Reliance Industries Ltd.
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. Readers will be able to edit existing articles and post new articles directly |
Contents |
Gas
KG-D6 Andhra offshore block/ field
Govt fines RIL $1.6bn for using ONGC gas
Govt fines RIL $1.6bn for using ONGC gas, Nov 05 2016 : The Times of India
Co Plans Arbitration, Says Demand Based On `Misreading Of Key Elements' Of PSC
The stage has been set for another round of legal slugfest between India's biggest private sector oil company and the government, with the oil ministry asking Reliance Industries and its partners in the KG-D6 Andhra offshore Block to pay $1.55 billion (approximately Rs 10,000 crore based on current exchange rate) as cost of gas that migrated to their side from an adjacent block belonging to state-run ONGC.
RIL responded to the demand note, sent on Thursday to it, British major BP and Canadian explorer Niko, by saying it proposed to initiate arbitration since the demand was based on “misreading and misinterpretation of key elements of the PSC (production sharing contract) and is without precedent in the oil and gas industry anywhere in the world“. “RIL proposes to invoke the dispute resolution mechanism in the PSC and issue a Notice of Arbitration to the government. RIL remains convinced of being able to fully justify and vindicate its position that the government's claim is not sustainable,“ the company said in a statement.
“According to the government, the Contractor is restricted to producing only that quantity of hydrocarbon as they existed at the point in time when the PSC was signed.This approach overlooks the fundamental fact that at that stage the work of exploration of the block has not even commenced and a complete lack of data makes it impossible to estimate the quantity of hydrocarbons available in the block.“ “The liability of the contractor has not been established by any process known to law and the quantification of the purported claim is without any basis and arbitrary .“
RIL and the government are already engaged in several international arbitrations with more than $5 billion at stake. The arbitrations have been initiated on issues ranging from penalty imposed for failure to meet the promised output targets and gas pricing in KG-D6 to cost calculations in the Panna-Mukta and Tapti fields, which have now been abandoned.
The ministry has deman ded $1.47 billion for 338.332 million units (measured in British thermal unit) of gas that migrated from ONGC's field in seven years ended March 2016. From this amount, $71.71million royalty that RIL paid on this gas was demanded. But an interest of $149.86 million, charged at the rate of 2% above Libor, was added to the amount to work out the total demand. The ministry also demanded $177 million in profit petroleum (government's share of profit) from the partners after disallowing certain costs previously as a penalty for RIL's failure to meet output targets.
The demand note follows the direction set by the panel the ministry had constituted under retired Justice A P Shah to adjudicate the report by US-based reservoir experts, DeGolyer and MacNaugton, appointed at the behest of the Delhi High Court. The report had confirmed ONGC's claim on migration of gas from its idle field into RIL's block, which started production in 2009.
The Shah panel upheld the report and said RIL and its partners had derived “undue enrichment“ from gas migrating from ONGC's block. It also said the compensation should go to the government since it is the public trustee of all natural resources. This is a sore point with ONGC since it was the original claimant for compensation -and some industry watchers said rightfully so -and had moved the court against RIL to pay up.
“The committee has concluded that the contractor's (RILBP-Niko) production of migrated gas and retention of ensuing benefits amounts to unjust enrichment, since the production sharing contract (PSC)... does not permit a contractor to produce and sell migrated gas,“ the demand note said.
Irregularities
2000 case: ₹25cr fine for takeover code was violation
April 8, 2021: The Times of India
Sebi fines Ambani bros ₹25cr in 21-year-old case
Penalty For Alleged Violation Of Takeover Rules While Issuing Shares In Undivided RIL In 2000
Mumbai:
Markets regulator Sebi on Wednesday imposed a Rs 25-crore fine collectively on Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani, the erstwhile main promoters of the undivided Reliance Group, along with several family members and group companies. They were penalised for alleged irregularities relating to the issue of 12 crore equity shares in January 2000 by Reliance Industries (RIL). Sebi imposed the penalty on Ambani family members and related entities since it was found that the takeover code was violated during the allotment of shares by RIL.
According to Sebi’s order, in January 2000, RIL allotted 12 crore shares to 38 entities from within the Reliance Group. The allotment was made after exercise of the option on warrants attached with 6 crore non-convertible debentures (NCDs), which were issued in 1994. From the disclosure filed with the bourses by RIL, it was found that these 38 entities were ‘persons acting in concert’ (PACs) with RIL promoters.
Through this conversion, RIL promoters together with the PACs had increased their stake in the company from 22.7% as of end-March 1999 to 38.3% as of end-March 2000. Out of these, 7.8% shares were acquired as a result of a merger and hence were exempt under the then prevailing Takeover Regulations.
