|
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | [[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources|I]] | | [[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources|I]] |
| | [[Category:Government |I]] | | [[Category:Government |I]] |
| − |
| |
| − | ==The source of this article==
| |
| − | ''' INDIA 2012 '''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A REFERENCE ANNUAL
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '' Compiled by ''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | RESEARCH, REFERENCE AND TRAINING DIVISION
| |
| − |
| |
| − | PUBLICATIONS DIVISION
| |
| − |
| |
| − | MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
| |
| − |
| |
| − | GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
| |
| | =Insurance= | | =Insurance= |
| | Since opening up, the number of participants in the industry has gone up from six | | Since opening up, the number of participants in the industry has gone up from six |
| Line 41: |
Line 26: |
| | are operating in the country in collaboration with established foreign insurance | | are operating in the country in collaboration with established foreign insurance |
| | companies from across the globe as on 31st March, 2010. | | companies from across the globe as on 31st March, 2010. |
| − |
| |
| − | =General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC Re)=
| |
| − | The General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC Re) was approved as the ‘‘Indian
| |
| − | Reinsurer’’ on 3rd November 2000. As an ‘‘Indian Reinsurer’’ GIC Re has been giving
| |
| − | reinsurance support to non-life Insurance companies in India. It continues its role
| |
| − | as a reinsurance facilitator by managing Marine Hull Pool, Terrorism Pool and Indian
| |
| − | Motor Third Party Insurance Pool on behalf of Indian Insurance industry. The
| |
| − | Reinsurance programme of GIC Re aims at optimizing the retention within the
| |
| − | country and developing adequate reinsurance capacity.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The Corporation continued to offer maximum support for all classes of business
| |
| − | to the Indian insurers. Property and Engineering Risks are covered up to Rs 1500
| |
| − | crore. Whenever there is a requirement to cover a Large Risk beyond Rs 1500 crore,
| |
| − | specific Excess of Loss cover is arranged beyond the said limit. The per location
| |
| − | capacity of the Terrorism Pool managed by GIC Re has increased to Rs 750 crore with
| |
| − | effect from 1.4.2008 from the earlier limit of Rs 600 crore.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Since 1.4.2007, the GIC Re administers the market initiative in respect of
| |
| − | Commercial Vehicle Market Third Party Liability policies as a multi-lateral
| |
| − | reinsurance arrangement among the participating non-life insurance companies in
| |
| − | India. The GIC Re continues to lead the reinsurance programme of the companies
| |
| − | in Kenya, Malaysia, Mauritius, Middle-East, Africa and Sri Lanka. In the process, it
| |
| − | has emerged as a preferred Reinsurer in the Afro-Asian region. GIC Re is expanding
| |
| − | its global presence and now plans to enter the Latin American market having got
| |
| − | the 'Eventual Reinsurer' status in Brazil. GIC Re has been selected as the Manager
| |
| − | for Nat Cat Pool promoted by the Federation of Afro-Asian Insurers and Reinsurers
| |
| − | (FAIR).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During the year 2009-10, the net premium income of the Corporation was
| |
| − | Rs 8776.87 crore as against Rs 7402.33 crore in the previous year. The net incurred
| |
| − | claims were at Rs 6,856.39 crore, i.e., 84.9 per cent as against Rs 6217.14 crore in the
| |
| − | previous year, i.e., 79.6 per cent. Profit after tax was Rs 1774.60 crore as on 31st March
| |
| − | 2010 compared to Rs 1407.20 crore as on 31st March 2009. The total assets and networth
| |
| − | as on 31st March 2010 was Rs 43842.13 crore and Rs 9133.26 crore, respectively.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The Corporation has its presence in foreign reinsurance business through its
| |
| − | Branch offices in Dubai and Londan and a Representative Office in Moscow. A branch
| |
| − | office is also being opened shortly in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Apart from
| |
| − | reinsurance business, GIC Re continues to participate in the share capital of Kenindia
| |
| − | Assurance Company Ltd. Kenya; India International Insurance Pvt Ltd. Singapore;
| |
| − | LIC (Mauritius) Offshore Ltd, Mauritius; Asian Reinsurance Corporation. Thailand;
| |
| − | East Africa Reinsurance Company Ltd.; Kenya; and Agriculture Insurance Company
| |
| − | of India Limited.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Public Sector General Insurers' Companies (GIPSA)===
| |
| − | After opening up of the insurance sector and de-linking from GIC in 2000, the four
| |
| − | General Insurance Companies, namely, National Insurance Company Ltd., New
| |
| − | India Assurance Company Ltd., Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., and United India
| |
| − | Insurance Company Ltd., are functioning independently. The four Public Sector
| |
| − | General Insurance Companies have a network of 101 Regional Offices, 1395
| |
| − | Divisional Offices, 2880 Branch Offices in India and 55 Overseas Offices.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The gross premium income of the four Public Sector General Insurance
| |
| − | Companies during 2008-09 was Rs 19,107 crore as against Rs 17,813 crore during 2007-
| |
| − | 08. Profit after Tax for 2008-09 was Rs 508.85 crore as against Rs 2205 crore in 2007-08.
