Latest revision as of 14:20, 13 August 2024

New: Several sections of this page have been shifted to the page Election expenditure: India

This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. You can help by converting these articles into an encyclopaedia-style entry, deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries. Please also fill in missing details; put categories, headings and sub-headings; and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject. Readers will be able to edit existing articles and post new articles directly on their online archival encyclopædia only after its formal launch. See examples and a tutorial.

1 History
- 1.1 General Elections to the Lok Sabha, 1951- onw
  - 1.1.1 Details 1951 – 2019
  - 1.1.2 The results: 1951-2024
- 1.2 1951: ballot boxes by Godrej & Boyce
- 1.3 1951: many did not know how to vote
2 The major political parties
- 2.1 1952-2014: The two biggest parties
- 2.2 2014>2019
3 Big data
- 3.1 2014-19
  - 3.1.1 2019
4 The biggest electoral clashes
- 4.1 1952-2009
5 Candidates
- 5.1 1998-2014: no. per constituency; non-serious candidates
  - 5.1.1 1996: Nalgonda
- 5.2 Non-serious candidates
6 Caste, religion: the use of
- 6.1 The ‘upper’ castes: voting behaviour
- 6.2 Laws, SC rulings fail to stop election casteism, communalism
- 6.3 Scheduled caste (‘reserved’) seats in UP: the trend
7 Conduct during elections: Model?
- 7.1 Legality of election-eve promises
8 Constituencies: how many voters do they represent?
- 8.1 As in 2019
- 8.2 As in 2024
9 Corruption, corrupt candidates
- 9.1 Corruption does not bother the voter
- 9.2 Indeed, the perception is corrupt leaders can move things
10 Expenditures
- 10.1 Gujarat, 2017
11 First-past-the-post system
- 11.1 Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won
  - 11.1.1 1951-2019
12 ‘Inauspicious’ periods
- 12.1 Holashtak days of March
13 Indelible ink
- 13.1 Quantities ordered: 2009-19
14 Independent candidates
- 14.1 1957-2014: electoral performance
- 14.2 More Independents win in Karnataka than other big states
15 Landslides: Major electoral landslides
- 15.1 1951-2015
16 Length of polling process
- 16.1 1951-52
- 16.2 Why Indian elections have stretch for weeks since the 1990s
  - 16.2.1 1952-2014: votes received by the winning party
17 Mandate: the representativeness of political parties
- 17.1 The mandate for the ruling party/ coalition: Its size 1952-2014
- 17.2 1957-2014: vote share of party that obtained the majority of seats
- 17.3 1951-2019
- 17.4 One MP for 16,00,000 voters
- 17.5 Are candidates elected by at least 50% of the voters?
  - 17.5.1 DELHI TOPS
18 Manifestoes
- 18.1 2004-19: Cong normally released it before BJP
- 18.2 The things that are given to voters as bribes
19 Margins of victory
- 19.1 One vote margins
- 19.2 The highest and lowest margins
- 19.3 Pritam Munde, 2014
- 19.4 1989, 1998
- 19.5 1977, 2019
- 19.6 As a %age: Jardosh, 2014
20 Muslim (and SC/ ST) representation in Lok Sabha
- 20.1 1952, 2014
21 NOTA, Use of
- 21.1 2014: state-wise use of NOTA option
- 21.2 2016
- 21.3 Gujarat: NOTA is bigger than the no.3 party
- 21.4 Maharashtra
  - 21.4.1 Mumbai
22 NRI/ overseas voters
- 22.1 2014, 2019: Keralites are the majority
23 Polling period
- 23.1 1977-2024
24 Polling stations
- 24.1 Accessible to disabled persons/ 2019
25 Polling stations in remote areas
- 25.1 Dodging pythons, crocodiles between island booths
- 25.2 Booths with the most and least voters, 2019
- 25.3 Arunachal Pradesh: Malogam
- 25.4 Dumka’s Upper Murgathali, Amlagadhiya
- 25.5 Himachal Pradesh, 2019
  - 25.5.1 Tashigang, HP
- 25.6 Uttaraj (Mt Abu)
- 25.7 Saputara hill range
26 Political parties
- 26.1 Number: 1951>2014
  - 26.1.1 Details
27 Political involvement of the public
- 27.1 2018: Indians among most involved
28 Postal ballots
- 28.1 2004-14: 19.2% were rejected
- 28.2 Seats in which postal ballots made a difference / 2019
29 Predicting results (trying to, the Indian way)
- 29.1 As in 2024
30 Re-elected parliamentarians
- 30.1 1952-2014
31 Security during the election process
- 31.1 Personnel deployed in 2014
32 Symbols used by political parties during elections
- 32.1 2024: Interesting symbols
33 Temperatures, daytime, on general election day
- 33.1 Delhi region
  - 33.1.1 1977-2019
34 Trends
- 34.1 1952-2014: eight major trends
- 34.2 2021 Assembly elections
35 ‘Unopposed’ victors
- 35.1 1951-2024
36 Villages on disputed borders
- 36.1 Andhra Pradesh – Odisha
- 36.2 Maharashtra- Telangana
  - 36.2.1 14 villages
37 Voter enrolment
- 37.1 1952: a sense of belonging
- 37.2 Barely 40% go age 18-19 enrolled as voters
38 Vote percentage vis-à-vis seats won/ ‘Strike rate’
- 38.1 1996-2014: BJP more successful than Congress
39 ’Vote share’ of the contesting parties
- 39.1 1952-2024
- 39.2 1991-2014
40 Voter turnout
- 40.1 What does a high turnout signify?
41 Wars and election results
- 41.1 Indo-Pak conflicts and elections: 1965-1999
42 Women in the Lok Sabha
- 42.1 1952-2014
- 42.2 The representation of women in 2014
43 Women voters
- 43.1 1951-52: 28 lakh dropped from rolls
  - 43.1.1 Burqa, ghoonghat, reluctance to disclose names
- 43.2 1962, 2019
- 43.3 2014> 2019: a sharp increase
44 See also
- 44.1 ...and also

[edit] History

[edit] General Elections to the Lok Sabha, 1951- onw

Lok Sabha

The first General Elections were held from 25 October 1951 to 21 February 1952;

the second from 24 February to 14 March 1957;

the third from 19 to 25 February 1962;

the fourth from 17 to 21 February 1967;

the fifth from 1 to 10 March 1971;

the sixth from 16 to 20 March 1977;

the seventh from 3 to 6 January 1980;

the eighth from 24 to 28 December 1984;

the ninth from 22 to 26 November 1989;

the tenth from 20 May to 15 June 1991;

the eleventh from 27 April to 30 May 1996;

the twelfth from 16 to 23 February 1998;

the thirteenth from 5 September to 6 October 1999;

the fourteenth from 20 April to 10 May 2004;

the fifteenth from 16 April to 13 May 2009;

the sixteenth General Elections from 7 April 2014 to 12 May 2014,

the seventeenth General Elections from 11 April 2019 to 19 May 2019 (schedule),

[edit] Details 1951 – 2019

Anubhuti Vishnoi, August 17, 2023: The Times of India

As India heads to the 18th Lok Sabha election after 76 years of Independence, the electoral journey travelled by the largest democracy is one marked with many milestones — the largest electorate in the world at more than 900mn; female voters who closed the gender gap in voter turnout in 2019 and outdid males; and the only country to transition to paperless ballots through electronic voting machines (EVMs). 

The first general election

 Things moved swiftly in independent India with the adoption of the Constitution on November 26, 1949. Four months later, Sukumar Sen was appointed the first chief election commissioner (CEC). With this, the country embarked on the great experiment to conduct the first nationwide election.

 In April 1950, the Representation of People Act was passed by the provisional Parliament. The first general election was held in 68 phases between October 25, 1951 and February 21, 1952. Around 53 political parties and 533 independents were in the fray for 489 seats. Around 173mn voters were registered out of a population of 361mn and 45.8% voter turnout was recorded. 

The Indian National Congress wrested 364 of the 489 seats and Jawaharlal Nehru became India’s first democratically elected prime minister.

 The first general election was what Sen described as “an act of faith”. Every general election still is. 

The genesis of political parties

 The first election opened up new political and electoral fault lines and sowed the seeds of a multi-party democracy.

 While the Congress won and did so for several elections to come, indicating a ‘national consensus’, new political formations emerged over the following decades.

Of the 14 parties in the fray in 1952, four retained the national status among them, some by ministers previously in the Nehru-led government who had resigned to form their own parties. 

Syama Prasad Mookerjee quit Nehru’s provisional ministry to later form the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the reincarnation of which in 1980 was the Bharatiya Janata Party, which has formed five Union governments so far, including the current one.

 The Communist Party of India (CPI) also contested the first general election and became the principal Opposition party winning 16 seats. It split in the 1960s and the CPI (Marxist) faction grew stronger in political influence over the years. It supported the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government in 2004 but withdrew support over the Indo-US nuclear deal. It is today allied with the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) and leads the ruling alliance in Kerala, apart from being part of the Nitish Kumar-led alliance in Bihar and also supports the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government in Tamil Nadu.

Law minister BR Ambedkar revived the Scheduled Castes Federation, which later led to the creation of the Republican Party of India that splintered into nearly 50 factions over the years. Acharya Kriplani formed the Kisan Mazdoor Praja Parishad or Praja Party, which merged with Jayaprakash Narayan’s and Ram Manohar Lohia’s Socialist Party to become the Praja Socialist Party (PSP). Many parties formed later had leaders who emerged from the PSP.  There were also parties whose fortunes dwindled over the years and others that merged into similar politically-ideological tents. For instance, the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha of VD Savarkar and Nathuram Godse never notched electoral victories but its strong ‘Hindu rashtra’ underpinnings continue to be reflected in political narratives right into 2023. The Akhil Bharatiya Ram Rajya Parishad (RRP), led by Hariharanand ‘Swami’ Karpatri, also advocated for a ‘Hindu rashtra’. It won three seats in the 1951 polls and later merged with the BJS.  The All-India Forward Bloc, founded by Subhas Chandra Bose, survived several splits and is quite diminished in presence and influence. The Revolutionary Socialist Party has also survived many splits and retains its pockets in West Bengal and Kerala.

Alongside, there was also the rise of regional parties. The Shiromani Akali Dal bagged four seats in the 1952 election and remains a critical stakeholder in Punjab. 

The Jharkhand Party, set up by Jaipal Singh Munda, contested several assembly elections, demanded statehood for Jharkhand and was the principal Opposition to the Congress in Bihar for several years.

 Such changes became deep-driven with alliances and multi-party governments becoming more commonplace as regional and community aspirations found representation in the electoral space. As on date, there are six national parties, 54 state parties and more than 2,500 unrecognised parties in India.

 Even in 2023, both the ruling dispensation and the Opposition are alliances stitched up with several parties that have roots in the first general election. 

Female voters  

India made the big leap with its first election by bringing universal adult franchise — every man and woman over 21 years was allowed to vote. In the late 1980s, the voting age was lowered to 18. 

The first general election was challenging, including in bringing female voters to the polling booth. Women of the era refused to give their complete names due to social inhibitions and would refer to themselves as mother of X, or daughter/wife of Y. No such allowance was permitted by Sen on the voters’ list. It is estimated that more than 2.8mn women could not vote in the first election due to this. 

Sen, still the CEC into the second general election in 1957, launched massive public campaigns and appealed to women to disclose their full names to exercise their voting right. The next election saw better numbers.

 The Election Commission (EC) had to keep at it over the years, methodically addressing various barriers faced by women in participating in elections, from ensuring separate toilets to creche facilities, all-women polling stations and women block-level polling registration staff. And it has worked with phenomenal results.

From men, starting at a 16 percentage point edge over women in voter turnout in 1962, the figure was halved to 8.4 percentage points in the 2004 Lok Sabha election and was down to 1.8 percentage point in 2014.

 The 2019 Lok Sabha election marked a watershed because females closed the gender gap with male voters. They surpassed them at over 67% turnout. From a gender gap (in female to male voter turnout) of -16.71% in 1962, it not only closed but reversed to +0.17% in 2019, the EC noted. India witnessed a 235.72% increase in female electors since the 1971 election. Women have risen to become an independent and important segment for every political party as the election manifestos clearly indicate.

 There is also a rise in the number of women elected to Parliament — from 24 in the first general election to 78 in 2019. This needs to improve as does overall voter turnout — up from 44.8% in the first election to a record 67.4% in the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.  The EC is mindful that migrant and young voters are still not exercising their vote, and discussions have been opened to consider remote voting options. 

Progress in electoral process

 The first general election process involved allotting each candidate a different coloured ballot box with his name and symbol at the polling booth to help even unlettered people to vote. People would cast their vote into the desired candidate’s ballot box. The process took 68 phases of voting. 

The 2019 Lok Sabha election was held in seven phases and within 50 days.

The nation moved fast from this setup. Almost every election has seen a reworking of processes which are now well-etched into the electoral machinery — from preparation of electoral rolls, their summary revision, mapping of vulnerable polling stations, ensuring adequate security deployment among others. There are also fully home-grown technological innovations that are today integral to the poll process.

 The first challenge encountered by the EC was identity theft and multiple votes by a single voter. The indelible ink was brought in for this. Developed with the help of the National Physical Laboratory, the indelible ink was first used in the 1962 election and is still key proof to a voter having cast the vote.

 The most tectonic shift in the electoral landscape came in the late 1990s when the electronic voting machine (EVM) was introduced. The ballot paper had acquired notoriety over ballot loot and manipulation of votes across several states.

 The EVM became the only voting method for general and assembly elections in 2004 and is credited for stamping out the booth-capture model of electioneering of the 1980s. Alongside the EVM came the voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) to help a voter verify the candidate and party he has voted for and dispel impressions on possible hacking of EVMs.

Piloted in the Nagaland polls in 2014, the VVPAT has been used in all assembly and Lok Sabha polls from 2019. Following an SC order on April 9, 2019, the EC also increased the VVPAT slips vote count to five randomly selected EVMs per assembly constituency. The EVM-VVPAT combine has been questioned by several cynics, but continues to stay. The 2024 Lok Sabha election will see EVMs deployed in its latest avatar — the M3.

 Electronically transmitted postal ballot papers, meant to service voters on duty away from their place of domicile, have more recently been extended to senior citizens, which is said to have improved their participation in polls. 

Still miles to go  

Courts have often stepped in on behalf of voters. In 2013, the Supreme Court allowed citizens to cast a negative vote — ‘None of the above’ (Nota). 

Courts have also intervened to ensure greater voter awareness. On its orders, each candidate must declare his criminal antecedents in his poll affidavit.

However, attempts to ensure migrant voting through options like remote voting or for non-resident Indian (NRI) voters have not succeeded so far. Similarly, while the Model Code of Conduct came into effect from the 1962 election, it is found deficient in checking hate speech, bribing of voters and the influence of money power in elections.

 While the symbols order of 1968 and the anti-defection law of 1985 have tried to combat “the evil of political defections” in the lure of office, that has not stopped splits or defections.  The EC, Law Commissions, governments and courts have made recommendations to usher in greater transparency in the electoral system from aspects such as funding to checking criminalisation. Although much has been achieved, much more is waiting to be done. There’s a list of more than 50 electoral reform recommendations that the EC sends to every government, year after year.

[edit] The results: 1951-2024

Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1951- 67
From: March 17, 2024: The Times of India

Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1971-84
From: March 17, 2024: The Times of India

Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1989-98
From: March 17, 2024: The Times of India

Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1999-2014
From: March 17, 2024: The Times of India

See graphics:

Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1951- 67

Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1971-84

Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1989-98

Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1999-2014

[edit] 1951: ballot boxes by Godrej & Boyce

Bhavika Jain1, This Bombay factory made ballot boxes for India’s first poll, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

Bombay policemen guarding the ballot boxes that were used in the first Lok Sabha polls held over 1951-52
From: Bhavika Jain1, This Bombay factory made ballot boxes for India’s first poll, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

Independent India was gearing up to hold its first elections in 1952 and inside a factory in the marshy suburbs of Mumbai’s Vikhroli, the workers were making history, literally.

It was the latter half of 1951 and from the outside, it was business as usual at Plant 1 of the Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. But unbeknownst to many, the workers were part of a nationbuilding project, assigned the task of speedily manufacturing the first ever ballot boxes to be used in general elections in India.

Archives of the company indicate that a total of 12.83 lakh ballot boxes were produced in the Vikhroli factory in barely four months. “A newspaper, Bombay Chronicle, had printed an article on December 15, 1951, saying the factory was manufacturing 15,000 ballot boxes a day.

This, without affecting the production of any of their other products like safes, cupboards, cabinets and locks, proves that the workers at the factory were putting in extra hours every day to ensure that the ballot boxes were readied in time,” said Vrunda Pathare, chief archivist at Godrej.

An official from the archives division said an ad in The Times of India published by Godrej shows that the original order was for 12.24 lakh ballot boxes but they ended up making 12.83 lakh. “It’s probably because orders were given to other companies as well and those who did not finish them in time passed the order on to Godrej in the end,” said the official.

The production cost of one ‘olive green’ box came to Rs 5 and the model was finalised after testing 50 designs. The internal locking system in the ballot box was designed by a factory hand, Nathalal Panchal, after it was found that an external lock would inflate the making cost.

“We have anecdotal evidence that Panchal played a key role in suggesting the design for the internal locking mechanism,” said Pathare. That story is now part of an oral history project of 2006 when company officials interviewed KR Thanewala, the plant manager of Plant 1 in 1951, who is now no more. Thanewala had recalled during the interview that Plant 1 had just started in May 1951.

“Pirojsha Godrej (the owner) would come to the factory at 3 o’clock every afternoon asking us how it was going. And he got orders from other companies who had not somehow or the other managed to make them (ballot boxes). The mechanism was tested. Every box had to be checked. Click when it closes and click it should open. Once it was closed, without putting your finger inside and pulling the string, you cannot unlock it,” he said.

By February 1952, all the ballot boxes were manufactured, loaded onto railway wagons and sent to the 22 states in preparation for the holding of the polls. Thanewala, in his interview, describes how the boxes were moved: “...We had to walk to the station and back. And...I did a lot of night shifts. At night we (used to) light mashaals (torches) and with the mashaal, I used to walk from the railway tracks up to Vikhroli station. It was great fun.”

[edit] 1951: many did not know how to vote

In 1951 many did not know how to vote
From: March 15, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

In 1951 many did not know how to vote

[edit] The major political parties

[edit] 1952-2014: The two biggest parties

1952-2014: The two biggest parties

MIND THE GAP

The Times of India May 17 2014

It was a Congres show in the initial elections. By the late 1980s, the picture began to change. With a fragmented polity, coalition governments became the norm. After 25 years, BJP has changed the script winning a decisive majority

[edit] 2014>2019

The number of registered and/ or recognised political parties in India, 2014>2019
From: April 16, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

The number of registered and/ or recognised political parties in India, 2014>2019

[edit] Big data

[edit] 2014-19

Shubhra Pant, (Additional reporting by Swati Mathur), April 16, 2019: The Times of India

Why this is India’s big data election

You may struggle to read your neta’s mind but the neta has a lot of help reading yours.

This election season, you may have noticed a trend in the kind of political videos popping up on your feeds. And posts related to polls you haven’t participated in but are there for your reading anyway. You might have also noticed ads from election candidates in your vicinity. And when you want to find out what’s trending? There’s a pattern there too, right?

While reading about elections in newspapers, you may have come across a story about the explosion of ‘Gully Boy’ rappers with their politics-themed numbers on Kolkata’s hip-hop scene. What you wouldn’t have known is that West Bengal is among the largest consumers of political videos in the country.

It shows how one trend begets another — in this case, a certain kind of online behaviour creates a demand, and as more videos are produced because of that demand, it drives up the trend line of the behaviour itself. And the politician who has access to this data would know that while the best way to a Bengali’s heart may be through food, the best way to her or his brain is through videos. Trust the WhatsApp group admins to make full use of that.

Pratham Mittal of the Neta App says of the 90 crore voters in India, around 54 crore are unique mobile phone users who have Facebook and WhatsApp accounts, quoting a McKinsey report. “An analysis shows around 30% of the total voters can be influenced with the use of social media in these elections,” Mittal says.

The ongoing Lok Sabha polls may or may not be an election for a new India, but they certainly are an election that’s about Big Data and its consorts — algorithms, analytics and artificial intelligence (AI). They are invisible but everywhere, creating endless patterns of political messaging around you by relentlessly tracking and decoding your online activity. In election season, when the neta wants to be in your head, this Big Data is worth its gigabytes in gold because it allows customised campaigns, just like targeted ads.

For example, if you have interacted with BJP posts of late, the algorithm would know if the nationalism message is for you. Similarly, how you react to Congress’ pet issues would tell the AI whether you like NYAY.

Poll pitch from data

Both national and regional parties are working with huge data sets of online behaviour to understand household and booth-level profiles in a constituency, first-time voters, floating voters, demographics, caste and socio-economic segments. This data is guiding campaign strategy (not only what to talk about but also what not to), selection of candidates as well as building a pro-party narrative.

Congress has given all its candidates a data docket for each constituency. Praveen Chakrabarty, chairman of Congress’ data analytics department, says the dockets have information on households, new voters, missing voters and local issues. “Instead of pushing down a single leader’s message using technology, we empower our party workers with data and technology. These workers pass on personalised or customised messages to voters.” The party tracks its on-ground activity through the Ghar Ghar Congress app.

But BJP is well ahead of others in using Big Data. It started using analytics in the 2014 general election when others were still grappling with the digital medium. But the technology five years ago wasn’t as advanced as today, when it has opened up new avenues to understand voters. Shivam Shankar, a poll strategist who worked with BJP in Manipur and Tripura in 2017 and 2018, and is now with the Grand Alliance in Bihar, says BJP has first-mover advantage. “BJP has around 25,000 WhatApp groups in all northern states whereas, by the time Congress came to forming such groups, the policies were changed by the social media giant. So, there is no way for Congress to match BJP’s reach,” says Shankar.

More personalised, the better

He says besides polling booths and caste, parties also collect data on utility bills (like power bills, which give an idea about the socioeconomic status of a voter). According to Shankar, the game-changer for BJP will be its latest campaign to target beneficiaries of government schemes. “BJP is working on data of beneficiaries of schemes like Ujjwala, which has never been done before. The data is used to approach voters and convince them to vote for the party,” he says. A BJP MLA from the northeast says analytics are also in pace to study conversations on social media WhatsApp, Twitter and Facebook. This not only gives the party an idea about the “narrative” but, with its formidable digital network, allows it easily turn a conversation into a social media trend.

AAP, meanwhile, is working with a team of data researchers and scientists to design its poll strategy. “We use data to identify volunteers at the booth level, which are the booths where AAP is strong and which ones are floating booths and optimise our resources,” says Ankit Lal, who oversees analytics and IT.

Another party which has extensively used social media to canvass is Chandrababu Naidu’s TDP (though it’s now locked in a legal battle with Telangana over voter data). “the village and mandal-level committees upwards, we have party agents who use technology to target people about things we have promised and delivered,” says TDP spokesperson Rammohan Rao.

In Tamil Nadu, DMK has been using the digital medium to court first-time voters. “A team of IT personnel segregates information based on the target audience — youth, IT professionals, entrepreneurs, students and so on — and our messaging to them is tailored accordingly,” says TKS Elangovan, Rajya Sabha MP and organisation secretary of DMK.

SP is using Akhilesh Yadav’s social media popularity to explain the “importance of gathbandhan”. Its spokesperson Abhishek Mishra says, “In the Hindi belt, Akhilesh’s social media following is among the highest. The feedback, along with daily meetings, is what we use to convey that this election is not just a battle of politics and polity, but of ideology and philosophy.”

Enter, the startups

The same analytics that help a company sell toothpaste or Bluetooth speakers are being used by parties to peddle their poll pitches. But the need for expertise to sharpen their messages, and do it across a vast and bewilderingly diverse country like India, has taken them to specialists and startups.

Silver Push, a Gurgaonbased startup which is working with Congress, is doing a sentiment analysis of voters, using keywords. “Once the party has rolled out a campaign, we analyse its success. Then we share this information with the party, which helps them tweak their campaign wherever required,” says Hitesh Chawla, co-founder of the startup, which also analyses videos.