However, 6.8% shares that were acquired by RIL promoters together with PACs in exercise of 3 crore warrants were alleged to be in excess of the 5% ceiling under the same regulation. Hence the imposition of the Rs 25-crore fine on these entities, the Sebi order said.
RIL was yet to comment on the Sebi order, which was issued on Wednesday evening. Sebi said that the Ambani brothers and all the other entities named in the order jointly and severally would pay the total fine within 45 days.
The order noted that while determining the quantum of penalty, no quantifiable figures or data were available on record to assess the disproportionate gain or unfair advantage and amount of loss caused to an investor or group of investors as a result of the default committed by the entities.
2017: Banned from trading in equity derivatives for 1 year
RIL barred from equity derivatives mkt for a year, Mar 25, 2017: The Times of India
Sebi Asks It To Pay Rs 447Cr Plus Rs 536Cr Interest
In a 54-page order released late on Friday , markets regulator Sebi banned Reliance Industries and 12 of its associate companies from trading in equity derivatives for one year “directly or indirectly“.
Sebi also directed India's largest private sector company to pay up within 45 days -Rs 447 crore plus interest on it at 12% for almost 10 years -which adds up to nearly Rs 1,000 crore -for alleged fraudulent trading in a case that dates back to 2007.
Derivatives are financial instruments traded on exchang es which include futures and options (F&O) contracts, the prices of which are directly dependent on the price of the stock. The case relates to alleged fraudulent trading in the F&O segment in Reliance Petroleum, which was a subsidiary of RIL and has since been merged with the major.
Sebi member G Mahaling am said the directions were passed after taking into consideration the magnitude of the fraud across the markets.“I am inclined to pass certain directions against the noticees in order to protect the interest of investors and reinstil their faith in the regulatory system,“ the order said.“The noticees may , however, square off or close out their existing open positions.“
The others are Gujarat Petcoke & Petro Product Supply , Aarthik Commercials, LPG Infrastructure India, Relpol Plastic Products, Fine Tech Commercials, Pipeline Infrastructure India, Motech Software, Darshan Securities, Relogistics (India), Relogistics (Rajasthan), Vinamara Universal Traders and Dharti Investment and Holdings. In an email response to TOI, an RIL spokesperson said the company was seeking legal opinion and would challenge what it dubbed “untenable findings“ in the Sebi order. “The trades in RPL shares which were examined by Sebi were genuine and bona fide transactions,“ he added.
He went on to add: “The se were carried out keeping the best interest of the company and its shareholders in view. Sebi appears to have misconstrued the true nature of the transactions and imposed unjustifiable sanctions.
We are in the process of consulting our legal advi sors. We propose to prefer an appeal and challenge the order in the Securities Appellate Tribunal. We remain confident of fully justifying the veracity of the transactions and vindicating our stand.
We have full confidence in the judicial process and we propose to vigorously exercise all options available to us to challenge the untenable findings in the order.“
The RIL group had earlier sought to settle the case, but Sebi had refused. The proceedings in the longpending case were expedited in the last few months.
2021: fined for ‘manipulative trades’
January 2, 2021: The Times of India
From: January 2, 2021: The Times of India
Markets regulator Sebi fined Reliance Industries, Mukesh Ambani and two other entities a total of Rs 70 crore for alleged manipulative trading in the shares of Reliance Petroleum — which was merged with RIL in 2009— in a case that dates back to 2007.
Sebi, in its 95-page order, said in November 2007, RIL and several other entities closely associated with it, simultaneously traded in RPL in the cash and derivatives segments to profit from it.
Any manipulation erodes investor confidence: Sebi
Sebi imposed a fine of Rs 25 crore on RIL, Rs 15 crore on Ambani, the company’s chairman & managing director, Rs 20 crore on Navi Mumbai SEZ and Rs 10 crore on Mumbai SEZ. The order said that “any manipulation in the volume or price of securities always erodes investor confidence in the market when investors find themselves at the receiving end of market manipulators”.
Till late on Friday RIL had not commented on the Sebi order. The regulatory order of Friday said that between October and November 2007, ‘RIL admittedly appointed 12 agents’ to undertake transactions in RPL derivative contracts on its behalf. During November 2007, these 12 agents took short positions in the derivatives segment on behalf of RIL, while the company traded in RPL shares in cash segment.
