Revision as of 21:13, 22 November 2017

Indian judges in the ICJ

2017: Dalveer Bhandari

Sachin Parashar, India wins int’l court judge race as ‘humiliated’ UK beats retreat, November 22, 2017: The Times of India

1st Time Britain Won’t Hold ICJ Post In 71 Yrs

New Delhi: India scored a dramatic diplomatic victory with the election of its candidate, Dalveer Bhandari, to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) after the UK withdrew its nominee in the face of overwhelming support in the UN General Assembly for the Indian judge.

Atop Indian diplomat quoted British poet Lord Tennyson, “the old order changeth, yielding place to new”, to describe the upbeat mood in the Indian camp and the major shift in equations between the UK and its former colony, with the development read as India’s biggest diplomatic coup in years.

This will be the first time in the 71-year-old history of the ICJ that there will be no British judge in what is described as “the world court”. Guardian described UK candidate Christopher Greenwood’s defeat as a humiliating blow to British international prestige and proof of its diminished status in international affairs.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi swiftly congratulated Bhandari in a tweet, calling his re-election to ICJ a proud moment and thanked members of the (UN general) assembly and (UN security) council. Foreign minister Sushma Swaraj tweeted “Vande Mataram” and “Jai Hind” as she singled out India’s permanent representative to the UN, Syed Akbaruddin, for special mention.

The extremely aggressive, in-your-face Indian campaign was led by India’s permanent representative.

India scuttles UK’s plan to leverage its P-5 status

It ensured that there were few takers for an arcane UK proposal that a “joint conference” be formed, as first reported by TOI on Sunday, to break the deadlock between the UNGA and UNSC. The old-fashioned attempt to leverage its status as a P-5 member failed as India insisted the will of the UNGA could not be ignored.

Bhandari’s election come as a shot in the arm for the Modi government with its increased diplomatic clout read in conjunction with improved ratings in the easeof-doing-business index and an upgrade by the ratings agency Moody’s that are seen as recognition of India’s reforms. “The extraordinary support from the UN membership is reflective of the respect for strong constitutional integrity of the Indian polity and the independence of the judiciary in India,” MEA said in a statement.

The UK needed support from eight members of the security council to stall voting and instead go for a joint conference. But several council members, who otherwise might have voted for Britain’s candidate Greenwood, were opposed to the proposal as they agreed with India’s position that it was an “undemocratic” move which would only further complicate the process.

Also, for a joint conference to be formed, all 15 council members would have had to publicly endorse UK’s proposal, something which countries like the US and France, which regularly profess their friendship and strategic partnership with India, would have been averse to.

In the last round of UNGA voting, Bhandari had 121 votes and Greenwood only 68. In the final round of voting conducted after Greenwood’s withdrawal, Bhandari got 183 out of 193 votes in GA and all 15 votes in the council.

See also

International Court of Justice and South Asia