Non-governmental organisations (NGOs): India
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. Readers will be able to edit existing articles and post new articles directly |
Contents |
An overview
Only 2% NGOs registered with govt
PTI | Mar 23, 2014
NEW DELHI: Despite voluntary organizations receiving over Rs 11,500 crore of foreign funds annually, only two per cent of the 20 lakh odd NGOs operating in the country have been registered, raising eyebrows in the home ministry.
According to a home ministry report, although there is no centralized database on the number of NGOs in the country and the quantum of finance involved in their operations, unofficial figures indicate that there are over 20 lakh NGOs registered under Societies' Registration Act, Trust Act etc.
However, the number of NGOs registered under Foreign Contribution Regulation Act would be less than 2 per cent of the total number of NGOs.
"Though, the number of associations reporting receipt and utilization of foreign contribution is increasing; yet, it is a matter of concern that a large number of registered associations still do not submit their statutory annual returns mandated by the law," the latest Home Ministry report on receipt and utilization of foreign contribution by voluntary associations said.
A total of 43,527 NGOs were registered under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act up to March 31, 2012. During the year 2011-12, a total of 22,702 NGOs reported receipt of foreign contribution amounting to Rs 11,546.29 crore.
Altogether 9,509 NGOs have reported 'Nil' receipt of foreign contribution while many have not filed their returns.
Top four recipient states
Among all states and Union Territories, Delhi received highest amount of foreign contributions in 2011-12.
While Rs 2285.75 crore of foreign contribution has been received by 1482 NGOs in the national capital, 3341 NGOs in Tamil Nadu received Rs 1704.76 crore, 2527 NGOs in Andhra Pradesh received Rs 1258.52 crore and 2056 voluntary organizations in Maharashtra received Rs 1107.39 crore.
Top five donor countries
The five major donor countries are the US (Rs 3838.23 crore), the UK (Rs 1219.02 crore), Germany (Rs 1096.01 crore), Italy (Rs 528.88 crore) and the Netherlands (Rs 418.37 crore).
2012: Government’s reply in Lok Sabha
UPA too talked of NGOs' role in anti-India activities in '12
The Times of India Jun 15 2014 Deeptiman Tiwary New Delhi:
TNN
Docu Said Bodies In Delhi, TN Got `10k Cr In 3 Yrs
The UPA-commissioned Intelligence Bureau report on NGOs, that surfaced days after the new government took over, has kicked up a ruckus but the assertion that some of these organizations were engaged in “anti-national activities” was made way back in 2012 by the government in Parliament.
In reply to a question in Lok Sabha, the Congres-led UPA had then said, “There were reports that certain NGOs were engaged in antinational and political activities.” The statement had come amid raging protests against the Kundankulam nuclear power project in Tamil Nadu. The government had even presented a document showing that NGOs in
Tamil Nadu and Delhi had received foreign contributions to the tune of over Rs 10,000 crore between 2008 and 2011.
It said Tamil Nadu-based NGOs received 10,119 contributions in that period, adding up to Rs 4,800 crore. Delhi based NGOs, the government said, received 4,297 contributions amounting to Rs 5,800 crore. The contributions came from around 160 countries, the government had informed the House.
A recently leaked IB report, submitted to the Narendra Modi government on June 3, has also called into question the role of NGOs involved in the Kudankulam
protests and gives details of foreign contributions received by them.
The report says that eight out of 11 NGOs involved in the protests were primarily funded by Europe-based donors who allegedly pumped in Rs 80 crore between 200506 and 2010-11.
Of this, Rs 43 crore flowed into Tuticorin Multipurpose Social Service and Rs 20 crore to Tuticorin Diocesan Association.
In the 2012 document, the government said one of the NGOs involved in Kundankulam protests was facing a CBI inquiry for contributions received by it and that 30% of the 3000-odd foreign contributions in the period had been cornered by Tamil Nadu.
The outfit under CBI inquiry — Coimbatore-based Tamil Nadu Muslim Muneetra Kazagham (TNMMK) — had supported the anti-Kudankulam protests and some of its members were arrested during an agitation in September 2012. Other NGOs under investigation by the Tamil Nadu Police include AID India (Chennai), Saccer (Nagercoil) and Centre for Promotion of Social Concern.
Following vociferous protests by NGOs, the government had alleged the Kudankulam stir was being funded from abroad by vested interests and put 77 NGOs under the scanner for funding. The document also named some other states where NGOs had received a large number of contributions.
These included Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, Kerala and Maharashtra with 4,500-6,000 contributions during the period.
Foreign-funded NGOs with malign agendas
Foreign-funded NGOs stalling devpt: IB report
The Times of India Jun 12 2014
To Muzzle Dissent, Say Activists An Intelligence Bureau report has accused “foreign-funded” NGOs such as Greenpeace, Cordaid, Amnesty and ActionAid of “serving as tools for foreign policy interests of western governments” by sponsoring agitations against nuclear and coal-fired power plants across the country.
