | China, India, and Pakistan bumped up their nuclear arsenal, adding 10 to 20 weapons each in 2012, a handbook released by arms watchdog SIPRI noted.
| + | Despite his dislike for the rough and tumble for state politics, he has taken the initiative of bringing regional parties including Telangana Jana Samithi, Telangana Inti Party and independents like Teenmar Mallana together. He says a unified regional outfit could take on TRS effectively and does not rule out joining hands with the BJP or Congress in the future. “We will also bring together some people from Congress and TRS. They are looking for a viable alternative.” |
| | | | |
| − | India increased its nuclear warheads from 80-100 in 2012 to 90-110 in 2013, keeping pace with Pakistan, which went from 90-110 weapons to 110-120. China piled up 10 more weapons from 240 in 2012. “India’s expansion of missile capabilities isn’t targeted at Pakistan, but at China,” a SIPRI staff said
| + | On why he wants to form a new outfit, he says, “In any national party, decisions have to go to the central leadership. Look at the Congress. By the time they understand the problem, report it to the central leadership, find a solution and discuss it democratically, someone like a KCR (chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao) has changed things.” |
| − | | + | |
| − | ===The status in 2012===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | With eye on China, India ramps up N-arsenal
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | SIPRI Says Delhi, Beijing And Islamabad Added 10-20 Weapons Last Year
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Chidanand Rajghatta TNN
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Washington: China, India, and Pakistan all added 10 to 20 nuclear weapons to their arsenal last year even as the top four nuclear nations — US, Russia, UK and France — appear determined to retain their nuclear arsenals indefinitely even if they didn’t add to their inventory, the Swedish arms watchdog SIPRI said in its 2013 handbook.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | SIPRI’s world nuclear forces chart showed India bumping up its nuclear warheads from 80-100 in 2012 to 90-110 in 2013, keeping pace with Pakistan, which went from 90-110 weapons to 110-120. China, in the meantime, went from 240 nuclear weapons in 2012 to 250 in 2013.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | However, SIPRI said, Russia and the US, along with the three other nuclear powers — France, Britain and China — are either deploying new nuclear weapon delivery systems or have announced programmes to do so, and appear determined to retain their nuclear arsenals indefinitely.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | As a result, although the total number of nuclear weapons in the world dropped from approximately 19,000 in 2012 to 17,265 in 2013, there was little to inspire hope that states are genuinely willing to give up their nuclear arsenals, the SIPRI report said.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | With greater insecurities and fears of survival, Pakistan is long thought to possess more nukes than India, although suggestions that it has or will overtake the weapons count of Britain and France seem misplaced. India, on the other hand, appears to be ramping up its arsenal with China in its calculations since Pakistan’s smaller land mass has few targets.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | “With India we see the gradual expansion of its longer-range ballistic missile capabilities which are not really targeted at Pakistan but rather at China,” Kile said.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Nuclear arsenal: India, Pakistan==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Pak’s nuke arsenal bigger than India’s
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Rajat Pandit
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=CAP&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI&Enter=true&Skin=TOINEW&AW=1393708348876 Times of India]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[File: army1.png | |frame|500px]]
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | New Delhi: After racing past India in ballistic and cruise missiles, with covert help from China and North Korea, Pakistan seems to be surging ahead on the nuclear front too.
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | A series of recent estimates by international nuclear watchdogs and reputed thinktanks hold that Pakistan has 70-90 warheads compared to India’s 60-80. China has around 240 warheads.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Even as global fears about the possibility of jihadis gaining access to Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, enriched uranium or technical know-how continue, its deadly inventory is only going to expand.
| + | |
| − | Pakistan, after all, is supplementing its ongoing enriched uranium-based nuke programme with a weaponsgrade plutonium one. Its two new heavy-water reactors being built at Khushab nuclear facility, with China’s help, are geared towards producing weapons-grade plutonium, as reported by TOI earlier. 100 Pak nukes at short notice?
| + | |
| − | New Delhi: The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)’s latest annual world military expenditure report, released on Wednesday, estimates Pakistan’s stock of nuclear warheads to be at least 10 more than that of India’s. The report also said Pakistan’s weapons-grade plutonium production would jump seven-fold with the two new reactors at Khushab nearing completion.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | “Our conservative estimates are that Pakistan has 60 warheads and could produce 100 nuclear weapons at short notice,” said SIPRI, adding that Islamabad had earmarked its US-supplied F-16 fighters, Ghaznavi and Shaheen missiles as its nuke delivery systems.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | India’s nuclear weapons programme, in turn, has largely been plutoniumbased, basically centred around the Pu-239 produced in research reactors like Cirus and Dhruva at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre.
