Surrogacy, its practice and the Law: India
(Created page with "[[File: The Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill, surrogacy and the law in India, 2004 and 201o.jpg|Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=20_1...") |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[Category:Health |S ]] | [[Category:Health |S ]] | ||
| − | + | =Nov 2015: Bombay HC relaxes bar on foreigners= | |
[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=HC-relaxes-surrogacy-bar-on-foreigners-07112015001066 ''The Times of India''], November 7, 2015 | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=HC-relaxes-surrogacy-bar-on-foreigners-07112015001066 ''The Times of India''], November 7, 2015 | ||
'''HC relaxes surrogacy bar on foreigners''' | '''HC relaxes surrogacy bar on foreigners''' | ||
| + | |||
| | ||
| − | The Bombay high court in an interim order | + | The Bombay high court in an interim order stayed the directive of the Centre and Indian Council for Medical Research banning surrogacy for foreign couples who are in the final stages of the process, reports Shibu Thomas. |
Hearing a petition filed by fertility clinics, the court's vacation bench said before introducing a sudden change in policy , prior notice should have been given. | Hearing a petition filed by fertility clinics, the court's vacation bench said before introducing a sudden change in policy , prior notice should have been given. | ||
Revision as of 06:32, 16 November 2015
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Nov 2015: Bombay HC relaxes bar on foreigners
The Times of India, November 7, 2015
HC relaxes surrogacy bar on foreigners
The Bombay high court in an interim order stayed the directive of the Centre and Indian Council for Medical Research banning surrogacy for foreign couples who are in the final stages of the process, reports Shibu Thomas. Hearing a petition filed by fertility clinics, the court's vacation bench said before introducing a sudden change in policy , prior notice should have been given.
The bench clarified that its order was restricted to cases in the middle of treatment. It asked the clinics to furnish details of such cases to the authorities and barred them from taking up fresh cases of surrogacy for foreign couples.