Others like Bangalorebased Next Election, Noidabased Vidooly and Delhi-based Neta App are also working with election-related data. The Next Election app is a bridge between candidates and voters. Amit Bansal, founder of the app, says voters have three tabs — discovery, accountability and contribution. “Constituencies and education of candidates come under discovery while accountability covers work done by candidates. Under contribution, candidates can communicate their message to voters through the app,” explains Bansal, adding he is working with multiple candidates across political parties, and also those contesting in Bangalore.

The Neta App, founded in January 2018 by Pratham Mittal, currently has a 55-member team. It allows users to rate and review their MPs and MLAs, handy data for political parties. The company says in the Karnataka elections, 90% of candidates who won were also rated highest on the app.

Vidooly’s analytics, meanwhile, tell them which political videos are gaining maximum traction, which it then shares with advertisers. “Our current study shows UP, Maharashtra and West Bengal see maximum consumption of political videos. And FMCG is the biggest investor in advertisements,” says Subrata Kar, founder of Vidooly. Founded in 2014, Vidooly analyses online video viewership for various companies.

[edit] 2019

April 5, 2024: The Times of India

No. of candidates in 2019
From: April 5, 2024: The Times of India

1 vote, 185 candidates

 Electors in Telangana’s Nizamabad constituency were really spoilt for choice in 2019. After all, they had a field of 185 candidates from which to pick their representative. Belagavi in Karnataka, too, had a heavy roster of LS hopefuls, though a distant second to Nizamabad. Meghalaya’s Tura, on the other hand, had the smallest candidates’ list, with only three names on it.

[edit] The biggest electoral clashes

[edit] 1952-2009

Goliaths felled, 1952-2009;
Courtesy: The Times of India

See graphic:

Goliaths felled, 1952-2009

[edit] Candidates

[edit] 1998-2014: no. per constituency; non-serious candidates

Chethan Kumar, Why the outcome doesn’t matter for these poll candidates, March 21, 2019: The Times of India

1998-2014: no. of Candidates per Lok Sabha constituency; non-serious candidates; independents
From: Chethan Kumar, Why the outcome doesn’t matter for these poll candidates, March 21, 2019: The Times of India

Talk about participating being more important than winning and there is the case of independent contestants and those from smaller outfits in Indian elections, who make little impact cumulatively as an electoral group but continue to jump into the fray in numbers.

A total of 31,154 candidates (party-affiliated and others) contested in the past five Lok Sabha elections. About eight in 10 of these, or 25,478 candidates, forfeited their deposits with independents and members of smaller parties making up the bulk of their numbers.

Elections are getting more expensive to fight and the electorate rarely chooses a contestant from unrecognised parties or an independent as their member of Parliament. Despite this ground reality, the average number of candidates per constituency has jumped by 70% in 2014 compared to 1998.

In 1998, the average number of candidates per constituency was 8.7, rising to 15.2 in 2014. The maximum number of candidates in one constituency was 34 and 42 in these years, respectively. The average has increased every election since 1998 (see graphic).

“For many, it is a way to gain popularity locally. They know they won’t win, but they want to make themselves known and gain influence in whatever way possible. In some cases, such candidates are later seen associated with major parties,” said political scientist Suhas Palshikar.

Since India follows a firstpast-the-post system, where a candidate with the maximum votes among all contestants wins — even if she or he doesn’t recieve a majority of the votes — many contestants are in it on a gamble.

While some are proxies of major parties looking to divide votes or plain political rebels, some are contesting to make a point.

Take the example of Sumalatha in Karnataka. The wife of late actor-politician MH Ambareesh, she announced on Monday that she would contest as an independent from Mandya, where state CM HD Kumaraswamy’s son Nikhil is making his LS poll debut. Ambareesh was a Congress member and Sumalatha had been looking to get a ticket from her late husband’s party. But Congress ceded the seat to JD(S) as part of its seatsharing pact with the regional party, prompting Sumalatha to declare she would nonetheless join the fray in Mandya.

But many of the new parties cropping up before elections — the number of parties registered with the Election Commission has increased from 1,709 in 2014 to 2,354 as of March 10, 2019 — are seen as proxies by experts. Analysts say the number of “serious candidates” in every constituency is only three or four.

Among 10 major states — Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Delhi — Tamil Nadu and Delhi, at 21, had the highest average of candidates per constituency in 2014.

“There are multiple reasons for a large number of people contesting elections, but key among those is the return on investment that politics offers in developing countries like India,” said political analyst Harish Ramaswamy. “Whether it is in the decentralised institutions or at the national level, people’s economic condition strengthens very quickly and their lifestyle changes.”

Elections are getting more expensive to fight and the voters rarely elect an MP from unrecognised parties or an independent. Despite this ground reality, the average number of candidates per constituency has jumped by 70% between 1998 and 2014

[edit] 1996: Nalgonda

1996: Nalgonda holds the record for the highest number of candidates per constituency
From: April 1, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

1996: Nalgonda holds the record for the highest number of candidates per constituency

[edit] Non-serious candidates

[edit] 1988-2018: Padmarajan lost 170 elections

March 29, 2019: The Times of India

1988-2018- Padmarajan lost 170 elections.jpg
From: March 29, 2019: The Times of India

Some never tire of trying. Like, Dr K Padmarajan. Starting 1988, the man from Salem, Tamil Nadu, has contested 170 elections. And the 60-year-old has lost all of them. The Limca Book of Records names him as 'India's Most Unsuccessful Candidate'

Dr Padmarajan, a homoeopathic doctor-turned-businessman, has labelled himself as ‘All India Election King’. He has contested not just local and parliamentary but also Presidential elections. Forfeiting his deposit is obviously not a matter of serious concern for him (From The Times of India)

[edit] Kashyap: every election makes him poorer

Ishita Bhatia, He’s probably the poorest LS candidate, and every election makes him poorer, April 1, 2019: The Times of India

With no cash and zero balance in his bank account and his wife’s, a 51-year-old advocate from Muzaffarnagar constituency is perhaps the poorest candidate in the fray in this Lok Sabha election.

At first glance, there is little to differentiate Mange Ram Kashyap from several other advocates clad in black robes that crowd the Muzaffarnagar court on a daily basis. But ask anybody in the premises and they would tell you that Mange Ram is also a neta who has fought all of the general elections since 2000. Mange Ram contests elections from a party named Mazdoor Kisan Union Party which he founded in 2000. The party has 1,000-odd members, most of them labourers, according to Mange Ram.

In his election affidavit submitted recently, Mange Ram has declared that he has no jewellery, no cash and zero money in his bank account. His wife, Babita Chauhan, also has no cash, no jewellery and no money in her bank account. He does own a 100sq yard plot now valued at Rs 5 lakh and a house built on 60sq yard with an estimated current value of Rs 15 lakh. The house is a gift from Mange Ram’s in-laws. He also owns a bike worth Rs 36,000.

While his political dreams may be taking a long time to materialize, it has done little to deter Mange Ram from campaigning on foot in the city. “I have a bike but I cannot afford petrol for it every day. My wife is a homemaker and we have two kids to take care of. I have tried to find other jobs but there are hardly any,” he told TOI.

“In the last elections too I went on foot to appeal to people to vote for me. I wonder why big politicians spend so much on campaigns when that money could be used for welfare of people,” he said.

But has his door-to-door campaign worked its charm on the voters in the past? The candidate has had to forfeit his deposit every single time as he was unable to secure the minimum number of votes.

Mange Ram is, however, convinced that things will change for the better this year for him. He is also unfazed that he is pitted against heavyweights like BJP’s Sanjeev Balyan, Ajit Singh fielded by SP-BSP-RLD’s alliance and Congress’ Narendra Kumar.

“Voters know that politicians have not looked out for them. I will help the poor. I will propose a voter pension scheme so no man is in want of money,” he said.

[edit] Some famous cases

Avijit Ghosh, April 28, 2019: The Times of India

Additional reporting by Binay Singh in Varanasi, Senthil Kumaran in Salem, and Kumar Rajesh in Bhagalpur

These ‘dhartipakads’ are the world’s biggest election losers

From Varanasi’s Adig to Salem’s ‘Election King’, meet the incorrigible poll fighters who have no qualms about losing their deposits

Long before Narendra Modi discovered Varanasi as an election destination, the city of piety had Narendra Nath Dubey ‘Adig’. Often referred to as Kashi’s Dhartipakad, he has been fighting every election as an independent since 1984. And every time he has lost his security deposit. “Victory or defeat is irrelevant to me. I contest elections to make everyone laugh and live stress-free. And I will continue to do so till my last breath,” says the 53-yearold lawyer, a veteran of innumerable contests, including five battles to be the President. On Thursday, Adig (The Unrelenting) dressed up as Lord Ram before filing his papers to take on Modi.

Adig belongs to a select group of oddballs who are as addicted to filing nominations as Navjot Singh is to Sidhuisms. In a country where the general elections are the closest to a people’s festival, they personify its maverick soul, encapsulate its never-say-die spirit. Most of them are referred to by a common moniker, Dhartipakad. Translated literally, Dhartipakad means one who clings on to the earth. The word suggests both tenacity and defiance. There was even a television satire by that name. It’s possible to dismiss these unusual candidates as mere attention seekers who receive disproportionate media spotlight compared to the few hundred or less votes they fetch. But it can be also argued that these eyeball-grabbers — some of whom claim to have contested 200-300 polls at various levels — represent the quintessential spirit of Indian democracy, where even the dissenter or the jester is offered space.

In his book, Ballot: 10 Episodes That Shaped India’s Democracy, journalist Rasheed Kidwai writes about Chowdhry Hari Ram, a farmer from the Rohtak area, who fought the presidential polls in 1952, 1957,1962, 1967 and 1969, sometimes getting no votes. “He was the original Dhartipakad,” he says.

But the threesome who epitomised the non-conformist spirit through the 1960s and later were: Textile businessman Kaka Joginder Singh, cloth merchant Mohan Lal of Gwalior and trader-social worker Nagarmal Bajoria of Bhagalpur. Singh was born in Gujranwala, and Bajoria in Lahore in undivided India. Of the three, only Bajoria survives.

Other than their obsession with contesting polls, the Dhartipakads shared no unifying strand. In an interview to news agency UNI in February 1998, Singh promised to repay all foreign loans, inculcate sterling character in children, and bring back the barter system to cure the ills of the Indian economy in his ‘manifesto’. The Bareillybased businessman also said that losing the security amount was his ‘humble contribution’ to the national fund. Singh, who reportedly distributed sweets after defeat, died the same year. Social scientist Ramchandra Guha mentions Lal, who contested against five Prime Ministers, in his book, India after Gandhi. “Wearing a wooden crown and a garland gifted by himself, he would walk the streets of his constituency, ringing a bell…His idea in contesting elections, said Mohan Lal, was ‘to make everyone realise that democracy was meant for one and all’,” he wrote quoting from The Telegraph newspaper.

The reasoning of such individuals, explains political scientist Imtiaz Ahmad, emerges from the fact that ours is a protesting society and elections for many are an occasion to express dissent. “Contesting an election for them is to make a political statement that all candidates are no good and they are standing to show that democracy is a farce. They have no impact whatsoever. Once the election is over they recede in the background. They are protesters and that’s the only role they play,” he says.

There were other motivations too. For Mitt Singh Sehjara, contesting elections was a passion, as he had told a TOI reporter in 2012. Even during the period of violent militancy that engulfed Punjab, the army man who had fought in the 1962 war against China filed his papers from seven constituencies. The veteran of 42 elections passed away in 2014.

Shyam Babu Subudhi, 84, a resident of Odisha’s Berhampur who has contested 32 elections since 1962 and lost every one of them, told ANI that he has to “continue the fight against corruption” even if he loses his deposit. His most memorable contest was the one against the then Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao for the Berhampur seat.

‘Election King’ K Padmarajan of Salem says he fights to create the awareness that anyone can contest polls. “It is the right of every citizen of India,” says the 60-year-old tyre retreader who filed his papers for the 201st time in Wayanad for the same seat as Congress president Rahul Gandhi. Other star rivals in the past: P V Narasimha Rao, M Karunanidhi, J Jayalalithaa, S M Krishna and many more.

Padmarajan, who has spent nearly 30 lakh in 30 years on elections, claims to occasionally receive threatening calls. “I was kidnapped in 1991 after I filed my nomination in Nandyal constituency in Andhra Pradesh. I don’t know who the kidnappers were but they let me go,” he says.

But perhaps the most remarkable example of persistence and commitment to the ballot is Bajoria, now 94 and ready to contest from Patna and Delhi next month. Also known as a social crusader — for digging tubewells and paying for marriages of underprivileged girls — Bajoria has contested Lok Sabha polls against Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Sanjay Gandhi, Atal Bihari Vajpayee and L K Advani, among others.

“Skewed politics based on party lines, fragmented society, caste, creed and religious divisions create revulsion. It instilled in me a desire to contest elections and spread the message of nationalism, unity and brotherhood,” says Bajoria, who fought his first election against V V Giri in 1969 and has since contested from most states, including Jammu and Kashmir.

In his younger days Bajoria often went to file his nomination accompanied by a drove of donkeys. Says Kidwai, “For him, the donkeys were symbolic of political leaders who fooled people with false promises.”

[edit] Caste, religion: the use of

[edit] The ‘upper’ castes: voting behaviour

What Johnny won’t see? Upper caste votebank

Why is the support of upper castes for the BJP secular, but that of Muslims for any party communal?

Ajaz Ashraf The Times of India

The 2009 National Election Study, which the Centre for the Study of Developing Studies (CSDS) carried out. It shows 44% of upper castes voted the NDA, down by 9 % from 2004, but the BJP’s decline was just 4%. The UPA bagged 33% of their votes, the Left 10%, the BSP 3%, and Others, a category comprising parties neither in the UPA nor the NDA, 12%. In the 1999 elections, the BJP alone bagged nearly 50% of upper caste votes. [This indicates] an upper caste consolidation

But the incidence of consolidation is far more among other groups, [detractors argue]. The same CSDS study shows 31% of upper OBCs voted the UPA, 27% the NDA, 3% the BSP, 2% the Left, and 37% Others. Take the Dalits, of whom 34% voted the UPA, 15% the NDA, 11% the Left, 21% the BSP, and 20% Others. As for the Muslims, some 47% voted the UPA, of which the Congres bagged 38%, 6% the NDA, 12 % the Left, 6% the BSP, and 29% Others.

This statistical evidence tells a few things. One, other social groups boast as diverse a voting pattern, if not more, as existing among upper castes. Two, voting patterns among all social groups fluctuate over elections. Three, every social group is strongly inclined towards one or two parties which it believes represents its interests.

The tendency to search for Muslim consolidation dates back to the Mandir-Mandal politics, which saw upper castes in significant numbers desert the Congrss for the BJP. But their heft was diminished because Muslims and Dalits, who had sustained Cogress domination for decades, didn’t follow them into the BJP. The myth of Muslim consolidation helps spawn mobilisation of Hindus to offset the numerical disadvantage of upper castes, among whom the BJP is most favoured.

True, Muslims vote tactically in every constituency to vanquish the BJP.

The author is a Delhi-based journalist

[edit] Laws, SC rulings fail to stop election casteism, communalism

Dhananjay Mahapatra, April 15, 2019: The Times of India

Leaders of South Sudan were in for a surprise during their recent ecumenical retreat in Rome. Pope Francis knelt down and kissed the shoes of two rival politicians. The Pope’s unique gesture was an attempt to encourage peace in a country which has seen more than 400,000 people killed in a civil war since independence in 2011.

Legally, it is impermissible to mix religion and politics in most countries, including India. There will be an uproar if any top political leader in India goes for a religious retreat. And it looks a remote possibility for any religious leader to kiss the shoes of our political leaders to persuade them to refrain from whipping up religious, communal or casteist emotions during campaigning for general elections. Why would they, when political leaders are queuing up to kiss the feet of religious leaders to improve their election prospects, apart from attempting to appease the gods and goddesses every now and then.

In India, secularism is the core of the constitutional scheme of governance. But on the ground, this core philosophy has always been wounded by parties, howsoever the political leaders may filibuster about adherence to the constitutional ethos.

To overcome the deepseated societal division on the basis of caste and religion, Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, prohibits a candidates from making systematic appeal to vote on the ground of caste, race, community or religion by terming such action as corrupt practice which would render the candidate disqualified.

Amendment to Section 123 (3) in 1956 broad-based the ambit of the provision by including not only the candidate but his agent or any other person. After two more amendments, the law as it stands today was amended in 1961 and reads, “The appeal by a candidate or his agent or by any person with the consent of the candidate or his agent to vote or refrain from voting for any person on the ground of religion, race, caste, community or language or the use of religious symbols or the use of, or appeal to, national symbols, such as national flag or the national emblem, for the furtherance of the prospect or for prejudicially affecting the election of any candidate" will be considered as corrupt practice, making the candidate liable for disqualification.

This provision would convince a person, unaware of the ground reality of Indian elections, that it is mandatory for candidates to shun reference to religion, race, caste and community in their campaign speeches. Despite the stringent law which threatens to disqualify a candidate on a single appeal to voters on the prohibited lines, caste and religious credentials of a candidate continue to be the key factor of her success in elections, depending on the demographic structure

of a constituency. Parties have sprung up on the foundation of caste and religion. Campaign speeches are getting shriller on caste and community lines.

A seven-judge bench of the SC in a 2017 judgment (Abhiram Singh vs C D Commachen) had further expanded the ambit of Section 123(3) to maintain purity of the electoral process. It brought within the ambit of corrupt practices “any appeal made to an elector by a candidate or his agent or by any other person with the consent of the candidate or his election agent to vote or refrain from voting for the furtherance of the prospects of election of that candidate or for prejudicially affecting the election of any candidate on the ground of religion, race, caste, community or language of (i) any candidate or (ii) his agent or (iii) any other person making the appeal with the consent of the candidate or (iv) elector”.

This means no candidate in Odisha can tell voters in the state not to vote for BJD on the ground that its leader and chief minister does not speak the local language fluently. Surprisingly, many who campaigned questioning Sonia Gandhi’s foreign origin and her religion and nationality did not fall foul of Section 123(3) in the last three general elections.

Congress candidates in the 2007 Gujarat assembly elections did not attract disqualification when Sonia threw the “dharm aur maut ka saudagar’ barb at then CM Narendra Modi. Congress candidates did not attract disqualification when the Congress president in April 2014 met the shahi imam of Jama Masjid Syed Ahmed Bukhari and sought his support. Bukhari appealed to Muslims to support Congress all over India. Similarly, an association of church leaders had issued an appeal to voters in 2014 asking them not to vote for BJP.

BJP leaders, Modi included, have never lost a chance to subtly mix religion in campaign speeches. The latest being Maneka Gandhi openly telling Muslims that consequences would follow if they did not vote for her.

Apart from religion being used by candidates to either seek votes or prejudice voters against their rivals, caste equations still continue to be a key parameter for a candidate’s success in polls. The stringent laws enacted by Parliament to prohibit the use of race, caste, religion and language of a candidate or electors during campaigning, and the Supreme Court’s attempt to sharpen the provisions by widening their ambit, has done little to deter candidates from using these very prohibited means to seek votes.

[edit] Scheduled caste (‘reserved’) seats in UP: the trend

Sub-caste challenge awaits BSP in reserved seats

TIMES NEWS NETWORK The Times of India

Lucknow: BSP may be rushing in to campaign for candidates in reserved constituencies in UP, but past experience shows that the party has performed poorly in these seats.

In 2009, BSP, which claims to be a party of dalits, was able to register a win in only two of the 17 reserved constituencies. Experts say the stumbling block is not only the uncertain transfer of Brahmin votes to dalit candidates but also that sub-castes within the scheduled castes (SCs) make it tough for the party to sail through.

While the BSP won Lalganj and Misrikh seats, its arch-rival, the Samajwadi Party (SP), won nine reserved seats, the Congres three and the BJP two. And the BSP has never won from reserved seats such as Nagina, Shahjahanpur, Hardoi, Basgaon, Mohanlalganj and Bulandshahr.

“Even this time, the Brahmin votes are unlikely to be transferred to the party,” said a district coordinator in a reserved constituency. “Since all parties put up SC candidates on these seats, the question of sub-castes in the SC category comes into play.”

C S Verma, a senior fellow at the Giri Institute of Development Studies in Lucknow, says that local-level politics come into effect in the reserved constituencies. “There’s a clear-cut fragmentation within the dalits.”

On the other hand, the BJP has the support of upper castes and some backward classes. Hence, the SP and the BJP score over the BSP in reserved constituencies.

Studies show out of 66 SCs, Chamars have the highest number, constituting 56.3% of the total SC population. Pasis happen to be the second largest group, forming 15.9% of the SC population. These two sub-castes combined with Dhobis, Koris and Valmikis constitute 87.5% of the total SC population.

While Chamars are concentrated in Azamgarh, Jaunpur, Agra, Bijnor, Saharanpur, Gorakhpur and Ghazipur districts, Pasis are is in Sitapur, followed by Rae Bareli, Hardoi and Allahabad. The other three major groups — Dhobi, Kori and Valmiki — have the maximum population in Bareilly, Sultanpur and Ghaziabad districts.

[edit] Conduct during elections: Model?

Model conduct, without a code Source: The Times of India

[edit] Legality of election-eve promises

The Times of India, Jul 20 2015

Dhananjay Mahapatra

Can parties be forced to fulfil promises made on eve of elections?

Political parties too issue manifestos prior to elections, promising many things. Politicians seek votes from citizens by telling them that if they are elected to power, their party will fulfill the election promises.

Tamil Nadu presents a good case study where arch-rivals DMK and AIADMK try to outdo each other with election-eve promises, which include free distribution of household items. For the 2006 assembly elec tions, the DMK's manifesto promised free distribution of colour TV sets to each household which did not possess the same, if it was elected to power.

DMK justified distribution of free colour TVs saying it provided commoners with recreation and general knowledge to housewives, especially those living in rural areas.DMK and its allies emerged victorious in the elections. To fulfill the poll promise, a policy decision was taken to provide one 14-inch CTV to all eligible families. To implement it in a phased manner, budgetary provision of Rs 750 crore was made.

For the 2011 assembly elections, the DMK again promised a raft of freebies if it returned to power. More than matching the DMK's promises, AIADMK too announced free gifts. It promised mixergrinders, electric fans, laptop computers, 4 grams of gold `thalis', Rs 50,000 cash for a girl's marriage, green houses, 20 kg of rice to all ration card holders, even to those above the poverty line, and free cattle and sheep.

The AIADMK and its allies swept the elections in 2011.Like DMK, it took steps to ful fill the promises.

S Subramaniam Balaji challenged the distribution of freebies by both parties, term ing it a corrupt practice to lure voters and also against right to equality as the free gifts were not meant for all voters.

The Supreme Court on July 5, 2013 decided Balaji's petition and ruled, “Promises in the election manifesto do not constitute corrupt practices under the prevailing law.“

However, it directed the Election Commission to frame guidelines for election manifestos and decide whether it could be included in the model code of conduct for the guidance of political parties and candidates.

“We are mindful of the fact that generally , political parties release their election manifesto before the announcement of election date, in that scenario, strictly speaking, the Election Commission will not have the authority to regulate any act which is done before the announcement of the date. Nevertheless, an exception can be made in this regard as the purpose of election manifesto is directly associated with the election process,“ the SC had said.

In the 2014 general elections, the Congress-led UPA was trounced by the BJP-led NDA after Narendra Modi succeeded in driving home the hope of “acche din aayenge“ (good days will come). The UPA regime was perceived so bad by the citizens that they lapped up the promise of “acche din“.

How can one quantify “acche din“? It is no colour TV or grinder-mixer that one can examine its quality . Good days for whom? And how will it come? If it comes, how long should the voter wait? And how long will it last? Election promises are a tricky affair. Citizens express their verdict on whether the promises were met only after five years. Is defeat at the elections just punishment for not meeting the promises? Lord Denning, sitting in the House of Lords, had in Bromley London Borough Council vs Greater London Council [1982 (1) All England Law Reports] elaborated on election promises.