| |
| − | The companies have paid a total dividend of Rs141 crore in 2008-09 to the government
| |
| − | as against Rs 449 crores in 2007-08.
| |
| − | ==Market share, growth: 2016==
| |
| − | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=For-first-time-pvt-general-insurer-breaks-into-06082016023037 The Times of India]
| |
| − | [[File: Insurance 2016.jpg| Market share and growth of general insurance companies: June 2016|frame|500px]] Mayur Shetty, Aug 06 2016/ For first time, pvt general insurer breaks into top 4
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Private sector nonlife insurer ICICI Lombard has overtaken state-owned Oriental Insurance to become the third-largest in terms of gross written premium. This is the first time after the industry opened up in 2000 that a private insurer has surpassed a PSU counterpart.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ICICI Lombard ended the quarter-ended June 2016 with gross premium of Rs 2,880 crore. This has given the private insurer a lead over Oriental Insurance, which recorded premium income of Rs 2,508 crore after a 15% growth with a 9% market share.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The first quarter has been good for non-life companies, which collectively grew nearly 17%. Private insurers grew at a much faster rate (about 21%) as against public sector companies (nearly 14%). For one and half decades, the top four slots have been consistently held by New India Assurance, which continues to be the market leader, and three other public sector units -National Insurance, Oriental Insurance and United India Insurance. PSU insurers continue to have a market share of nearly 52%. However, there appears to be some consolidation in business among private compani es with the top five companies ICICI Lombard, Bajaj Allianz (6% marketshare), IFFCO Tokio (4%), Tata AIG (3.4%) and Reliance General (3.2%) accounting for more than half the business for private insurers.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Disinvestment===
| |
| − | The disinvestment of Government equity in Central Public Sector Enterprises
| |
| − | (CPSEs) began in 1991-1992. Since then, it has emerged as a common ground across
| |
| − | the polity and as an integral part of Public Finances in India's economic growth
| |
| − | story. The year-wise resources mobilized through disinvestment are given in the
| |
| − | Table. From 1999-2000 till 2003-04, the emphasis of disinvestment changed in favour
| |
| − | of Strategic Sale viz., sale of large block of shares along with transfer of management
| |
| − | control to a Strategic Partner identified through a process of competitive bidding.
