Examine individual changes
This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change, and test it against filters.
Variables generated for this change
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Edit count of user (user_editcount) | |
| Name of user account (user_name) | 188.143.232.12 |
| Time email address was confirmed (user_emailconfirm) | |
| Age of user account (user_age) | 0 |
| Groups (including implicit) user is in (user_groups) | *
|
| Page ID (article_articleid) | 1636 |
| Page namespace (article_namespace) | 0 |
| Page title (without namespace) (article_text) | River Yamuna |
| Full page title (article_prefixedtext) | River Yamuna |
| article_restrictions_create | |
| Edit protection level of the page (article_restrictions_edit) | |
| Move protection level of the page (article_restrictions_move) | |
| article_restrictions_upload | |
| Last ten users to contribute to the page (article_recent_contributors) | Pdewan
|
| Action (action) | edit |
| Edit summary/reason (summary) | /* TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS */ |
| Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (minor_edit) | |
| Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext) | == Yamuna, pollution in the river ==
[[File:Yamuna1.jpg|Supreme Court and Yamuna|frame|500px]]
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
Title and authorship of the original article(s)</div>
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:150%">
6,500cr and 19yrs later, Yamuna dirtier than ever/ Clean-Up Plan Flops, SC Review Today
By '''Neha Lalchandani, Add source''', 2013/03/11 </div>
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:110%">
[http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/03/11&PageLabel=3&EntityId=Ar00301&ViewMode=HTML The Times of India] </div>
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This is a newspaper article selected for the excellence of its content.<br/>You can help by converting it into an encyclopedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br/>Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br/>and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br/>
See [[examples]] and a tutorial.</div>
|}
New Delhi: [In 1994?] the Supreme Court first scrutinized pollution in the Yamuna. Innumerable orders later, Yamuna is dirtier than ever with a mind-numbing Rs 6,500 crore spent to clean the river and the latest plan — interceptor sewers — going
On Monday, when SC reviews Yamuna’s pollution, it could be back to the drawing board. Six years after the Delhi Jal Board proposed interceptor sewers to treat sewage before it flows into major drains, just Rs 51 crore of the Rs 1,963 crore scheme has been spent.
Worse, it is not even clear if the measure that was to improve water quality by 2010 will actually work in light of the rapid growth of unauthorized colonies discharging sewage into the river, an issue flagged even in 2007 by an official committee that approved the interceptor proposal.
The committee had warned that 1,432 unauthorized colonies were the nub of the problem. By 2012, their number had jumped to 1,639. Although these colonies have been promised regularization, drainage and sewers are years away. In 2007, 517 of 567 unauthorized regularized colonies had sewers. The number grew by just six in the next five years. DJB says it is tough to provide sewerage in such densely populated colonies where they have barely any road space for their work.
A report submitted to the court by an inspection team that included amicus curiae Ranjit Kumar as recently as November last year called for sewage connections to all new colonies, whether authorized or not.
It pointed out that Delhi’s 17 sewage treatment plants (STPs) have a capacity of 2,460 MGD against utilization of 1,558 MGD. Delhi’s sewage generation is around 3,800 MGD.
=== THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER ===
6,500cr spent by Delhi, UP and Haryana to clean Yamuna. This includes central funds. No improvement in water quality in past 8 yrs Only 51cr of 1,963cr sanctioned for interceptor drains spent. Scheme proposed in 2007, was to deliver results by 2010
Number of unauthorized colonies has jumped from
1,432 in 2007 to 1,639 in 2012
Only 55% of Delhi’s population served by sewer system
Delhi’s installed sewage treatment capacity is 2,460 MLD. Sewage generated is 3,800 MLD. But just 63% of installed capacity is being used
City’s biggest drain, Najafgarh, discharges 2,064 MLD. Only 30% is treated.
Worse, treated sewage is again mixed with waste
SC-mandated team inspected 4 sewage treatment plants in November 2012.
All four were deficient
=== Heavy metals in city’s drinking water ===
New Delhi:Delhi’s drinking water is contaminated with tonnes of industrial waste. Industries located upstream of the Yamuna have been found to be discharging untreated waste into the river, leading to the presence of heavy metals in water that is picked up at Wazirabad to meet the city’s drinking water needs.
Manoj Misra of the Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan had water from the Dhanura Escape — a channel that empties into the Yamuna — tested at a laboratory in Gwalior and found that the levels of chromium, lead and iron were higher than permissible. “While chromium was 0.13 mg/l against 0.05 mg/l, lead was 0.035 mg/l against 0.01mg/l and iron was 3.51mg/l against a permissible 0.1 mg/l. The presence of heavy metals is even more problematic since the treatment plants in Delhi are not equipped to detect or treat them,” said Misra.
Pollution from industries in Haryana, especially those located in and around Panipat and Sonepat, has caused treatment plants to stop functioning on several occasions after ammonia level went so high that it could not be treated. Untreated industrial effluent from Yamuna Nagar, Misra said, is released into the Dhanura Escape from where it meets the river upstream of Kunjpura in the Karnal district.