“A manifesto issued by a political party -in order to get votes -is not to be taken as gospel. It is not to be regarded as a bond, signed, sealed and delivered. It may contain -and often does contain -promises or proposals that are quite unworkable or impossible of attainment. Very few of the electorate read the manifesto in full. A goodly number only know of it from what they read in the newspapers or hear on television. Many know nothing whatever of what it contains.

“When they come to the polling booth, none of them vote for the manifesto. Certainly not for every promise or proposal in it. Some may by influenced by one proposal. Others by another. Many are not influenced by it at all. They vote for a party and not for a manifesto,“ he had said.

As an advice to political parties successful in elections, Lord Denning had said, “When the party gets into power, it should consider any proposal or promise afresh -on its merits -without any feeling of being obliged to honour it or being committed to it. It should then consider what is best to do in the circumstances of the case and to do it if it is practicable and fair.“

[edit] Constituencies: how many voters do they represent?

[edit] As in 2019

How many voters India’s parliamentary constituencies represent
From: March 19, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

How many voters India’s parliamentary constituencies represent

[edit] As in 2024

April 10, 2024: The Times of India

Lok Sabha seats with the highest and lowest number of voters; Size of constituency: as in 2024; Population figures as in 2011
From: April 10, 2024: The Times of India

Each vote counts in an election. But not all votes are equal. That is considering the fact that the number of voters is not the same for all Lok Sabha seats, though the understanding is that so far as practicable all seats should have about the same number of voters. The freezing of seats till 2026 (following the yet-to-be-held Census 2021) means that while it takes 21 lakh voters to elect an MP in the likes of Rajasthan and Delhi, the Lakshadweep MP has a constituency that’s only 58,000-strong — the smallest in India.

[edit] Corruption, corrupt candidates

[edit] Corruption does not bother the voter

Is graft really a big election issue? Stats say otherwise

Deeptiman Tiwary TNN

New Delhi: Is corruption really an issue in elections? Some surveys claim people worry more about the economy than corruption. Data for 2004 and 2009 general elections show that not only do parties continue to repeatedly field candidates facing graft charges, people even vote for them.

Analysis of affidavits filed by Lok Sabha candidates shows that in 2004, parties fielded a total of 12 candidates facing cases under Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA). Of them, nine won. In 2009, 15 candidates with PCA cases were in the fray with four emerging victorious. Both elections combined, 27 such candidates contested and 16 of them won — a success rate of almost 60%.

Data also shows only one of 2004’s winners (SP’s Rashid Masood) with graft cases lost in 2009. Of the nine winners in 2004, only three (including SAD’s Rattan Singh and RJD chief Lalu Prasad) contested in 2009. Among other winners of 2004, BSP chief Mayawati was UP CM at the time of the 2009 polls and SAD’s Sukhbir Singh Badal was Punjab deputy CM. One candidate died while others did not contest.

A recent survey by Lok Foundation and University of Pennsylvania’s Centre for Advanced Study of India says corruption has found some traction with voters this election, but is still at second position compared to economic growth.

Social and political theorist and Centre for the Study of Developing Societies professor Aditya Nigam says though people seemed to have accepted graft as a part of life until recently, this election could be different. “Giving bribes at every step for decades had made people accept corruption as their destiny. But the Anna Hazare-led anti-corruption movement and Arvind Kejriwal’s AAP have changed that feeling. Economic growth is too abstract an idea to attract masses unless someone breaks it down for them.”

[edit] Indeed, the perception is corrupt leaders can move things

April 28, 2018: The Times of India

‘The perception is corrupt netas can move things’

Set aside the grandstanding on cleaning up politics, the return of the Reddy brothers, to BJP in Karnataka has turned back the focus on the ‘winnability’ of corrupt netas. Political scientist and senior fellow at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Milan Vaishnav talks to Jayanth Kodnani about the “perplexing cohabitation” of criminality and democratic politics as discussed in his recent book on why parties field the corrupt and why voters elect them, When Crime Pays. Extracts from the interview

Your study shows the tribe of corrupt netas in the poll arena is growing. What explains this

• The reason is two-fold. First, parties are desperate to identify wealthy, selffinancing candidates. Those involved in criminal activity have both the ability and incentives to deploy resources to winning electoral office. From the voters’ perspective, candidates often use their criminality to signal their credibility... There is the perception that tainted politicians “know how to get things done”.

Do voters elect them in spite of knowing their criminal bona fides?

• Research demonstrates that voters are wellaware of the details of candidates they support. Perversely, they vote such candidates because of, not despite, their criminality. A politician with criminal background manages to create an aura of a “godfather”.

Does the seriousness of criminal charge make a difference in choice of candidates — say, between a white collar crime and one of murder?

• The dominant strain in the data is ‘blue collar’ crime, for lack of a better word. These are politicians associated with physical acts of abuse and/or throwing their weight around. While it is true that a large number of politicians are suspected of white -collar offences, politicians exclusively linked with white-collar crimes do not enjoy the same level of popular support, in my view. People ask: what’s in it for me?

Do tainted politicians use additional identity groupings (caste, region or sect) for ‘dabangg’ influence?

• Caste and identity are inextricably tied to the dabangg image. Almost all strongmen mobilise their social identity (caste or religion). This allows them to slice and dice the electorate in their favour, at the same time establishing their bona fides with supporters with whom they share fundamental affinity. The politician’s criminality is then cast in terms of protecting the status of his or her community as a defensive. It reinforces the idea of a Robin Hood narrative.

Is abusive trolling online muscle flexing?

• It’s a way of asserting presence, much like advertising. The difference is the degree of individual and group targeting, which can be very sophisticated. It is a way for politicians to assert their viability and demonstrate their credibility.

[edit] Expenditures

[edit] Gujarat, 2017

TNN, Nov 15, 2022: The Times of India

AHMEDABAD: Politicians can indeed exceed expectations when it comes to spending money on voters, splurging 1,000% higher than promised. But that applies only to campaigning, before the netas are elected. A study has shown that in the 2017 Gujarat election, candidates burnt Rs 459 per voter in outreach programmes when the Election Commission of India (ECI) cap implied that approximately Rs 45 per voter could be spent. The figures have been derived using the overall limit of Rs 28 lakh per candidate set by the ECI for campaign expenses in 2017.

The study of poll expenses was the first of its kind and involved researchers from Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai, and from two American institutions, Temple University in Philadelphia and Vanderbilt University in Nashville. The researchers scrutinised expenses incurred by candidates in the previous assembly election in a Walled City constituency in Ahmedabad, and in Kapadvanj.

The study analysed poll spending between November 2017 and March 2018. The researchers noted that in Ahmedabad, the Congress candidate had shown expenditure of Rs 13.4 lakh, the BJP candidate had declared Rs 10.5 lakh, while an Independent candidate had reported Rs 2.7 lakh. In Kapadvanj, dominated by dairy cooperatives and rural voters, the Congress candidate submitted expenses of Rs 9.7 lakh and the BJP candidate of Rs 11.8 lakh.

Researchers Ashwani Kumar of TISS, Souradeep Banerjee of Temple University, and Shashwat Dhar of Vanderbilt University collated expenses that candidates of both the major parties had incurred in Ahmedabad and Kapadvanj in 14 days before polling. The researchers found that the candidates had spent Rs 16 lakh to Rs 28 lakh each on organising sabhas and rallies, Rs 7 lakh to Rs 14 lakh for allowances for booth managers, and about Rs 10 lakh for printing banners.

The researchers determined that the candidates had spent overall between Rs 57 lakh and Rs 1.2 crore.

But how do parties and candidates bypass the official ceiling and underreport aggregate election expenses? The study found that third-party accounts are used to pump money into campaigning. These accounts typically belong to family members and aides of candidates.

For the 2022 poll, the ECI is expected to spend Rs 450 crore, which works out to Rs 90 per eligible voter, to get the voter to the booth. The state has 4.6 crore voters this year.

"Candidates receive an amount to the tune of Rs 50 lakh to Rs 60 lakh from party coffers," the study said. "Small businesses and traders' associations are major sources of candidate funding," the study said. "Real estate, cement and the construction sectors are among the biggest political donors."

Pankti Jog, state coordinator of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), said: "There is no effective mechanism to control the use of money during elections."

[edit] First-past-the-post system

[edit] Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won

[edit] 1951-2019

May 9, 2024: The Times of India

First past the post system in India, Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won, 1951-2019
From: May 9, 2024: The Times of India

Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won by DMK, 1977-2019
From: May 9, 2024: The Times of India

Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won by AIDMK, 1977-2019
From: May 9, 2024: The Times of India

Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won by BSP, 1998-2019
From: May 9, 2024: The Times of India

Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won by SP, 1998-2019
From: May 9, 2024: The Times of India

Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won by BJD, 1998-2019
From: May 9, 2024: The Times of India

Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won by Trinamool, 1998-2019
From: May 9, 2024: The Times of India

BJP’s gain in 2014 and the collapse of Congress and Left  BJP

From the time of Jan Sangh — 1951 to 1971 — to BJP’s ﬁrst election in 1984, the party had a low conversion ratio of votes into seats. Its vote share was always higher than its seat share. In 1984, it got 7.4% of the votes and 0.4% of the seats. From the next election onwards, when it crossed 11% of votes — which might be near the party’s seat conversion threshold — it saw a dramatic increase in seats.

 From 1989 onwards its seat share was always higher than vote share. Between 1984 and 2014, the party peaked in 1998-99, when it got around 24-26% of the votes and 34% of the seats. The next dramatic jump came in 2014. From 18.8% in 2009, vote share increased by 12.5 percentage points to reach 31.3%. Share in seats, however, improved by more than 30 percentage points — from 21.4% in 2009 to 51.9% in 2014.

 Cong Congress, on the other hand, went on a different trajectory. In 2009, the party had got 28.6% of the votes and won 37.9% of the seats. In the next election, its vote share declined by 9 percentage points while seats came down by almost 30 percentage points. Despite getting around 20% votes in 2014 and 2019 – which seems to be lower than the party’s threshold – the party got less than 10% of the seats, indicating that seats alone are no benchmark to understand its ground presence.  Left Between 2004 and 2009, the Left’s vote share increased by 0.4% while seats increased by 3.1%, indicating that for that election the party’s threshold was between 7% and 8% of votes. In the next election, the party saw a 0.6 percentage point dip in its vote share but the seat share came down by 6.4 percentage points.  

TMC gained 0.4% votes, lost 12 seats...  

Trinamool Congress’ vote and seat shares show an interesting trend. Between 2004 and 2009, its vote share increased by 1.1 percentage points while seat share saw a 3.1 percentage point rise.

 For these elections, which were multi-cornered between the Left, Trinamool and Congress, the party’s threshold might be around 3% votes, and hence a small jump in votes gave a disproportionate gain in seats. Elections in West Bengal kept on becoming two-cornered, which might have pushed the threshold vote share. Between 2014 and 2019, when the election was between BJP and Trinamool, the party’s vote share increased by 0.4 percentage points while its seats dropped by 2.2 percentage points.  Similarly, BJD’s vote share remained the same between 2014 and 2019 but the party lost eight seats as the contest became more bipolar.  

...but BSP lost 0.5% votes, yet gained 10 seats  

Samajwadi Party saw a slight increase in its vote share but lost 18 seats between 2009 and 2014 because of a similar reason.

 BSP, on the other hand, has a slightly different story. In 2014 it got 4.2% of votes and 0 seats. In 2019, its vote share declined but seat share increased. This happened because it contested fewer seats as it had allied with SP.  

Fence-sitting voters are the real sultans of swing

 For many parties like DMK and ADMK, the dedicated voters remain loyal as their vote share remains constant but seats might change dramatically. This could be because fence-sitting voters with no committed loyalty to DMK or ADMK switch votes in different elections. For instance, in the 2004, 2009 and 2014 LS elections, DMK’s vote share remained constant at 1.8% while its seats changed from 16 to 18 to 0 in the three elections. In 2019, its vote share increased by 0.6 percentage points while its seats increased by 4.4 percentage points. Similarly for ADMK, between 2009 and 2014, the vote share increased by 1.6 percentage points while the corresponding increase in seat share was more than 5 percentage points.

[edit] ‘Inauspicious’ periods

[edit] Holashtak days of March

Sandeep Rai, Pre-Holi ‘jinx’ keeps netas away from filing poll papers, March 20, 2019: The Times of India

Two days after nominations for the first phase of the 2019 Lok Sabha polls began, not a single candidate from any of the main political parties has filed his papers here. The chief reason: Holashtak, or a period of eight days preceding Holi that is considered to be highly inauspicious. In 2019, Holashtak began on March 14 and will end on March 21, when the Holika fire is lit.

It is believed that during the period of Holashtak, a host of heavenly bodies, along with the feared astrological quantity called Rahu, undergo transformations that make it inadvisable to hold auspicious ceremonies during this time.

Said BJP’s former state president Laxmikant Bajpai, “A Hindu contestant will not file his nomination before the culmination of Holashtak as any work done during this period becomes counter-productive.”

Somesh Kumar, additional district election officer in Meerut, said, “Nomination forms start coming in from the second day, but no form was filed here on Tuesday. Some of them are delaying it for religious reasons.”

According to astrologer Ashwini Tripathi, “During the Holashtak period, cosmic changes take place that minimise the intensity of rays of the Sun, which is the main provider of energy to Earth. Because of this, the period is considered inauspicious.”

Indira Bhati, the Congress candidate from Bijnor, cited Holashtak for delaying the filing of her nomination. “I will file my papers after Holi when the time is auspicious.”

[edit] Indelible ink

[edit] Quantities ordered: 2009-19

April 13, 2019: The Times of India

The amount of Indelible ink ordered by the EC 2009-19
From: April 13, 2019: The Times of India

Trinamool candidate Mimi trolled for gloved handshake

Bengal’s actor-turned-politician Mimi Chakraborty was trolled on Friday as a photo of her wearing gloves and shaking hands with people went viral on Friday. Mimi said she had applied some ointment to heal scratches and burns sustained over the past few weeks and had covered her hands to ensure the medicine did not smudge. “The photo was taken when I was returning home in my car from a rally at Sonarpur on Thursday,” she said. “While resting in the car after applying medicine, I found some fans waiting by the roadside and lowered the window to respond to their greetings. The handshake was not part of my campaign. I am astounded at how low the BJP IT cell is stooping,” she said.

Betul candidate files papers first for luck, then for show

Durga Das Uike, the BJP candidate from Betul in MP, will file his nomination twice. On April 10, the schoolteacher and R S S leader filed his papers as the stars were aligned and it was an ‘auspicious time’ for him. On April 15, he will file his papers again for the May 6 polls, this time in the presence of former CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan, with pomp and show. “On April 10, I had just done a formality because, according to priests, the ‘subh muhurat’ for me was between 1pm and 1.30pm that day.” Filing multiple nomination forms is common, but most do it to ensure that if one nomination is rejected due to a technical error, there is another.

[edit] Independent candidates

[edit] 1957-2014: electoral performance

Independent candidates haven’t fared well since the early elections. The highest number of independent winners was recorded in 1957, when 42 of the 481 such candidates were elected. It’s only been downhill from there. Though the number of independents contesting has risen steadily, peaking at 10,635 in 1996, a vast majority not only loses but also forfeits deposits by failing to capture one-sixth of the total votes polled. In the 2014 Lok Sabha polls, a total of 3,234 independents contested, but only three won and a whopping 3,218 lost their deposits

[edit] More Independents win in Karnataka than other big states

Chethan Kumar, April 28, 2018: The Times of India

Of all Members of state Legislative Assemblies, the percentage of those who won as Independents, and not as the candidate of a political party, was very low. More Independents won in Karnataka than in other big states.
The years when the five elections counted took place have not been mentioned, but the time span could be assumed as roughly 1990- 2015
From: Chethan Kumar, April 28, 2018: The Times of India

HIGHLIGHTS

Results of 50 elections show that nearly 2% of Independents in Karnataka stand a good chance of winning.

Barring Rajasthan, no other state has offered more than 1% chance of winning.

One factor that ups their winnability is the fact they are rebel candidates, says analyst Harish Ramaswamy.

Disgruntled individuals across parties have sworn to defeat their parties’ official candidates after being denied tickets ahead of the May 12 assembly election in Karnataka.

While some have already joined rivals, others are likely to contest as Independents, with potential to cause upsets across the state. Over the past five elections, Independent nominees in the state have had a better chance at winning than similar candidates in 10 major states.

Results of 50 elections — five each in Karnataka, Andhra, Tamil Nadu, UP, Gujarat, New Delhi, Bihar, Rajasthan, Bengal and MP — show that nearly 2% of Independents in Karnataka stand a good chance of winning. Barring Rajasthan, no other state has offered more than 1% chance of winning.

One factor that ups their winnability is the fact they are rebel candidates, says analyst Harish Ramaswamy. For example, Belur Gopalakrishna, denied a ticket by BJP in Sagar, has said not only would he not back Hartal Halappa (who got the ticket), but would doubly ensure BJP is routed.

“Independents who make a difference are confident people who believe they have nurtured the constituencies. When they rebel and contest, they also take away a good portion of the party’s machinery,” Ramaswamy said.

The trend of Independents winning here started in 1983 when 22 such candidates won, says analyst S Mahadevprakash. Strong local leaders, especially at zilla panchayat levels, with about 30,000 to 40,000 votes under their influence can trigger upsets. “This happens every time there is a three-party fight. Local leaders snatch votes when the mandate is already fractured,” he says. UP’s seen the highest number of Independents contesting in the past five elections.

[edit] Landslides: Major electoral landslides

[edit] 1951-2015

The Times of India Feb 12 2015

Major electoral landslides in India:1951-2015

AAP's tally of 67 out of 70 seats in Delhi means it won about 96% of the total seats in the state assembly. An analysis of over 300 assembly elections held since Independence shows that the battle for Delhi was among one of the most one-sided ever. In terms of the proportion of total seats won by the largest party, AAP's sweep is the fourth largest so far. The previous three have all been in Sikkim. The Sikkim Sangram Parishad led by Nar Bahadur Bhandari won all 32 seats in 1989, the first instance of a 100% sweep. In 2009, the Sikkim Democratic Front led by Pawan Kumar Chamling repeated the feat. The SDF had in 2004 come close, winning 31 of the 32 seats

[edit] Length of polling process

[edit] 1951-52

The length of the polling process in 1951-52
From: March 11, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

The length of the polling process in 1951-52

[edit] Why Indian elections have stretch for weeks since the 1990s

SA Aiyar, In Digital India, why do elections stretch for weeks?, March 10, 2019: The Times of India

In most democracies, polling occurs on a single day, and the counting of votes begins soon after polling ends. In the US, counting of votes in East Coast states can start before polling ends in West Coast states, which are in a time zone three hours behind the east. Typically, counting begins and election results are declared the same evening or next day.

But India takes ages to hold a poll, and the time between the first and last rounds of polling keeps rising. In the 2004 general election, polling in four phases took 21 days. In 2009, polling over five phases took 28 days. Polling in the 2014 election required no less than nine phases over 37 days.

Is India too large to organise elections in a day or two? No, even elections in a single state take weeks. The 2015 Bihar election was held in five phases over 24 days. The 2017 election in Uttar Pradesh required seven rounds of polling over 26 days.

Moreover, we have long gaps between the last day of polling and counting of votes. In the 2014 election, counting started three days after polling ended. A task taking a few hours in other democracies takes three days in India. This is not because of manual counting, as was the case in earlier decades. In recent times, all votes are recorded on electronic voting machines. But these are not digitally interlinked, and after polling, are kept in secure storage, with all political parties keeping guard, to check against hanky-panky. They are eventually all moved to counting centres.

Why does holding elections and counting votes take so long? In the early decades after Independence, polling was held mostly on a single day, with no violence. The main exception was in snow-bound areas like Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh, where elections took place later. By the 1960s, violent political clashes at election time caused many deaths. By the 1980s, the capture of polling booths and stuffing of ballot boxes by gangsters of sundry parties became a menace. The police and para-military forces were supposed to check this. But often the ruling party facilitated booth capture by its own goons, who were aided by manipulating deployment of security forces. Democracy was in jeopardy.

Chief election commissioner T N Seshan finally checked this in the early 1990s. He berated chief ministers and other politicians for booth capturing. He decided that the Election Commission and not chief ministers would control the deployment of security forces to ensure fair elections. He phased polling over several days so that security forces could be shifted from one polling zone to another. In time, this mostly ended booth capture by gangs. When officials or rival parties reported a capture, repolling would be ordered, making booth capture a failure.

[edit] 1952-2014: votes received by the winning party

1952-2014: votes received by the winning party
From: March 14, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

1952-2014: votes received by the winning party

[edit] Mandate: the representativeness of political parties

[edit] The mandate for the ruling party/ coalition: Its size 1952-2014

Mandate: the representativeness of the national ruling party/ coalition, 1951-2019
From: Nov 25, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

Mandate: the representativeness of the national ruling party/ coalition, 1951-2019

VOTE A MANDATE

The Times of India May 17 2014

When many choose not to vote and only a fraction of those who do opt for the ruling party, those in power could have a `mandate' that involves a really small proportion of all those eligible to vote. As the polity has fragmented, the `effective vote share' for the ruling party or coalition has shrunk.

[edit] 1957-2014: vote share of party that obtained the majority of seats

The vote share of the winning party

Strike rate

BJP's 31% lowest vote share of any party to secure majority

The Times of India May 19 2014

TIMES INSIGHT GROUP

The fact that BJP has won a majority on its own in the 16th Lok Sabha has, inevitably, drawn comparisons with previous polls in which parties won a majority on their own. (Chart1: The vote share of the winning party; Chart 2: Strike rate)

What has not quite figured in most of these comparisons is the fact that no party has ever before won more than half the seats with a vote share of just 31%. Indeed, the previous lowest vote share for a single-party majority was in 1967, when Congres won 283 out of 520 seats with 40.8% of total valid votes polled.

Far from spelling the end of a fractured polity, the 2014 Lok Sabha poll results show just how fragmented the vote is. It is precisely because the vote is so fragmented that the BJP was able to win 282 seats with just 31% of the votes. Simply put, less than four out of every 10 voters opted for NDA candidates and not even one in three chose somebody from the BJP to represent them.

Those who picked Congres or its allies were even fewer, less than one in five for Congres with a 19.3% vote share (which incidentally is higher than BJP's 18.5% in 2009) and less than one in every four for the UPA. Unfortunately for Congres, its 19.3% votes only translated into 44 seats while BJP's 18.5% had fetched it 116 seats.

With the combined vote share of the BJP and Congres -the two major national parties -adding up to just over 50%, almost half of all those who voted in these elections voted for some other party . Even if we add up the vote tallies of the allies of these two parties, it still leav es a very large chunk out.

The NDA's combined vote share was 38.5% and the UPA's was just under 23%. That leaves out nearly 39% -or a chunk roughly equal to the NDA's -for all others.

Is the 38.5% vote share for the NDA the lowest any ruling coalition has ever obtained? Not quite. The parties that constituted UPA-1 had just 35.9% of votes polled and the Congres won just 38.2% of the votes in 1991, when it ran a minority government under P V Narasimha Rao. But, except in 1991, they had to depend on outside support to keep the government afloat, which meant that the total vote share of those in the government or supporting it was higher.

In 1989, the National Front, consisting of the Janata Dal, DMK, TDP and Congres (S) won 146 seats and a vote share of 23.8%. To this were added the 85 seats and 11.4% of BJP and the 52 seats and 10.2% of the Left, taking the total, including those parties supporting from outside, to 283 seats and 45.3% of the votes.

In 2004, parties in the prepoll alliance stitched up by Congres had 220 seats and just under 36% of the votes. But the UPA then got outside support from the Left, SP and PDP, which between them had 100 seats and about 11.2% vote share. Thus, UPA-1 was formed with the support of 320 MPs and about 47% of votes.

The NDA does not need any outside support to form the government. Indeed, BJP can form it even on its own. But unless it ropes in others, the party will become the government with the lowest popular support in terms of vote share after the Rao government.

