Arnab Goswami
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
A profile
His signature show, 'The News Hour', is the country's most-watched TV debate show that often sets the agenda for others. His aggressive grilling of politicians has made him a national icon among the urban youth.
He did the most controversial interviews of the year which made headlines-from Rahul Gandhi to Narendra Modi, from Lalu Yadav to Vinod Rai. He has transcended the world of news TVwith spoofs of him appearing in rap videos, a popular paint company advertisement and to promote Shah Rukh Khan's Happy New Year.
Break time Often watches three films back-to-back to unwind.
No love lost
"I am not romantically involved with any political party, so I don't end up having a bitter break-up with them. My distance with politicians is both physical and psychological."
Appropriating Sardesai’s 2002 Gujarat riot experience
Ranjona Banerji| September 22| MxMIndia
Ranjona Banerji, Arnab Goswami – A legend in his own mind?, Sep 25, 2017: The Times of India
What an incredible kerfuffle! In a speech he made a couple of years ago, TV anchor Arnab Goswami told a moving story about how he was attacked by riotous mobs carrying trishuls, close to the chief minister's residence, while covering the Gujarat riots in 2002. Great story, but one slight issue with it. The incident did happen. But it did not happen to Goswami. It happened to Rajdeep Sardesai and other colleagues at NDTV.
Sardesai put the video of Goswami's speech up on Twitter, expressing surprise at Goswami's story. The video was taken down and then put up again. Inevitably, minor spats broke out all over Twitter. An employee of Republic TV standing up for her boss, Goswami, posted a photograph where Goswami was part of the group covering the riots. This claim was quickly demolished by Goswami's former colleagues - he was sent to Gujarat yes but to Kheda and a week after Sardesai's car was attacked by a mob. The photo was taken later. Several colleagues from NDTV corroborated Sardesai's assertion that Goswami was lying. Goswami was also defended, or rather Sardesai was attacked, by actor Anupam Kher who occasionally functions as a spokesperson for the government and now also apparently for Goswami.
What makes someone lie like this? In an article for DailyO, journalist Swati Chaturvedi called Goswami a "fantasist". On an India Today TV show on the issue, lawyer Sanjay Hegde pointed out, tongue firmly in cheek, that everyone is entitled to be a "legend in their own minds".
But what it comes to down to plain and simple is plagiarism. Writers steal words. Those who do not write, steal experiences. Goswami's story had many personal touches which add verisimilitude - the fear of the driver who had no ID, Goswami's preference to sit in the front of a car, the sound of the mob. This was a story he must have internalised until it became his own. Perhaps he really believes it happened to him.
Maybe he wished it happened to him. Goswami is a studio creation. He was forgettable in his earlier jobs, whatever he did there. He came into his own thundering behind a desk at Times Now.
Perhaps however he still carries a torch for his non-existent days as an intrepid reporter, covering perilous ground and breaking earth-shattering stories. Since he does not have enough fireside chat experiences of his own, he has no option but to steal the experiences of others. Or maybe he was just borrowing this one: he was going to return it but he forgot: "I covered the riots but not this part that I wanted to cover. So I thought I'd just try your part for a bit to see what it felt like."
Of all the roles that journalism offers you, reporting is only one of them. It is not too late for Goswami to become a reporter. He may find it suits him. But he must be more courageous than he has been in the past. Even recently, during one of Mumbai's super-rainy days, he did not venture very far from his office and stood under a flyover on Tulsi Pipe Road with an umbrella. That is not proper reporting. Nor is going to Milan ?Subway in Santa Cruz.
He can instead prowl the countryside of Raigad to find any more clues in Sheena Bora's murder. It may be more dramatic to go at night. And not wear a suit while he does it, although that can be his signature move. He might also lurk around the Leela Palace hotel in Delhi and solve the Sunanda Pushkar case all by himself.
But let us get down to brasstacks. What Goswami did is not excusable. He stole an experience to make himself look bigger and braver. All it has done is make him look smaller and sillier.
It has been a while since Goswami stopped practising any type or form of journalism. If he wants to make a comeback, I am not sure that stealing someone else's experience is the right way to go about it.
But who knows. This is the "new India". Anything is possible.
Meanwhile, it is terrible that one more journalist was brutally killed, this time in the line of duty. Santanu Bhowmick was covering a protest in Tripura when he was abducted and hacked to death by political elements at the rally. This has sadly become all too common - to kill journalists in an attempt to silence the media. Appalling, unacceptable.