“Similarly, toxic waste from Panipat falls into the Yamuna near the village of Simla Gujran in Panipat district. Samples from the Dhanura Escape show presence of heavy metals, known health hazards and a clear indication of industrial pollution. This water is picked up at Wazirabad for treatment at Chandrawal and Wazirabad treatment plants,” he said.
Other than heavy metals, other pollutants, too, were much higher than BIS norms for drinking water. Total coliform was 1,200 against the permissible limit of 10, total dissolved solids were 3,324 against the permissible limit of 500, biochemical oxygen demand was 240 mg/l against a limit of 30 mg/l, and chemical oxygen demand was 768 mg/l against a limit of 250 mg/l, Misra added.
Central Pollution Control Board officials said they had made it compulsory for all industries to have effluent treatment plants. “Most industries have installed ETPs but either the treatment is not up to mark or not all effluent is reaching the ETPs. We have set up a real time water pollution monitoring station at Wazirabad where we monitor 10 parameters... heavy metals are not monitored as they cannot be treated in the plants,” said an official.
=== THE WISH LIST ===
Haryana government release more water from Hathnikund Barrage for Uttar Pradesh
Alternate arrangement be made for disposal of untreated sewage in Delhi, which is at present dumped into the river at 22 places
The holy river be given due respect
=== TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS ===
Skin diseases, including cancer, among people in Mathura and other neighbouring areas
Crops & cattle suffering too
Toxic waste in river water has upset the natural habitat of birds and smaller animals
[[Category:Rivers|Y]]
[[Category:India|Y]]
[[Category:S&T|Y]]
[[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary|Y]]
[[Category:Government|Y]] |
| New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext) | == Yamuna, pollution in the river ==
[[File:Yamuna1.jpg|Supreme Court and Yamuna|frame|500px]]
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
Title and authorship of the original article(s)</div>
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:150%">
6,500cr and 19yrs later, Yamuna dirtier than ever/ Clean-Up Plan Flops, SC Review Today
By '''Neha Lalchandani, Add source''', 2013/03/11 </div>
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:110%">
[http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/03/11&PageLabel=3&EntityId=Ar00301&ViewMode=HTML The Times of India] </div>
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This is a newspaper article selected for the excellence of its content.<br/>You can help by converting it into an encyclopedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br/>Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br/>and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br/>
See [[examples]] and a tutorial.</div>
|}
New Delhi: [In 1994?] the Supreme Court first scrutinized pollution in the Yamuna. Innumerable orders later, Yamuna is dirtier than ever with a mind-numbing Rs 6,500 crore spent to clean the river and the latest plan — interceptor sewers — going
On Monday, when SC reviews Yamuna’s pollution, it could be back to the drawing board. Six years after the Delhi Jal Board proposed interceptor sewers to treat sewage before it flows into major drains, just Rs 51 crore of the Rs 1,963 crore scheme has been spent.
Worse, it is not even clear if the measure that was to improve water quality by 2010 will actually work in light of the rapid growth of unauthorized colonies discharging sewage into the river, an issue flagged even in 2007 by an official committee that approved the interceptor proposal.
The committee had warned that 1,432 unauthorized colonies were the nub of the problem. By 2012, their number had jumped to 1,639. Although these colonies have been promised regularization, drainage and sewers are years away. In 2007, 517 of 567 unauthorized regularized colonies had sewers. The number grew by just six in the next five years. DJB says it is tough to provide sewerage in such densely populated colonies where they have barely any road space for their work.
A report submitted to the court by an inspection team that included amicus curiae Ranjit Kumar as recently as November last year called for sewage connections to all new colonies, whether authorized or not.
It pointed out that Delhi’s 17 sewage treatment plants (STPs) have a capacity of 2,460 MGD against utilization of 1,558 MGD. Delhi’s sewage generation is around 3,800 MGD.
=== THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER ===
6,500cr spent by Delhi, UP and Haryana to clean Yamuna. This includes central funds. No improvement in water quality in past 8 yrs Only 51cr of 1,963cr sanctioned for interceptor drains spent. Scheme proposed in 2007, was to deliver results by 2010
Number of unauthorized colonies has jumped from
1,432 in 2007 to 1,639 in 2012
Only 55% of Delhi’s population served by sewer system
Delhi’s installed sewage treatment capacity is 2,460 MLD. Sewage generated is 3,800 MLD. But just 63% of installed capacity is being used
City’s biggest drain, Najafgarh, discharges 2,064 MLD. Only 30% is treated.
Worse, treated sewage is again mixed with waste
SC-mandated team inspected 4 sewage treatment plants in November 2012.
All four were deficient
=== Heavy metals in city’s drinking water ===
New Delhi:Delhi’s drinking water is contaminated with tonnes of industrial waste. Industries located upstream of the Yamuna have been found to be discharging untreated waste into the river, leading to the presence of heavy metals in water that is picked up at Wazirabad to meet the city’s drinking water needs.