[edit] 1951-2019

1951-2019: What percentage of the votes cast were needed to form the national government in India/ The representativeness of the national ruling party/ coalition.
From:

See graphic:

1951-2019: What percentage of the votes cast were needed to form the national government in India/ The representativeness of the national ruling party/ coalition.

[edit] One MP for 16,00,000 voters

Mind the gap: 1 MP for 16L voters

Keeping In Touch With Electors Tough

Subodh Varma | TIG The Times of India

For the 2014 general elections, over 84 crore/ 840 million people are registered as voters as per the latest Election Commission figures. They will elect 543 MPs. That means on average, each MP represents over 15.5 lakh voters. That’s almost four and a half times the number of voters per MP in the first general elections held in 1951-52.

Voters have been increasing because population is increasing. But the number of seats in Lok Sabha has not increased since 1977. As a result, an MP has to represent more and more people with each passing election.

This anomaly gets stranger if you look at statewise averages of voters per MP. For the coming election, a Rajasthan MP will represent nearly 18 lakh voters on average, while one from Kerala will represent just 12 lakh voters. This is among the bigger states, not counting the smaller states and UTs where MPs can get elected with as low an electorate as 50,000 as in Lakshadweep or four to eight lakh in the Northeast.

In the 2008 delimitation, standardization of constituencies did not take place as it would have meant creating more constituencies in states like Rajasthan or Bihar with higher population growth rates, and cutting down in states like Tamil Nadu or Kerala with lower population growth, says election expert Sanjay Kumar, director of New Delhi-based think tank Centre for Studies of Developing Societies.

“It would have meant penalizing states that have successfully restricted their population. This was not fair,” he explained.

So, constituency numbers were kept the same within states, leading to the present anomalous ratio of voters per MP. Nowhere in the world is there such a high ratio of voters per elected representative. The closest would be the US where the average number of voters per House of Representatives member is about 7 lakh.

All this leads to an increasing disconnect between people and elected representatives, turning serious as elections approach. In two weeks candidates have to somehow contact 15 lakh people. With increasing restrictions on overt spending – on posters, vehicles or public meetings – the dynamic of contesting elections is fast changing. And so is covert spending. Increasing use of electronic media or Web-based platforms is also driven by this compulsion.

Once the MP is elected, the responsibility of staying in touch with the voters also is more difficult.

Although the MP is not supposed to be looking after day-to-day issues like roads or drinking water or whether doctors are there in health centres, in India’s topsy turvy democracy it doesn’t work like that.

“People expect their elected representatives to solve everything. They don’t make a distinction between what an MP is responsible for and what a local councillor is supposed to do,” says Kumar.

In reality, the elected representatives too don’t follow these distinctions when it comes to promises, so the people can’t be blamed.

So, what is the solution? In the future, there is no option but to increase the number of seats in the Parliament opines Kumar. But for now, the unwieldy electoral system will have to bumble along.

[edit] Are candidates elected by at least 50% of the voters?

Only 120 winning candidates in ’09 got over 50% votes

TIMES NEWS NETWORK

New Delhi: Is our democracy truly representative? Election Commission (EC) data on percentage of votes secured by winning candidates shows it may not be so. In the 2009 general elections, only 120 winning candidates out of the 543 could secure 50% or more votes polled in their respective constituencies.

This meant that on remaining 423 seats (nearly 78% of seats), the winning candidates had the approval of less than half of the electorate. Elections to the Lok Sabha are carried out using the first-past-the-post electoral system, in which the candidate securing the maximum votes of the total votes polled is declared elected, irrespective of the percentage of votes polled or the total number of eligible voters.

The EC data has a silver lining though. Delhi, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Kerala, Gujarat and Maharashtra are some of the better states in terms of consolidation of votes in the favour of winning candidates. While Delhi had six out of seven candidates winning more than 50% votes, Rajasthan was second best with 15 of the 25 winning candidates in that category.

Half of the 42 winning candidates in West Bengal secured the approval of more than 50% of the electorate. Among the worst performing states is Andhra Pradesh where only one out of 42 candidates could get more than 50% votes polled.

[edit] DELHI TOPS

Delhi first in vote consolidation, Rajasthan second

Half of the 42 winning candidates in Bengal got over 50% votes

Andhra the worst with only one out of 42 getting over 50% votes

[edit] Manifestoes

[edit] 2004-19: Cong normally released it before BJP

April 6, 2019: The Times of India

Cong Beats BJP In This

Congress released its manifesto for the coming polls early this week. BJP is yet to release its list of promises. The saffron party had released its manifesto after Congress in the last three Lok Sabha polls too

2004

Congress released its manifesto on: March 22 BJP released it on: April 8 Elections began: April 20

2009

Cong: March 24; BJP: April 3 Elections began: April 16

2014

Cong: March 26; BJP: April 7 Elections began: April 7

2019

Cong: April 2; BJP: Likely on April 8; Elections begin: April 11 In 2014, BJP had released its manifesto on the first day of the nine-phased Lok Sabha polls. That had prompted the Congress to complain to the Election Commission that the move could influence voters. So, ahead of these elections, the EC has barred political parties from releasing election manifestos in the last 48 hours before polling

[edit] The things that are given to voters as bribes

The things that were meant to be given to voters as bribes, presumably as in 2019 March
From: April 6, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

The things that were meant to be given to voters as bribes, presumably as in 2019 March

[edit] Margins of victory

[edit] One vote margins

Credit: The Times of India

Every vote counts

The most often heard excuse for not voting in an election is “my one little vote won't make a difference.” Ask Congress leader C P Joshi about the importance of one Vote. CP Joshi, lost to BJP candidate Kalyan Singh Chauhan in Nathdwara, Rajasthan in 2008 assembly elections by just one vote. CP Joshi was not only state Congress President at that time but was also tipped to be the next Chief Minister of Rajasthan. Ironically Congress party came to power after defeating the ruling party BJP but CP Joshi who was considered architect of this victory lost

[edit] The highest and lowest margins

[edit] 1951 – 2019

The highest and lowest margins of victory in parliamentary elections in India, 1951 – 2019
From: April 13, 2024: The Times of India

See graphic:

The highest and lowest margins of victory in parliamentary elections in India, 1951 – 2019

[edit] 1962-2014

MPs who got elected by the highest and lowest margins.
Source: The Times of India

See graphic:

MPs who got elected by the highest and lowest margins.

[edit] 1980-2017: in five states

The graphic shows the highest and lowest victory margins in state assembly elections, UP, Punjab and Goa, 1980-2017; The Times of India, March 12, 2017

The graphic shows the highest and lowest victory margins in state assembly elections, Uttarakhand and Manipur, 1980-2017; The Times of India, March 12, 2017

[edit] Pritam Munde, 2014

Pritam Munde’s record margin of victory, 2014
From: March 21, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

Pritam Munde’s record margin of victory, 2014

[edit] 1989, 1998

The lowest margins of victory were recorded in 1989 and 1998
From: March 25, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

The lowest margins of victory were recorded in 1989 and 1998

[edit] 1977, 2019

Margins of victory in Lok Sabha elections, 1977, 2019
From: [From the archives, June 5, 2024: The Times of India]

See graphic:

Margins of victory in Lok Sabha elections, 1977, 2019

[edit] As a %age: Jardosh, 2014

Margins of victory as a %age: Jardosh, 2014
From: March 31, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

Margins of victory as a %age: Jardosh, 2014

[edit] Muslim (and SC/ ST) representation in Lok Sabha

While this section is mainly about the Muslims, it also has statistics about SC and ST representation. The main difference is that there are no Lok Sabha seats reserved for the Muslims.

[edit] 1952, 2014

Lowest no. of Muslim MPs since 1952

The Times of India May 17 2014

The representation of Muslims in the 16th Lok Sabha is the lowest since the first general election of 1952. The 16th Lok Sabha will have just 24 Muslim MPs, down from 30 in the 15th. That translates to just 4.4% of the strength of the House.

Muslims constituted 4.3% of the first LS, but their proportion has hovered between 5 and 6% for the last quarter of a century after dropping from a high of 9.3% or 49 members in the LS elected in the 1980 polls.

Reverse polarization is why Muslim votes did not count in UP and Bihar

The Times of India May 17 2014

No Muslim MP In UP For First Time Since Independence

Despite a concerted effort by “secular“ parties to get Muslims to vote en bloc against BJP , the saffron challenger prevailed largely because of what is being called “reverse polarization“.

In both UP and Bihar, which have a significant population of Muslims, the BJP pulled off big wins. Talking to TOI after the results were declared, BJP general-secre tary Amit Shah said his party succeeded “because the number of people who are not part of the politics of vote bank are much more“.

As per the 2011 Census, released by CVoter, Muslims are nearly 15% of India's 1.2 billion people. In 35 seats, they number around one in three voters or more. In 38 other seats, Muslims are 2130% of the electorate. If the 145 seats where they are 1120% are added to this, Muslim voters have the ability to influence the outcome in 218 seats. UP and Bihar, which have 120 seats between them, have 18% and 16% share of Muslims respectively . So the “secular“ gamble was not unreasonable.

In UP alone, out of 80 seats, 32 have a Muslim population of close to 15% or more. Yet, despite a serious pitch as the only force that could stop Modi, SP won only two seats, with 30 going to BJP . Curiously , the saffron party swept all eight constituencies, including Saharanpur, Amroha, Shrawasti, Bijnor, Muzaffarnagar, Moradabad and Rampur, where the Muslim population hovers around 40%. For the first time since Independence, UP has no Muslim MP.

The trend is similar in Bihar where out of the 17 seats where Muslims have more than 15% of votes, BJP has won 12. The remaining five have been shared by the RJDCongres-NCP combine and JD(U) which has got one seat.

Even in Maharashtra, which has Muslims constituting 14% of its population, BJP and its allies have swept the polls winning 42 out of 48 seats. The combine also won all the seats with considerable Muslim voters. In Mumbai and other Muslim-populated areas across Maharashtra, low polling in Muslim pockets and votes split between Congres-NCP and AAP made Muslim votes ineffective.

“In the Muslim-dominated Govandi area of Mumbai North-East polling was 40% while in the Gujarati-dominated Mulund, in the same constituency , it was 60%. And Muslim votes got divided between AAP's Medha Patkar and sitting MP NCP's Sanjay Dina Patil. This gave BJP's Kirit Somaiya a comfortable win,“ said Rais Shaikh, Samajwadi Party councillor from Govandi.

Pollsters, going by trends of past elections, say the Muslim vote is most effective where it is around 10% of the electorate, big enough to sway the result in a multi-cornered contest, by consolidating for a single candidate. Ironically , where Muslim presence is over 20%, their votes have been mostly ineffective. This is because of a multiplicity of Muslim can didates that divide their votes. In such constituencies, say psephologists, there is often counter-polarization of Hindu votes. In a polarized UP, it's the latter that seems to have helped the BJP. “In the future, Muslims will have to change their strategy and keep their options open,“ said M A Khalid of All India Milli Council.

[edit] NOTA, Use of

[edit] 2014: state-wise use of NOTA option

2014: the extent of the use of the NOTA option, state-wise
From: March 27, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

2014: the extent of the use of the NOTA option, state-wise

[edit] 2016

‘None of the above’ (NOTA) votes casted in the 2016 Assembly elections in five states ; Graphic courtesy: The Times of India, May 21, 2016

See graphic:

None of the above’ (NOTA) votes cast in the 2016 Assembly elections in five states

[edit] Gujarat: NOTA is bigger than the no.3 party

Notabhai gets more votes than winning margin in 1 out of 6 seats, December 19, 2017: The Times of India

The Gujarat elections this time were a lot closer than in 2012, so you might expect that margins in seatswouldbe a lottighter too. Surprisingly, BJP’s average margin is actually higher at 29,970 than last time’s 26,237. The Congress average of 13,354 is slightly lower than the13,577 it averaged in 2012.

That, in fact, goes a long way towards explaining why the race became so close despite BJP gaining 1.2 percentage points in vote share compared with 2012.

Nota (none of the above) too made its presence felt, exceeding the margin of victory or defeat in 29 constituencies, or about one in six seats. It cut both ways, with BJP winning 15 of these seats, Congress 13 and an independent one.

[edit] Maharashtra

[edit] Mumbai

VijayV Singh, June 6, 2024: The Times of India

Mumbai:NOTA (none of the above) emerged as the thirdhighest vote-getter in four of six parliamentary constituencies in Mumbai. In the other two, Vanchit Bahujan Agadhi (VBA), led by Prakash Ambedkar, managed to bag more than NOTA. 

Notably, all third-place vote tallies accounted for less than 2% of total votes cast.

 The 2024 Lok Sabha polls saw a tight race between the two primary candidates in each of Mumbai’s seats, with minimal influence from thirdparty contenders. In contrast to the 2019 elections, where VBA had garnered between 2% and 8% of total votes cast in all six constituencies, pushing NOTA to a distant position, NOTA did well this time. The two main contenders captured over 95% votes in the six constituencies, leaving about 5% to be shared among smaller parties, including VBA, Independents and NOTA.

 Across the six constituencies, a total of 75,262 NOTA votes were recorded, with the highest number (15,161) in the Mumbai North West constituency, where Shiv Sena candidate Ravindra Waikar defeated Shiv Sena UBT candidate Amol Kirtikar by a slim margin of 48 votes. In terms of percentage, Mumbai South and South Central had the highest NOTA share, at 1.7 each.

[edit] NRI/ overseas voters

[edit] 2014, 2019: Keralites are the majority

Rajeev KR, 92% of overseas electors are Keralites, March 14, 2019: The Times of India

Indian overseas electors, 2019.
From: Rajeev KR, 92% of overseas electors are Keralites, March 14, 2019: The Times of India

The Malayali’s obsession with politics doesn’t end at the neighbourhood saloon back home. In fact, take Malayalis out of the country and they will still turn up to vote: Expats from the state account for 92% of NRIs who have registered as overseas electors.

The state witnessed a fivefold increase in the number of overseas electors — from 12,653 in 2014 to 66,584 as of January 30, 2019. Though the number is a small fraction of the country’s total NRI population of 1.3 crore, the fact that an overwhelming majority of the 71,735 overseas electors registered in the country hails from the state reflects the growing enthusiasm among non-resident Keralites to participate in the political process back home.

Of the total of 66,584 overseas electors from the state, 3,729 are women, as per EC.

Expat organisations from the state had conducted mass online voter enrolment drives in the Gulf, especially after Lok Sabha passed a bill in August 2018 to allow NRIs to appoint proxy voters who can cast their vote. Between October 2018 and January 2019, more than 40,000 expats registered as overseas electors. But the bill lapsed as Rajya Sabha failed to take it up.

As of now, NRIs can vote in their hometown after registering as overseas voters. There is no provision for online voting.

[edit] Polling period

[edit] 1977-2024

1977-2024: The polling period and the number of polling days
From: March 17, 2024: The Times of India

See graphic:

1977-2024, The polling period and the number of polling days

[edit] Polling stations

[edit] Accessible to disabled persons/ 2019

Anam.Ajmal, Booths without ramps may deny vote to 2L, April 2, 2019: The Times of India

2019: The states that have the most Polling stations without assured minimum facilities
From: Anam.Ajmal, Booths without ramps may deny vote to 2L, April 2, 2019: The Times of India

Many votes are lost because not all polling booths in India are accessible yet for disabled persons. According to data from the Disability Rights Alliance (DRA), an umbrella body of NGOs that work to make public places more accessible for disabled persons, there are at least 50,000 polling stations that are inaccessible to PwDs because they do not have ramps that would allow the use of a wheelchair for access.

DRA compiled the list of inaccessible polling stations by analysing EC data on psl.nic.in, a website which provides details of each polling station in India and its location. According to DRA, there are 2 lakh voters with locomotive disabilities who will be unable to vote because their polling stations do not have ramp facilities.

There are over 10.35 lakh polling stations across India. These should have “assured minimum facilities (AMF) which, as defined by EC, include a ramp, proper signage, wheelchairs and parking facilities for PwDs. But according to DRA, over 2.4 lakh polling stations do not have any information about the availability of AMFs. EC did not reply to a detailed email questionnaire sent by TOI.

According to Vaishnavi Jayakumar, a rights activist and DRA member, the “most visible” problem in polling stations is the lack of ramps.

Although Jayakumar admits that there has been a “huge push” towards making voting easier, there is a gap in implementation. “EC has done some ground-breaking work when it comes to pushing accessibility. They have progressive instructions, including the availability of vehicles for PwDs. But the implementation on the ground depends on the CEO of the state,” she says.

[edit] Polling stations in remote areas

[edit] Dodging pythons, crocodiles between island booths

Yusra Hussain, In Andamans, sitting by the sea with EVMs for 3 days, April 15, 2019: The Times of India

Three days after polling concluded in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, poll officers are still waiting for EVMs and VVPAT machines, docked on small boats, to reach the Port Blair headquarters of the Lok Sabha constituency.

After several dinghy rides, meandering through shallow seas and coral reefs with officers carrying electoral machines and sacks full of papers having crossed sandy beaches and dense forests, the last leg of the precounting electoral process will be completed on April

15. At Port Blair, the presiding officer’s diary will be put to scrutiny and relevant documents will be filled up by officials, four days after polling was conducted. In other constituencies, this process is generally completed on the day of polling itself.

Polling is conducted in the 31 inhabited islands under nine tehsils of the Andaman and Nicobar parliamentary constituency through 407 polling stations with an electorate of 3,17,878 voters of which around 8% are tribals.

Many of these islands are situated in areas where it takes three or more days to reach after travelling by different modes of transport, including boat and ship, and even helicopter rides in certain cases. In a huge challenge, polling officials have to trek through large patches of irregular terrain.

“It takes around three to four days for all EVMs and VVPAT machines to reach us. In some islands, even after the end of polling, officers have to stay back the night, since sailing in unpredictable climatic conditions is not advisable. Next day, they take dinghies to the temporary strong rooms in the nine tehsils of the area. From here, the polling parties bring the machines to Port Blair in ships,” chief electoral officer of Andaman and Nicobar Islands KR Meena said.

In some areas, officers have to wade through mangroves infested with crocodiles on small canoes or take long routes through hilly patches to avoid pythons in order to reach hamlets in the interiors.

[edit] Booths with the most and least voters, 2019

April 6, 2024: The Times of India

Average voters per booth, 2024
From: April 6, 2024: The Times of India

There should be a polling booth within 2km-radius of every voter and none should have to deal with more than 1,500 voters, ECI says. In 2019, there was at least one seat where the average number of voters per booth exceeded that number. In UP’s Deoria, there were 1,543 voters on average to each booth. The national average was 879 voters per booth in 2019.

[edit] Arunachal Pradesh: Malogam

Poll staff to trek for a day to reach lone voter in Arunachal, March 18, 2019: The Times of India

Election personnel will hike through the rugged and difficult terrain of an Arunachal Pradesh district bordering China for a day to ensure that the lone voter of a polling station can exercise her franchise.

Sokela Tayang lives with her children in Malogam, around 39km from Anjaw district headquarter Hayuliang. The area falls under Hayuliang constituency. According to sources, very few families reside in Malogam and all the voters, except 39-year-old Sokela, are registered in other polling stations.

“The station had two voters during the 2014 elections. Now, for some reason, Sokela’s husband Janelum Tayang has transferred his name to another booth under the same constituency,” sources at the office of the state’s chief electoral officer (CEO) said.

It will take a full day for the polling party to reach Malogam polling station from Hayuliang on foot, Deputy CEO Liken Koyu said.

“They may have to be in the polling booth from 7am to 5pm on the day of voting. We do not know when she will come. One cannot be forced to cast his or her vote early,” Koyu said.

[edit] Dumka’s Upper Murgathali, Amlagadhiya

For Dumka’s 400 Pahadiyas, the booth may be 12km too far

Dumka goes to polls in another 10 days, but about 400 Pahadiyas, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group from Upper Murgathali and Amlagadhiya villages, may not be able to exercise their franchise as the allotted polling booth is 12km away. The administration officials said they were unaware of the accessibility issue, and are too close to the polling date now to take any corrective steps.

Around 400 Pahadiya tribals live in the two villages under Rajbandh Panchayat and their booth is at a primary school building in Mahuadih, 12km away. “This will be deterrent for many, especially the elderly and women,” said Gaytri Devi, a villager, adding that it will also result in loss of their day’s income. “There are a few booths 2km from here in villages like Heth, Murgathali and Jhopa, but our names do not feature in electoral rolls there,” she said. AGENCIES

[edit] Himachal Pradesh, 2019

Polling stations in the remote areas of Himachal Pradesh, as in 2019
From: March 15, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

Polling stations in the remote areas of Himachal Pradesh, as in 2019

[edit] Tashigang, HP

Suresh Sharma, April 19, 2019: The Times of India

SPECIAL 48- This booth will serve 48 voters from Tashigang and Gete villages when Himachal goes to polls on May 19
From: Suresh Sharma, April 19, 2019: The Times of India

The road to Tashigang, in the forbidding cold desert of Spiti in Himachal Pradesh, is closed for almost the entire year due to snowfall.

But the road will open early this year, most likely by the end of this week, to allow polling officers and voters to reach this hamlet at 15,256ft, which has been declared as the highest polling station in the world.

The polling station will serve 48 voters from Tashigang and its neighbouring hamlet Gete, when Himachal goes to polls on May 19 in the last phase of the Lok Sabha elections.

Initially, the polling station was established at the government primary school in Gete. But officials found that the building was unsafe as it had developed cracks. The booth was then shifted to a tourist lodge in Tashigang.

“The highest polling station will see 30 men and 18 women from Gete and Tashigang villages cast their votes here,” says deputy commissioner Ashwani Chawdhary.

Chowdhury, who is also the district polling officer, says PWD is working to make the road to Tashigang motorable by the end of this week. “We are strengthening the electricity infrastructure in the village before the elections. Officers have been deputed to help physically challenged people to ensure their votes are cast.”

Before Tashigang, Hikkim in Spiti had the distinction of being the highest polling station in the world at 14,567ft.

Carrying out Systematic Voters Education and Electoral Participation (SVEEP) is a big challenge in Spiti, says nodal officer G C Pathak. All villages in the first phase of the programme were covered except Tashigang, Mudh, Teling and Khar, the highest booths, he adds.

[edit] Uttaraj (Mt Abu)

Parul Kulshrestha, April 30, 2019: The Times of India

Voters in Rajasthan’s Jalore-Sirohi Lok Sabha constituency cast their vote at the highest polling booth in the state
From: Parul Kulshrestha, April 30, 2019: The Times of India

Voting means braving bears, leopards

Two Examples From Rajasthan And Maharashtra Show How India’s Poll Machinery Is Virtually Unstoppable

Uttaraj (Mt Abu):

Arun Vaghela, headmaster of the government middle school here, climbed atop a water tank and shouted like a town crier of the yore — it was 7am and polling at the village under the Jalore-Sirohi Lok Sabha constituency had begun.

In his new role as the block level officer of Uttaraj, Vaghela was on duty at the polling centre that stood at 4,921 feet — the highest booth in Rajasthan.

But none of the 348 voters, including those from the villages of Uttarah and Shergaon 11km downhill, was in a hurry. The five-hour uphill trek from Shergaon to Uttaraj through a mountainous and forested path had exhausted them. “Half the village began trekking in the morning. After we return, the remaining half will start,” said Vijay Singh from Shergaon.

The journey though is not a touristy trek. Fraught with risks, the meandering pathway cuts through the Mt Abu sanctuary where sloth bears and leopards roam. “Once a bear pawed out a woman’s eye and another almost broke open the skull of a man a year back. Both of them miraculously survived,” said Singh.

Idyllic as it may sound, life here is tough. Shergaon does not have a school and medical facilities are absent in both villages. The polling team, however, had geared up for the polls a day ahead. Four election officers along with security officials trekked 5km downhill from Gurushikhar. But despite the preparedness, polling was halted at 11am when the VVPAT machine malfunctioned. Quick calls were made to authorities at Mount Abu and a replacement was requisitioned.

