Pensions and retirement: India
From Indpaedia
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "[[File: In 2015, the Indian retirement income system was the worst among the 25measured.jpg|In 2015, the Indian retirement income system was the worst among the 25measured; Gr...") |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=PUTTING-INDIA-ON-THE-MAP-13122015027009 ''The Times of India''], Dec 13 2015 | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=PUTTING-INDIA-ON-THE-MAP-13122015027009 ''The Times of India''], Dec 13 2015 | ||
| | ||
| + | |||
'''No country to retire''' | '''No country to retire''' | ||
| + | |||
The Indian retirement system was ranked last worldwide, while Denmark topped the list of countries in the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index 2015. The MMGPI's seventh edition measured 25 retirement income systems against more than 40 indicators, under the sub-indices of adequacy, sustainability and integrity. In the process, it covered nearly 60% of the global population | The Indian retirement system was ranked last worldwide, while Denmark topped the list of countries in the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index 2015. The MMGPI's seventh edition measured 25 retirement income systems against more than 40 indicators, under the sub-indices of adequacy, sustainability and integrity. In the process, it covered nearly 60% of the global population | ||
Revision as of 12:02, 15 December 2015
In 2015, the Indian retirement income system was the worst among the 25measured; Graphic courtesy: The Times of India, December 13, 2015
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Global Pension Index 2015
The Times of India, Dec 13 2015
No country to retire
The Indian retirement system was ranked last worldwide, while Denmark topped the list of countries in the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index 2015. The MMGPI's seventh edition measured 25 retirement income systems against more than 40 indicators, under the sub-indices of adequacy, sustainability and integrity. In the process, it covered nearly 60% of the global population
