Retail business: India
(→Sales) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
New Delhi: In a strong warning to retail chain stores, the Supreme Court refused to reverse the conviction of a superstore owner found guilty of keeping packaged foodgrain with impermissible preservatives but agreed to consider his release under Probation of Offenders Act. | New Delhi: In a strong warning to retail chain stores, the Supreme Court refused to reverse the conviction of a superstore owner found guilty of keeping packaged foodgrain with impermissible preservatives but agreed to consider his release under Probation of Offenders Act. | ||
+ | |||
Appearing for owners of Theni Anantham Super Store Wonder, senior advocate Anitha Shenoy argued that her client was a mere retailer and not producer of the foodgrain, which was found to contain preservative sulphur-dioxide. “This does not entail any injury to the consumer,” she argued. |
Appearing for owners of Theni Anantham Super Store Wonder, senior advocate Anitha Shenoy argued that her client was a mere retailer and not producer of the foodgrain, which was found to contain preservative sulphur-dioxide. “This does not entail any injury to the consumer,” she argued. | ||
+ | |||
Finding the bench of Chief Justice N V Ramana and Justices A S Bopanna and Hima Kohli unconvinced, Shenoy took the last resort and argued that this was the first time the owner was booked under the Food Safety and Standards Act and hence, entitled to relief under the Probation of Offenders Act. |
Finding the bench of Chief Justice N V Ramana and Justices A S Bopanna and Hima Kohli unconvinced, Shenoy took the last resort and argued that this was the first time the owner was booked under the Food Safety and Standards Act and hence, entitled to relief under the Probation of Offenders Act. | ||
Line 27: | Line 29: | ||
The trial court had convicted the owner and manager of the superstore and sentenced each of them to three years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 5,000 each. The additional district judge as well as the Madras HC had concurred with the Theni trial court’s decision. | The trial court had convicted the owner and manager of the superstore and sentenced each of them to three years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 5,000 each. The additional district judge as well as the Madras HC had concurred with the Theni trial court’s decision. | ||
+ | |||
+ | =Food and grocery= | ||
+ | ==2015 – 2023== | ||
+ | [[File: Food and grocery in retail market in India, 2015-25.jpg| Food and grocery in retail market in India, 2015-25 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/article-share?article=15_06_2023_019_005_cap_TOI June 15, 2023: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''See graphic''': | ||
+ | |||
+ | '' Food and grocery in retail market in India, 2015-25 '' | ||
+ | |||
+ | =Organised vis-à-vis unorganised sector= | ||
+ | ==2018- 2023== | ||
+ | [[File: Retail market dominated by unorganised sector by India, 2018- 25.jpg| Retail market dominated by unorganised sector by India, 2018- 25 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/article-share?article=15_06_2023_019_005_cap_TOI June 15, 2023: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''See graphic''': | ||
+ | |||
+ | '' Retail market dominated by unorganised sector by India, 2018- 25 '' | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources|R RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | ||
+ | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | ||
+ | [[Category:India|R RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | ||
+ | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Pages with broken file links|RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | ||
+ | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | ||
=The retail market= | =The retail market= | ||
− | =2017= | + | ==2017== |
− | ==Jan-June: India surpasses China== | + | ===Jan-June: India surpasses China=== |
[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/india-surpasses-china-on-retail-development-index-in-first-half-of-fy17-report/articleshow/60103015.cms India surpasses China on Retail Development Index in first half of FY17: Report, Aug 17, 2017: The Times of India] | [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/india-surpasses-china-on-retail-development-index-in-first-half-of-fy17-report/articleshow/60103015.cms India surpasses China on Retail Development Index in first half of FY17: Report, Aug 17, 2017: The Times of India] | ||
Line 69: | Line 94: | ||
In terms of rental for the retail space, areas such as Connaught Place, Khan Market, and South Extension in the Capital and Park Street and Elgin Road in Kolkata witnessed appreciation. | In terms of rental for the retail space, areas such as Connaught Place, Khan Market, and South Extension in the Capital and Park Street and Elgin Road in Kolkata witnessed appreciation. | ||
While rentals in most other high streets remained stable, some high streets such as Linking Road in Mumbai and MG Road in Pune saw a marginal dip in rentals. | While rentals in most other high streets remained stable, some high streets such as Linking Road in Mumbai and MG Road in Pune saw a marginal dip in rentals. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources|R RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | ||
+ | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | ||
+ | [[Category:India|R RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | ||
+ | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Pages with broken file links|RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | ||
+ | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | ||
=Sales= | =Sales= | ||
Line 78: | Line 110: | ||
'' Retail trends in India in 2019, and projections for 2025 <br/> The segment-wise online share of the retail business in India, 2008> 2018 '' | '' Retail trends in India in 2019, and projections for 2025 <br/> The segment-wise online share of the retail business in India, 2008> 2018 '' | ||
− | + | =See also= | |
− | + | [[Cities of India: the best and the worst]] | |
− | [[ | + | |
− | + | ||
− | [[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources|R RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | + | [[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources|R RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA |
RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | ||
− | [[Category:India|R RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | + | [[Category:India|R RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA |
RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | ||
− | [[Category:Pages with broken file links|RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA | + | [[Category:Pages with broken file links|RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIARETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA |
RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] | RETAIL BUSINESS: INDIA]] |
Latest revision as of 13:41, 13 July 2023
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Contents |
[edit] Court judgements
[edit] Retailers can’t escape blame for packaged food in stores/ SC
Dhananjay Mahapatra, March 1, 2022: The Times of India
New Delhi: In a strong warning to retail chain stores, the Supreme Court refused to reverse the conviction of a superstore owner found guilty of keeping packaged foodgrain with impermissible preservatives but agreed to consider his release under Probation of Offenders Act.