| |
| − | After 2004-2005, disinvestment realizations have been through sale of small portions
| |
| − | of equity. The total proceeds from disinvestment between 1991-1992 and 31st March,
| |
| − | 2011 amounted to Rs. 99,120.17 crore, consisting of the following:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Item Amount realized %
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (Rs. in crores)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Receipts through sale of minority shareholding in CPSEs 81,055.15 81.77
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Receipts through sale of majority shareholding of
| |
| − | one CPSE to another CPSE 1,317.23 1.33
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Receipts through Strategic Sale 6,344.35 6.40
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Receipts from other related transactions 4,005.17 4.04
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Receipts from sale of residual shareholding in disinvested CPSEs/Companies
| |
| − | 6,398.27 6.46
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Total 99,120.17 100.00
| |
| − | ===Policy Framework===
| |
| − | I. One of the main objectives of the ''' disinvestment policy ''' is to develop people's
| |
| − | ownership of Central Public Sector Enterprises so as to let them directly share
| |
| − | in the wealth and prosperity accruing to the country's economy through the
| |
| − | combined enterprise of the business ventures in the Public Sector. The policy
| |
| − | inter alia ensures that Government equity does not fall below 51% and
| |
| − | Government retains management control.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | II. The Government, on 5th November 2009 approved an action plan for
| |
| − | disinvesting Government equity in profit making CPSEs.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | III. Approach for disinvestment
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (i) Already listed profitable Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) not
| |
| − | meeting the mandatory public shareholding of 10% are to be made
| |
| − | compliant by public offering out of Government shareholding or issues
| |
| − | of fresh equity by the CPSEs concerned or a combination of both;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (ii) All unlisted CPSUs having positive net worth, no accumulated losses
| |
| − | and having earned net profit for three preceding consecutive years, are
| |
| − | to be listed through public offerings out of Government shareholding or
| |
| − | issue of fresh equity by the company or a combination of both; and
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (iii) Further public offerings by listed CPSEs taking into consideration their
| |
| − | capital investment requirements with GoI simultaneously or
| |
| − | independenty offering a portion of its shareholding in such CPSEs;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (iv) All cases of disinvestment are to be decided on a case by case basis as
| |
| − | each CPSE has different equity structure, financial strength, fund
| |
| − | requirement, sector of operation, etc., factors that will not permit a
| |
| − | uniform pattern;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (v) Government retains at lease 51 per cent equity and management control
| |
| − | in all cases of disinvestment through public offerings.
| |
| − | ===Constitution of National Investment Fund===
| |
| − | The Government has constituted a "National Investment Fund" (NIF) in 2005-06,
| |
| − | into which the proceeds from disinvestment of Government equity in CPSEs would
| |
| − | flow in. NIF is maintained outside the Consolidated Fund of India and is
| |
| − | professionally manged to provide sustainable returns without depleting the corpus.
| |
| − | Of the annual income of the Fund, 75% is envisaged to be used to finance selected
| |
| − | social sector schemes, which promote education, health and employment.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The
| |
| − | residual 25% of the annual income of the Fund is envisaged to be used to meet the
| |
| − | capital investment requirements of profitable and revivable CPSEs that yield
| |
| − | adequate returns, in order to enlarge their capital base to finance expansion/
| |
| − | diversification. The corpus of the Fund as on 31st March, 2010 is Rs. 1814.45 crore.
| |
| − | In view of difficult economic situation, the disinvestment proceeds channelised
| |
| − | into NIF from April 2009 to March 2012 (three years) would be used in full to support
| |
| − | specific social sector schemes identified by Planning Commission/Department of
| |
| − | Expenditure. Status quo ante of NIF will thus get restored after three years, i.e.,
| |
| − | after April 2012.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Use of Disinvestment Proceeds===
| |
| − | From April 2009, the disinvestment proceeds are being used for funding the capital
| |
| − | expenditure under the social sector schemes of the Government, namely:-
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (i) Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (ii) Indira Awas Yojana;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (iii) Rajiv Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojana;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (iv) Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (v) Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (vi) Accelerated Power Development Reform Programme.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During 2004-05, Government realized t 2,684.07 crore from the sale of 43.29
| |
| − | crore equity share of t 10 each of National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd.,
| |
| − | t 64.81 crore from the sale of shares to employees of IPCL and t15.99 crore as balance
| |
| − | amount of realization from the Offer for Sale in ONGC.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During the year 2005-06, the Government realized a sum of t1,567.60 crore
| |
| − | from the sale of 8 per cent of equity, out of its shareholding of 18.28 per cent, in
| |
| − | Maruti Udog Limited (MUL), to public sector financial institutions and banks. The
| |
| − | average realization was t 678.24 per share. Further, t 2.08 crore were received by
| |
| − | the Government, from the sale of 31,507 equity shares in MUL to officers/employees
| |
| − | of MUL at a price of t 660 per share.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During the year 2007-08, the Government realized a sum of t4,181.39 crore
| |
| − | from the sale of 10.27 per cent equity of Maruti Udyog Limited (MUL); and 10%
| |
| − | paid up equity each of Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and Rural Electrification
| |
| − | Corporation India Ltd.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During the year 2009-10, the Government realized an amount of t23,552.93
| |
| − | crore from sale of 5 per cent equity in NHPC Ltd., 10 percent in Oil India Ltd., 5 per
| |
| − | cent in NTPC Ltd., 5 per cent in REC Ltd. and 8.38 per cent in NMDC Ltd.