The NGOs, said to be working through a network of local organizations such as PUCL and Narmada Bachao Andolan, have negatively impacted GDP growth by 2-3%, claims the IB report sent to the PMO and other government agencies.
Environmental activists joined Greenpeace in rubbishing the IB report. Greenpeace said it was a conscious attempt by the country’s premier intelligence agency to crush and stifle opposing voices in civil society. The organization also wrote to the home minister, requesting him to share a copy of the report “to know and understand impacts of this labeling”.
As far as the source of funding is concerned, the NGO said, “Greenpeace India is funded by individual supporters in India. Greenpeace does not accept any donation from corporate or government entities.” Environmentalist Ramesh Agrawal, who recently won the Goldman Environmental Prize for resisting destruction of forests by private mining companies in Chhatisgarh, said the report was an attempt to muzzle dissent. “Environmentalists working on the ground have always been branded as anti-development.
At a time when global warming is threatening us and air pollution is the most serious
public health problem, why is the government suppressing voices of dissent?“ he asked.
The IB report -addressed to PMO, heads of joint intelligence committee and R&AW , national security council secretariat (NSCS), coal and power secretaries, home minister, finance minister and Cabinet secretary , and signed by IB joint director Safi A Rizvi -alleges that the “areas of action“ of these NGOs include anti-nuclear, anti-coal and anti-genetically modified organisms protests. Apart from stalling mega industrial projects, including those floated by Posco and Vedanta, these NGOs have also been working to the detriment of mining, dam and oil drilling projects in north-eastern India, it adds.
According to the report dated June 3, these NGOs are allegedly the influence behind “Praful Bidwais and Medha Patkars“. The document, the details of which were accessed by TOI, accuses Greenpeace of having expanded its activities to oppose coal-fired power plants and coal mining and receiving Rs 45 crore from abroad in the last seven years.
“It is using foreign funds to create protest movements under `Coal Network' umbrella at prominent coal block and coal-fired power plant locations in India,“ alleged the IB report.
Since 2013, Greenpeace has undertaken protests in five project-affected villages of Mahaan (in MP) coal block allocated to Essar and Hindalco under the banner of Mahaan Sangarsh Samiti. Its activists have been targeting mining companies, specifically Coal India, Hindalco, Aditya Birla group and Essar as they “stand in their way“, the report alleged.
The report has also raised questions over nearly $40,000 deposited in two bank accounts of S P Udayakumar, convenor of People's Movement against Nuclear Energy that has been at the forefront of the agitation against the Kudankulam N-plant. The money was supposedly transferred by Ohio University for sending in resources and articles in the field of Kudankulam.
Holland's CORDAID and oil drilling in Manipur
IB: Dutch-funded NGO bid to stall oil drilling in NE
Bharti Jain New Delhi:
TNN
The Times of India Jun 14 2014
The Dutch government-funded CORDAID and its associate outfits had organized an elaborate training session for northeastern NGO activists in Shillong last year, teaching them how to use GPS tracking to map oil wells, mines, dams, forests and habitation for an updated GIS platform on extractives in the region.
The database would be used to facilitate targeted local protests and international activism against extractive industries like oil drilling in Manipur, according to an Intelligence Bureau report on the impact of foreign-funded NGOs' activism on India's GDP growth.
The trainers at the session, two Dutch and an American, constantly told the participants that oil reserves in the northeast were as large as those in the entire Gulf region and that the resources must be preserved by the local tribals for their own use. They alleged that the government of India was, in collaboration with MNCs, “stealing the resources of the region and refusing to remove the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (from Manipur) as it needed the Indian Army to extract those resources“.
The trainers insisted that until the rights of communities over their land and resources were recognized, Jubilant Energy , engaged in oil drilling in Manipur, and the government should stop all petroleum and drilling activity in Manipur.
According to the IB report, CORDAID has added `extractive industries in the northeast' as one of the focal points for its interventions in India.
Greenpeace and coal plants
`Anti-coal stir picked up after Turkey meet'
Deeptiman Tiwary New Delhi: TNN
The Times of India Jun 14 2014
The leaked Intelligence Bureau report on NGOs has detailed how Greenpeace sent its activists to Istanbul for a coal conference where an elaborate plan to “stop new coal build (plant) and to retire existing coal plants“ was mooted.
According to the report, though Greenpeace had begun expanding its anti-CFPP (coal fired power plant) activity in 2010-11, the real push came following the Istanbul conference held in July 2012.
The report said, “Starting 2012, Greenpeace activists have been financed to attend international coal conferences, such as the Istanbul Coal Strategy Conference (July 2012). This conference was held to discuss `people-centric' protests in order `to stop new coal build (plant) and to retire existing coal plants'.“
The report said at the conference, the US-based Climate Works Foundation presented a paper that highlighted India as the primary target for CFPP activism.