Appearing for owners of Theni Anantham Super Store Wonder, senior advocate Anitha Shenoy argued that her client was a mere retailer and not producer of the foodgrain, which was found to contain preservative sulphur-dioxide. “This does not entail any injury to the consumer,” she argued.
Finding the bench of Chief Justice N V Ramana and Justices A S Bopanna and Hima Kohli unconvinced, Shenoy took the last resort and argued that this was the first time the owner was booked under the Food Safety and Standards Act and hence, entitled to relief under the Probation of Offenders Act.
The bench in its order said, “On hearing senior counsel and on expressing that the concurrent conviction handed down by the courts below would not call for interference, the counsel submits that as the petitioners have been convicted under the Food Safety and Adulteration Act, 2006, and there is no past history, Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 is applicable to him and seeks consideration in that regard. ”
“Issue limited notice to the respondent (food safety officer) to consider the applicability of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to the pet- itioners. In the meantime, order dated February 14 granting exemption from surrendering to the petitioners herein shall continue to operate until further orders,” the bench ordered.
The food safety officer had lifted samples of coriander (whole) in October 2011 from four packets displayed for consumers in the store. The samples were tested at Madurai and the food analyst report said the coriander grains were unsuitable for human consumption because of the presence of class-II preservative sulphur-dioxide.
The trial court had convicted the owner and manager of the superstore and sentenced each of them to three years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 5,000 each. The additional district judge as well as the Madras HC had concurred with the Theni trial court’s decision.
[edit] Food and grocery
[edit] 2015 – 2023
See graphic:
Food and grocery in retail market in India, 2015-25
[edit] Organised vis-à-vis unorganised sector
[edit] 2018- 2023
See graphic:
Retail market dominated by unorganised sector by India, 2018- 25
[edit] The retail market
[edit] 2017
[edit] Jan-June: India surpasses China
India replaces China as top retail destination in 2017: Study, Sep 20, 2017: The Times of India
HIGHLIGHTS
India has surpassed China in the global Retail Development Index in 2017
Seven new global brands entered the country during the first half of this year
The investments into the retail segment touched $200 million
MUMBAI: India has replaced China as the numero uno retail destination in 2017 as part of the global retail development index, according to industry experts.
"India has replaced China in 2017 as the top retail destination as part of the study on global retail development index," AT Kearney partner Subhendu Roy said on the concluding day of the two-day India Retail Forum 2017.
The change in ranking was an outcome of four factors including increased consumer spending beyond essentials, rising mobile and internet penetration, favourable foreign investment climate and bold action on cashless transaction and GST, Roy explained. "This has triggered the entry of global brands into India with transparency and ease," he added.
According to India Retail Report 2017, over the past 12-15 months, 100 per cent cash and carry operations are gaining significance in India with Thailand's Siam Makro being the latest entrant in this space following Metro, Walmart and Booker.
Furthermore, Swedish-furniture maker Ikea plans to open its lone distribution centre or warehouse in the country in Pune by end 2017 and its first store in Hyderabad by early 2018 with overall plans to invest USD 1.56 billion to set up 25 stores in India.
In addition to the bigger retailer and brands, the mid-size brands from across the world are also looking to cash on the relaxed retail policy in India.
Food as well as retail Brands such as Korres, Migato, Evisu, Wallstreet English, Pasta Mania, Lush Addiction, Melting Pot, Yogurt Lab and Monnalisa and many others from across the world, are expected to invest about USD 300-500 million cumulatively to open roughly 2,500-3,000 stores, the study said. With increasing global participation in Indian retail, the sector will further evolve and become more organised and competitive in providing better assortment to the consumer.
Seven new global brands entered the country during the first half (H1) of 2017 and investments into the segment touched $200 million, said the India Retail Market View Report. Besides, it added, international brands already present in the country also expanded their presence.
Several hypermarkets, including Big Bazaar which opened new stores in Mumbai, Bengaluru and Chennai, expanded their presence, it said, adding that clothing retailers such as Max and Pantaloons were also active during the review period.
"Our ranking on the 2017 Global Retail Index for developing countries, as well as continued investment by private equity players, is a demonstration of the sustained preference of international brands to set up, or expand their operations in India," CBRE Chairman, India and South East Asia Anshuman Magazine said. The brands which opened their first store in India during H1 include Kate Spade, Scotch & Soda, Pandora and Selected Homme while those who expanded operations were H&M, Jack & Jones, US Polo, Taco Bell and Forever 21, among others.
In terms of rental for the retail space, areas such as Connaught Place, Khan Market, and South Extension in the Capital and Park Street and Elgin Road in Kolkata witnessed appreciation. While rentals in most other high streets remained stable, some high streets such as Linking Road in Mumbai and MG Road in Pune saw a marginal dip in rentals.
[edit] Sales
[edit]
See graphic:
Retail trends in India in 2019, and projections for 2025
The segment-wise online share of the retail business in India, 2008> 2018