| |
| − | During the year 2010-11, the Government realized an amount of t22,144.21
| |
| − | crore from sale of 10.03 per cent in SJVN Ltd., 10 per cent equity each in Engineers
| |
| − | India Ltd., Coal India Ltd., Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., MOIL Ltd., and
| |
| − | Shipping Corporation of India Ltd.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =Agriculture=
| |
| − | ===Agriculture Insurance Company of India Ltd (AIC) ===
| |
| − | A separate organization for agriculture insurance viz. Agriculture Insurance
| |
| − | Company of India Ltd. (AIC) was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 on
| |
| − | 20 December, 2002 with the capital participation from General Insurance Corporation
| |
| − | of India (GIC), four public sector general insurance companies viz., (i) National
| |
| − | Insurance Company Ltd., (ii) New India Assurance Company Ltd., (iii) Oriental
| |
| − | Insurance Company Ltd., and (iv) United India Insurance Company Ltd. and
| |
| − | NABARD. The promoter’s subscription to the paid-up capital is 35 per cent by
| |
| − | GIC, 30 per cent by NABARD and 8.75 per cent each by the four public sector
| |
| − | general insurance companies.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The authorised capital of the AIC is Rs 1,600 crore, while the initial paid-up
| |
| − | capital is Rs 200 crore. The company had commenced business from 1 April 2003.
| |
| − | While AICIL underwrote crop insurance to begin with, it has covered other allied
| |
| − | rural/agricultural risks also. National Agriculture Insurance Scheme (NAIS) which
| |
| − | was being implemented by the General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC) was
| |
| − | transferred to the AICIL, in addition to NAIS. AICIL is also implementing Weather
| |
| − | Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Appreciating the importance of agriciulture insurance the Government of India
| |
| − | while approving the National Policy for Farmers 2007, has taken into account the
| |
| − | recommendations of National Commission on Farmers for inclusion of crop
| |
| − | insurance as a part of a comprehensive approach towards development and
| |
| − | sustenance of the farm sector.
| |
| − | ==National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS) ==
| |
| − | NAIS was implemented from Rabi 1999-2000 season replacing Comprehensive Crop
| |
| − | Insurance Scheme (CCIS). The Scheme is being implemented by the Agriculture
| |
| − | Insurance Company of India Ltd. on behalf of Ministry of Agriculture. The main
| |
| − | objective of the Scheme is to protect the farmers against the losses suffered by them
| |
| − | due to crop failure on account of natural calamities, such as drought, food, hailstorm,
| |
| − | cyclone, fire, pest/diseases, etc, so as to restore their credit worthiness for the
| |
| − | ensuring seasons.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The Scheme is available to all the farmers both, loanee and non loanee
| |
| − | irrespective of the size of their holding. The Scheme envisages coverage of all crops
| |
| − | including cereals, millets, pulses, oilseeds and annual commercial and horticulture
| |
| − | crops in respect of which past yield data of 10 years, is available.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | At present, 70 different Food and Oilseed crops are covered during Kharif
| |
| − | and Rabi seasons. Sugarcane, Potato, Ginger, Onion, Turmeric, Chilly, Jute, Tapioca,
| |
| − | Banana, Pineapple, Brinjal, Coriander, Cumin, Fennel, French Bean, Garlic, Isabgol,
| |
| − | Fenugreek and Tomato have been brought under insurance coverage among the
| |
| − | annual commercial/horticultural crops.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | As per the provisions of National Agriculture Insurance Scheme, the flat
| |
| − | premium rates are 3.5 per cent for Bajra and Oilseeds, 2.5 per cent for other Kharif
| |
| − | crops; 1.5 per cent for Wheat, and 2 per cent for other Rabi crops. In case actuarial
| |
| − | rates are less than prescribed flat premium rates, the lower rate is applicable for
| |
| − | food crops and oilseeds.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In case of annual commercial and horticulture crops, actuarial rates are charged.
| |
| − | At present, 10 per cent subsidy in premium is allowed for small and marginal
| |
| − | farmers, shared equally by Central and State government.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | However, some State and Union Territory governments are also providing
| |
| − | higher subsidy to small and marginal farmers and subsidy to other farmers. The
| |
| − | Scheme operates on the basis of 'Area Approach' for widespread calamities. The
| |
| − | unit of insurance may be Gram Panchayat, Mandal, Hobli, Circle, Phirka, Block,
| |
| − | Taluka etc., to be decided by the respective State/UT Government.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | At present, 25 States and 2 Union Territories are implementing the Scheme.
