Swami Narayan Sect

From Indpaedia
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> This article was written in 1916 when conditions were different. Even in<br/>1916 its contents related only t...")

Revision as of 21:56, 13 February 2014

This article was written in 1916 when conditions were different. Even in
1916 its contents related only to Central India and did not claim to be true
of all of India. It has been archived for its historical value as well as for
the insights it gives into British colonial writing about the various communities
of India. Indpaedia neither agrees nor disagrees with the contents of this
article. Readers who wish to add fresh information can create a Part II of this
article. The general rule is that if we have nothing nice to say about
communities other than our own it is best to say nothing at all.

Readers will be able to edit existing articles and post new articles directly
on their online archival encyclopædia only after its formal launch.

See examples and a tutorial.

From The Tribes And Castes Of The Central Provinces Of India

By R. V. Russell

Of The Indian Civil Service

Superintendent Of Ethnography, Central Provinces

Assisted By Rai Bahadur Hira Lal, Extra Assistant Commissioner

Macmillan And Co., Limited, London, 1916.

NOTE 1: The 'Central Provinces' have since been renamed Madhya Pradesh.

NOTE 2: While reading please keep in mind that all articles in this series have been scanned from the original book. Therefore, footnotes have got inserted into the main text of the article, interrupting the flow. Readers who spot these footnotes gone astray might like to shift them to their correct place.


Swami-Narayan Sect

This, one of the most modern Vaishnava sects, was founded by Sahajanand Swami, a Sarwaria Brahman, born near Ajodhia in the United Pro- vinces in A.D. 1780. At an early age he became a religious mendicant, and wandered all over India, visiting the principal shrines. When twenty years old he was made a Sadhu of the Ramanandi order, and soon nominated as his successor by the head of the order. He preached with great success in Gujarat, and though his tenets do not seem to have differed much from the Ramanandi creed, his personal influence was such that his followers founded a new sect and called it after him. He proclaimed the worship of one sole deity, Krishna or Narayana, whom he identified with the sun, and apparently his followers held, and he inclined to believe himself, that he was a fresh incarnation of Vishnu.


It is said that he displayed miraculous powers before his disciples, entrancing whomsoever he cast his eyes upon, and causing them in this mesmeric state (Samadhi) to imagine they saw Sahajanand as Krishna with- yellow robes, weapons of war, and other characteristics of the God, and to behold him seated as chief in an assembly of divine beings. His creed prohibited the destruction of animal life ; the use of animal food and intoxicating liquors or drugs on any occasion ; promiscuous intercourse with the other sex ;

  • Based on the account of the sect Swat/ii-N'fn-aj'an SectY>a.m\A\\c\.,\)Y\r\{cd in the volume, Hindus of Gujarat, at the Education Society's Press, Bom- of the Bombay Gazetteer, and The bay, 1887.


suicide, theft and robbery, and false accusations, I\Iuch good was done, the Collector testified, by his preaching among the wild Kolis of Gujarat ; ' his morality was said to be far better than any which could be learned from the Shastras ; he condemned theft and bloodshed ; and those villages and Districts which had received him, from being among the worst, were now among the best and most orderly in the Province of Bombay, His success was great among the lower castes, as the Kolis, Bhils and Kathis. He was regarded by his disciples as the surety of sinners, his position in this respect resembling that of the Founder of Christianity, To Bishop Heber he said that while he per- mitted members of different castes to eat separately here below, in the future life there would be no distinction of castes.""^ His rules for the conduct of the sexes towards each other were especially severe. No Sadhu of the Swami- Narayan sect might ever touch a woman, even the accidental touching of any woman other than a mother having to be expiated by a whole-day fast. Similarly, should a widow- disciple touch even a boy who was not her son, she had to undergo the same penalty. There were separate passages for women in their large temples, and separate reading and preaching halls for women, attended by wives of the Acharyas or heads of the sect. These could apparently be married, but other members of the priestly order must remain single; while the lay followers lived among their fellows, pursuing their ordinary lives and avocations.

The strictness of the Swami on sexual matters was directed against the licentious practices of the Maharaj or Vallabhacharya order. He boldly denounced the irregularities they had introduced into their forms of worship, and exposed the vices which charac- terised the lives of their clergy. This attitude, as well as the prohibition of the worship of idols, earned for him the hostility of the Peshwa and the Maratha Brahmans, and he was subjected to a considerable degree of persecution ; his followers were taught the Christian doctrine of suffering 1 Bishop Heber's Narrative of a because in the Bombay Gazetteer the Journey through the Upper Proinnces, Swami is said to have prohibited the pp. 143, 153. taking of food with low-caste people, 2 The Stvami-Narayan Sect, pp. 4, and caste pollution ; and this appears 22. The above details are given, incorrect.