Manoj Misra of the Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan had water from the Dhanura Escape — a channel that empties into the Yamuna — tested at a laboratory in Gwalior and found that the levels of chromium, lead and iron were higher than permissible. “While chromium was 0.13 mg/l against 0.05 mg/l, lead was 0.035 mg/l against 0.01mg/l and iron was 3.51mg/l against a permissible 0.1 mg/l. The presence of heavy metals is even more problematic since the treatment plants in Delhi are not equipped to detect or treat them,” said Misra.
Pollution from industries in Haryana, especially those located in and around Panipat and Sonepat, has caused treatment plants to stop functioning on several occasions after ammonia level went so high that it could not be treated. Untreated industrial effluent from Yamuna Nagar, Misra said, is released into the Dhanura Escape from where it meets the river upstream of Kunjpura in the Karnal district.
“Similarly, toxic waste from Panipat falls into the Yamuna near the village of Simla Gujran in Panipat district. Samples from the Dhanura Escape show presence of heavy metals, known health hazards and a clear indication of industrial pollution. This water is picked up at Wazirabad for treatment at Chandrawal and Wazirabad treatment plants,” he said.
Other than heavy metals, other pollutants, too, were much higher than BIS norms for drinking water. Total coliform was 1,200 against the permissible limit of 10, total dissolved solids were 3,324 against the permissible limit of 500, biochemical oxygen demand was 240 mg/l against a limit of 30 mg/l, and chemical oxygen demand was 768 mg/l against a limit of 250 mg/l, Misra added.
Central Pollution Control Board officials said they had made it compulsory for all industries to have effluent treatment plants. “Most industries have installed ETPs but either the treatment is not up to mark or not all effluent is reaching the ETPs. We have set up a real time water pollution monitoring station at Wazirabad where we monitor 10 parameters... heavy metals are not monitored as they cannot be treated in the plants,” said an official.
=== THE WISH LIST ===
Haryana government release more water from Hathnikund Barrage for Uttar Pradesh
Alternate arrangement be made for disposal of untreated sewage in Delhi, which is at present dumped into the river at 22 places
The holy river be given due respect
Was totally stuck until I read this, now back up and rnuinng. |
| Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff) | @@ -66,14 +66,4 @@
The holy river be given due respect
-=== TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS ===
-
-Skin diseases, including cancer, among people in Mathura and other neighbouring areas
-Crops & cattle suffering too
-Toxic waste in river water has upset the natural habitat of birds and smaller animals
-
-[[Category:Rivers|Y]]
-[[Category:India|Y]]
-[[Category:S&T|Y]]
-[[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary|Y]]
-[[Category:Government|Y]]
+Was totally stuck until I read this, now back up and rnuinng. |
| New page size (new_size) | 6384 |
| Old page size (old_size) | 6696 |
| Size change in edit (edit_delta) | -312 |
| Lines added in edit (added_lines) | Was totally stuck until I read this, now back up and rnuinng.
|
| Lines removed in edit (removed_lines) | === TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS ===
Skin diseases, including cancer, among people in Mathura and other neighbouring areas
Crops & cattle suffering too
Toxic waste in river water has upset the natural habitat of birds and smaller animals
[[Category:Rivers|Y]]
[[Category:India|Y]]
[[Category:S&T|Y]]
[[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary|Y]]
[[Category:Government|Y]]
|
| All external links in the new text (all_links) | http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/03/11&PageLabel=3&EntityId=Ar00301&ViewMode=HTML
|
| Links in the page, before the edit (old_links) | http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/03/11&PageLabel=3&EntityId=Ar00301&ViewMode=HTML
|
| All external links added in the edit (added_links) | |
| All external links removed in the edit (removed_links) | |
| Parsed HTML source of the new revision (new_html) | <table id="toc" class="toc"><tr><td><div id="toctitle"><h2>Contents</h2></div>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-1"><a href="#Yamuna.2C_pollution_in_the_river"><span class="tocnumber">1</span> <span class="toctext">Yamuna, pollution in the river</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2"><a href="#THROWING_MONEY_IN_THE_RIVER"><span class="tocnumber">1.1</span> <span class="toctext">THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-3"><a href="#Heavy_metals_in_city.E2.80.99s_drinking_water"><span class="tocnumber">1.2</span> <span class="toctext">Heavy metals in city’s drinking water</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-4"><a href="#THE_WISH_LIST"><span class="tocnumber">1.3</span> <span class="toctext">THE WISH LIST</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</td></tr></table>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=1" title="Edit section: Yamuna, pollution in the river">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Yamuna.2C_pollution_in_the_river"> Yamuna, pollution in the river </span></h2>
<div class="thumb tright"><div class="thumbinner" style="width:481px;"><a href="/ind/index.php/File:Yamuna1.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="/ind/images/d/d8/Yamuna1.jpg" width="479" height="536" class="thumbimage" /></a> <div class="thumbcaption">Supreme Court and Yamuna</div></div></div>
<table class="wikitable">
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:100%">
Title and authorship of the original article(s)</div>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:150%">
<p>6,500cr and 19yrs later, Yamuna dirtier than ever/ Clean-Up Plan Flops, SC Review Today
</p>
By <b>Neha Lalchandani, Add source</b>, 2013/03/11 </div>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:110%">
<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/03/11&PageLabel=3&EntityId=Ar00301&ViewMode=HTML">The Times of India</a> </div>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:100%">
<p>This is a newspaper article selected for the excellence of its content.<br />You can help by converting it into an encyclopedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br />Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br />and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br />
</p>
See <a href="/ind/index.php/Examples" title="Examples">examples</a> and a tutorial.</div>
</td></tr></table>
<p>New Delhi: [In 1994?] the Supreme Court first scrutinized pollution in the Yamuna. Innumerable orders later, Yamuna is dirtier than ever with a mind-numbing Rs 6,500 crore spent to clean the river and the latest plan — interceptor sewers — going
</p><p>On Monday, when SC reviews Yamuna’s pollution, it could be back to the drawing board. Six years after the Delhi Jal Board proposed interceptor sewers to treat sewage before it flows into major drains, just Rs 51 crore of the Rs 1,963 crore scheme has been spent.