| |
| − | Some of the states have notified lower unit of insurance such as village. Till kharif
| |
| − | 2009 season, 15.23 crore farmers were covered with area insurance of 23.63 crore
| |
| − | hectares, sum insured of Rs 174910 crore, compensating 4.28 crore farmers with claim
| |
| − | amount of Rs 18725.27 crore since the inception of the scheme.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS) ==
| |
| − | From the season Kharif 2007-08, AIC has started implementing WBCis as a pilot
| |
| − | risk mitigation scheme as an alternative to NAIS. WBCIS is a parametric insurance
| |
| − | product designed to provide insurance protection to the cultivator against adverse
| |
| − | weather incidence during the cultivation period, such as deficit and excess rainfall,
| |
| − | frost, heat (temperature), relative humidity, wind speed etc. which are deemed to
| |
| − | adversely impact the crop yield.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Crops and Reference Unit Areas (RUA) are notified before the commencement
| |
| − | of the season by the State Governments. Each RUA is linked to a Reference Weather
| |
| − | Station (RWS), on the basis of which payout/claims are processed. The payouts are
| |
| − | made on the basis to adverse variations in the current season's weather parameters
| |
| − | as measured at Reference Weather Station (RWS). Claim under WBCIS is area-based
| |
| − | and automatic. Insured cultivators are not needed to intimate losses or lodge claims
| |
| − | to the insurers.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During Kharif 2007 season, the scheme was implemented in Karnataka
| |
| − | covering 70 Hoblis. During Rabi 2007-08 season, the Scheme was implemented in
| |
| − | the State of Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar.
| |
| − | [[File: finance.PNG ||frame|500px]]
| |
| − | During the Kharif 2008 season, the Scheme was implemented in 10 States,
| |
| − | namely, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Bihar, Rajasthan, Jharkhand,
| |
| − | Maharashtra, Karnataka, Orissa and Tamilnadu. During Rabi 2008-09 season, the
| |
| − | Scheme was again implemented in 10 States, namely, Haryana, Bihar, Rajasthan,
| |
| − | Jharkhand, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh and Himachal
| |
| − | Pradesh.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During Kharif 2009 season, the Scheme was implemented in 13 States, namely,
| |
| − | Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Bihar, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Karnataka,
| |
| − | Orissa, Tamilnadu, Gujarat, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh and Kerala.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During the
| |
| − | Rabi 2009-10 season, the Scheme was again implemented in 11 States, namely,
| |
| − | Haryana, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Tamilnadu,
| |
| − | Kerala, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh. The coverage so far
| |
| − | under WBCIS is shown in the table below:
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Besides the above, AIC has designed and implemented various crop insurance
| |
| − | products to cater to the diverse needs of farming community of India such as Apple
| |
| − | Insurance, Cardamon Insurance, Rubber Insurance, etc.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =Health insurance=
| |
| − | [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Chennai-tops-in-health-cover-Mumbai-worst/articleshow/51387414.cms ''The Times of India''], Mar 14, 2016
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Pushpa Narayan
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Chennai tops in health cover, Mumbai worst'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | More than half of Chennai's households have a member covered by a health scheme or health insurance. Thanks in-part to a massive government health insurance scheme that covers nearly 5 crore people, or more than three-fourth of Tamil Nadu's population, Chennai is the city with the most health-insured people among metros. Hyderabad, that comes close to Chennai, also benefits from a government insurance scheme.
| |
| − | Data from the National Family Health Survey -4 released by the Union health ministry shows that almost all metros have more than doubled their insured population in the past ten years, a pace organisations like World Bank say has probably not been witnessed anywhere else in the world.
| |
| − | In Chennai, 56.8% of households are covered by health insurance followed by Hyderabad with 49.8% and Kolkata with 26.1%. Among the metros, Mumbai (city) has the lowest coverage at 12.4%. The data for New Delhi, however, is yet to be released.