[edit] Saputara hill range

April 30, 2019: The Times of India

To reach nine polling stations located in the Saputara hill range in Maharashtra, 60 officials travelled 85km
From: April 30, 2019: The Times of India

Daylong road-river trip for 1,000 voters

Nashik: For large parts of Nandurbar to vote on Monday, polling officials set off on a long journey the previous day, travelling nearly 85km, by road and by barge on the Narmada.

About 60 polling officials took barges to reach nine polling stations located in the Saputara hill range. Each of these stations have about 120 voters each. The remotest among them is Manibeli, which falls in the Akkalkuwa assembly constituency and Nandurbar LS seat.

“All these areas are inaccessible by any other route. Mobile connectivity is almost non-existent in these parts,” a senior official from the district election office said.

The first set of polling parties had to travel from Akrani taluka to Udadya, Bhabri and Bhadal polling stations; second from Akklakuwa taluka to Bamani, Danel, Mukhadi and the third, from Akkalkuwa to Chimalkhedi, Dhankhedi and Manibeli.

“The farthest route is to Manibeli, where the officials first travelled 67km by road till Gaman barge point. There, they boarded the barge and travelled 8km to reach Chimalkhedi, another 4km to reach Dhankhedi and 5km to Manibeli polling station, which is listed first among Maharashtra’s polling stations,” the official said.

At three locations in Dhankhedi and Mukhadi, temporary polling stations were constructed in tin sheds for voting day.

Voters appear to have done the polling staff proud, registering a turnout of around 60.3%.

Though polling is done, the officials will return only by Tuesday morning. They spent the night in the tin sheds constructed for voting.

[edit] Political parties

[edit] Number: 1951>2014

The Number of political parties in Indian elections: 1951>2014
From: March 13, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

The Number of political parties in Indian elections: 1951>2014

[edit] Details

1951-2019: The number of political parties that contested the General Election to the Lok Sabha, including recognised state parties and other parties
From:

See graphic:

1951-2019: The number of political parties that contested the General Election to the Lok Sabha, including recognised state parties and other parties

[edit] Political involvement of the public

[edit] 2018: Indians among most involved

Among major countries, Indians were the most involved in politics, presumably as in 2018
From: December 23, 2018: The Times of India

See graphic:

Among major countries, Indians were the most involved in politics, presumably as in 2018

[edit] Postal ballots

[edit] 2004-14: 19.2% were rejected

Chethan Kumar, Why one-fifth of postal votes end up in the bin, April 12, 2019: The Times of India

Rejected Postal ballots, 2004-14
From: Chethan Kumar, Why one-fifth of postal votes end up in the bin, April 12, 2019: The Times of India

Postal ballots can make or mar the fortunes of a candidate in a closely fought contest. For instance, in the 2017 assembly polls in Gujarat’s Dhokla constituency, Ashwin Rathod lost by 327 votes while the returning officer had rejected 429 postal ballots — the matter is now in court.

An analysis of postal votes cast in the past three Lok Sabha elections shows that a large number of postal ballots get rejected. In fact, the rejection rate has been increasing with every passing election.

In 2004, for example, of the 6 lakh postal votes cast, 95,455 or 16% were rejected while in 2009, 19.5% of the 11.5 lakh postal votes got rejected, which went up to 21.5% of the 5.6 lakh votes cast in 2014. In the three elections between 2004 and 2014, a total of 23.2 lakh postal votes were cast of which 4.4 lakh votes were rejected.

From signatures or dates of birth not matching, to electors not filling their addresses accurately, a variety of reasons have seen a fifth of all postal votes get rejected cumulatively in the past three elections.

Among the common mistakes made by officials are: Not marking the candidate of choice in the space provided; providing wrong address; writing slogans such as ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’, or their own names in the slot given to mark votes and so on.

Ironically, a large number of these votes are cast by people responsible for the smooth functioning of the overall elections apart from those in the armed forces.

“It is disappointing that so many votes get rejected despite many training sessions and clear instructions given in writing in local languages and English that they can read before casting the votes. We’ve taken additional care this time to organise better training,” an EC official deputed to take care of postal ballots, said.

EC officials say ignorance and irresponsible voting results in a lot of postal votes getting invalidated, and that efforts are being made to ensure that officials are trained properly for the 2019 elections—the first phase of voting is scheduled on April 11.

However, political scientist Muzaffar Assadi says the reasons found by EC aren’t serious enough to always reject such large number of votes. “What if there is a case like the one in Dhokla, Gujarat. This is of serious concern and the returning officers must follow all procedures correctly.”

Officials argue that ROs follow guidelines before rejecting such votes. “The voters are given three forms: First, the ballot where they need to cast their vote. Second, a form that needs to be filled with basic details and signed so that the RO can attest that the person claiming to be voting is the same as the one in the records, and three, a complete instructions form in the local language and English. If people do not read instructions carefully and cast invalid votes, the RO cannot accept it,” the official said.

[edit] Seats in which postal ballots made a difference / 2019

May 2, 2024: The Times of India

11 Seats in which postal ballots made a difference, 2019
From: May 2, 2024: The Times of India

Postal ballot enables registered voters to submit their votes via mail, bypassing the need to visit a polling station.

 In the 2019 general elections, the most signiﬁcant use of postal ballots was observed in Arunachal, Sikkim, Himachal, Uttarakhand and Jammu & Kashmir. Given the challenging and remote terrains of these regions, postal ballots played a crucial role in ensuring the inclusion of every vote. Leading the way, Arunachal Pradesh accounted for 3.8% of postal votes (of the total votes polled), with Arunachal East and Arunachal West recording 3.7% and 4% respectively. Sikkim followed with 3.4%, then Uttarakhand’s Garhwal at 2.9%, and Ladakh at 2.5% postal votes. Notably, in nearly 11 constituencies, the number of postal ballot votes surpassed the winning margin.

[edit] Predicting results (trying to, the Indian way)

[edit] As in 2024

Himanshi Dhawan, Ajay Singh Ugras & Rajiv Mani, Additional reporting by Julie Mariappan | And the winner is? From Sangam to satta, how India predicts an election/ TNN/ The Times of India / 2 June 2024]

Pilgrims at Allahabad’s Sangam, bellwether states, the uttar-chadhav (highs and lows) of the satta bazaar, onion prices, parrots who predict winners, crowds at a rally…these are just some of the endless ways that we try to read an election for an answer to that tantalising question: Who is winning? The answer will be revealed on June 4, but patience has never been our strong suit.

The straws are even more unreliable. Asim Ali, researcher at the Centre for Policy Research, says informal mechanisms, such as gauging a seat by how many people turn up for a rally or satta bazaar wagers, have proved to be unreliable.

Political scientist Philip Oldenburg has long held that it is a group of elites that included knowledgeable people and local politicians who would create the ‘chunavi mahaul’ and that would filter down to ordinary people. TOI examines what other factors predict the ‘hawa’:

BELLWETHER SEATS

These are constituencies that have consistently elected MPs whose party has formed the government at the centre.

Clallam County in Washington state has voted for the winning nominee in 11 US elections since 1980. Dartmouth in the UK has been getting it right since 1964, and in India, Gujarat’s Valsad has a similar reputation since Independence.

In 1998, BJP’s Manibhai Chaudhary won in Valsad, a reserved seat, and his party went on to form the government at the centre. When the Vajpayee-led BJP was up for re-election in 1999, Chaudhary repeated the feat, and NDA went on to form the government again. In 2004, Kishan Bhai Patel of Congress won and Congress-led UPA pulled off an unexpected victory. Not surprisingly, Patel won in 2009 as well. In 2014, BJP won the seat, and has held on to it in the subsequent election.

Like bellwether constituencies, there are bellwether politicians and parties as well. Described as the ‘mausam vigyanik’ or weathervane of Indian politics, Ram Vilas Paswan of Lok Janshakti Party had the uncanny knack of picking the winning side. PMK’s S Rama doss and son Anbumani were equally inspired with their selection of alliances. Since 1998, PMK has won four out of six general elections in Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu. “It also has to do with S Ramadoss’s selection of allies who have a winnable chance to form the government,” says Kolathur Mani, president of Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam, from Mettur in Dharmapuri. For instance, PMK candidate K Pary Mohan won the seat in the NDA-AIADMK alliance and ‘enabled’ A B Vajpayee to form the government that year. In 2009, Dharmapuri threw its weight behind DMK, and UPA-II followed. In 2014, PMK leader A Ramadoss won the election as part of NDA. The exception was in 2019, when DMK’s S Senthil Kumar won the seat but it was BJP which won at the centre.

BETS ON Phalodi

A sleepy town near Rajasthan’s Jodhpur has been in the news recently, not just for its soaring temperatures but also because predictions made by bookies here are often eerily accurate. Many in Phalodi, with strong connections and experience in the Mumbai stock market, claim their satta business is underpinned by rigorous research. “This research includes insights from experienced analysts who consider caste equations and regional preferences. They understand the market and remain objective,” claims a bookie. Besides analysts, this bazaar also has its own sources of political information, with people placed across major political centers. The bazaar sets rates based on the inputs it receives. Across the country, people keep an eye on Phalodi through WhatsApp channels.

BULLISH BOATMEN

Sangam’s boatmen and pilgrims have been considered prescient about the last eight elections. Former journalist Jawid Liaq says he visited the Sangam at Allahabad (now Prayagraj) for a boat ride and spoke to boatmen about the 1977 election. Reluctant to talk politics at first, they later predicted Indira Gandhi’s defeat attributing it to the “rough Emergency measures.” Liaq, who has visited Sangam eight times, says the pilgrims of all castes and classes who visit the confluence of rivers are a mine of voting opinions. “As they represent a cross-section of the country, their views about election results have turned out to be generally correct,” he adds. This time the consensus has been pro-Modi with boatmen like Jagdish Nishad from Arail village saying, “I am not sure of 400-plus but Modi is coming back.” Somit Dhar, who has travelled with his family of five from Bengal’s Howrah declares, “BJP will perform better than last time in Bengal. We have tested Mamata, and now we want to test Modi.”

ONION INDEX

US political strategist and senior aide to the Bill Clinton election campaign James Carville said one of the keys to winning the 1992 election was “the economy, stupid”. Dozens of elections over several decades have shown that US voters are tempted to react unfavourably to inflation and vote against it. In India, onions have a similar exalted status. This kitchen staple has brought down governments whenever its price soared. Delhi chief minister Sushma Swaraj lost the 1998 assembly poll over this. Yet it is not a foolproof theory, and AAP was insulated from this in the 2020 election. In 2024, Maharashtra’s onion farmers are seething due to export curbs and pose a test for BJP. Let’s see who is left in tears this time.

WILD PREDICTIONS

This anxiety to know has led to some strange situations like the arrest of a fortune teller who kept a kili josiyar (parrot fortune teller) in captivity. It would be useful to mention that the offending pair — human and bird — had predicted a PMK win from Cuddalore constituency in DMK-led Tamil Nadu. We will only know if the parrot is right on June 4, but the belief that animals may know something we don’t goes beyond politics. Like Paul, the ‘octopus oracle’ which had an impressive 87% success rate and correctly predicted all seven of Germany’s matches, including a surprise defeat to Serbia in the group stage in the 2010 football World Cup. Mani the parakeet from Singapore and Achilles the cat had similar successes.

[edit] Re-elected parliamentarians

[edit] 1952-2014

RATE OF RETURN

GETTING BACK INTO THE HOUSE

RATE OF RETURN

The Times of India May 17 2014

How many sitting MPs get re-elected and how many debutants does the LS typically have? Here (Chart: RATE OF RETURN) are the numbers for all the Houses so far, showing that it is rare for a majority of the outgoing MPs to be chosen again

GETTING BACK INTO THE HOUSE

The Times of India May 19 2014

BJP has the highest number of re-elected MPs in the 16th Lok Sabha while 70% of Congres MPs managed to duck anti-incumbency. So, those candidates who had a proven record as MP survived the Modi wave. Only in three elections -the post-Emergency election of 1977, 1980 poll that saw the return of Indira Gandhi, and the 1989 election after Bofors -did fewer MPs return to the House (Chart: GETTING BACK INTO THE HOUSE)

[edit] Security during the election process

[edit] Personnel deployed in 2014

Personnel deployed in 2014 during the LS elections
From: March 26, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

Personnel deployed in 2014 during the LS elections

[edit] Symbols used by political parties during elections

[edit] 2024: Interesting symbols

Shruti Sonal, April 27, 2024: The Times of India

Some interesting symbols from the 2024 Parliamentary elections
From: Shruti Sonal, April 27, 2024: The Times of India

Advocate Manish Kumar Dwivedi, 31, had never imagined that one day he’d be contesting a Lok Sabha election. But ahead of the second phase, dressed in a kurtapyjama, he was walking around the lanes of UP’s Gautam Buddh Nagar, greeting people with folded hands. His supporters handed out pamphlets bearing his photograph and a symbol: the humble chai kettle. 

For the last two years, Dwivedi was part of a social campaign that voiced the concerns of small businessmen and entrepreneurs who were trapped in debt as a result of Covid lockdowns “While big corporations often get debt waivers, there are small people who are getting no relief as they struggle to pay back bank loans and credit card bills. Who will speak for them?” Dwivedi asked.

In order to push for a waiver and extension of time for repayments, Dwivedi and his team wrote to multiple political parties and MPs, but no one responded, he says. That’s when the group decided to enter the arena of politics. In fact, the Akhil Bharatiya Parivar Party had plans to contest all the 543 seats. All of them are first-time contenders, and come from various walks of life. The idea of the symbol, he pointed out, was crowdsourced as they asked people for suggestions. It not only represented a symbol of livelihood, but also was a barb at PM Modi’s ‘chaiwallah’ image, he said. “The symbol was a way of saying: hamein sirf chai nahi chahiye, poori ketli chahiye (we don’t want just the tea, we want the whole kettle).”

The chai kettle is one of the many symbols that have been adopted by candidates like Dwivedi in the ongoing elections. From daily household items that the aam aadmi uses in kitchens to aspirational gear and gadgets, they’re all in the fray. And while they were first introduced to reach out to the people at a time when the literacy rate stood at a mere 16%, they’re still as relevant, with party factions even going to court to claim them after a split.

Unlike recognised political parties, Independent candidates choose from a list of ‘free’ symbols that the Election Commission updates frequently. These include the likes of grapes, dumbbells, vacuum cleaners, batter, and more. In fact, for decades, they’ve been drawn by one person. Draftsman M S Sethi was hired by the ballot committee back in 1950 and retired in 1992. Armed with an HB pencil and paper, over the years, he doodled the images, which became the mainstay of Indian elections. While he passed away in the 2000s, his drawings continue to find their way to voting machines, posters, and households. 

The symbols themselves might be minimalistic and resemble hand-drawn sketches, the narratives behind them are much more complex.

For lawyer Yusuf Ali Khan, contesting from Rajasthan’s Churu, choosing a ‘baby walker’ as a symbol was about making a point. “In Marwari, we call it ‘rerula’, and it represents something using which a baby learns to walk. Similarly, I want to help my community walk on its own feet,” Khan says.

Khan, who contested the 2003 and 2008 assembly elections, says he had no plans to contest the Lok Sabha polls. Then, he heard that Congress had not fielded a single Muslim candidate in Rajasthan. 

“We are 9% of the state’s population, but have no voice. I want to change that,” Khan points out, adding that increasing access to education and scholarship opportunities are his topmost priority. 

Meanwhile, social worker Niranjan Singh Rathore is using his ‘belt’ symbol to tell people in Taranagar about his intentions. “Koi bhi kaam karne se pehle, kamar kasni padti hai. We need a belt for that,” he says.

Belonging to a Scheduled Tribe, he says that while govts have come and gone, the benefits of social justice reforms and reservations still haven’t reached certain regions and sections. Armed with data that shows the lack of representation, he is going door to door, telling people to buckle up and demand change. These polls will be his ‘first and last’ election, Rathore says.  Some are going out of their way to make sure the public doesn’t forget the symbol on the day of voting. In a move that grabbed many eyeballs, Aligarh’s Pandit Keshav Dev walked around in his constituency wearing a garland of slippers, his chosen symbol.

Chennai South’s V Sivakumar, contesting on the symbol of dumbbells, hasn’t attempted anything similar yet. And for Lakhimpur’s Deba Nath Pait, it might be nearly impossible to parade with a ‘fountain’. But as they say, elections can spring many surprises.

[edit] Temperatures, daytime, on general election day

[edit] Delhi region

[edit] 1977-2019

May 23, 2024: The Times of India

The maximum daytime temperature on general election day in Delhi, 1977-2019; turnout 1952-2019
From: May 23, 2024: The Times of India

Just 2nd LS polls in peak summer

All general elections in Delhi prior to 1977 were held in Feb-March, when temperatures are much milder.    2024: This is the second time general elections are taking place in the capital during its peak summer period of May 16 to June 9. The previous instance was in 1991, when polling took place on May 20. However, as per records, the maximum temperature at Safdarjung was a relatively mild 36.5 degrees C.

 Weather is just one of several factors that impact poll turnouts. However, if there’s one election where heat appears to have played a role in dampening voting, it’s the last Lok Sabha poll (2019) in Delhi. Held on May 12, when the maximum temperature touched 41 degrees C, the turnout dipped to 60.6%. That was a fall of 4.5 percentage points from the previous LS election, held on April 10, 2014, when the temperature was much more agreeable at 32 degrees C. Both elections produced the same outcome, with BJP winning all seven city seats.

  The Times of India’s VIEW: National elections should avoid peak summer as they did before 1991.

TOI looked at LS polling day temperatures in the capital since 1977 and found that the hottest election day so far was in 2004, when Delhi voted on May 10 when the maximum temperature at the city’s base station of Safdarjung was 41.4 degrees C, as per weather archive website Tutiempo.

[edit] Trends

[edit] 1952-2014: eight major trends

Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

[edit] Anti-incumbency

Ruling party has the edge, 1952-2019
From: Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

There is a widespread belief that most ruling governments are not re-elected by voters. In our analysis of big and medium-sized states, in the period 1977–2002, 70% of governments were thrown out by angry, dissatisfied voters. However, this has changed over the last 20 years. To put it simply, the anti-incumbency era is over. India is now going through what can be called a ‘Fifty:Fifty Era’. Governments today have a 50:50 chance of being re-elected. Governments that perform are voted back. Those that do not deliver are voted out. The angry voter has given way to a wiser, more mature voter.

[edit] Young voters, old MPs

Youth under-represented in Lok Sabha, 1952-2014
From: Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

Our members of Parliament are much older than the average age of voters. Once again, expect older candidates as the average age of members of the Lok Sabha has been rising with every election. Today, 59% of voters in India are young, between the ages of 18 and 40. But only 15% of MPs are between 25 and 40 years old. This means that 85% of MPs are of a different generation from the majority of voters. And it’s a widening age gap.

[edit] Women of India

Potential NDA seats in 2014
From: Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

Women’s participation in elections has been rising much faster than men, and the next Lok Sabha elections could be the first time in India’s history that their turnout will be higher than men. But who do women vote for? Traditionally, the BJP has had a higher support base amongst men than women. Which is why the government’s free gas cylinder policy (Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana) was a perfect election campaign idea; it targeted primarily rural, women voters. All parties can now be expected to make similar promises targeting women in these elections. To illustrate how important the male voter is for the NDA, a simple simulation of the 2014 elections threw up two alternative scenarios. First, if only men had voted, the NDA would have won as many as 376 seats (40 seats more than the 336 that they actually won). Second, if only women had voted, the NDA would have won only 265 seats (71 seats lower than their final total in 2014 and 7 seats below the halfway mark of 272).

[edit] 21 million missing women voters

Women denied chance to vote- 2011 census (projected to 2019)
From: Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

Early estimates suggest that as many as 21 million eligible women voters will be denied their right to vote in 2019 simply because their names have been excluded... To place this number of missing women voters in perspective: it is equal to 39,000 women missing in every constituency in this country.

[edit] Disappearing Independents

Having understood the unfairness of the first-past-the-post system, voters are increasingly ignoring Independents. The vote for Independents has dropped from 13% in the earlier years to just 4% today. Victims of the system, they will be all but irrelevant in this election.

[edit] Elections are not national but of federation-of-states

The rise of regional parties- seats won by recognized regional parties, 1952-2014
From: Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

No longer a national election; it’s a true federation-of-states election

The number of seats won by regional parties has risen from an average of 35 Lok Sabha seats in the early phase after Independence to over 160 seats now, almost a third of the seats in the Lok Sabha, and the trend is decidedly upwards. Even more significant is the rapid increase in the votes that regional parties are now winning. In the early phase of Indian elections, regional parties won 4% of the vote, this has now risen to 34% of the national vote in Lok Sabha elections. The end of the all-India ‘uniform-swing’ will play a crucial role in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. The importance of strong sub-national parties will create state-level swings and relegate the phenomenon of a national swing to a memory from the past. It’s probably best not to focus exclusively on the ‘Modi-Shah-appeal’ or the ‘Rahul-Priyanka-effect’ or even the ‘Modi-Rahul-contest’ in 2019. Increasingly, it is the ‘state-leader-impact’ that will be more relevant.

[edit] Opposition unity

A divided opposition- Average IOU (Index of Opposition Unity) in Lok Sabha, 1952-2019
From: Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: The Times of India

What will be more important for victory: votes or dividing the Opposition?

In the past, winning the popular vote yielded more seats than a fragmented Opposition. In fact in every Lok Sabha election victory between 1952 and 2002, the ruling party won about two-thirds of its seats because of a high popular vote and only one-third of the seats were won due to the effect of a divided Opposition. The impact of Opposition unity on seats is rising with every election, from an average of 33% in the first two phases to 45% in the last three Lok Sabha elections.

[edit] The ‘Bump’

On vote counting day, watch out for the ‘Bump’

Do not make the mistake of walking away from your television set on counting day when all the ‘leads’ are in. Major changes happen as more and more rounds are counted. Nothing sinister, it is merely a statistical phenomenon that happens in every election — and benefits the leading party, no matter which party is leading. The party that is ahead when all the leads are in gets an amazing ‘Bump’ in actual seats once all the results are in. For Lok Sabha elections, when all the 543 ‘leads’ are in but counting is still in progress, be prepared to add another forty-five seats to the leading party’s tally and subtract about the same number from the trailing parties’ total. In other words, be prepared for as much as a forty-five-seat Bump, or what could be up to a ninety-seat swing.

Edited excerpts from The Verdict: Decoding India’s Elections by Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala with permission [for The Times of India] from Penguin Random House India

[edit] 2021 Assembly elections

Elections to 5 state legislative assemblies in April 2021: trends
From: May 17, 2021: The Times of India

See graphic:

Elections to 5 state legislative assemblies in April 2021: trends

[edit] ‘Unopposed’ victors

[edit] 1951-2024

April 23, 2024: The Times of India

BJP candidate Mukesh Dalal winning the Surat LS seat unopposed is the first victory of the party in the ongoing seven-phased Lok Sabha elections, reports PTI. Before him, 10 party candidates have won uncontested in the just-held assembly elections in Arunachal Pradesh. A maximum of seven candidates won the general elections uncontested in 1957, followed by five each in 1951 and 1967 polls. While three candidates won uncontested in 1962 and two in 1977, one candidate each won the polls in a similar fashion in 1971, 1980 and 1989. 

Before Dalal, Samajwadi Party’s Dimple Yadav had won Kannauj LS bypolls in 2012 unopposed. Only at least nine, including Dimple, have won bypolls uncontested.

 Amongst the prominent politicians who have won parliamentary polls uncontested are YB Chavan, Farooq Abdullah, Hare Krishna Mahtab, TT Krishnamachari, PM Sayeed, and SC Jamir. Of the candidates who have entered LS without a contest, the maximum have been from Congress. Sikkim and Srinagar constituencies have seen such unopposed elections twice.  TNN

[edit] Villages on disputed borders

[edit] Andhra Pradesh – Odisha

See Kotia, panchayat

[edit] Maharashtra- Telangana

[edit] 14 villages

Vallabh Ozarkar, April 14, 2024: The Indian Express

With their villages under two panchayats in both Maharashtra’s Chandrapur and Telangana’s Adilabad, each resident has two voter IDs, Aadhaar cards etc., even as both district administration decide to counsel them not to indulge in ‘unlawful’ dual voting

About 4,000 voters from 14 villages along the border between Maharashtra and Telangana could be the only ones in India to have the “privilege” to vote twice in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections — in Maharashtra for the Chandrapur constituency in the first phase on April 19, and then in Telangana for the Adilabad constituency in the fourth phase on May 13.

