National Highways: India
(→Cost of acquiring land) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File: highways performance.jpg|Highways performance: total construction and total award, year-wise; 2008-2015; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Data-nails-Gadkaris-claim-on-roads-built-under-23052015015020 ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]] | [[File: highways performance.jpg|Highways performance: total construction and total award, year-wise; 2008-2015; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Data-nails-Gadkaris-claim-on-roads-built-under-23052015015020 ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]] | ||
| + | [[File: highway.jpg|Construction and award of highway projects: 2008-16; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=10_01_2016_021_028_007&type=P&artUrl=Govt-targets-30-km-a-day-highway-construction-10012016021028&eid=31808 ''The Times of India''] Jan 10 2016|frame|500px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=10_01_2016_021_028_007&type=P&artUrl=Govt-targets-30-km-a-day-highway-construction-10012016021028&eid=31808 | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 06:58, 20 January 2016
This article has been sourced from an authoritative, official After the formal launch of their online archival encyclopædia, |
Contents |
The source of this article
INDIA 2012
A REFERENCE ANNUAL
Compiled by
RESEARCH, REFERENCE AND TRAINING DIVISION
PUBLICATIONS DIVISION
MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
National Highways: India
LIST OF STATE-WISE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS IN THE COUNTRY8
Sl. Name of State National Highway No. Total Length
No. (in km)
1 Andhra Pradesh 4, 5, 7, 9, 16, 18, 43, 63, 202, 205, 214, 214A, 219, 221 & 222 4472
2 Arunachal Pradesh 52, 52A & 153 392
3 Assam 31, 31B, 31C, 36, 37, 37A, 38, 39, 44, 51, 52, 52A, 2836 52B, 53, 54, 61, 62,151,152,153 &154
4 Bihar 2, 2C, 19, 28, 28A, 28B, 30, 30A, 31, 57, 57A, 77, 80, 81, 82, 3642 83, 84, 85, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 & 110
5 Chandigarh 21 24
6 Chhattisgarh 6, 12A, 16, 43, 78, 111, 200,202, 211, 216 and 217 2184
7 Delhi 1, 2, 8, 10 & 24 72
8 Goa 4A, 17, 17A & 17B 269
9 Gujarat NE-I, 6, 8, 8A, 8B, 8C, 8D, 8E, 14, 15, 59, 113 & 228 3245
10 Haryana 1, 2, 8, 10, 21A, 22, 64, 65, 71, 71A, 71B, 72, 73, 73A , 1512 & NE-II
11 Himachal Pradesh 1A, 20, 21, 21A, 22, 70, 72, 73A & 88 1208
12 Jammu & Kashmir 1A, 1B, 1C &1D 1245
13 Jharkhand 2, 6, 23, 31, 32, 33, 75, 78, 80, 98, 99 & 100 1805
14 Karnataka 4, 4A, 7, 9, 13, 17, 48, 63, 67, 206, 207,209, 212 & 218 3843
15 Kerala 17, 47, 47A, 47C, 49, 208, 212, 213, & 220 1457
16 Madhya Pradesh 3, 7, 12, 12A, 25, 26, 26A, 27, 59, 59A, 69, 75, 76, 78, 86 & 92 4670
17 Maharashtra 3, 4, 4B, 4C, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 16, 17, 50, 69, 204, 211 & 222 4176
18 Manipur 39, 53, 150 & 155 959
19 Meghalaya 40, 44, 51 & 62 810
20 Mizoram 44A, 54, 54A, 54B, 150 & 154 927
21 Nagaland 36, 39, 61, 150 & 155 494
22 Orissa 5, 5A, 6, 23, 42, 43, 60, 75, 200, 201, 203, 203A, 215, 3704 217 & 224
23 Puducherry 45A & 66 53
24 Punjab 1, 1A, 10, 15, 20, 21, 22, 64, 70, 71, 72 & 95 1557
25 Rajasthan 3, 8, 11, 11A, 11B, 11C, 12, 14, 15, 65, 71B, 76, 79, 79A, 89, 5585 90, 112, 113, 114 & 116
26 Sikkim 31A 62
27 Tamilnadu 4, 5, 7, 7A, 45, 45A, 45B, 45C, 46, 47, 47B, 49, 66, 67, 4462 68, 205, 207, 208, 209, 210, 219, 220, 226 & 227
28 Tripura 44 & 44A 400
29 Uttar Pradesh 2, 2A, 3, 7, 11, 12A, 19, 24, 24A, 24B, 25, 25A, 26, 27, 28, 28B, 5874 28C, 29, 56, 56A, 56B, 58, 72A, 73, 74, 75, 76, 86, 87, 91, 91A, 92, 93 ,96, 97 , 119 & NE-II
30 Uttarakhand 58, 72, 72A, 73, 74, 87, 94, 108, 109, 121, 123 & 125 1991
31 West Bengal 2, 2B, 6, 31, 31A, 31C, 31D, 32, 34, 35, 41, 55, 60, 60A, 2524 80, 81 &117
32 Andaman & 223 300 Nicobar
Total 66754
Source : Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Website http:/morth.nic.in/ statedetailsmain.asp
National Highways: Some comparisons
Dec 20 2014
There were 127 delayed national highway projects as per December, 2014. An analysis of the estimated project cost per kilometre and the rate of construction of these roads showed some interesting patterns. Bridges were understandably far more expensive to construct--the per km cost of construction of Chambal bridge on NH-76 was Rs 200.9cr, 84 times the cost of construction of the Rai Bareli-Allahabad section of NH-24B. They also had the slowest construction rate. The annual construction rate was 0.1 km for the Chambal bridge, far lower than the 123.8 km year rate at which sections of NH-69A and 26B were being constructed.