| |
| − | Among states, more than three-fifth of the people in TN got health insurance in the last decade, lowering the number of uninsured by 60% from 2005-2006. At the national level, 17% of the population was under the health net until 2014.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Experts link the leap in numbers to the state-sponsored health insurance schemes in TN, Kerala, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra. The climb began when a state-sponsored scheme was launched by the DMK government in July 2009, two years after the AP government launched its Arogyashri. In 2012, the AIADMK regime upgraded the scheme and extended its coverage to include some 1.5 crore families.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | While state insurance is available to the poor, many in the middle and upper-income group now have a company-sponsored insurance or an individual insurance. "Today, even if a few of the private insurers aren't making huge profits, their losses are down," says Star Health Insurance CMD V Jagannathan.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The TN scheme is offered through the United India Insurance Company Ltd, a public-sector undertaking headquartered in Chennai. The scheme provides free medical and surgical treatment for up to Rs1.5 lakh in government and private hospitals to the members of any family whose annual family income is less than Rs.72,000.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Between January 2012 and March 2016, the scheme has paid Rs 29 billion towards 14 lakh claims. Most people were allowed to be treated in private hospitals that have been empanelled under the state scheme. "This is beside the free treatment we roll out at government hospitals, some of which earned money through this scheme. It was used for development works such as air-conditioning wards, buying better drugs, equipment and improve housekeeping services at hospitals," said Dr J Mohanasundram, former dean of Government General Hospital.
| |
| − | ==Universal Health Insurance Scheme (UHIS) ==
| |
| − | The four Public Sector General Insurance Companies have been implementing UHIS
| |
| − | for improving health care access to poor families from the year 2003-04 onwards;
| |
| − | The Scheme, applicable to BPL families, provides for reimbursement of medical
| |
| − | expenses up to Rs 30,000 towards hospitalisation floated amongst the entire family;
| |
| − | death cover due to accident for Rs 25,000/- to the earning head of the family and
| |
| − | compensation due to loss of earning of the earning member or spouse @ Rs 50/- per
| |
| − | cent per day upto a maximum of 15 days of hospitalization. The coverage also
| |
| − | includes pre-existing diseases. Maternity benefits up to Rs 2,500/- for normal delivery
| |
| − | are reimbursed and expenses for the new born are also covered. The entry into the
| |
| − | Scheme is available for persons upto the age of 70 years.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The subsidy amounting to Rs 200/- for an individual, Rs 300/- for a family of
| |
| − | five and Rs 400/- for a family of seven members is provided by the Central
| |
| − | Government. The premium rest of subsidy Rs 100/- for individuals, Rs 150/- for a
| |
| − | family of five and Rs 200/- only for a family of seven members.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =Senior citizens' insurance=
| |
| − | ''' `Only 1.6% elderly have health cover' '''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Only-16-elderly-have-health-cover-06122014021033''The Times of India'']
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Sushmi Dey,
| |
| − |
| |
| − | December 06 2014
| |
| − | [[File: pop.jpg|Estimated elderly population in India in coming years|frame|500px]]
| |
| − | Less than two of every 100 senior citizens in India are covered under public and private health insurance. This even as the population of elderly people is growing significantly and is forecast to hit almost 300 million in around two decades. The elderly population, aged more than 60 years, is projected to constitute 18.3% of the total population in 2050, up from 7.7% in 2010, according to the United Nations. Their population will grow to 112 million by 2015 from 72 million in 2000.
| |
| − | However, health insurance penetration among this population remains significantly low in India. A recent study by Deloitte shows mere ly 1.6% of elderly population is covered under public and private insurance schemes.“This low insurance penetration amongst the elderly is fur ther exacerbated by inadequate coverage provided to the insured, in terms of both amount and type of services covered,“ the report states. Experts point out the overall health insurance penetration in India is as it is low at 26%, as compared to other countries. According to World Bank estimates, India's healthcare spending as a percentage of GDP is among the lowest in emerging markets.During 2012; India spent a total of around 4% of GDP on healthcare, whereas Brazil and China spent 9.3% and 5.4%, respectively.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Currently, there is a lack of emphasis on insurance cover for the elderly . Most private players do not want to cover the elderly in their plans because the expenditures are high as compared to premiums earned, experts say.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =10% claims fake=
| |
| − | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=1-in-10-insurance-claims-turns-out-to-04122015027027 ''The Times of India''], Dec 04 2015
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Mayur Shetty
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''1 in 10 insurance claims turns out to be a fraud'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Insurance claim rauds -which are growing in number and getting more innovative -have put insurers in a dilemma. Companies want to simplify the claims process and wipe out the trust deficit faced by insurers. But this is tough when frauds are close to one in ten claims in some retail categories.