Because of the decades-old boundary dispute between Maharashtra and Telangana, these 14 villages, located in a remote belt, with an aggregate population of over 6,000, have two of every institution and facility, provided by each of the neighbouring states — ranging from gram panchayats and sarpanches to primary government schools (one instructing in Marathi, the other in Telugu) and health care centres.

The territorial dispute over the 14 villages (called Sade Bara Gaav in Maharashtra) that fall in the Kerameri tehsil of Adilabad in Telangana and Jivati tehsil of Chandrapur in Maharashtra, dates back to 1956, when the state of Andhra Pradesh was formed. The 14 villages come under two gram panchayats — Parandoli and Antapur — which are over 30 km apart. The villagers have two voter ID cards each with their names listed in the constituencies of both the states.

Each of the villagers also have two ration cards, Aadhaar cards, MNREGA cards, caste certificates and other documents — one each from Maharashtra and Telangana, based on their respective classifications — which enable them to avail benefits of social welfare schemes from both states.

The only difference between the two gram panchayats is that while all villages under Parandoli receive water and electricity supply from both states — although the Maharashtra services are billed — residents of the five villages under Antapur say only Telangana has been giving them water and electricity, that too for free.

Currently, the two elected sarpanches for the two gram panchyats in both Prandoli and Antapur are from different parties from Maharashtra and Telangana, because of which they also get two separate funds from their respective governments to carry out development works.

As the villagers, who mostly belong to the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) communities, have ration cards from both states, they can also avail ration benefits as well as other schemes being implemented by both states.

Parandoli sarpanch Leenabai Birade — a member of the Congress in Maharashtra — and her husband Bharat said, “Yes, we have been voting on both sides in every Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. We have separate voter IDs from both state governments, and different administrations. If the election date is the same in both states, we vote in whichever state is feasible. But if it’s not on the same date, we vote on both sides, since we are getting facilities from both sides.”

On the issue of the villagers’ dual voting, Chandrapur district collector Vinay Gauda C G said that at a recent interstate meeting of administrative officials of both districts — Chandrapur in Maharashtra and Adilabad in Telangana — it was decided that the teams from both district administrations will counsel the villagers not to vote twice as that is unlawful.

“Not only are we counselling the villagers not to vote twice, we have also decided to apply the indelible ink on the entire index finger, instead of just a single mark, so that they can’t vote again,” Gauda said. “The administration of both districts will apply the ink on the entire finger so that it is easily identifiable.”

These are new developments. In the past, these villagers have voted on both sides. But, Gauda said, “Not only two votes, even having two voter ID cards from two places is unlawful. So we are conveying that to the villagers.”

A Parandoli sarpanch disagreed with the development, saying that the governments should first decide which state their villages belong to. “If voting twice is not according to law, then let the Election Commission ask the states to resolve our issue first. We are voting on both sides. If you have a problem with that, then ask the EC to remove our name from the list of any one constituency. We do not have a problem with that. Our only concern is that the authorities must tell us whether we are part of Maharashtra or Telangana. We do not have a problem in joining any state, as long as they resolve our issue with land ownership pattas (land ownership documents),” said Nimbadas Patange, the sarpanch of Mukadam wada of the Parandoli gram panchayat, who is affiliated with the BRS in Telangana.

Parandoli’s other sarpanch Leenabai Birade said that while benefit from both states is fine, their biggest grouse is that they can’t get their land registered in their names. “Since the land is designated as forest, it can’t be registered in anyone’s name. The demand of the villagers is to give us pattas (7/12 utara) in our names,” she said.

When The Indian Express visited Antapur and Narayanguda villages under the Antapur gram panchayat, several residents claimed they were being “neglected” by the Maharashtra government, whereas the Telangana government was providing facilities like water and electricity for free to them.

“We have everything here. We vote on both sides, but still we do not have basic facilities yet. We are in a state of limbo between Maharashtra and Telangana. At least the Telangana government is trying to help us, but the Maharashtra government is not concerned at all,” alleged Vitthal Rathod, a farmer from Narayanguda village.

At Antapur village, Vilas Pundlik, on whose land the Telangana government has built a school, agreed with Rathod, saying that he and most of his neighbours wish to be part of Telangana. “The Maharashtra government isn’t concerned about us at all. They are not giving us pattas, whereas the Telangana government has. It also gives us free power and water lines to each house, as well as pensions, rations and other schemes for women, children and farmers, which Maharashtra doesn’t,” Vilas claimed. Sahebrao Bhadange’s wife, a BRS member, is a sarpanch of Antapur gram panchayat. “The Telangana government has given us all necessary certificates and documents, including land pattas, without any hassle. We should be allowed to join Telangana,” he said.

S Chockalingam, Chief Electoral Officer of Maharashtra, told The Indian Express that they have referred the matter to the Election Commission (EC) to ensure that the villagers are voting only in one of the states either in Maharashtra or in Telangana and do not vote twice. He said they have requested the ECI to guide Telangana to ensure that the villagers who have already voted are not allowed to vote again.

“The issue of these villages is under consideration and standard protocols are put in place. Generally when the voting takes place in Maharashtra and Telangana simultaneously then the villagers are free to go to one of the places and vote. Now this time this confusion is also not there. Election in Maharashtra is going to take place first and so our booths will be put up there,” Chockalingam said.

[edit] Voter enrolment

[edit] 1952: a sense of belonging

Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: The Times of India

FOR THE PEOPLE- Campaigning in the time of K Kamaraj
From: Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: The Times of India

FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-1
From: Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: The Times of India

FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-2
From: Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: The Times of India

FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-3
From: Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: The Times of India

The estimated cost of State and Union govt elections, 1952
From: Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: The Times of India

‘A test for all of us’ is how Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru described the first general elections in India, in his radio broadcast on Nov 22, 1951, 8.30pm. “This is our first election on an adult franchise. The standard we set now will act as a precedent and govern future elections.”

 In Madras, the elections were spread over Jan 1952, and ahead of the polls, instructions to the public on how to cast their votes and the purpose of adult franchise were aired through All India Radio and documentaries in cinema halls, while magazines published articles on how assembly and parliamentary constituencies are structured.  So, what was it like then?

  BALLOTS IN OR BALLOTS OUT?

 In those days, as only about 20% of the population was literate, polling booths had a row of ballot boxes with symbols, says former journalist K Vishwanathan. “The ballot paper merely had to be dropped into the box that had the symbol of the candidate being voted for. But confusion ensued since it was the first election, and some ballot papers were found placed on top of the boxes instead. Fraudulence was rampant, and interested parties would collect these and drop them in their own candidate’s box,” says the 92-year-old.

 Counting, he says, took several days and people got to know the results only through newspapers. Not many people lived to old age, so there was no question of postal votes.

 “ Women from Thanjavur-Trichy belt were progressive and made sure they cast their vote. They had been active during the freedom movement as well.”  

A SENSE OF POWER

 It was the first election in which anyone could be a candidate and that gave a lot of confidence to the common man and the working classes, says R Raman, principal of Presidency College in Chennai. “Until then local landlords held power and were the presidents of panchayats. The 1952 election was thus a kind of celebration for the masses; they felt the country belonged to them, for the fir st time. It brought people together. Meetings were held all night, till 4am and 5am, often on the beaches of Chennai, as there were no restrictions on the timings.”  

BACK UP OR PAY UP

 As quoted in the Madras Information magazine (editions 1951-1952), the rules of campaigning were that anyone who held a public meeting or canvassed on polling day within 100 yards of a polling station even in a private place, or exhibited signs could be arrested without warrant and fined up to ₹250 (more than ₹20,000 today).

 Any person who tampered with a ballot box would also lose the right to vote in future elections.  

PITCHER, TWIG OR CAMEL?

 Party candidates who were qualified to fill reserved seats were distinguished by a black circle around the party symbol. Independent candidates had to specify in their order of preference, any three symbols out of only six options — bow and arrow, boat, flower, pitcher, camel and a twig with two leaves, left after allotment to the All-India parties and state political parties, says T S Krishnamurthy, former chief election commissioner.  

MRS AND MISSES

 Many women in northern India did not register in their own names, and instead registered as ‘A’s mother’ or ‘B’s wife’ and some 2.8 million women voters were struck off the list, writes Ramachandra Guha in his book ‘India after Gandhi’. The then chief election commissioner of India, Sukumar Sen, considered the furore over their omission as something good, as it would motivate women to give their own names for the next elections.

 In his address to the public prior to the 1952 election, chief electoral officer of Madras S Venkateswaran appealed to women to not let their “shyness stand between them and the polling booth”. “Our elections would be unsatisfactory unless our women, who constitute half our electorate, exercise their rights as voters with as much keenness and intelligent appreciation as men voters. Shrewd common sense is good enough equipment for a voter and our women have that in abundance,” he said. He also announced that booths with “appreciable number of gosha women voters (who follow Islamic traditions strictly) will be manned entirely by women staff” and only women voters will be allowed to vote there.  

POLL NUMBERS OVER THE YEARS

 1952 | 51.5% of the country voted (8.9 crore voted out of 17.3 crore). There were over 2.7 crore voters in Madras State which included parts of modern-day Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh 1957 | only 47.57% voted (9.2 crore out of 19.3 crore)

 1962 | Polling period was reduced to less than a week from the initial 19 days. The number of polling booths were increased to 2.5 lakh, one for 900 voters. No one had to travel more than one mile to vote. Also, a new system of voting was introduced where the choice of candidate was indicated on the ballot paper itself. Until then, each candidate had a different ballot box Source: Madras Information magazine

[edit] Barely 40% go age 18-19 enrolled as voters

EC uses FB to reach out to young unlisted voters|Jul 03 2017: The Times of India (Delhi)

Barely 40% of the country's newly eligible voters in the 18-19 age group are currently enrolled as voters. In fact, in big states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, 75 lakh and 46 lakh young people have turned 18 but are yet to enlist themselves as voters. As per statistics compiled by the Election Commission as part of its special enrolment drive focused on young voters, 3.36 crore people in the 18-19 age group have not registered themselves in the voters list. The difference between electors and projected population in the age group is most prominent in states like UP, Bihar, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh, even as Kerala, Punjab, Andhra Pradesh and many smaller states are better off.

It is precisely this large gap that has prompted the EC to launch the month-long drive from July 1 to reach out to unlisted voters and persuade them through popular modes like social media to sign up. Elaborating on the special drive, chief election commissioner Nasim Zaidi told TOI, “Focus of the commission is mainly on young voters as we noticed that young voters are enrolled much less in number. In fact, 5-6 years ago, the registered youth as a percentage of eligible youth used to be 10%. In successive years, we have increased this enrolment percentage to 40% or so.But still, a large number of youth are not registered.“

“In UP , close to 75 lakh eligible young voters are yet to be enrolled. Likewise for many other states. So, we are launching a special campaign for enrolment of these young voters from July 1.This time we are making use of Facebook because young people are on Facebook.Facebook will issue reminders to all young voters between July 1 and 3, reminding them whether they are registered or not registered.If they are not, it will direct them to the National Voters' Search Portal, where they can fill the online application, which will then be pursued (at our end).“

A national call centre has been launched with tollfree number 1800111950. As part of the enrolment drive through July , the EC has written to all political parties seeking their cooperation to ensure its success.

[edit] Vote percentage vis-à-vis seats won/ ‘Strike rate’

[edit] 1996-2014: BJP more successful than Congress

Chethan Kumar, Lok Sabha elections: How BJP beats Congress in turning votes into seats, March 29, 2019: The Times of India

1996-2014: Vote percentage vis-à-vis seats won in LS elections/ ‘Strike rate’
From: Chethan Kumar, Lok Sabha elections: How BJP beats Congress in turning votes into seats, March 29, 2019: The Times of India

Much of BJP's dominance in electoral politics in the past five years has been credited to PM Modi and party chief Amit Shah. While the duo did lead BJP to a sweeping majority in 2014, the ground for that may have been laid much before their time.

Analysis of election data from 1996 to 2009, including the two terms of the Congress-led UPA, shows that the strike rate of BJP contestants was far better than those fielded by the grand old party. The percentage of BJP candidates winning was higher in all but one election (2009), including in 2004 when the UPA-I assumed office.

That Congress also fielded more candidates than BJP could have affected its winning percentage, but as experts explain, "BJP's success in building a national narrative had been in the pipeline since 1992".

Veteran BJP leader BS Yeddyurappa told TOI: "Narendra Modi was a Gujarat CM and was working in that capacity for the party. But from the time of Vajpayee, we worked across the breadth and length of this country with leaders like Advani and Murali Manohar Joshi, and at a time all this was taking a more concrete shape, Modi was projected as the PM candidate and naturally it got converted into votes."

1n 1999, when the BJP-led NDA came to power under Vajpayee, 57% of BJP candidates had won, against 25% from the rival party.

In 1996, 34% of all BJP contestants won, compared to 26% of Congress candidates; in 2004, when UPA eventually formed the government, 38% of BJP candidates won, against 35% for Congress. In 1998 and 1999, when NDA ruled, BJP candidates had a much higher winnability record compared to Congress.

"You can map the timeline of how we grew from Gujarat and Rajasthan to Karnataka and the northeast. It was between 1996 and 1998 that the party emerged nationally. In 2014, we did reach the peak as there was 'partial consolidation' because of the spiralling growth of the middle class and youth which came in handy," BJP spokesperson Krishna Sagar Rao said.

At a discussion last month, psephologists spoke of how the 2014 LS polls were critical in setting the ground for a narrative on New India. "If BJP comes back to power you will see this narrative getting stronger by 2024. But even if the party fails to retain power, the idea won't die, such was the nature of the elections in 2014," said Suhas Palshikar.

"India Shining may not have worked for BJP electorally in that year (2004), but the exercise of building a national narrative that has engaged people had begun and that was the first attempt. Today, the Naya Bharat campaign is not just a linguistic nuance but a sustained effort at consolidation," Palshikar said.

[edit] ’Vote share’ of the contesting parties

[edit] 1952-2024

The percentage of votes polled by the BJP and Congress, 1952-2024
From: [From the archives, June 5, 2024: The Times of India]

See graphic:

The percentage of votes polled by the BJP and Congress, 1952-2024

[edit] 1991-2014

Chethan Kumar, How smaller players gained at national parties’ expense, April 4, 2019: The Times of India

1991-2014-
National Party voteshare vs state, others
Congress share dips 16 points, BJP up by 11
From: Chethan Kumar, How smaller players gained at national parties’ expense, April 4, 2019: The Times of India

The soaring graph of BJP, which took the party to a record 282 Lok Sabha seats and a voteshare of 31% in 2014 coincides with an inverse trend – the gradual fall in the voteshare of national parties as a whole, touching an all-time low of 60.7% that very year.

So, where did the disappearing national votes go?

The 2014 voteshare marks a staggering 20% dip since 1991 when national parties polled 80.7% of the votes. Election Commission data shows the votes lost by the national parties mostly went to unrecognised parties; this is evident as the other potential beneficiary, the state parties, recorded only a marginal increase in voteshare.

Comparatively, the share of unrecognised parties — including AAP and Trinamool Congress — has jumped to 22.7% in 2014, compared to 2.2% in 1991, fluctuating every year. Other than 2014, the best performance of such parties was in 1998, when they got 10.9% of votes.

The share of independents has more or less remained flat: From 4.16% in 1991, they got 3.06% votes in 2014.

To register as a state-level or national political party, an outfit must poll a certain percentage of votes or win a certain percentage of seats contested. All others are termed “unrecognised”.

“The decline in Congress’ share was not transferred entirely to BJP, or the Janata Party and Dal before that, which is why you see the cumulative dip. Janata Dal has split into several fragments, like RJD, SP, JD(S) and JD(U), all of whom collect votes in their respective states,” psephologist Sandeep Shastri said.

BJP improved its voteshare every election barring 2009 while Congress has consistently lost out. Even so, BJP’s best performance in 2014 elections (31%) does not overtake that of Congress (35.4%) in 1991.

Political analyst S Mahadevaprakash said: “Until the early 1990s, Congress had a strong consolidated vote bank. In UP for example, Congress got the votes of both the upper caste Brahmins and Thakurs and the minorities. Post-Mandal and Masjid, this broke. But BJP has not managed to consolidate that fully and no other party has grown in stature.”

In this period, there were three other major national parties — Janata Dal (JD), CPM and BSP — but none of them individually crossed 12% in any of the elections. With 11.84% of votes in 1991, Janata Dal performed the best among these three parties, while BSP with barely 4.2% was the worst. Compared to 1991, the share of national parties has dipped 20%.

The gap appears to have been filled by registered unrecognised parties whose voteshare surged from 2.2% in 1991 to 22.7% in 2014. At least 10% of this went to AAP (2%), Trinamool Congress. (5.2), All Jharkhand Students Union (1.4%), JD(S) and other regional parties.

[edit] Voter turnout

[edit] What does a high turnout signify?

High turnout doesn’t signal a wave

The meaning of high voter turnout

Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the world, Voter turnout in parliamentary elections, 2012-14; Graphic courtesy: The Times of India, December 5, 2015

‘Long Queues Outside Booths Don’t Necessarily Mean Doom For Incumbent, Desire For Change’

Praveen Chakravarty The Times of India

Television anchors, columnists and poll pundits have been taking the line that a high voter turnout in the current Lok Sabha elections is the result of a “wave” sweeping the country. The average turnout in the 438 constituencies that finished voting until April 30 reportedly shows an eight percentage point increase over the 2009 elections. As election chatter moves away from candidates, their wealth, wives and lineage to voter turnout and its significance, it is pertinent to ask two questions: Does high voter turnout correlate to any national trend? Does high voter turnout signal anti-incumbency?

This analysis (see box) studies five “wave” elections — 1977 (anti-Emergency), 1984 (Indira Gandhi assassination), 1989 (Bofors scandal), 1999 (Vajpayee wave) and 2004 (India Shining) and compares change in voter turnout vis-à-vis the previous election across the 12 largest states that account for 82% of all seats. The 1984 election after Indira Gandhi’s assassination, where a sympathy wave was said to turn the tide in favour of Congres, witnessed a seven percentage points increase in voter turnout in these 12 states versus the 1980 election, the highest-ever increase. And all 12 states saw an increased turnout in this election. The 1977 election, after Emergency was lifted, saw a 4.7 percentage point increase versus the previous Lok Sabha election (1971).

The other three supposed “wave” elections — 1989, 1999 and 2004 had a lower turnout than the polls immediately prior to them. Voter turnout numbers are not comparable and somewhat meaningless given the wild fl uctuations in voter lists across elections. It is not abundantly clear from data that higher voter turnout correlates with any national sentiment or wave.

The other popular perception is that voter anger leads to higher voter turnout and hence anti-incumbency. We analysed 1,174 constituencies across three elections in the 12 largest states for the last three elections (1999, 2004 and 2009) where Congres and/or BJP had a candidate contesting. The results show that there is no significant correlation between higher turnouts and loss for an incumbent MP. (Higher turnout is defined as higher than the previous Lok Sabha election and higher than the average turnout in that state).

In the 1999 election, 40% of incumbents lost where there was a higher voter turnout, 28% in 2004 and 30% in 2009. In other words, not even half of incumbent MPs lost the election when there was a higher voter turnout in their constituency. Hence, it is not possible to draw a direct correlation between higher turnout and anti-incumbency. There is also substantial variation across the 12 largest states in terms of anti-incumbency (see box). For example, in the 2004 elections in Bihar, every incumbent MP lost in a constituency where turnout was higher but in Madhya Pradesh, none of the incumbent MPs lost where turnout was higher. Similarly, in the 2009 elections, 75% of incumbents in Orissa lost but none in Kerala. It is evident that regional context is a far bigger driver of anti-incumbency than mere voter turnout or national sentiment.

Voter turnouts across most democracies are a fascinating trend to observe and paint themes. It is even more interesting in large and old democracies such as India and the US where voting is not mandatory and hence the choice to exercise one’s vote during a particular election represents a certain motivation. The sheer size of India’s national elections and Election Commission data make it plausible to analyse and tell stories of how we vote, why we vote and who we vote for. If we believe what we see in our politics is who we are as a society, electoral data can be a true mirror to ourselves.

(The writer is founding trustee, IndiaSpend, a non-profi t data journalism initiative)

[edit] Wars and election results

Do Indo-Pak conflicts affect elections? | March 2019 [ The Times of India

[edit] Indo-Pak conflicts and elections: 1965-1999

War and polls:

Indian and Pakistani armies have fought thrice: in 1965, 1971 and 1999. Elections after the 1965 war were held only two years later (Congress’ seat fell from 361 in 1962 to 283 in 1967) and the 1971 war happened eight months after an election that Indira Gandhi had won. Only the Kargil war (fought from May to July 1999) was immediately followed by that year’s Lok Sabha elections (held in October).

Lessons from Kargil:

After the victory in Kargil, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led BJP won 182 seats in Lok Sabha. So, how much of it was the impact of Kargil? Depends. BJP’s 182 seat tally was the same number as in 1998 but its overall vote share fell by 1.84% (which means it got fewer votes than in the previous elections). In politically crucial Uttar Pradesh, BJP’s vote-share went down 9% and its seat tally dropped from 57 (in 1998) to 29. The party also lost seats in some other big states (like Punjab). That means the electoral outcome did not match the outpouring of emotions during the two-month war. Does it mean, Kargil had no impact? A counter view is that the BJP government during the Kargil was only a caretaker government (though war allowed Vajpayee to function as a full-fledged PM) and their retaining the previous poll tally was itself the impact of the war (182 was the best the BJP had ever performed in history till then). Others point out that it wasn’t the war but Vajpayee’s charisma that got the votes for BJP as the opposition then was weak and Congress was turning out to be a party of rebels.

[edit] Women in the Lok Sabha

[edit] 1952-2014

Women in the Lok Sabha 1952-2014

NO ROOM IN THE HOUSE FOR WOMEN

The Times of India May 17 2014

Women make up 49% of the population but only 7.7% of the total candidates (8,163) contesting in 2014 are female. One third of the 631 women candidates are independents. Congres had the largest number (57) while BJP fielded only 37. Women now often outnumber men in polling queues but clearly parties haven't woken up to this new scenario (Chart: Women in the Lok Sabha)

[edit] The representation of women in 2014

The representation of women in the Indian parliament in 2014
From: May 5, 2019: The Times of India

' See graphic ‘:

The representation of women in the Indian parliament in 2014

[edit] Women voters

[edit] 1951-52: 28 lakh dropped from rolls

In 1951-52, 28 lakh women had to be dropped from the rolls
From: March 24, 2019: The Times of India

See graphic:

In 1951-52, 28 lakh women had to be dropped from the rolls

[edit] Burqa, ghoonghat, reluctance to disclose names

Damini Nath , May 14, 2024: The Indian Express

Hyderabad Police registered an FIR against Latha under IPC sections pertaining to undue influence at an election (171C), obstructing a public servant (186), and intent to incite (505(1)(c)), and Section 132 of The Representation of the People Act, 1951 (misconduct at the polling station).

Voters who cover their face

While face coverings have been increasingly politicised of late, women who wear ghoonghat or niqab have always voted in India’s elections.

Before the first Lok Sabha election in 1951-52, the Election Commission of India (ECI) worked hard to ensure women became full participants in India’s democratic process — however, many women refused to enrol with their names, and instead asked to be identified in relation to a male member of the family, as the mother of so-and-so or wife of so-and-so.

“The reason…was that according to local custom, women in these areas were averse to disclosing their proper names to strangers… Out of a total of nearly 80 million voters in the country, nearly 2.8 million eventually failed to disclose their proper names, and the entries relating to them had to be deleted from the rolls,” Sukumar Sen, the first Chief Election Commissioner, wrote in his report on the election.

Following a sustained campaign by the ECI, the numbers of women increased steadily on voters’ lists. Today, women account for almost 49% of the electorate.