</p><p>Worse, it is not even clear if the measure that was to improve water quality by 2010 will actually work in light of the rapid growth of unauthorized colonies discharging sewage into the river, an issue flagged even in 2007 by an official committee that approved the interceptor proposal.
</p><p>The committee had warned that 1,432 unauthorized colonies were the nub of the problem. By 2012, their number had jumped to 1,639. Although these colonies have been promised regularization, drainage and sewers are years away. In 2007, 517 of 567 unauthorized regularized colonies had sewers. The number grew by just six in the next five years. DJB says it is tough to provide sewerage in such densely populated colonies where they have barely any road space for their work.
</p><p>A report submitted to the court by an inspection team that included amicus curiae Ranjit Kumar as recently as November last year called for sewage connections to all new colonies, whether authorized or not.
</p><p>It pointed out that Delhi’s 17 sewage treatment plants (STPs) have a capacity of 2,460 MGD against utilization of 1,558 MGD. Delhi’s sewage generation is around 3,800 MGD.
</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=2" title="Edit section: THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="THROWING_MONEY_IN_THE_RIVER"> THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER </span></h3>
<p>6,500cr spent by Delhi, UP and Haryana to clean Yamuna. This includes central funds. No improvement in water quality in past 8 yrs Only 51cr of 1,963cr sanctioned for interceptor drains spent. Scheme proposed in 2007, was to deliver results by 2010
Number of unauthorized colonies has jumped from
1,432 in 2007 to 1,639 in 2012
</p><p>Only 55% of Delhi’s population served by sewer system
</p><p>Delhi’s installed sewage treatment capacity is 2,460 MLD. Sewage generated is 3,800 MLD. But just 63% of installed capacity is being used
</p><p>City’s biggest drain, Najafgarh, discharges 2,064 MLD. Only 30% is treated.
</p><p>Worse, treated sewage is again mixed with waste
</p><p>SC-mandated team inspected 4 sewage treatment plants in November 2012.
</p><p>All four were deficient
</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=3" title="Edit section: Heavy metals in city’s drinking water">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Heavy_metals_in_city.E2.80.99s_drinking_water"> Heavy metals in city’s drinking water </span></h3>
<p>New Delhi:Delhi’s drinking water is contaminated with tonnes of industrial waste. Industries located upstream of the Yamuna have been found to be discharging untreated waste into the river, leading to the presence of heavy metals in water that is picked up at Wazirabad to meet the city’s drinking water needs.
</p><p>Manoj Misra of the Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan had water from the Dhanura Escape — a channel that empties into the Yamuna — tested at a laboratory in Gwalior and found that the levels of chromium, lead and iron were higher than permissible. “While chromium was 0.13 mg/l against 0.05 mg/l, lead was 0.035 mg/l against 0.01mg/l and iron was 3.51mg/l against a permissible 0.1 mg/l. The presence of heavy metals is even more problematic since the treatment plants in Delhi are not equipped to detect or treat them,” said Misra.
</p><p>Pollution from industries in Haryana, especially those located in and around Panipat and Sonepat, has caused treatment plants to stop functioning on several occasions after ammonia level went so high that it could not be treated. Untreated industrial effluent from Yamuna Nagar, Misra said, is released into the Dhanura Escape from where it meets the river upstream of Kunjpura in the Karnal district.
</p><p>“Similarly, toxic waste from Panipat falls into the Yamuna near the village of Simla Gujran in Panipat district. Samples from the Dhanura Escape show presence of heavy metals, known health hazards and a clear indication of industrial pollution. This water is picked up at Wazirabad for treatment at Chandrawal and Wazirabad treatment plants,” he said.
