International students in India
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
'' 2018-19: The Top 7 source countries for international students in India '' | '' 2018-19: The Top 7 source countries for international students in India '' | ||
− | [[Category:Education|S | + | ==2020== |
+ | === Participation in protest rallies=== | ||
+ | [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2020%2F03%2F04&entity=Ar02103&sk=7CDA6B26&mode=text Jayanta Gupta, March 4, 2020: ''The Times of India''] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File: Students asked to leave India for their participation in ant-CAA protest rallies in 2020.jpg| Students asked to leave India for their participation in ant-CAA protest rallies in 2020 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2020%2F03%2F04&entity=Ar02103&sk=7CDA6B26&mode=text Jayanta Gupta, March 4, 2020: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kamil Siedcynski, the Polish student at Jadavpur University who has been asked to leave the country by the Foreigner Regional Registration Office, has challenged the order in the Calcutta HC, invoking the principles highlighted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) that are applicable to all persons. | ||
+ | |||
+ | While the FRRO has found Siedcynski guilty of violating visa norms by participating in an anti-CAA rally, he has claimed in his petition that he was inadvertently caught in the protest. He has maintained that as a student with interest in Indian culture, he was merely watching the proceedings and had clicked photographs of the “carnival-like” proceedings from a sidewalk. | ||
+ | Siedcynski has claimed in his petition that the FRRO order of February 14 is contrary to the principles of natural justice. His petition is likely to be heard. | ||
+ | |||
+ | He stated in his petition that he had been persuaded by other students to accompany them to the protest place on December 19. He apparently didn’t know what the protest meet was all about and soon got separated from his fellow students. He stood on the sidewalk watching the event and clicking photographs. He claimed there were other foreigners watching the protest as well and a person approached him wanting to know his name and views on the protest. The man also clicked his photograph after which he left for home. The next day, Siedcynski realised the man he had spoken to was a photojournalist and an article on him had appeared in a newspaper. He has claimed that much of what was written in the article was made up. | ||
+ | |||
+ | He received a notice from the FRRO thereafter and was asked to leave the country on February 14. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Education|S INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA | ||
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA]] | INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA]] | ||
− | [[Category:Foreign Relations|S | + | [[Category:Foreign Relations|S INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA |
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA]] | INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA]] | ||
− | [[Category:India|S | + | [[Category:India|S INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA |
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA]] | INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN INDIA]] |
Revision as of 14:23, 15 October 2020
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Contents |
Number of international students in India
2008-14
See graphic:
International students in India, 2008- 2014
2018-19: Top 7 source countries
See graphic:
2018-19: The Top 7 source countries for international students in India
2020
Participation in protest rallies
Jayanta Gupta, March 4, 2020: The Times of India
Kamil Siedcynski, the Polish student at Jadavpur University who has been asked to leave the country by the Foreigner Regional Registration Office, has challenged the order in the Calcutta HC, invoking the principles highlighted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) that are applicable to all persons.
While the FRRO has found Siedcynski guilty of violating visa norms by participating in an anti-CAA rally, he has claimed in his petition that he was inadvertently caught in the protest. He has maintained that as a student with interest in Indian culture, he was merely watching the proceedings and had clicked photographs of the “carnival-like” proceedings from a sidewalk. Siedcynski has claimed in his petition that the FRRO order of February 14 is contrary to the principles of natural justice. His petition is likely to be heard.
He stated in his petition that he had been persuaded by other students to accompany them to the protest place on December 19. He apparently didn’t know what the protest meet was all about and soon got separated from his fellow students. He stood on the sidewalk watching the event and clicking photographs. He claimed there were other foreigners watching the protest as well and a person approached him wanting to know his name and views on the protest. The man also clicked his photograph after which he left for home. The next day, Siedcynski realised the man he had spoken to was a photojournalist and an article on him had appeared in a newspaper. He has claimed that much of what was written in the article was made up.
He received a notice from the FRRO thereafter and was asked to leave the country on February 14.