Identifying women in burqa

Conducting free and fair elections is the ECI’s mandate, which includes ensuring no bogus votes are cast. Polling officers are required to verify a voter’s appearance against the photo on the voter card, if needed.

To ensure this is done while also protecting the privacy of the woman elector in ghoonghat/ burqa/ niqab, the ECI has issued standing instructions for Returning Officers of constituencies and Presiding Officers of polling stations:

“If sufficiently large number of ‘pardanashin’ (burqa-clad) women electors are assigned to your Polling Station, you should make special arrangements for their identification and application of indelible ink on the left index finger by a lady Polling Officer in a separate enclosure having due regard to privacy, dignity, and decency.”

“For such special enclosure you may use locally available but inexpensive material,” says the ECI’s Handbook for Presiding Officers.

The ECI’s Handbook for Returning Officers says: “The availability of female polling personnel should be examined for appointing Presiding/ Polling Officers in polling stations set up exclusively for female voters or where the number of female voters, especially, pardanashin women is large, there must be at least one lady-polling officer who may facilitate and identify the women electors.”

The action of Madhavi Latha

The responsibility and right to verify the identity of voters lies with the ECI, not a contesting candidate.

Candidates or their polling agents are allowed access to polling stations in the constituency, to ensure that the polling process is conducted without interference. However, they are not permitted to intervene in the voting process.

Madhavi Latha’s action was viewed as interference and, therefore, at the ECI’s behest, she was booked by the police.

[edit] 1962, 2019

Difference between female and male voter turnout not only closed in but also reversed to 0.175 percentage points in 2019 Lok Sabha polls from -16.71 percentage points in the 1962 general election.

[edit] 2014> 2019: a sharp increase

Bhavika Jain & Siva Kumar, Number of women voters is surging across the country, February 1, 2019: The Times of India

Women voters in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, 2014> 2019
From: Bhavika Jain & Siva Kumar, Number of women voters is surging across the country, February 1, 2019: The Times of India

For a country that suffers from low sex ratios and female literacy rates, the 2019 general elections will herald a level of gender parity giving women voters a greater say. The latest enrolment data from two large states — Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu — shows the gap between the male and female voter base has narrowed considerably in one state, while in the other, the number of women voters has overtaken that of registered men.

The increase in enrolment of female voters in both states is in keeping with the broader national trend of improved voter sex ratios (number of women voters for every 1,000 male voters). In the 2014 polls, Kerala, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram & Puducherry already had more women in the electorate than men.

Tamil Nadu has now joined the club: of its 5.91 crore voters, as per the final revised rolls released on Thursday, 2.98 crore are women and 2.92 crore are men. The number of women voters in the state has increased by 11% against a rise of 8.5% for men in the last five years.

Women voters in Maha have increased by 13L

Maharashtra, where the voter sex ratio was traditionally skewed towards men, has shown an increase in women voters by 13 lakh in the latest round of enrolments. As per final rolls, there are a total of 8.73 crore voters in Maharashtra, of which 4.57 crore are male and 4.16 crore are females. The voter sex ratio this year is thus 911 against 905 in 2014.

“The voter sex ratio before 2014 was 875 or 880. It was then that we undertook a special drive to enrol more women to increase their representation,” said a senior official in Maharashtra. The drive in the states has involved door-to-door verification, contact programmes using educational institutions, and outreach through women self-help groups and networks such as those established by welfare schemes like the aanganwadis.

Over the past decade, there has been increasing emphasis at the national level to increase electoral participation of women in all states. The all-India sex ratio of voters had, from 715 female voters for every 1,000 male voters in the 1960s, improved to 883 female voters in the 2000s. It was 940 in 2011, the highest since 1971.

By 2014, all the southern states had voter parity or near parity between women and their male counterparts. Kerala, of course, had more women voters—a reflection of its overall sex ratio-—while TN, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka had nearly the same number of voters of both sexes.

The increased participation of women — who have made up for 47-48% of the electorate in Lok Sabha elections dating back to 1971— and improved voter sex ratios also denote the success of the Election Commission in countering the impact of migration on electoral rolls. As highlighted by TOI through its Lost Votes Campaign, a large chunk of the potential electorate is unable to exercise its franchise because of changes in address. In the case of women, this is a crucial factor as many move house after marriage.

[edit] See also

Chief Election Commissioners Of India

Delhi: Parliamentary elections

Election Commission of India

Election expenditure: India

Election laws, rules. procedures: India

Elections in India: behaviour and trends (historical)

Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2014)

Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2019)

Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2024)

India: A political history, 1947 onwards

Karnataka: caste, mutts and elections

Pakistan: Elections, 1937 onwards

Uttar Pradesh: Assembly elections

[edit] ...and also

Indpaedia has

i) ‘Political history’ pages, state-wise, and a page for India as a whole.