</p><p>Other than heavy metals, other pollutants, too, were much higher than BIS norms for drinking water. Total coliform was 1,200 against the permissible limit of 10, total dissolved solids were 3,324 against the permissible limit of 500, biochemical oxygen demand was 240 mg/l against a limit of 30 mg/l, and chemical oxygen demand was 768 mg/l against a limit of 250 mg/l, Misra added.
</p><p>Central Pollution Control Board officials said they had made it compulsory for all industries to have effluent treatment plants. “Most industries have installed ETPs but either the treatment is not up to mark or not all effluent is reaching the ETPs. We have set up a real time water pollution monitoring station at Wazirabad where we monitor 10 parameters... heavy metals are not monitored as they cannot be treated in the plants,” said an official.
</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=4" title="Edit section: THE WISH LIST">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="THE_WISH_LIST"> THE WISH LIST </span></h3>
<p>Haryana government release more water from Hathnikund Barrage for Uttar Pradesh
</p><p>Alternate arrangement be made for disposal of untreated sewage in Delhi, which is at present dumped into the river at 22 places
</p><p>The holy river be given due respect
</p><p>Was totally stuck until I read this, now back up and rnuinng.
</p> |
| New page text, stripped of any markup (new_text) | Contents
1 Yamuna, pollution in the river
1.1 THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER
1.2 Heavy metals in city’s drinking water
1.3 THE WISH LIST
[edit] Yamuna, pollution in the river
Supreme Court and Yamuna
Title and authorship of the original article(s)
6,500cr and 19yrs later, Yamuna dirtier than ever/ Clean-Up Plan Flops, SC Review Today
By Neha Lalchandani, Add source, 2013/03/11
The Times of India
This is a newspaper article selected for the excellence of its content.You can help by converting it into an encyclopedia-style entry,deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.
See examples and a tutorial.
New Delhi: [In 1994?] the Supreme Court first scrutinized pollution in the Yamuna. Innumerable orders later, Yamuna is dirtier than ever with a mind-numbing Rs 6,500 crore spent to clean the river and the latest plan — interceptor sewers — going
On Monday, when SC reviews Yamuna’s pollution, it could be back to the drawing board. Six years after the Delhi Jal Board proposed interceptor sewers to treat sewage before it flows into major drains, just Rs 51 crore of the Rs 1,963 crore scheme has been spent.
Worse, it is not even clear if the measure that was to improve water quality by 2010 will actually work in light of the rapid growth of unauthorized colonies discharging sewage into the river, an issue flagged even in 2007 by an official committee that approved the interceptor proposal.
The committee had warned that 1,432 unauthorized colonies were the nub of the problem. By 2012, their number had jumped to 1,639. Although these colonies have been promised regularization, drainage and sewers are years away. In 2007, 517 of 567 unauthorized regularized colonies had sewers. The number grew by just six in the next five years. DJB says it is tough to provide sewerage in such densely populated colonies where they have barely any road space for their work.
A report submitted to the court by an inspection team that included amicus curiae Ranjit Kumar as recently as November last year called for sewage connections to all new colonies, whether authorized or not.
It pointed out that Delhi’s 17 sewage treatment plants (STPs) have a capacity of 2,460 MGD against utilization of 1,558 MGD. Delhi’s sewage generation is around 3,800 MGD.
[edit] THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER
6,500cr spent by Delhi, UP and Haryana to clean Yamuna. This includes central funds. No improvement in water quality in past 8 yrs Only 51cr of 1,963cr sanctioned for interceptor drains spent. Scheme proposed in 2007, was to deliver results by 2010
Number of unauthorized colonies has jumped from
1,432 in 2007 to 1,639 in 2012
Only 55% of Delhi’s population served by sewer system
Delhi’s installed sewage treatment capacity is 2,460 MLD. Sewage generated is 3,800 MLD. But just 63% of installed capacity is being used
City’s biggest drain, Najafgarh, discharges 2,064 MLD. Only 30% is treated.
Worse, treated sewage is again mixed with waste
SC-mandated team inspected 4 sewage treatment plants in November 2012.
All four were deficient
[edit] Heavy metals in city’s drinking water
New Delhi:Delhi’s drinking water is contaminated with tonnes of industrial waste. Industries located upstream of the Yamuna have been found to be discharging untreated waste into the river, leading to the presence of heavy metals in water that is picked up at Wazirabad to meet the city’s drinking water needs.
Manoj Misra of the Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan had water from the Dhanura Escape — a channel that empties into the Yamuna — tested at a laboratory in Gwalior and found that the levels of chromium, lead and iron were higher than permissible. “While chromium was 0.13 mg/l against 0.05 mg/l, lead was 0.035 mg/l against 0.01mg/l and iron was 3.51mg/l against a permissible 0.1 mg/l. The presence of heavy metals is even more problematic since the treatment plants in Delhi are not equipped to detect or treat them,” said Misra.
