Internet, the worldwide web and India
(Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/> </div> |} [[Category:Ind...") |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[File: India and the world, Speed of internet connections, 2015.jpg|India and the world: Speed of internet connections, 2015; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=STATOISTICS-WIRED-WORLD-24102015016025 ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]] | [[File: India and the world, Speed of internet connections, 2015.jpg|India and the world: Speed of internet connections, 2015; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=STATOISTICS-WIRED-WORLD-24102015016025 ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | =Digital divide= | ||
| + | [[File: in.jpg|Internet users|frame|500px]] | ||
| + | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=08_01_2015_008_009_003&type=P&artUrl=STATOISTICS-DIGITAL-DIVIDE-08012015008009&eid=31808 ''The Times of India''] | ||
| + | Jan 08 2015 | ||
| + | |||
| + | India saw its first internet connection on August 15, 1995 when Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited launched the country's first internet services. The government opened up the sector for private operators in 1998. New regulations in telecom policy opened up internet telephony in 2002. Despite these measures, India's internet prevalence is far lower than in the advanced or other BRICS economies. Given the literacy levels and with average revenues per user in many cases being comparable to the cost of the cheapest internet packages offered, this is hardly surprising. | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Net control= | ||
| + | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Govt-blocked-2341-URLs-in-14-73-more-04042015012033 ''The Times of India''] | ||
| + | [[File: URLs, blocked and unblocked(year-wise) 2012 14.jpg|URLs, blocked and unblocked (year-wise): 2012-14; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Govt-blocked-2341-URLs-in-14-73-more-04042015012033 ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]] | ||
| + | Apr 04 2015 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Govt blocked 2,341 URLs in '14, 73% more than '13 ''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The government issued orders to block 2,341 URLs in 2014, the official response to an RTI application has shown, up 73% from the number blocked in 2013. | ||
| + | The RTI was filed by Delhi-based nonprofit legal services organisation Software Freedom Law Center India (SFLC.in) last month with the Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeitY), which falls under the ministry of communications and IT. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The number of orders blocking URLs (Uniform Resource Locators), the address of data available on the world wide web, stood at 1,341 in 2013. The application sought answers on blocking orders issued pursuant to court orders, requests from government departments, and at the suggestion of private parties. The DeitY response says that “barring a few numbers, all URLs were blocked on the orders of the court.“ “Further, as per the provisions of Rule 16 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguard for locking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009, notified under section 69 A of the Information Technology Act 2000, the requests and complaints received and ac tions taken thereof are confidential,“ the reply adds. | ||
| + | |||
| + | SFLC.in, which uploaded the RTI and the reply on its website, has said in an accompanying blog that the government needs to review its stance on confidentiality, particularly in the light of the apex court's observations while striking down Section 66 A of the IT Act. It says that the SC “invited attention to several safeguards incorporated into Section 69A -one amongst them being that reasons behind blocking orders are to be recorded in writing in the orders... so that they may be challenged by means of writ petitions...“ | ||
Revision as of 13:39, 16 November 2016
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Digital divide
The Times of India Jan 08 2015
India saw its first internet connection on August 15, 1995 when Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited launched the country's first internet services. The government opened up the sector for private operators in 1998. New regulations in telecom policy opened up internet telephony in 2002. Despite these measures, India's internet prevalence is far lower than in the advanced or other BRICS economies. Given the literacy levels and with average revenues per user in many cases being comparable to the cost of the cheapest internet packages offered, this is hardly surprising.
Net control
_2012_14.jpg)
Apr 04 2015
Govt blocked 2,341 URLs in '14, 73% more than '13
The government issued orders to block 2,341 URLs in 2014, the official response to an RTI application has shown, up 73% from the number blocked in 2013. The RTI was filed by Delhi-based nonprofit legal services organisation Software Freedom Law Center India (SFLC.in) last month with the Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeitY), which falls under the ministry of communications and IT.
The number of orders blocking URLs (Uniform Resource Locators), the address of data available on the world wide web, stood at 1,341 in 2013. The application sought answers on blocking orders issued pursuant to court orders, requests from government departments, and at the suggestion of private parties. The DeitY response says that “barring a few numbers, all URLs were blocked on the orders of the court.“ “Further, as per the provisions of Rule 16 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguard for locking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009, notified under section 69 A of the Information Technology Act 2000, the requests and complaints received and ac tions taken thereof are confidential,“ the reply adds.
SFLC.in, which uploaded the RTI and the reply on its website, has said in an accompanying blog that the government needs to review its stance on confidentiality, particularly in the light of the apex court's observations while striking down Section 66 A of the IT Act. It says that the SC “invited attention to several safeguards incorporated into Section 69A -one amongst them being that reasons behind blocking orders are to be recorded in writing in the orders... so that they may be challenged by means of writ petitions...“