Sikh.png


injury without retaliation, and the devotees of hostile sects took advantage of this to beat them unmercifully, some being even put to death. 3. Meeting In Order to protect the Swami, his followers constituted Bishop f^rom themselves an armed guard, as shown by Bishop Ileber's Heber. account of their meeting : " About eleven o'clock I had the expected visit from Swami-Narayan. He came in a some- what different guise from all which I expected, having with him near 200 horsemen, mostly well-armed with matchlocks and swords, and several of them with coats of mail and spears. Besides them he had a large rabble on foot with bows and arrows, and when I considered that I had my- self an escort of more than fifty horses and fifty muskets and bayonets, I could not help smiling, though my sensa- tions were in some degree painful and humiliating, at the idea of two religious teachers meeting at the head of little armies, and filling the city which was the scene of their interview with the rattling of gunners, the clash of shields and the tramp of the war-horse. Had our troops been opposed to each other, mine, though less numerous, would have been doubtless far more effective from the superiority of arms and discipline.

But in moral grandeur what a difference was there between his troop and mine. Mine neither knew me nor cared for me ; they escorted me faithfully and would have defended me bravely, because they were ordered by their superiors to do so. The guards of Swami-Narayan were his own disciples and enthusiastic admirers, men who had voluntarily repaired to hear his lessons, who now took a pride in doing him honour, and would cheerfully fight to the last drop of blood rather than suffer a fringe of his garment to be handled roughly. . . . The holy man himself was a middle-aged, thin and plain- looking person, about my own age, with a mild expression of countenance, but nothing about him indicative of any extraordinary talent. I seated him on a chair at my right hand and offered two more to the Thakur and his son, of which, however, they did not avail themselves without first placing their hands under the feet of their spiritual guide and then pressing them reverently to their foreheads." Owing, apparently, to the high moral character of his

preaching and his success in reducing to order and tran- 4- Meeting quillity the turbulent Kolis and Bhlls who accepted his (jovernor doctrines, Swami-Narayan enjoyed a large measure of esteem of Bombay, and regard from the officers of Government.

This will be evidenced from the following account of his meeting with the Governor of Bombay : ^ " On the receipt of the above two letters, Swami-Narayan Maharaj proceeded to Rajkote to visit the Right Honourable the Governor, and on the 26th February 1830 was escorted as a mark of honourable reception by a party of troops and military foot-soldiers to the Political Agent's bungalow, when His Excellency the Governor, the Secretary, Mr. Thomas Williamson, six other European gentlemen, and the Political Agent, Mr. Blane, having come out of the bungalow to meet the Swami - Narayan, His Excellency conducted the Swami, hand in hand, to a hall in the bungalow and made him sit on a chair. His Excellency afterwards with pleasure enquired about the principles of his religion, which were communicated accordingly.

His Excellency also made a present to Swami-Narayan of a pair of shawls and other piece-goods. Swami-Narayan was asked by the Governor whether he and his disciples have had any harm under British rule ; and His Excellency was informed in reply that there was nothing of the sort, but that on the contrary every protection was given them by all the officers in authority.


His Excellency then asked for a code of the religion of Swami-Narayan, and the book called the Shiksapatri was presented to him accordingly. Thus after a visit extending to an hour Swami-Narayan asked permission to depart, when he was sent back with the same honours with which he had been received, all the European officers accompany- ing him out of the door from the bungalow." The author of the above account is not given, and it 5. Conciu- apparently emanates from a follower of the saint, but there seems little reason to doubt its substantial accuracy, and it certainly demonstrates the high estimation in which he was held. After his death his disciples erected Chauras or rest- houses and monuments to his memory in all the villages and beneath all the trees where he had at any time made ' The Swami-Narayan Sect, p. 25.

any stay in Gujarat ; and here he is worshipped by the sect. In 1 90 1 the sect had about 300,000 adherents in Gujarat. In the Central Provinces a number of persons belong to it in Nimar, principally of the Teli caste. The Telis of Nimar are anxious to improve their social position, which is very low, and have probably joined the sect on account of its liberal principles on the question of caste. I.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Translate