Pollution from industries in Haryana, especially those located in and around Panipat and Sonepat, has caused treatment plants to stop functioning on several occasions after ammonia level went so high that it could not be treated. Untreated industrial effluent from Yamuna Nagar, Misra said, is released into the Dhanura Escape from where it meets the river upstream of Kunjpura in the Karnal district.
“Similarly, toxic waste from Panipat falls into the Yamuna near the village of Simla Gujran in Panipat district. Samples from the Dhanura Escape show presence of heavy metals, known health hazards and a clear indication of industrial pollution. This water is picked up at Wazirabad for treatment at Chandrawal and Wazirabad treatment plants,” he said.
Other than heavy metals, other pollutants, too, were much higher than BIS norms for drinking water. Total coliform was 1,200 against the permissible limit of 10, total dissolved solids were 3,324 against the permissible limit of 500, biochemical oxygen demand was 240 mg/l against a limit of 30 mg/l, and chemical oxygen demand was 768 mg/l against a limit of 250 mg/l, Misra added.
Central Pollution Control Board officials said they had made it compulsory for all industries to have effluent treatment plants. “Most industries have installed ETPs but either the treatment is not up to mark or not all effluent is reaching the ETPs. We have set up a real time water pollution monitoring station at Wazirabad where we monitor 10 parameters... heavy metals are not monitored as they cannot be treated in the plants,” said an official.
[edit] THE WISH LIST
Haryana government release more water from Hathnikund Barrage for Uttar Pradesh
Alternate arrangement be made for disposal of untreated sewage in Delhi, which is at present dumped into the river at 22 places
The holy river be given due respect
Was totally stuck until I read this, now back up and rnuinng.
|
| old_html | <table id="toc" class="toc"><tr><td><div id="toctitle"><h2>Contents</h2></div>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-1"><a href="#Yamuna.2C_pollution_in_the_river"><span class="tocnumber">1</span> <span class="toctext">Yamuna, pollution in the river</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2"><a href="#THROWING_MONEY_IN_THE_RIVER"><span class="tocnumber">1.1</span> <span class="toctext">THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-3"><a href="#Heavy_metals_in_city.E2.80.99s_drinking_water"><span class="tocnumber">1.2</span> <span class="toctext">Heavy metals in city’s drinking water</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-4"><a href="#THE_WISH_LIST"><span class="tocnumber">1.3</span> <span class="toctext">THE WISH LIST</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-5"><a href="#TOXIC_RIVER:_ITS_RAMIFICATIONS"><span class="tocnumber">1.4</span> <span class="toctext">TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</td></tr></table>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=1" title="Edit section: Yamuna, pollution in the river">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Yamuna.2C_pollution_in_the_river"> Yamuna, pollution in the river </span></h2>
<div class="thumb tright"><div class="thumbinner" style="width:481px;"><a href="/ind/index.php/File:Yamuna1.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="/ind/images/d/d8/Yamuna1.jpg" width="479" height="536" class="thumbimage" /></a> <div class="thumbcaption">Supreme Court and Yamuna</div></div></div>
<table class="wikitable">
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:100%">
Title and authorship of the original article(s)</div>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:150%">
<p>6,500cr and 19yrs later, Yamuna dirtier than ever/ Clean-Up Plan Flops, SC Review Today
</p>
By <b>Neha Lalchandani, Add source</b>, 2013/03/11 </div>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:110%">
<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/03/11&PageLabel=3&EntityId=Ar00301&ViewMode=HTML">The Times of India</a> </div>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:100%">
<p>This is a newspaper article selected for the excellence of its content.<br />You can help by converting it into an encyclopedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br />Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br />and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br />
</p>
See <a href="/ind/index.php/Examples" title="Examples">examples</a> and a tutorial.</div>
</td></tr></table>
<p>New Delhi: [In 1994?] the Supreme Court first scrutinized pollution in the Yamuna. Innumerable orders later, Yamuna is dirtier than ever with a mind-numbing Rs 6,500 crore spent to clean the river and the latest plan — interceptor sewers — going
</p><p>On Monday, when SC reviews Yamuna’s pollution, it could be back to the drawing board. Six years after the Delhi Jal Board proposed interceptor sewers to treat sewage before it flows into major drains, just Rs 51 crore of the Rs 1,963 crore scheme has been spent.
</p><p>Worse, it is not even clear if the measure that was to improve water quality by 2010 will actually work in light of the rapid growth of unauthorized colonies discharging sewage into the river, an issue flagged even in 2007 by an official committee that approved the interceptor proposal.
</p><p>The committee had warned that 1,432 unauthorized colonies were the nub of the problem. By 2012, their number had jumped to 1,639. Although these colonies have been promised regularization, drainage and sewers are years away. In 2007, 517 of 567 unauthorized regularized colonies had sewers. The number grew by just six in the next five years. DJB says it is tough to provide sewerage in such densely populated colonies where they have barely any road space for their work.
</p><p>A report submitted to the court by an inspection team that included amicus curiae Ranjit Kumar as recently as November last year called for sewage connections to all new colonies, whether authorized or not.