| + | |
| − | Nuclear arsenals of India, Pakistan, and even China, pale in comparison to the gigantic ones of the two former Cold War foes, US and Russia. SIPRI estimates there are a whopping 22,600 active, inactive and stored nuclear warheads around the globe, enough to destroy it several times over.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | While Russia has 12,000 warheads, 4,630 of them ‘‘deployed’’ ones, US has 9,600, which includes 2,468 of them operational.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ===2012: Nuclear arsenals around the world===
| + | |
| − | See graphic
| + | |
| − | [[File: nuclear arsenals.jpg|The status in 2012-13|frame|500px]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[File: nuclear india.jpg|Imbalance of nuclear power: India and the world; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Gallery.aspx?id=04_04_2015_009_011_004&type=P&artUrl=STATOISTICS-IMBALANCE-OF-POWER-04042015009011&eid=31808 ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
| + | |
| − | ===2016: Nuclear arsenals around the world===
| + | |
| − | [[File: India, China, Pakistan number of nuclear warheads and the range of their missiles.jpg| India, China, Pakistan and six other nuclear powers: the number of nuclear warheads each country possesses, and the range of their missiles in kilometres, presumably as in 2016.<br/> [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=STATOISTICS-THERE-ARE-AN-ESTIMATED-230-NUCLEAR-WEAPONS-22092016009023 Sep 22 STATOISTICS - THERE ARE AN ESTIMATED 230 NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT, Sep 22 2016''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[File: India, Pakistan and the world, nuclear tests conducted as on September 12, 2016.jpg| India, Pakistan and the world: Nuclear tests conducted as on September 12, 2016; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=STATOISTICS-UNLIKE-NORTH-KOREA-INDIA-TESTED-NUCLEAR-TECHNOLOGY-12092016008019 ''The Times of India''], September 12, 2016|frame|500px]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''See graphics''':
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | 1. ''India, China, Pakistan number of nuclear warheads and the range of their missiles''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | 2. ''India, Pakistan and the world, nuclear tests conducted as on September 12, 2016''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ===2018: Pakistan has more nuclear warheads===
| + | |
| − | [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2018%2F06%2F19&entity=Ar01506&sk=CF128556&mode=text Rajat Pandit, Pak has more N-warheads, India credible deterrence, June 19, 2018: ''The Times of India'']
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[File: Strategic deterrence- number of warheads- China, Pakistan and other countries, Delivery systems- India, Pakistan and China, India's strategic forces command.jpg|Strategic deterrence- <br/> Number of warheads- China, Pakistan and other countries; <br/> Delivery systems- India, Pakistan and China; <br/> India's strategic forces command <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2018%2F06%2F19&entity=Ar01506&sk=CF128556&mode=text Rajat Pandit, Pak has more N-warheads, India credible deterrence, June 19, 2018: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '' ‘Nukes Not Delhi’s War-Fighting Weapon But Tool For Retaliation’ ''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Pakistan may continue to remain slightly ahead of India in terms of the number of nuclear warheads, with China having double the quantity, but the Indian defence establishment believes its deterrence capability is “robust”, designed to ensure “survivability” for retaliatory strikes and firmly on track for further modernisation.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Pakistan now has 140-150 nuclear warheads compared to India’s 130-140, with China hovering around 280, as per the latest assessment of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), released on Monday.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The US and Russia are in a different league altogether with 6,450 and 6,850 nuclear warheads respectively, accounting for 92% of the world’s nuclear weapons.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Defence establishment sources here said India, confronted with the collusive threat from China and Pakistan, has no other option but to systematically build nuclear deterrence that is “credible” and capable of inflicting massive damage in a retaliatory strike to any first strike by an adversary.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | “Number of warheads does not really matter. With a declared no-first use nuclear policy, India is keen to ensure survivability and credibility of our assets and NC3 (nuclear command, control and communication) systems for assured secondstrike capabilities,” a source said.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Pakistan has deliberately kept its nuclear policy ambiguous to deter India from undertaking any conventional military action despite repeated provocations, even as it steps up development at the Khushab nulear complex with help from China.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | “For India, nuclear weapons are not war-fighting weapons. But we need credible minimum deterrence, with the certainty of massive retaliation,” the source said. It is estimated that India would like to achieve a stockpile of around 200 warheads in the next decade.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The tri-Services Strategic Forces Command is in the process of inducting India’s first intercontinental ballistic missile, Agni-V, which can reach the northernmost region of China with a range of 5,000km. But the continuing lack of an adequate number of nuclear-powered submarines armed with long-range nuclear-tipped missiles, needs to be plugged to achieve a credible nuclear weapons triad. “Projects are underway to achieve this,” the source said.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | =Missiles, nuclear capable, land- based=