| |
| − | “Our estimate is that industry frauds are in the range of 10% of claims, which I feel is a conservative one,“ said Ri esh Kumar, MD & CEO, HDFC Ergo General Insurance. The choice is between being very careful in accepting proposals and liberal in settlement, or in being liberal in accepting proposals and vigilant while sett ing. Excess scrutiny in policy ssuance makes it difficult to sell in a market with low penetration. But delaying claims worsens the trust deficit among individuals, reflected in the belief that getting claims paid is a challenge.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Simplifying claim settlement is something that most companies are trying to do in order to build a retail portfolio.“If a policyholder who has spent lakhs on an overseas trip claims $300 for lost baggage, we would accept the claim,“ said Sanjay Datta, head of underwriting and claims at ICICI Lombard General Insurance.Even state-owned New India Assurance had a few months earlier launched a householder policy that settles claims for breakdown of electronic equipment where all household items would be covered on good faith without the buyer having to declare each individual item or provide proof of ownership.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | According to G Srinivasan, chairman, New India Assurance, frauds are expected to be around 10% and the company is trying to address frauds by drawing patterns and through analytics without inconveniencing policyholders.Insurers have also created an electronic database that serves as a blacklist.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The challenge is that fraud patterns are also changing fast.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | According to Bhaskar Jyoti Sarma, MD, SBI General, a large chunk of frauds are also in motor insurance.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) norms: 2015=
| |
| − | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=IRDAIs-new-draft-norms-bat-for-GIC-in-04122015027008 ''The Times of India''], Dec 04 2015
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Mayur Shetty
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''IRDAI's new draft norms bat for GIC in reinsurance'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In a move that might cause some global reinsurance companies to rework their plans for opening branches in India, the insurance regulator has done an about-turn on its regulations. In the IRDAI's meeting held on November 24, the government nominee Alok Tandon, joint secretary in the finance ministry , vetoed the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India's (IRDAI's) proposal to keep Indian reinsurer GIC Re on a par with other reinsurers and said that GIC Re needs to be given preference in reinsurance deals. Following this, IRDAI has put out a new draft norms for foreign reinsurers.
| |
| − | This is the third time that the regulations on reinsurance have undergone a change. In the first draft in April 2015, the IRDAI had proposed a similar regime giving preference to GIC. However, after foreign reinsurers expressed reservations, a second draft was issued in May whereby insurance companies, while entering into reinsurance deals, would deal with the Indian reinsurer (GIC) or other registered reinsurers or Indian insurance companies.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Earlier, following the draft guidelines that sought to have a level playing field, multinational reinsurers such as Swiss Re, Munich Re and Scor had expressed interest in setting up a branch in India. “Even today , GIC Re's share of the reinsurance business in India is 52% and rest 48% of reinsurance business goes to foreign reinsurers. I do not think the norms provide any extra advantage to GIC Re,“ said K Sanath Kumar, acting chairman, GIC Re.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | However, industry sources said that the idea behind branch licences was to bring onshore those reinsurers who are writing business from India sitting in international markets.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =See also=
| |
| − | [[Life Insurance: India]]
| |
Since opening up, the number of participants in the industry has gone up from six
insurers (including Life Insurance Corporation of India, four public sector general
insurers and General Insurance Corporation of India as the National Reinsurer) in
the year 2000 to 47 insurers as on March 2010 operating in the life, non-life and
reinsurance segments (including specialized insurers, viz., Export Credit Guarantee
Corporation and Agriculture Insurance Company of India Ltd. AICIL). Three of the
general insurance companies, viz., Star Health and Alliance Insurance Company;
Apollo Munich Health Insurance Company; and Max BUPA Health Insurance Co.
Ltd. function as standalone health insurance companies.
Of the 22 life insurance companies which have set up operations in the life
segment post opening up of the sector, 20 are in joint venture with foreign partners.
Of the 17 who have commenced operations in the non-life segment, 16 had been set
up in collaboration with foreign partners. Thus, 36 companies in the private sector
are operating in the country in collaboration with established foreign insurance
companies from across the globe as on 31st March, 2010.