</p><p>It pointed out that Delhi’s 17 sewage treatment plants (STPs) have a capacity of 2,460 MGD against utilization of 1,558 MGD. Delhi’s sewage generation is around 3,800 MGD.
</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=2" title="Edit section: THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="THROWING_MONEY_IN_THE_RIVER"> THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER </span></h3>
<p>6,500cr spent by Delhi, UP and Haryana to clean Yamuna. This includes central funds. No improvement in water quality in past 8 yrs Only 51cr of 1,963cr sanctioned for interceptor drains spent. Scheme proposed in 2007, was to deliver results by 2010
Number of unauthorized colonies has jumped from
1,432 in 2007 to 1,639 in 2012
</p><p>Only 55% of Delhi’s population served by sewer system
</p><p>Delhi’s installed sewage treatment capacity is 2,460 MLD. Sewage generated is 3,800 MLD. But just 63% of installed capacity is being used
</p><p>City’s biggest drain, Najafgarh, discharges 2,064 MLD. Only 30% is treated.
</p><p>Worse, treated sewage is again mixed with waste
</p><p>SC-mandated team inspected 4 sewage treatment plants in November 2012.
</p><p>All four were deficient
</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=3" title="Edit section: Heavy metals in city’s drinking water">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Heavy_metals_in_city.E2.80.99s_drinking_water"> Heavy metals in city’s drinking water </span></h3>
<p>New Delhi:Delhi’s drinking water is contaminated with tonnes of industrial waste. Industries located upstream of the Yamuna have been found to be discharging untreated waste into the river, leading to the presence of heavy metals in water that is picked up at Wazirabad to meet the city’s drinking water needs.
</p><p>Manoj Misra of the Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan had water from the Dhanura Escape — a channel that empties into the Yamuna — tested at a laboratory in Gwalior and found that the levels of chromium, lead and iron were higher than permissible. “While chromium was 0.13 mg/l against 0.05 mg/l, lead was 0.035 mg/l against 0.01mg/l and iron was 3.51mg/l against a permissible 0.1 mg/l. The presence of heavy metals is even more problematic since the treatment plants in Delhi are not equipped to detect or treat them,” said Misra.
</p><p>Pollution from industries in Haryana, especially those located in and around Panipat and Sonepat, has caused treatment plants to stop functioning on several occasions after ammonia level went so high that it could not be treated. Untreated industrial effluent from Yamuna Nagar, Misra said, is released into the Dhanura Escape from where it meets the river upstream of Kunjpura in the Karnal district.
</p><p>“Similarly, toxic waste from Panipat falls into the Yamuna near the village of Simla Gujran in Panipat district. Samples from the Dhanura Escape show presence of heavy metals, known health hazards and a clear indication of industrial pollution. This water is picked up at Wazirabad for treatment at Chandrawal and Wazirabad treatment plants,” he said.
</p><p>Other than heavy metals, other pollutants, too, were much higher than BIS norms for drinking water. Total coliform was 1,200 against the permissible limit of 10, total dissolved solids were 3,324 against the permissible limit of 500, biochemical oxygen demand was 240 mg/l against a limit of 30 mg/l, and chemical oxygen demand was 768 mg/l against a limit of 250 mg/l, Misra added.
</p><p>Central Pollution Control Board officials said they had made it compulsory for all industries to have effluent treatment plants. “Most industries have installed ETPs but either the treatment is not up to mark or not all effluent is reaching the ETPs. We have set up a real time water pollution monitoring station at Wazirabad where we monitor 10 parameters... heavy metals are not monitored as they cannot be treated in the plants,” said an official.
</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=4" title="Edit section: THE WISH LIST">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="THE_WISH_LIST"> THE WISH LIST </span></h3>
<p>Haryana government release more water from Hathnikund Barrage for Uttar Pradesh
</p><p>Alternate arrangement be made for disposal of untreated sewage in Delhi, which is at present dumped into the river at 22 places
</p><p>The holy river be given due respect
</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=River_Yamuna&action=edit&section=5" title="Edit section: TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="TOXIC_RIVER:_ITS_RAMIFICATIONS"> TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS </span></h3>
<p>Skin diseases, including cancer, among people in Mathura and other neighbouring areas
Crops & cattle suffering too
Toxic waste in river water has upset the natural habitat of birds and smaller animals
</p> |
| old_text | Contents
1 Yamuna, pollution in the river
1.1 THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER
1.2 Heavy metals in city’s drinking water
1.3 THE WISH LIST
1.4 TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS
[edit] Yamuna, pollution in the river
Supreme Court and Yamuna
Title and authorship of the original article(s)
6,500cr and 19yrs later, Yamuna dirtier than ever/ Clean-Up Plan Flops, SC Review Today
By Neha Lalchandani, Add source, 2013/03/11
The Times of India
This is a newspaper article selected for the excellence of its content.You can help by converting it into an encyclopedia-style entry,deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.
See examples and a tutorial.
