Women in the Armed Forces
m (Pdewan moved page Women in armed forces: Delhi HC ruling to Women In Armed Forces: Delhi HC Ruling) |
m (Pdewan moved page Women In Armed Forces: Delhi HC Ruling to Women in the Armed Forces without leaving a redirect) |
Revision as of 16:07, 5 December 2016
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. Readers will be able to edit existing articles and post new articles directly |
Women in forces get full-term right
Services May Challenge HC Order In SC
Abhinav Garg
New Delhi: It’s clearly the season for women. The week started with the women’s reservation bill being passed by the Rajya Sabha, and it is ending with a landmark court judgment that breaks another glass ceiling for women by allowing them permanent commission in the Indian armed forces.
On Friday, the Delhi high court directed the government to grant permanent commission to interested women officers of the armed forces serving under the short service commission. The court, however, turned down the plea for allowing women in combat operations. The armed forces establishment has reacted negatively to the judgment and is in favour of challenging the order in the Supreme Court. However, the government’s view is not known. Observers say, given its pro-women stance, it might be uneasy about going in appeal.
Delivering its verdict, a bench comprising Justices S K Kaul and M C Garg said permanent commission was not a ‘‘charity being sought by women officers but enforcement of their constitutional rights’’. It found the policy of not offering permanent commission (PC) to women SSC officers discriminatory.
‘‘If male officers can be granted PC while performing those tasks there is no reason why equally capable women can’t be granted PC,’’ the court observed while disposing of appeals filed by more than 50 retired and serving women officers. The first appeal dates back to 2003. However, the relief has come with several caveats. The ruling is applicable only to those officers recruited prior to 2006 when the government decided to stop shifting officers from SSC to PC across the board, be it men or women.
AN UNEQUAL MUSIC
Apart from the medical corps, Army has around 1,100 women officers out of 35,000 officers; IAF, 700 out of 10,700 officers; Navy, 280 out of 8,000 officers Women officers serve in non-combat arms (engineering, ordnance, signals, intelligence, education, law, air traffic control, among others). IAF has 58 woman helicopter and transport aircraft pilots Women officers can serve up to 14 years only. In 2008, govt approved permanent commission in the legal and education wings of the three Services. The 2009 batch undergoing training can opt for permanent commission Doctors, dentists, nurses get permanent commission. There are 800 women doctors, 90 dentists and 3,200 nurses Govt doesn’t plan combat duty for women – in infantry, armoured corps, mechanised infantry or artillery. Women can’t fly fighters or serve on warships STORY ELSEWHERE...
Canada, Denmark, Norway, Portugal and Luxembourg allow combat roles for women Women in UK and US can serve in all wings but not allowed in direct ground combat missions Israel allows women in frontline combat units but it’s voluntary. If they decline a specific mission, it’s not a negative ‘No reason why women shouldn’t get benefits’
New Delhi: The HC ruling on permanent commission for women in the Indian armed forces comes with some caveats. Male officers on SSC have been given permanent commission despite a government order because of the acute shortage of officers. Given this fact, it is a moot point whether the court will allow the inequity if women officers were to go before it.
Significantly, while arguing that PC could not be granted retrospectively, the government counsel said this option could be allowed for women recruited in the future. The court, however, held that the petitioners — many of whom had retired by now — should be granted the benefit. ‘‘These women officers have served the armed forces of the country well in the areas of operation they were recruited for and have worked in this capacity for 14 to 15 years... There is no reason why these persons who have knocked the door of the court should be deprived of the benefit,’’ the court said.
The court refused to go into the debate on whether women should be allowed in combat, which was one of the pleas. ‘‘There are countries which have given opportunity to women even in combat areas but there are social and cultural ethos which vary from country to country... Thus we are clearly of the view that it is not for the court to decide which areas of operation of armed forces women should be employed in,’’ the bench observed.
In its 32-page order, the HC directed the government to grant within two months’ time all benefits of PC to all eligible women officers.