Cost of acquiring land
The Times of India, July 27, 2015
Land cost per km Rs 4.5cr, up from Rs 75 lakh in 2011-12
The land acquisition law enacted during UPA's tenure has pushed up the cost of buying land for highway projects almost six times over five years. In the financial year 2014-15, the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) estimates the initial price per hectare at Rs 3 crore, compared to Rs 56 lakh in 2011-12. Compared to the average cost of Rs 1.35 crore a hectare during 2013-14, the acquisition value is estimated to be more than double this year. This has resulted in the overall cost of constructing a kilometre of a four-lane highway rising to almost Rs 16 crore, compared to Rs 11crore -12 crore a couple of years ago. A steep rise in the project cost has implications for the toll users pay.
The overall cost of building a kilometre of road includes construction expens es and the compensation paid during land acquisition. Sources said the expenditure towards land acquisition for building bypasses could be even higher -as much as Rs 10 crore-11 crore a hectare in certain parts of the country -as land around urban clusters is more valuable. Also, it bypasses need for more land compared to upgrading an existing two-lane stretch to four lanes. The higher cost of land has implications for the greenfield expressways planned around the country .
Land was around 10% of the cost for constructing a four-lane highway in 2011-12, compared to almost 45% now. For instance, to build a kilometer of a four-lane highway , around 1.5 hectare is needed, which would have cost around 75 lakh in 201112. Now, the acquisition cost has increased to around Rs 4.50 crore for a km, in addition to the construction cost. But officials concede that thanks to higher compensation, landowners are willing to offer land for acquisition, after provisions of the new land law became applicable for NH projects from January . But the ministry has sought relaxations under the current law arguing that acquisition for linear projects does not displace people in large numbers unlike projects for irrigation.
2015-16
The Times of India, Sep 12 2015
Dipak Dash
National highways to grow by 50,000km in 6 mths
The road transport and highways ministryis supposed to add nearly 50,000 km of roads to the National Highways (NH) network in the country till March 2016. This addition within two years of the Narendra Modi government will be more than twice the length NDA-I had added in its six years and over three times of what UPA added in its 10-year rule.
Sources said Between June 2014 and August 2015, the new government has added about 7,000 km of roads to the NH length and at present it's little more than one lakh km. Road transport and highways minister Nitin Gadkari has announced to take it to 1.5 lakh km by this year end.
Between 1998 and 2004 when NDA was in power, about 23,814 km was added to the NH network and during the 10-year rule of the UPA government, a total of around 18,000 km were designated as NH.
On how the ministry is now going about including more stretches as NH, an official said, “While process of notification to include about 15,000 km under Bharat Mala and joining backward areas in the NH network is under way , we are carrying out feasibility study for large chunk of stretches that states have forwarded for upgrading them as NHs. This would be about 20,000 km.“
Sources said adding length is crucial to maintain the pace of award, which has been increased to about 30 km a day . Putting its focus to accelerate highway construction as growth multiplier, the Modi government plans to continue this high target of award of works for 3-4 years. “Moreover, ideally most of the major roads connecting districts, upcoming business hubs and even religious and tourist places should be connected with at least two-and-half lane roads,“ an official said.
However, there is also a flip side to it. Converting more stretches of state highways or major district roads to NHs will increase burden on the Central budget as states will stop spending on maintenance of these stretches as soon as the corridors are notified as NHs.Some of the officials said the situation won't get out of government control as most of the stretches being expanded now are on a model named “EPC contracts“. Under this, the contractor has to maintain the road for one year and is also responsible for any defect for four years.
No toll for bad roads: SC
The Times of India, Aug 28 2015
Dhananjay Mahapatra
No toll for bad roads, SC tells NHAI in pro-user order
Asks pvt contractor to refund Rs 11cr, slashes toll on NH-53 leg
In what will be music to the ears of long suffering highway users, the Supreme Court ruled that the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and concessionaires cannot collect toll from commuters if the road is in bad shape. Road users have had a long-standing grouse that they were fleeced by concessionaires who charged hefty toll on stretches of dilapidated national highways. They also believed that private contractors were enriching themselves while the NHAI looked the other way .
When a case relating to high toll on the poorly maintained 26-km Raipur-Durg stretch on NH-53 came before it, a bench of Justices T S Thakur and Kurian Joseph appointed a committee to inspect the road condition.
The panel, headed by a retired district judge, gave a stinging report about the road condition. This led the bench to tell NHAI and concession aries -“no toll for bad roads“.“General public should not be made to suffer on both counts -bad roads and hefty toll,“ the bench said while ordering the concessionaire to refund Rs 11 crore it had collected as toll to the Centre, which had taken over the road from the private party in March. The Centre wanted to score a point by informing the court that it had acted reasonably by reducing the toll by 60% since taking over the highway for repair work. But the court was unwilling to allow commuters to pay such charges when the condition of the 26-km stretch was poor.
However, taking into account the Centre's plea that the entire stretch was not completely damaged, the SC directed that the new toll would be 20% of the earlier fee.
The case would not have got such attention from the SC had a PIL petitioner, Lal Manohar Pandey , not approached the Chhattisgarh HC complaining against the pot-holed 26-km Raipur-Durg stretch.