New Delhi: [In 1994?] the Supreme Court first scrutinized pollution in the Yamuna. Innumerable orders later, Yamuna is dirtier than ever with a mind-numbing Rs 6,500 crore spent to clean the river and the latest plan — interceptor sewers — going
On Monday, when SC reviews Yamuna’s pollution, it could be back to the drawing board. Six years after the Delhi Jal Board proposed interceptor sewers to treat sewage before it flows into major drains, just Rs 51 crore of the Rs 1,963 crore scheme has been spent.
Worse, it is not even clear if the measure that was to improve water quality by 2010 will actually work in light of the rapid growth of unauthorized colonies discharging sewage into the river, an issue flagged even in 2007 by an official committee that approved the interceptor proposal.
The committee had warned that 1,432 unauthorized colonies were the nub of the problem. By 2012, their number had jumped to 1,639. Although these colonies have been promised regularization, drainage and sewers are years away. In 2007, 517 of 567 unauthorized regularized colonies had sewers. The number grew by just six in the next five years. DJB says it is tough to provide sewerage in such densely populated colonies where they have barely any road space for their work.
A report submitted to the court by an inspection team that included amicus curiae Ranjit Kumar as recently as November last year called for sewage connections to all new colonies, whether authorized or not.
It pointed out that Delhi’s 17 sewage treatment plants (STPs) have a capacity of 2,460 MGD against utilization of 1,558 MGD. Delhi’s sewage generation is around 3,800 MGD.
[edit] THROWING MONEY IN THE RIVER
6,500cr spent by Delhi, UP and Haryana to clean Yamuna. This includes central funds. No improvement in water quality in past 8 yrs Only 51cr of 1,963cr sanctioned for interceptor drains spent. Scheme proposed in 2007, was to deliver results by 2010
Number of unauthorized colonies has jumped from
1,432 in 2007 to 1,639 in 2012
Only 55% of Delhi’s population served by sewer system
Delhi’s installed sewage treatment capacity is 2,460 MLD. Sewage generated is 3,800 MLD. But just 63% of installed capacity is being used
City’s biggest drain, Najafgarh, discharges 2,064 MLD. Only 30% is treated.
Worse, treated sewage is again mixed with waste
SC-mandated team inspected 4 sewage treatment plants in November 2012.
All four were deficient
[edit] Heavy metals in city’s drinking water
New Delhi:Delhi’s drinking water is contaminated with tonnes of industrial waste. Industries located upstream of the Yamuna have been found to be discharging untreated waste into the river, leading to the presence of heavy metals in water that is picked up at Wazirabad to meet the city’s drinking water needs.
Manoj Misra of the Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan had water from the Dhanura Escape — a channel that empties into the Yamuna — tested at a laboratory in Gwalior and found that the levels of chromium, lead and iron were higher than permissible. “While chromium was 0.13 mg/l against 0.05 mg/l, lead was 0.035 mg/l against 0.01mg/l and iron was 3.51mg/l against a permissible 0.1 mg/l. The presence of heavy metals is even more problematic since the treatment plants in Delhi are not equipped to detect or treat them,” said Misra.
Pollution from industries in Haryana, especially those located in and around Panipat and Sonepat, has caused treatment plants to stop functioning on several occasions after ammonia level went so high that it could not be treated. Untreated industrial effluent from Yamuna Nagar, Misra said, is released into the Dhanura Escape from where it meets the river upstream of Kunjpura in the Karnal district.
“Similarly, toxic waste from Panipat falls into the Yamuna near the village of Simla Gujran in Panipat district. Samples from the Dhanura Escape show presence of heavy metals, known health hazards and a clear indication of industrial pollution. This water is picked up at Wazirabad for treatment at Chandrawal and Wazirabad treatment plants,” he said.
Other than heavy metals, other pollutants, too, were much higher than BIS norms for drinking water. Total coliform was 1,200 against the permissible limit of 10, total dissolved solids were 3,324 against the permissible limit of 500, biochemical oxygen demand was 240 mg/l against a limit of 30 mg/l, and chemical oxygen demand was 768 mg/l against a limit of 250 mg/l, Misra added.
Central Pollution Control Board officials said they had made it compulsory for all industries to have effluent treatment plants. “Most industries have installed ETPs but either the treatment is not up to mark or not all effluent is reaching the ETPs. We have set up a real time water pollution monitoring station at Wazirabad where we monitor 10 parameters... heavy metals are not monitored as they cannot be treated in the plants,” said an official.
[edit] THE WISH LIST
Haryana government release more water from Hathnikund Barrage for Uttar Pradesh
Alternate arrangement be made for disposal of untreated sewage in Delhi, which is at present dumped into the river at 22 places
The holy river be given due respect
[edit] TOXIC RIVER: ITS RAMIFICATIONS
Skin diseases, including cancer, among people in Mathura and other neighbouring areas
Crops & cattle suffering too
Toxic waste in river water has upset the natural habitat of birds and smaller animals
|
| Unix timestamp of change (timestamp) | 1366497099 |