“From November 15, 2007 onwards, RIL’s short position in the derivatives segment constantly exceeded the proposed sale of shares in the cash segment. On November 29, 2007, RIL sold a total of 2.25 crore RPL shares in the cash segment during the last 10 minutes of trading resulting in a fall in prices of RPL shares, which also lowered the settlement price of RPL November Futures. RIL’s entire outstanding position of 7.97 crore in the derivatives segment was cash settled at this depressed settlement price, resulting in profits on the said short positions. The said profits were transferred by the agents to RIL as per a prior agreement,” the order noted. “A common person connected with RIL had placed orders in the cash segment on behalf of RIL and in the derivatives segment on behalf of the agents.” The funding for margin payments for the 12 agents was provided by Navi Mumbai SEZ and Mumbai SEZ, it added. Sebi order also said that being the CMD of RIL, Ambani was “responsible for the manipulative activities of RIL”.
Earlier, on March 24, 2017, Sebi had ordered RIL and some of its associated entities to disgorge nearly Rs 450 crore plus interest on it (which could work out to over Rs 1,000 crore) in same case.
Oil-to-chemicals (O2C) operations
2021: transferred to wholly owned subsidiary
Reeba Zachariah, February 24, 2021: The Times of India
_operations,_as_in_2021.jpg)
From: Reeba Zachariah, February 24, 2021: The Times of India
Reliance Industries (RIL) will transfer its oil-tochemicals (O2C) operations to a wholly owned subsidiary for a $25-billion loan, besides $12-billion equity. Consideration for the transfer of the O2C assets, which includes the operating team and 12 manufacturing facilities, will be funded by a $25-billion loan from the parent, the company said in a presentation filed with the stock exchanges.
The interest-bearing loan from RIL to the O2C company will be an “efficient mechanism to upstream cash, including any potential capital receipts in the unit”, it said. Carving out the O2C operations into an independent entity will make it easier for RIL to bring in external investors. It had earlier explored a different structure, but India’s securities market rules did not permit such a scheme.
RIL had said earlier that it, being a listed company, cannot issue shares with differential rights (that is, equity shares with interest linked only to the O2C business) to investors. Therefore, the O2C undertaking has to be transferred into a wholly owned subsidiary of RIL, in which the external investors will invest, it had said.
RIL has been in discussions with Saudi Aramco to sell a 20% stake in the O2C unit for more than one and a half years. The deal, if successful, could lead to further deleveraging of RIL. RIL will retain management control of the O2C company. The separation will also not dilute earnings or restrict cash flows for the parent, according to the company’s presentation. The O2C transfer on a slump sale basis — subject to courts, shareholders and creditors approvals — is expected to be concluded before September 30. Slump sale means transfer of an undertaking for a lump sum consideration without values being assigned to individual assets and liabilities.
“The income tax law lays down specific computation provisions for a transaction qualifying as a slump sale. This computation mechanism remains the same, irrespective of such transaction carried out through an NCLT scheme or through a private arrangement. Basis of this mechanism, the seller is allowed to offset its tax net worth as on the transfer date from the aggregate sale consideration. If the sale consideration of the transaction equates to or is less than the tax net worth of the transferred undertaking, then no capital gains or associated tax liability would arise. Also, such slump sale transaction entailing the transfer of undertaking as a going concern would not entail GST implications,” said RBSA Advisors MD Ravi Mehta on the Reliance O2C demerger.
Market capitalisation
2019 Nov: RIL’s m-cap is ₹10-lakh-crore, first Indian co
Nov 29, 2019: The Times of India
,_2005-2017.jpg)
The growth of Reliance Industries (RIL), 2005-2017.
From: Nov 29, 2019: The Times of India
Homegrown global petrochemicals major Reliance Industries (RIL) on Thursday became the first Indian company to touch the Rs 10-lakh-crore market capitalisation level. This marks the doubling of its value in less than two and half years, and comes just over three years after its strong but controversial entry into the country’s telecom services business. During the day, the RIL stock on the BSE rallied to an all-time high of Rs 1,584 and closed at Rs 1,580, which translated into a market cap of Rs 10.01 lakh crore, BSE data showed.
Started as a polyester manufacturer in the early 1960s by its founder Dhirubhai Ambani, RIL grew during the first 40 years through forward and backward integrations, like setting up refineries and petrochemicals production facilities. It then went into oil explorations. In the early 2000s, it had entered the telecom services space and, in early 2010s, the consumer retail space. Through various subsidiaries, it also has a presence in areas like media, life sciences, infrastructure and logistics.
The promoters, led by billionaire Mukesh Ambani, hold a little over 50% in the company and the balance is held by institutional and public shareholders. With nearly 23 lakh shareholders, RIL is the most widely held company in India. Boosted by his majority stake in RIL, CMD Ambani is now the richest man in Asia with a net worth of nearly $61 billion.