| + | |
| − | ==Their range, as in 2019==
| + | |
| − | [[File: The range of India and Pakistan’s nuclear capable, land- based, ballistic missiles, as in 2019; The likely impact of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan.jpg|The range of India and Pakistan’s nuclear capable, land- based, ballistic missiles, as in 2019 <br/> The likely impact of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F08%2F29&entity=Ar00402&sk=223388C2&mode=image August 29, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ''' See graphic ‘'':
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '' The range of India and Pakistan’s nuclear capable, land- based, ballistic missiles, as in 2019 <br/> The likely impact of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan. ''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Category:Defence|NNUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN
| + | |
| − | NUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN]]
| + | |
| − | [[Category:India|NNUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN
| + | |
| − | NUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN]]
| + | |
| − | [[Category:Pages with broken file links|NUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN
| + | |
| − | NUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN]]
| + | |
| − | [[Category:Pakistan|NNUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN
| + | |
| − | NUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN]]
| + | |
| − | [[Category:S&T|NNUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN
| + | |
| − | NUCLEAR ARSENALS: INDIA, PAKISTAN]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | =India’s Nuclear and Strategic Commands=
| + | |
| − | [[File: Nuclear Command Authority and Strategic Forces Command, some facts; Nuclear balance among India, Pakistan and China.jpg|'i) India’s Nuclear Command Authority; <br/> ii) India’s Strategic Forces Command <br/> iii) Nuclear balance among India, Pakistan and China <br/> From: [http://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2018%2F01%2F19&entity=Ar01410&sk=B54673D6&mode=text Rajat Pandit, Entire China could soon be within India’s N-strike zone, January 19, 2018: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''See graphic''':
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ''i) India’s Nuclear Command Authority; <br/> ii) India’s Strategic Forces Command <br/> iii) Nuclear balance among India, Pakistan and China''
| + | |
Money begets power and power begets more money. Or at least that is what traditional logic says. But one of India’s richest politicians — Konda Vishweshwar Reddy— is now without party. He had joined TRS in 2013 and left it in 2018. He then joined Congress and left it last month. He is now hoping to launch a new political outfit in Telangana.
He was the richest MP in the country between 2014 and 2019 with assets worth Rs 528 crore after he won from Chevella in Telangana. He was the second-richest candidate in the 2019 elections with assets of Rs 895 crore. He lost the election that year on a Congress ticket.
He has political legacy too. He is the grandson of Konda Venkata Ranga Reddy, former deputy chief minister of united Andhra Pradesh after whom the Ranga Reddy district has been named.
And today, he is living in a world of contradictions. He is in the process of bringing small regional outfits together on one platform to create one mega regional party in Telangana. But he himself does not want to be involved in state politics. He prefers being Telangana’s representative in the Lok Sabha. He does not mind being called the ‘richest MP’ and ‘richest candidate’, but he cringes when you call him a rich businessman. Husband of Apollo Hospitals MD Sangita Reddy, he says, “I would like to be known as an academic, entrepreneur and researcher instead.”
But being called a rich politician is beneficial in some ways. “Initially, I was concerned (about being called rich),” he says. “They would think, arey, ine paise wala hai. Ine aam admi ki samaysa jaante nai, and all that (He is a rich man. How will he understand the problems of the poor),” he says with a touch of Hyderabadi Dakhni. “But to my shock, it helped me a lot (in 2014). People started saying he is a paisewala (rich). He does not need to take bribes and is a potential winner. And by the way, I am the richest only on paper. Almost every MP in Telangana is richer than me. These people can buy me over 20-30 times. I pay taxes, they don’t.”
State politics is like “wrestling with the pig in the mud” and he accepts that perhaps he is not cut out for it. “The level of politics is lower in assemblies. At least in Parliament, no one throws chappals at each other.”He admits that one needs to be a bit of a street fighter in state politics. “I am different. I entered politics in 2013 when I was 53. So, I am often thinking of things other than politics.” For instance, Reddy, who has a number of patents and copyrights to his name, adds that even at this moment he is working on a unique rice transplanting machine.
Despite his dislike for the rough and tumble for state politics, he has taken the initiative of bringing regional parties including Telangana Jana Samithi, Telangana Inti Party and independents like Teenmar Mallana together. He says a unified regional outfit could take on TRS effectively and does not rule out joining hands with the BJP or Congress in the future. “We will also bring together some people from Congress and TRS. They are looking for a viable alternative.”
On why he wants to form a new outfit, he says, “In any national party, decisions have to go to the central leadership. Look at the Congress. By the time they understand the problem, report it to the central leadership, find a solution and discuss it democratically, someone like a KCR (chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao) has changed things.”
