Right to life: India
(Created page with "{| Class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/> </div> |} [[Category:Ind...") |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
The state government has said it never intended to ban consumption of meat, which means it was not going to close all slaughterhouses and meat shops but only wanted these to be regulated under Supreme Court and National Green Tribunal guidelines. | The state government has said it never intended to ban consumption of meat, which means it was not going to close all slaughterhouses and meat shops but only wanted these to be regulated under Supreme Court and National Green Tribunal guidelines. | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Right to marry= | ||
| + | ==Not included in Right to life, Centre tells HC== | ||
| + | [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F12&entity=Ar01418&sk=C9C671BB&mode=text Right to life doesn’t include right to marry, Centre tells HC, March 12, 2019: ''The Times of India''] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The Centre and Army have defended their policy to bar married people from being recruited in the Judge Advocate General (JAG) wing of the forces. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a reply filed in the Delhi high court, the Centre has argued that the right to marry cannot be interpreted as right to life under the Constitution. It added that “there is nowhere written or proved that life of person would be miserable or unhealthy without marriage.” | ||
| + | |||
| + | The government’s response came on an earlier query by the HC where it sought to know how does marriage affect one’s ability to become an officer in JAG. Last year HC had asked the Centre why married men and women are barred from the service. HC is hearing a PIL by lawyer Kush Kalra claiming there was institutionalised discrimination against married people by not inducting them in JAG service. | ||
=See also= | =See also= | ||
[[Cow slaughter: India]] | [[Cow slaughter: India]] | ||
Revision as of 19:44, 15 March 2019
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Contents |
Food habits
Linked to right to life
HIGHLIGHTS
The HC said that Article 21 of the Constitution extends right to life to every citizen
Food, food habits and vending of food are linked to right to life and must not be curbed by the state
The UP government has said it never intended to ban consumption of meat
LUCKNOW: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court has observed that food, food habits and vending of food are linked to right to life and must not be curbed by the state.
Hearing a petition by a retail meat shop owner from Kheri, who had appealed for renewal of his licence in view of the crackdown by the UP government+ against illegal slaughterhouses and meat shops, the bench of Justice A P Sahi and Justice Sanjai Harkauli expressed concern that meat shops were being closed without considering renewal of shop-owners' licences.
The bench pored over the legal and constitutional provisions in this regard earlier this week, and said that Article 21 of the Constitution extends right to life to every citizen.
Directing the government's high-powered committee (to be headed by the chief secretary) to deliberate on the issue on April 10 to resolve the controversy, the bench observed, "Food that is conducive to health cannot be treated as a wrong choice and it is for this reason that provisions are obligated on the state to be made available for maintaining the requirement of supply of healthy foodstuff."
The bench asked the government to apprise it of the conclusion of the committee's deliberations on April 13.
The court's observations contained echoes of what the Bombay HC had said on the Maharashtra beef ban+ about a year ago, which had stated+ : "As far as the choice of eating food of the citizens is concerned, the citizens are required to be let alone especially when the food of their choice is not injurious to health...The state cannot make an intrusion into his home and prevent a citizen from possessing and eating food of his choice..."
Hearing a related petition, the Allahabad HC also directed the government to apprise it of the decision of the committee to deliberate on the issue of granting and renewing licences of slaughterhouses and meat shops.
The state government has said it never intended to ban consumption of meat, which means it was not going to close all slaughterhouses and meat shops but only wanted these to be regulated under Supreme Court and National Green Tribunal guidelines.
Right to marry
Not included in Right to life, Centre tells HC
Right to life doesn’t include right to marry, Centre tells HC, March 12, 2019: The Times of India
The Centre and Army have defended their policy to bar married people from being recruited in the Judge Advocate General (JAG) wing of the forces.
In a reply filed in the Delhi high court, the Centre has argued that the right to marry cannot be interpreted as right to life under the Constitution. It added that “there is nowhere written or proved that life of person would be miserable or unhealthy without marriage.”
The government’s response came on an earlier query by the HC where it sought to know how does marriage affect one’s ability to become an officer in JAG. Last year HC had asked the Centre why married men and women are barred from the service. HC is hearing a PIL by lawyer Kush Kalra claiming there was institutionalised discrimination against married people by not inducting them in JAG service.