In the last six months, the stock has rallied 20% after RIL recently set an 18-month target to turn itself into a zero-debt company. The recent rally was also boosted by the decision by Reliance Jio, the company’s telecom services arm, to hike telecom tariffs, which is expected to increase its average revenue per user (ARPU). This, in turn, would add to its revenues.
Among the Indian companies, software exports major TCS, with a market cap of Rs 7.8 lakh crore is behind RIL, with HDFC Bank (Rs 6.9 lakh crore), HUL (Rs 4.5 lakh crore) and HDFC (Rs 4 lakh crore) making up the top five slots in terms of most valuable companies.
Revenue
Q1 FY22
Tejeesh N.S. Behl, July 30, 2021: The Times of India
From: Tejeesh N.S. Behl, July 30, 2021: The Times of India
From: Tejeesh N.S. Behl, July 30, 2021: The Times of India
Graphics: Sajeev Kumarapuram
Source: Company reports, stock exchange filings, Bloomberg Billionaires Index
The oil-to-telecom conglomerate reported a 58.2% rise in its revenues in Q1 FY22 compared to Q1 FY21 — from Rs 95,626 crore to Rs 148.591 crore. Or in simpler terms, RIL not only clocked in revenues of more than Rs 1 crore per minute but also an increase in revenues to the tune of Rs 24.25 crore per hour.
RIL earned a net profit of Rs 13,806 crore for the quarter ended June 30 or Rs 6.32 crore per hour.
RIL’s total borrowings at the end of the first quarter this fiscal stood at close to Rs 2.54 lakh crore — an increase of more than Rs 2,000 crore since the end of March.
Of the Ambani family, RIL chairman and managing director Mukesh Ambani controls 42% of the company — with the family’s total stake being 50.6%.
Since the start of this fiscal, Ambani has managed to get richer by $2.8 billion in the first quarter — or by nearly Rs 21,000 crore in a span of three months.
That apart, Ambani, whose salary has been capped at Rs 15 crore annually since 2008-09 — or Rs 285 per minute — decided to forgo his salary for 2020-21. That however, wouldn’t have mattered much as he earned a dividend income of Rs 1,988 crore, based on a dividend of Rs 7 per share for FY21, or Rs 5.45 crore daily.
RIL’s retail arm brought in revenues of Rs 38,547 crore in Q1 FY22 — or around Rs 424 crore per day, with profits of Rs 10.6 crore daily.
RIL’s new focus area in the digital services space, Jio Platforms, which has marquee investors ranging from Facebook to Google, earned a net profit of Rs 3,651 crore in the April-June quarter.
Despite its thrust into the retail and digital segments, RIL’s 800-pound gorilla still remains its oil, chemicals and gas business.
And here’s how India’s largest private company compares with Apple, the world’s largest...
Vimal
RIL selling 49% in ‘Vimal’ to Chinese textile company
Piyush Pandey, December 10, 2014
Through the late 1970s and early 1980s, the distinctive tune of ‘Only Vimal’ ads became instantly recognizable to millions of Indians.
From top models to Bollywood hearthrobs and cricket stars, they all featured in the iconic ads. As the clothing brand went from strength to strength, so did its owner—an initially obscure company founded by Dhirubhai Ambani called Reliance Textiles that was in 1985 rechristened Reliance Industries Ltd.
While nostalgia may be a powerful factor, savvy tycoons don't allow it to overcome business sense. Which is why RIL, India's biggest company now led by Mukesh Ambani, has decided to sell a 49% stake in the textiles business to the $3-billion Chinese textile giant Shandong Ruyi Science & Technology Group for an undisclosed sum. RIL will hold 51% in the new JV. The textile business is located at Naroda near Ahmedabad and was set up in 1966. But it now contributes $300-350 million, or less than 1%, to the overall $65-billion annual revenues of RIL. In 2012, RIL had appointed bankers to sell its textile business but the sale was called off due to a tepid market and lack of buyers.
“Our joint venture with Ruyi Group will help Reliance reposition its textile business on a high-growth path,” said Nikhil R Meswani, executive director, RIL. Ruyi, a leading textile company in China, has a global presence, including in America, Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and China. It has a portfolio of world-renowned brands such as ‘Taylor & Lodge’, ‘Harris Tweed’, ‘Royal Ruyi China’, ‘Nogara Italy’ and ‘Indios Italy’. Ruyi also operates in India under the ‘Georgia Gullini’ brand in the worsted suiting segment of the market. This business operation and its other activities would get realigned to strengthen the JV.
Investment adviser S P Tulsian believes that the deal size would not be significant, given that none of the textile companies in that space is valued at over $100 million.