ii) State-wise pages on assembly elections

iii) State-wise pages on local bodies’ elections

iv) State-wise pages on parliamentary elections.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+''' New: ''' Several sections of this page have been shifted to the page [[Election expenditure: India ]]
 {| class="wikitable"
 |-
@@ Line 8: / Line 11: @@
 See [[examples]] and a tutorial.</div>
 |}
-[[Category:India|E]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|E]]
 [[Category:Government|E]]
+[[Category:India|E]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|E]]
 [[Category:Politics|E]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|E]]
+=History=
+== General Elections to the Lok Sabha, 1951- onw==
+[http://164.100.47.194/loksabha/FAQ.aspx#About_Lok_Sabha_and_its_History   Lok Sabha]
-=The two biggest parties: 1952-2014=
+The first General Elections were held from 25 October 1951 to 21 February 1952;
-[[File: two top parties.jpg| |frame| 500px]]
+the second from 24 February to 14 March 1957;
+the third from 19 to 25 February   1962;
+the fourth from 17 to 21 February 1967;
+the fifth from 1 to 10 March 1971;
+the sixth from 16 to 20  March 1977;
+the seventh from 3 to 6  January 1980;
+the eighth from 24 to 28 December 1984;
+the ninth from 22 to 26 November 1989;
+the tenth from 20  May  to 15 June 1991;
+the eleventh from 27 April to 30 May 1996;
+the twelfth from 16 to 23 February 1998;
+the thirteenth  from 5 September to 6 October 1999;
+the fourteenth  from 20 April to 10 May 2004;
+the fifteenth from 16 April to 13 May 2009;
+the sixteenth General Elections from 7 April 2014 to 12 May 2014,
+the seventeenth General Elections from 11 April 2019 to 19 May 2019 (schedule),
+===Details 1951 – 2019===
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/how-17-elections-transformed-indian-democracy/articleshow/102774869.cms   Anubhuti Vishnoi, August 17, 2023: ''The Times of India'']
+As India heads to the 18th Lok Sabha election after 76 years of Independence, the electoral journey travelled by the largest democracy is one marked with many milestones — the largest electorate in the world at more than 900mn; female voters who closed the gender gap in voter turnout in 2019 and outdid males; and the only country to transition to paperless ballots through electronic voting machines (EVMs).
+''' The first general election '''
+ Things moved swiftly in independent India with the adoption of the Constitution on November 26, 1949. Four months later, Sukumar Sen was appointed the first chief election commissioner (CEC). With this, the country embarked on the great experiment to conduct the first nationwide election.
+ In April 1950, the Representation of People Act was passed by the provisional Parliament. The first general election was held in 68 phases between October 25, 1951 and February 21, 1952. Around 53 political parties and 533 independents were in the fray for 489 seats. Around 173mn voters were registered out of a population of 361mn and 45.8% voter turnout was recorded.
+The Indian National Congress wrested 364 of the 489 seats and Jawaharlal Nehru became India’s first democratically elected prime minister.
+ The first general election was what Sen described as “an act of faith”. Every general election still is.
+''' The genesis of political parties '''
+ The first election opened up new political and electoral fault lines and sowed the seeds of a multi-party democracy.
+ While the Congress won and did so for several elections to come, indicating a ‘national consensus’, new political formations emerged over the following decades.
+Of the 14 parties in the fray in 1952, four retained the national status among them, some by ministers previously in the Nehru-led government who had resigned to form their own parties.
+Syama Prasad Mookerjee quit Nehru’s provisional ministry to later form the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the reincarnation of which in 1980 was the Bharatiya Janata Party, which has formed five Union governments so far, including the current one.
+ The Communist Party of India (CPI) also contested the first general election and became the principal Opposition party winning 16 seats. It split in the 1960s and the CPI (Marxist) faction grew stronger in political influence over the years. It supported the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government in 2004 but withdrew support over the Indo-US nuclear deal. It is today allied with the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) and leads the ruling alliance in Kerala, apart from being part of the Nitish Kumar-led alliance in Bihar and also supports the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government in Tamil Nadu.
+Law minister BR Ambedkar revived the Scheduled Castes Federation, which later led to the creation of the Republican Party of India that splintered into nearly 50 factions over the years. Acharya Kriplani formed the Kisan Mazdoor Praja Parishad or Praja Party, which merged with Jayaprakash Narayan’s and Ram Manohar Lohia’s Socialist Party to become the Praja Socialist Party (PSP). Many parties formed later had leaders who emerged from the PSP.
+ There were also parties whose fortunes dwindled over the years and others that merged into similar politically-ideological tents. For instance, the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha of VD Savarkar and Nathuram Godse never notched electoral victories but its strong ‘Hindu rashtra’ underpinnings continue to be reflected in political narratives right into 2023. The Akhil Bharatiya Ram Rajya Parishad (RRP), led by Hariharanand ‘Swami’ Karpatri, also advocated for a ‘Hindu rashtra’. It won three seats in the 1951 polls and later merged with the BJS.
+ The All-India Forward Bloc, founded by Subhas Chandra Bose, survived several splits and is quite diminished in presence and influence. The Revolutionary Socialist Party has also survived many splits and retains its pockets in West Bengal and Kerala.
+Alongside, there was also the rise of regional parties. The Shiromani Akali Dal bagged four seats in the 1952 election and remains a critical stakeholder in Punjab.
+The Jharkhand Party, set up by Jaipal Singh Munda, contested several assembly elections, demanded statehood for Jharkhand and was the principal Opposition to the Congress in Bihar for several years.
+ Such changes became deep-driven with alliances and multi-party governments becoming more commonplace as regional and community aspirations found representation in the electoral space. As on date, there are six national parties, 54 state parties and more than 2,500 unrecognised parties in India.
+ Even in 2023, both the ruling dispensation and the Opposition are alliances stitched up with several parties that have roots in the first general election.
+''' Female voters '''
+India made the big leap with its first election by bringing universal adult franchise — every man and woman over 21 years was allowed to vote. In the late 1980s, the voting age was lowered to 18.
+The first general election was challenging, including in bringing female voters to the polling booth. Women of the era refused to give their complete names due to social inhibitions and would refer to themselves as mother of X, or daughter/wife of Y. No such allowance was permitted by Sen on the voters’ list. It is estimated that more than 2.8mn women could not vote in the first election due to this.
+Sen, still the CEC into the second general election in 1957, launched massive public campaigns and appealed to women to disclose their full names to exercise their voting right. The next election saw better numbers.
+ The Election Commission (EC) had to keep at it over the years, methodically addressing various barriers faced by women in participating in elections, from ensuring separate toilets to creche facilities, all-women polling stations and women block-level polling registration staff. And it has worked with phenomenal results.
+From men, starting at a 16 percentage point edge over women in voter turnout in 1962, the figure was halved to 8.4 percentage points in the 2004 Lok Sabha election and was down to 1.8 percentage point in 2014.
+ The 2019 Lok Sabha election marked a watershed because females closed the gender gap with male voters. They surpassed them at over 67% turnout. From a gender gap (in female to male voter turnout) of -16.71% in 1962, it not only closed but reversed to +0.17% in 2019, the EC noted. India witnessed a 235.72% increase in female electors since the 1971 election. Women have risen to become an independent and important segment for every political party as the election manifestos clearly indicate.
+ There is also a rise in the number of women elected to Parliament — from 24 in the first general election to 78 in 2019. This needs to improve as does overall voter turnout — up from 44.8% in the first election to a record 67.4% in the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.
+ The EC is mindful that migrant and young voters are still not exercising their vote, and discussions have been opened to consider remote voting options.
+''' Progress in electoral process '''
+ The first general election process involved allotting each candidate a different coloured ballot box with his name and symbol at the polling booth to help even unlettered people to vote. People would cast their vote into the desired candidate’s ballot box. The process took 68 phases of voting.
+The 2019 Lok Sabha election was held in seven phases and within 50 days.
+The nation moved fast from this setup. Almost every election has seen a reworking of processes which are now well-etched into the electoral machinery — from preparation of electoral rolls, their summary revision, mapping of vulnerable polling stations, ensuring adequate security deployment among others. There are also fully home-grown technological innovations that are today integral to the poll process.
+ The first challenge encountered by the EC was identity theft and multiple votes by a single voter. The indelible ink was brought in for this. Developed with the help of the National Physical Laboratory, the indelible ink was first used in the 1962 election and is still key proof to a voter having cast the vote.
+ The most tectonic shift in the electoral landscape came in the late 1990s when the electronic voting machine (EVM) was introduced. The ballot paper had acquired notoriety over ballot loot and manipulation of votes across several states.
+ The EVM became the only voting method for general and assembly elections in 2004 and is credited for stamping out the booth-capture model of electioneering of the 1980s. Alongside the EVM came the voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) to help a voter verify the candidate and party he has voted for and dispel impressions on possible hacking of EVMs.
+Piloted in the Nagaland polls in 2014, the VVPAT has been used in all assembly and Lok Sabha polls from 2019. Following an SC order on April 9, 2019, the EC also increased the VVPAT slips vote count to five randomly selected EVMs per assembly constituency. The EVM-VVPAT combine has been questioned by several cynics, but continues to stay. The 2024 Lok Sabha election will see EVMs deployed in its latest avatar — the M3.
+ Electronically transmitted postal ballot papers, meant to service voters on duty away from their place of domicile, have more recently been extended to senior citizens, which is said to have improved their participation in polls.
+''' Still miles to go '''
+Courts have often stepped in on behalf of voters. In 2013, the Supreme Court allowed citizens to cast a negative vote — ‘None of the above’ (Nota).
+Courts have also intervened to ensure greater voter awareness. On its orders, each candidate must declare his criminal antecedents in his poll affidavit.
+However, attempts to ensure migrant voting through options like remote voting or for non-resident Indian (NRI) voters have not succeeded so far. Similarly, while the Model Code of Conduct came into effect from the 1962 election, it is found deficient in checking hate speech, bribing of voters and the influence of money power in elections.
+ While the symbols order of 1968 and the anti-defection law of 1985 have tried to combat “the evil of political defections” in the lure of office, that has not stopped splits or defections.
+ The EC, Law Commissions, governments and courts have made recommendations to usher in greater transparency in the electoral system from aspects such as funding to checking criminalisation. Although much has been achieved, much more is waiting to be done. There’s a list of more than 50 electoral reform recommendations that the EC sends to every government, year after year.
+===The results: 1951-2024===
+[[File: Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1951- 67.jpg| Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1951- 67 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=17_03_2024_008_001_cap_TOI  March 17, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1971-84.jpg|Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1971-84 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=17_03_2024_008_001_cap_TOI  March 17, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1989-98.jpg|Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1989-98 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=17_03_2024_008_001_cap_TOI  March 17, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1999-2014.jpg|Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1999-2014 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=17_03_2024_008_001_cap_TOI  March 17, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphics''':
+'' Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1951- 67 ''
+'' Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1971-84 ''
+'' Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1989-98 ''
+'' Lok Sabha elections, parties and seats, 1999-2014 ''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+==1951: ballot boxes by Godrej & Boyce ==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01410&sk=0E6368A5&mode=text  Bhavika Jain1, This Bombay factory made ballot boxes for India’s first poll, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: Bombay policemen guarding the ballot boxes that were used in the first Lok Sabha polls held over 1951-52.jpg|Bombay policemen guarding the ballot boxes that were used in the first Lok Sabha polls held over 1951-52 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01410&sk=0E6368A5&mode=text  Bhavika Jain1, This Bombay factory made ballot boxes for India’s first poll, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+''Independent India was gearing up to hold its first elections in 1952 and inside a factory in the marshy suburbs of Mumbai’s Vikhroli, the workers were making history, literally.''
+It was the latter half of 1951 and from the outside, it was business as usual at Plant 1 of the Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. But unbeknownst to many, the workers were part of a nationbuilding project, assigned the task of speedily manufacturing the first ever ballot boxes to be used in general elections in India.
+Archives of the company indicate that a total of 12.83 lakh ballot boxes were produced in the Vikhroli factory in barely four months. “A newspaper, Bombay Chronicle, had printed an article on December 15, 1951, saying the factory was manufacturing 15,000 ballot boxes a day.
+This, without affecting the production of any of their other products like safes, cupboards, cabinets and locks, proves that the workers at the factory were putting in extra hours every day to ensure that the ballot boxes were readied in time,” said Vrunda Pathare, chief archivist at Godrej.
+An official from the archives division said an ad in The Times of India published by Godrej shows that the original order was for 12.24 lakh ballot boxes but they ended up making 12.83 lakh. “It’s probably because orders were given to other companies as well and those who did not finish them in time passed the order on to Godrej in the end,” said the official.
+The production cost of one ‘olive green’ box came to Rs 5 and the model was finalised after testing 50 designs. The internal locking system in the ballot box was designed by a factory hand, Nathalal Panchal, after it was found that an external lock would inflate the making cost.
+“We have anecdotal evidence that Panchal played a key role in suggesting the design for the internal locking mechanism,” said Pathare. That story is now part of an oral history project of 2006 when company officials interviewed KR Thanewala, the plant manager of Plant 1 in 1951, who is now no more. Thanewala had recalled during the interview that Plant 1 had just started in May 1951.
+“Pirojsha Godrej (the owner) would come to the factory at 3 o’clock every afternoon asking us how it was going. And he got orders from other companies who had not somehow or the other managed to make them (ballot boxes). The mechanism was tested. Every box had to be checked. Click when it closes and click it should open. Once it was closed, without putting your finger inside and pulling the string, you cannot unlock it,” he said.
+By February 1952, all the ballot boxes were manufactured, loaded onto railway wagons and sent to the 22 states in preparation for the holding of the polls. Thanewala, in his interview, describes how the boxes were moved: “...We had to walk to the station and back. And...I did a lot of night shifts. At night we (used to) light mashaals (torches) and with the mashaal, I used to walk from the railway tracks up to Vikhroli station. It was great fun.”
+==1951: many did not know how to vote==
+[[File: In 1951 many did not know how to vote.jpg|In 1951 many did not know how to vote <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F15&entity=Ar01505&sk=4DF71952&mode=image  March 15, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''In 1951 many did not know how to vote''
+=The major political parties=
+==1952-2014: The two biggest parties==
+[[File: two top parties.jpg|1952-2014: The two biggest parties |frame| 500px]]
 ''' MIND THE GAP '''
@@ Line 22: / Line 217: @@
 It was a Congres show in the initial elections. By the late 1980s, the picture began to change. With a fragmented polity, coalition governments became the norm. After 25 years, BJP has changed the script winning a decisive majority
-=Caste=
+==2014>2019==
+[[File: The number of registered and, or recognised political parties in India, 2014-2019.jpg|The number of registered and/ or recognised political parties in India, 2014>2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F16&entity=Ar01402&sk=993C2FC1&mode=image  April 16, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''The number of registered and/ or recognised political parties in India, 2014>2019''
+=Big data=
+==2014-19==
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/why-this-is-indias-big-data-election/articleshow/68898005.cms  Shubhra Pant, (Additional reporting by Swati Mathur), April 16, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+''Why this is India’s big data election''
+'''You may struggle to read your neta’s mind but the neta has a lot of help reading yours. '''
+This election season, you may have noticed a trend in the kind of political videos popping up on your feeds. And posts related to polls you haven’t participated in but are there for your reading anyway. You might have also noticed ads from election candidates in your vicinity. And when you want to find out what’s trending? There’s a pattern there too, right?
+While reading about elections in newspapers, you may have come across a story about the explosion of ‘Gully Boy’ rappers with their politics-themed numbers on Kolkata’s hip-hop scene. What you wouldn’t have known is that West Bengal is among the largest consumers of political videos in the country.
+It shows how one trend begets another — in this case, a certain kind of online behaviour creates a demand, and as more videos are produced because of that demand, it drives up the trend line of the behaviour itself. And the politician who has access to this data would know that while the best way to a Bengali’s heart may be through food, the best way to her or his brain is through videos. Trust the WhatsApp group admins to make full use of that.
+Pratham Mittal of the Neta App says of the 90 crore voters in India, around 54 crore are unique mobile phone users who have Facebook and WhatsApp accounts, quoting a McKinsey report. “An analysis shows around 30% of the total voters can be influenced with the use of social media in these elections,” Mittal says.
+The ongoing Lok Sabha polls may or may not be an election for a new India, but they certainly are an election that’s about Big Data and its consorts — algorithms, analytics and artificial intelligence (AI). They are invisible but everywhere, creating endless patterns of political messaging around you by relentlessly tracking and decoding your online activity. In election season, when the neta wants to be in your head, this Big Data is worth its gigabytes in gold because it allows customised campaigns, just like targeted ads.
+For example, if you have interacted with BJP posts of late, the algorithm would know if the nationalism message is for you. Similarly, how you react to Congress’ pet issues would tell the AI whether you like NYAY.
+'''Poll pitch from data '''
+Both national and regional parties are working with huge data sets of online behaviour to understand household and booth-level profiles in a constituency, first-time voters, floating voters, demographics, caste and socio-economic segments. This data is guiding campaign strategy (not only what to talk about but also what not to), selection of candidates as well as building a pro-party narrative.
+Congress has given all its candidates a data docket for each constituency. Praveen Chakrabarty, chairman of Congress’ data analytics department, says the dockets have information on households, new voters, missing voters and local issues. “Instead of pushing down a single leader’s message using technology, we empower our party workers with data and technology. These workers pass on personalised or customised messages to voters.” The party tracks its on-ground activity through the Ghar Ghar Congress app.
+But BJP is well ahead of others in using Big Data. It started using analytics in the 2014 general election when others were still grappling with the digital medium. But the technology five years ago wasn’t as advanced as today, when it has opened up new avenues to understand voters. Shivam Shankar, a poll strategist who worked with BJP in Manipur and Tripura in 2017 and 2018, and is now with the Grand Alliance in Bihar, says BJP has first-mover advantage. “BJP has around 25,000 WhatApp groups in all northern states whereas, by the time Congress came to forming such groups, the policies were changed by the social media giant. So, there is no way for Congress to match BJP’s reach,” says Shankar.
+'''More personalised, the better '''
+He says besides polling booths and caste, parties also collect data on utility bills (like power bills, which give an idea about the socioeconomic status of a voter). According to Shankar, the game-changer for BJP will be its latest campaign to target beneficiaries of government schemes. “BJP is working on data of beneficiaries of schemes like Ujjwala, which has never been done before. The data is used to approach voters and convince them to vote for the party,” he says. A BJP MLA from the northeast says analytics are also in pace to study conversations on social media WhatsApp, Twitter and Facebook. This not only gives the party an idea about the “narrative” but, with its formidable digital network, allows it easily turn a conversation into a social media trend.
+AAP, meanwhile, is working with a team of data researchers and scientists to design its poll strategy. “We use data to identify volunteers at the booth level, which are the booths where AAP is strong and which ones are floating booths and optimise our resources,” says Ankit Lal, who oversees analytics and IT.
+Another party which has extensively used social media to canvass is Chandrababu Naidu’s TDP (though it’s now locked in a legal battle with Telangana over voter data). “the village and mandal-level committees upwards, we have party agents who use technology to target people about things we have promised and delivered,” says TDP spokesperson Rammohan Rao.
+In Tamil Nadu, DMK has been using the digital medium to court first-time voters. “A team of IT personnel segregates information based on the target audience — youth, IT professionals, entrepreneurs, students and so on — and our messaging to them is tailored accordingly,” says TKS Elangovan, Rajya Sabha MP and organisation secretary of DMK.
+SP is using Akhilesh Yadav’s social media popularity to explain the “importance of gathbandhan”. Its spokesperson Abhishek Mishra says, “In the Hindi belt, Akhilesh’s social media following is among the highest. The feedback, along with daily meetings, is what we use to convey that this election is not just a battle of politics and polity, but of ideology and philosophy.”
+'''Enter, the startups '''
+The same analytics that help a company sell toothpaste or Bluetooth speakers are being used by parties to peddle their poll pitches. But the need for expertise to sharpen their messages, and do it across a vast and bewilderingly diverse country like India, has taken them to specialists and startups.
+Silver Push, a Gurgaonbased startup which is working with Congress, is doing a sentiment analysis of voters, using keywords. “Once the party has rolled out a campaign, we analyse its success. Then we share this information with the party, which helps them tweak their campaign wherever required,” says Hitesh Chawla, co-founder of the startup, which also analyses videos.
+Others like Bangalorebased Next Election, Noidabased Vidooly and Delhi-based Neta App are also working with election-related data. The Next Election app is a bridge between candidates and voters. Amit Bansal, founder of the app, says voters have three tabs — discovery, accountability and contribution. “Constituencies and education of candidates come under discovery while accountability covers work done by candidates. Under contribution, candidates can communicate their message to voters through the app,” explains Bansal, adding he is working with multiple candidates across political parties, and also those contesting in Bangalore.
+The Neta App, founded in January 2018 by Pratham Mittal, currently has a 55-member team. It allows users to rate and review their MPs and MLAs, handy data for political parties. The company says in the Karnataka elections, 90% of candidates who won were also rated highest on the app.
+Vidooly’s analytics, meanwhile, tell them which political videos are gaining maximum traction, which it then shares with advertisers. “Our current study shows UP, Maharashtra and West Bengal see maximum consumption of political videos. And FMCG is the biggest investor in advertisements,” says Subrata Kar, founder of Vidooly. Founded in 2014, Vidooly analyses online video viewership for various companies.
+===2019===
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=05_04_2024_014_016_cap_TOI  April 5, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: No. of candidates in 2019.jpg|No. of candidates in 2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=05_04_2024_014_016_cap_TOI  April 5, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+''' 1 vote, 185 candidates '''
+ Electors in Telangana’s Nizamabad constituency were really spoilt for choice in 2019. After all, they had a field of 185 candidates from which to pick their representative. Belagavi in Karnataka, too, had a heavy roster of LS hopefuls, though a distant second to Nizamabad. Meghalaya’s Tura, on the other hand, had the smallest candidates’ list, with only three names on it.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=The biggest electoral clashes=
+==1952-2009==
+[[File: Goliaths felled .jpg|Goliaths felled, 1952-2009; <br/> Courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=17_05_2014_026_026_003&type=P&artUrl=BIG-KNOCK-OUTS-17052014026026&eid=31808  ''The Times of India'']
+|frame|left|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''Goliaths felled, 1952-2009''
+=Candidates=
+==1998-2014: no. per constituency; non-serious candidates==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F21&entity=Ar01300&sk=DAFC64F4&mode=text  Chethan Kumar, Why the outcome doesn’t matter for these poll candidates, March 21, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: 1998-2014- no. of Candidates per Lok Sabha constituency; non-serious candidates; independents.jpg|1998-2014: no. of Candidates per Lok Sabha constituency; non-serious candidates; independents <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F21&entity=Ar01300&sk=DAFC64F4&mode=text  Chethan Kumar, Why the outcome doesn’t matter for these poll candidates, March 21, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Talk about participating being more important than winning and there is the case of independent contestants and those from smaller outfits in Indian elections, who make little impact cumulatively as an electoral group but continue to jump into the fray in numbers.
+A total of 31,154 candidates (party-affiliated and others) contested in the past five Lok Sabha elections. About eight in 10 of these, or 25,478 candidates, forfeited their deposits with independents and members of smaller parties making up the bulk of their numbers.
+Elections are getting more expensive to fight and the electorate rarely chooses a contestant from unrecognised parties or an independent as their member of Parliament. Despite this ground reality, the average number of candidates per constituency has jumped by 70% in 2014 compared to 1998.
+In 1998, the average number of candidates per constituency was 8.7, rising to 15.2 in 2014. The maximum number of candidates in one constituency was 34 and 42 in these years, respectively. The average has increased every election since 1998 (see graphic).
+“For many, it is a way to gain popularity locally. They know they won’t win, but they want to make themselves known and gain influence in whatever way possible. In some cases, such candidates are later seen associated with major parties,” said political scientist Suhas Palshikar.
+Since India follows a firstpast-the-post system, where a candidate with the maximum votes among all contestants wins — even if she or he doesn’t recieve a majority of the votes — many contestants are in it on a gamble.
+While some are proxies of major parties looking to divide votes or plain political rebels, some are contesting to make a point.
+Take the example of Sumalatha in Karnataka. The wife of late actor-politician MH Ambareesh, she announced on Monday that she would contest as an independent from Mandya, where state CM HD Kumaraswamy’s son Nikhil is making his LS poll debut. Ambareesh was a Congress member and Sumalatha had been looking to get a ticket from her late husband’s party. But Congress ceded the seat to JD(S) as part of its seatsharing pact with the regional party, prompting Sumalatha to declare she would nonetheless join the fray in Mandya.
+But many of the new parties cropping up before elections — the number of parties registered with the Election Commission has increased from 1,709 in 2014 to 2,354 as of March 10, 2019 — are seen as proxies by experts. Analysts say the number of “serious candidates” in every constituency is only three or four.
+Among 10 major states — Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Delhi — Tamil Nadu and Delhi, at 21, had the highest average of candidates per constituency in 2014.
+“There are multiple reasons for a large number of people contesting elections, but key among those is the return on investment that politics offers in developing countries like India,” said political analyst Harish Ramaswamy. “Whether it is in the decentralised institutions or at the national level, people’s economic condition strengthens very quickly and their lifestyle changes.”
+'''Elections are getting more expensive to fight and the voters rarely elect an MP from unrecognised parties or an independent. Despite this ground reality, the average number of candidates per constituency has jumped by 70% between 1998 and 2014'''
+===1996: Nalgonda===
+[[File: 1996- Nalgonda holds the record for the highest number of candidates per constituency.jpg|1996: Nalgonda holds the record for the highest number of candidates per constituency <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F01&entity=Ar01305&sk=5FC1BEA9&mode=image  April 1, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''1996: Nalgonda holds the record for the highest number of candidates per constituency''
+==Non-serious candidates==
+===1988-2018: Padmarajan lost 170 elections===
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/dr-k-padmarajan-the-man-who-lost-all-elections/articleshow/68625092.cms  March 29, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: 1988-2018- Padmarajan lost 170 elections.jpg|1988-2018- Padmarajan lost 170 elections.jpg <br/> From: [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/dr-k-padmarajan-the-man-who-lost-all-elections/articleshow/68625092.cms  March 29, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Some never tire of trying. Like, Dr K Padmarajan. Starting 1988, the man from Salem, Tamil Nadu, has contested 170 elections. And the 60-year-old has lost all of them. The Limca Book of Records names him as 'India's Most Unsuccessful Candidate'
+Dr Padmarajan, a homoeopathic doctor-turned-businessman, has labelled himself as ‘All India Election King’. He has contested not just local and parliamentary but also Presidential elections. Forfeiting his deposit is obviously not a matter of serious concern for him (From The Times of India)
+===Kashyap: every election makes him poorer===
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F01&entity=Ar01300&sk=333B903B&mode=text  Ishita Bhatia, He’s probably the poorest LS candidate, and every election makes him poorer, April 1, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+With no cash and zero balance in his bank account and his wife’s, a 51-year-old advocate from Muzaffarnagar constituency is perhaps the poorest candidate in the fray in this Lok Sabha election.
+At first glance, there is little to differentiate Mange Ram Kashyap from several other advocates clad in black robes that crowd the Muzaffarnagar court on a daily basis. But ask anybody in the premises and they would tell you that Mange Ram is also a neta who has fought all of the general elections since 2000. Mange Ram contests elections from a party named Mazdoor Kisan Union Party which he founded in 2000. The party has 1,000-odd members, most of them labourers, according to Mange Ram.
+In his election affidavit submitted recently, Mange Ram has declared that he has no jewellery, no cash and zero money in his bank account. His wife, Babita Chauhan, also has no cash, no jewellery and no money in her bank account. He does own a 100sq yard plot now valued at Rs 5 lakh and a house built on 60sq yard with an estimated current value of Rs 15 lakh. The house is a gift from Mange Ram’s in-laws. He also owns a bike worth Rs 36,000.
+While his political dreams may be taking a long time to materialize, it has done little to deter Mange Ram from campaigning on foot in the city. “I have a bike but I cannot afford petrol for it every day. My wife is a homemaker and we have two kids to take care of. I have tried to find other jobs but there are hardly any,” he told TOI.
+“In the last elections too I went on foot to appeal to people to vote for me. I wonder why big politicians spend so much on campaigns when that money could be used for welfare of people,” he said.
+But has his door-to-door campaign worked its charm on the voters in the past? The candidate has had to forfeit his deposit every single time as he was unable to secure the minimum number of votes.
+Mange Ram is, however, convinced that things will change for the better this year for him. He is also unfazed that he is pitted against heavyweights like BJP’s Sanjeev Balyan, Ajit Singh fielded by SP-BSP-RLD’s alliance and Congress’ Narendra Kumar.
+“Voters know that politicians have not looked out for them. I will help the poor. I will propose a voter pension scheme so no man is in want of money,” he said.
+===Some famous cases===
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F28&entity=Ar02302&sk=98542692&mode=text  Avijit Ghosh, April 28, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+Additional reporting by Binay Singh in Varanasi, Senthil Kumaran in Salem, and Kumar Rajesh in Bhagalpur
+These ‘dhartipakads’ are the world’s biggest election losers
+From Varanasi’s Adig to Salem’s ‘Election King’, meet the incorrigible poll fighters who have no qualms about losing their deposits
+Long before Narendra Modi discovered Varanasi as an election destination, the city of piety had Narendra Nath Dubey ‘Adig’. Often referred to as Kashi’s Dhartipakad, he has been fighting every election as an independent since 1984. And every time he has lost his security deposit.
+“Victory or defeat is irrelevant to me. I contest elections to make everyone laugh and live stress-free. And I will continue to do so till my last breath,” says the 53-yearold lawyer, a veteran of innumerable contests, including five battles to be the President. On Thursday, Adig (The Unrelenting) dressed up as Lord Ram before filing his papers to take on Modi.
+Adig belongs to a select group of oddballs who are as addicted to filing nominations as Navjot Singh is to Sidhuisms. In a country where the general elections are the closest to a people’s festival, they personify its maverick soul, encapsulate its never-say-die spirit. Most of them are referred to by a common moniker, Dhartipakad. Translated literally, Dhartipakad means one who clings on to the earth. The word suggests both tenacity and defiance. There was even a television satire by that name.
+It’s possible to dismiss these unusual candidates as mere attention seekers who receive disproportionate media spotlight compared to the few hundred or less votes they fetch. But it can be also argued that these eyeball-grabbers — some of whom claim to have contested 200-300 polls at various levels — represent the quintessential spirit of Indian democracy, where even the dissenter or the jester is offered space.
+In his book, Ballot: 10 Episodes That Shaped India’s Democracy, journalist Rasheed Kidwai writes about Chowdhry Hari Ram, a farmer from the Rohtak area, who fought the presidential polls in 1952, 1957,1962, 1967 and 1969, sometimes getting no votes. “He was the original Dhartipakad,” he says.
+But the threesome who epitomised the non-conformist spirit through the 1960s and later were: Textile businessman Kaka Joginder Singh, cloth merchant Mohan Lal of Gwalior and trader-social worker Nagarmal Bajoria of Bhagalpur. Singh was born in Gujranwala, and Bajoria in Lahore in undivided India. Of the three, only Bajoria survives.
+Other than their obsession with contesting polls, the Dhartipakads shared no unifying strand. In an interview to news agency UNI in February 1998, Singh promised to repay all foreign loans, inculcate sterling character in children, and bring back the barter system to cure the ills of the Indian economy in his ‘manifesto’. The Bareillybased businessman also said that losing the security amount was his ‘humble contribution’ to the national fund. Singh, who reportedly distributed sweets after defeat, died the same year.
+Social scientist Ramchandra Guha mentions Lal, who contested against five Prime Ministers, in his book, India after Gandhi. “Wearing a wooden crown and a garland gifted by himself, he would walk the streets of his constituency, ringing a bell…His idea in contesting elections, said Mohan Lal, was ‘to make everyone realise that democracy was meant for one and all’,” he wrote quoting from The Telegraph newspaper.
+The reasoning of such individuals, explains political scientist Imtiaz Ahmad, emerges from the fact that ours is a protesting society and elections for many are an occasion to express dissent. “Contesting an election for them is to make a political statement that all candidates are no good and they are standing to show that democracy is a farce. They have no impact whatsoever. Once the election is over they recede in the background. They are protesters and that’s the only role they play,” he says.
+There were other motivations too. For Mitt Singh Sehjara, contesting elections was a passion, as he had told a TOI reporter in 2012. Even during the period of violent militancy that engulfed Punjab, the army man who had fought in the 1962 war against China filed his papers from seven constituencies. The veteran of 42 elections passed away in 2014.
+Shyam Babu Subudhi, 84, a resident of Odisha’s Berhampur who has contested 32 elections since 1962 and lost every one of them, told ANI that he has to “continue the fight against corruption” even if he loses his deposit. His most memorable contest was the one against the then Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao for the Berhampur seat.
+‘Election King’ K Padmarajan of Salem says he fights to create the awareness that anyone can contest polls. “It is the right of every citizen of India,” says the 60-year-old tyre retreader who filed his papers for the 201st time in Wayanad for the same seat as Congress president Rahul Gandhi. Other star rivals in the past: P V Narasimha Rao, M Karunanidhi, J Jayalalithaa, S M Krishna and many more.
+Padmarajan, who has spent nearly 30 lakh in 30 years on elections, claims to occasionally receive threatening calls. “I was kidnapped in 1991 after I filed my nomination in Nandyal constituency in Andhra Pradesh. I don’t know who the kidnappers were but they let me go,” he says.
+But perhaps the most remarkable example of persistence and commitment to the ballot is Bajoria, now 94 and ready to contest from Patna and Delhi next month. Also known as a social crusader — for digging tubewells and paying for marriages of underprivileged girls — Bajoria has contested Lok Sabha polls against Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Sanjay Gandhi, Atal Bihari Vajpayee and L K Advani, among others.
+“Skewed politics based on party lines, fragmented society, caste, creed and religious divisions create revulsion. It instilled in me a desire to contest elections and spread the message of nationalism, unity and brotherhood,” says Bajoria, who fought his first election against V V Giri in 1969 and has since contested from most states, including Jammu and Kashmir.
+In his younger days Bajoria often went to file his nomination accompanied by a drove of donkeys. Says Kidwai, “For him, the donkeys were symbolic of political leaders who fooled people with false promises.”
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+=Caste, religion: the use of=
 ==The ‘upper’ castes: voting behaviour==
 ''' What Johnny won’t see? Upper caste votebank '''
@@ Line 41: / Line 455: @@
 The author is a Delhi-based journalist
+== Laws, SC rulings fail to stop election casteism, communalism ==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F15&entity=Ar01305&sk=BE65AD88&mode=text  Dhananjay Mahapatra, April 15, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+Leaders of South Sudan were in for a surprise during their recent ecumenical retreat in Rome. Pope Francis knelt down and kissed the shoes of two rival politicians. The Pope’s unique gesture was an attempt to encourage peace in a country which has seen more than 400,000 people killed in a civil war since independence in 2011.
+Legally, it is impermissible to mix religion and politics in most countries, including India. There will be an uproar if any top political leader in India goes for a religious retreat. And it looks a remote possibility for any religious leader to kiss the shoes of our political leaders to persuade them to refrain from whipping up religious, communal or casteist emotions during campaigning for general elections. Why would they, when political leaders are queuing up to kiss the feet of religious leaders to improve their election prospects, apart from attempting to appease the gods and goddesses every now and then.
+In India, secularism is the core of the constitutional scheme of governance. But on the ground, this core philosophy has always been wounded by parties, howsoever the political leaders may filibuster about adherence to the constitutional ethos.
+To overcome the deepseated societal division on the basis of caste and religion, Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, prohibits a candidates from making systematic appeal to vote on the ground of caste, race, community or religion by terming such action as corrupt practice which would render the candidate disqualified.
+Amendment to Section 123 (3) in 1956 broad-based the ambit of the provision by including not only the candidate but his agent or any other person. After two more amendments, the law as it stands today was amended in 1961 and reads, “The appeal by a candidate or his agent or by any person with the consent of the candidate or his agent to vote or refrain from voting for any person on the ground of religion, race, caste, community or language or the use of religious symbols or the use of, or appeal to, national symbols, such as national flag or the national emblem, for the furtherance of the prospect or for prejudicially affecting the election of any candidate" will be considered as corrupt practice, making the candidate liable for disqualification.
+This provision would convince a person, unaware of the ground reality of Indian elections, that it is mandatory for candidates to shun reference to religion, race, caste and community in their campaign speeches. Despite the stringent law which threatens to disqualify a candidate on a single appeal to voters on the prohibited lines, caste and religious credentials of a candidate continue to be the key factor of her success in elections, depending on the demographic structure
+of a constituency. Parties have sprung up on the foundation of caste and religion. Campaign speeches are getting shriller on caste and community lines.
+A seven-judge bench of the SC in a 2017 judgment (Abhiram Singh vs C D Commachen) had further expanded the ambit of Section 123(3) to maintain purity of the electoral process. It brought within the ambit of corrupt practices “any appeal made to an elector by a candidate or his agent or by any other person with the consent of the candidate or his election agent to vote or refrain from voting for the furtherance of the prospects of election of that candidate or for prejudicially affecting the election of any candidate on the ground of religion, race, caste, community or language of (i) any candidate or (ii) his agent or (iii) any other person making the appeal with the consent of the candidate or (iv) elector”.
+This means no candidate in Odisha can tell voters in the state not to vote for BJD on the ground that its leader and chief minister does not speak the local language fluently. Surprisingly, many who campaigned questioning Sonia Gandhi’s foreign origin and her religion and nationality did not fall foul of Section 123(3) in the last three general elections.
+Congress candidates in the 2007 Gujarat assembly elections did not attract disqualification when Sonia threw the “dharm aur maut ka saudagar’ barb at then CM Narendra Modi. Congress candidates did not attract disqualification when the Congress president in April 2014 met the shahi imam of Jama Masjid Syed Ahmed Bukhari and sought his support. Bukhari appealed to Muslims to support Congress all over India. Similarly, an association of church leaders had issued an appeal to voters in 2014 asking them not to vote for BJP.
+BJP leaders, Modi included, have never lost a chance to subtly mix religion in campaign speeches. The latest being Maneka Gandhi openly telling Muslims that consequences would follow if they did not vote for her.
+Apart from religion being used by candidates to either seek votes or prejudice voters against their rivals, caste equations still continue to be a key parameter for a candidate’s success in polls. The stringent laws enacted by Parliament to prohibit the use of race, caste, religion and language of a candidate or electors during campaigning, and the Supreme Court’s attempt to sharpen the provisions by widening their ambit, has done little to deter candidates from using these very prohibited means to seek votes.
 ==Scheduled caste (‘reserved’) seats in UP: the trend==
@@ Line 63: / Line 505: @@
 While Chamars are concentrated in Azamgarh, Jaunpur, Agra, Bijnor, Saharanpur, Gorakhpur and Ghazipur districts, Pasis are is in Sitapur, followed by Rae Bareli, Hardoi and Allahabad. The other three major groups — Dhobi, Kori and Valmiki — have the maximum population in Bareilly, Sultanpur and Ghaziabad districts.
-=Corruption: Does not bother the voter=
+=Conduct during elections: Model?=
+[[File: model no cod)e.jpg| Model conduct, without a code  Source: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=17_05_2014_026_012_002&type=P&artUrl=Dance-of-Democracy--Party-Politics-17052014026012&eid=31808.jpg| The Times of India ] |frame|left|500px]]
+[[File: model no code1.jpg| Model conduct, without a code  Source: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=17_05_2014_026_012_002&type=P&artUrl=Dance-of-Democracy--Party-Politics-17052014026012&eid=31808.jpg| The Times of India ] |frame|500px]]
+==Legality of election-eve promises==
+[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=LEGALLY-SPEAKING-Can-parties-be-forced-to-fulfil-20072015010045 ''The Times of India''], Jul 20 2015
+Dhananjay Mahapatra
+''' Can parties be forced to fulfil promises made on eve of elections? '''
+Political parties too issue manifestos prior to elections, promising many things. Politicians seek votes from citizens by telling them that if they are elected to power, their party will fulfill the election promises.
+Tamil Nadu presents a good case study where arch-rivals DMK and AIADMK try to outdo each other with election-eve promises, which include free distribution of household items. For the 2006 assembly elec tions, the DMK's manifesto promised free distribution of colour TV sets to each household which did not possess the same, if it was elected to power.
+DMK justified distribution of free colour TVs saying it provided commoners with recreation and general knowledge to housewives, especially those living in rural areas.DMK and its allies emerged victorious in the elections. To fulfill the poll promise, a policy decision was taken to provide one 14-inch CTV to all eligible families. To implement it in a phased manner, budgetary provision of Rs 750 crore was made.
+For the 2011 assembly elections, the DMK again promised a raft of freebies if it returned to power. More than matching the DMK's promises, AIADMK too announced free gifts. It promised mixergrinders, electric fans, laptop computers, 4 grams of gold `thalis', Rs 50,000 cash for a girl's marriage, green houses, 20 kg of rice to all ration card holders, even to those above the poverty line, and free cattle and sheep.
+The AIADMK and its allies swept the elections in 2011.Like DMK, it took steps to ful fill the promises.
+S Subramaniam Balaji challenged the distribution of freebies by both parties, term ing it a corrupt practice to lure voters and also against right to equality as the free gifts were not meant for all voters.
+The Supreme Court on July 5, 2013 decided Balaji's petition and ruled, “Promises in the election manifesto do not constitute corrupt practices under the prevailing law.“
+However, it directed the Election Commission to frame guidelines for election manifestos and decide whether it could be included in the model code of conduct for the guidance of political parties and candidates.
+“We are mindful of the fact that generally , political parties release their election manifesto before the announcement of election date, in that scenario, strictly speaking, the Election Commission will not have the authority to regulate any act which is done before the announcement of the date. Nevertheless, an exception can be made in this regard as the purpose of election manifesto is directly associated with the election process,“ the SC had said.
+In the 2014 general elections, the Congress-led UPA was trounced by the BJP-led NDA after Narendra Modi succeeded in driving home the hope of “acche din aayenge“ (good days will come). The UPA regime was perceived so bad by the citizens that they lapped up the promise of “acche din“.
+How can one quantify “acche din“? It is no colour TV or grinder-mixer that one can examine its quality . Good days for whom? And how will it come? If it comes, how long should the voter wait? And how long will it last? Election promises are a tricky affair. Citizens express their verdict on whether the promises were met only after five years. Is defeat at the elections just punishment for not meeting the promises?
+Lord Denning, sitting in the House of Lords, had in Bromley London Borough Council vs Greater London Council [1982 (1) All England Law Reports] elaborated on election promises.
+“A manifesto issued by a political party -in order to get votes -is not to be taken as gospel. It is not to be regarded as a bond, signed, sealed and delivered. It may contain -and often does contain -promises or proposals that are quite unworkable or impossible of attainment. Very few of the electorate read the manifesto in full. A goodly number only know of it from what they read in the newspapers or hear on television. Many know nothing whatever of what it contains.
+“When they come to the polling booth, none of them vote for the manifesto. Certainly not for every promise or proposal in it. Some may by influenced by one proposal. Others by another. Many are not influenced by it at all. They vote for a party and not for a manifesto,“ he had said.
+As an advice to political parties successful in elections, Lord Denning had said, “When the party gets into power, it should consider any proposal or promise afresh -on its merits -without any feeling of being obliged to honour it or being committed to it. It should then consider what is best to do in the circumstances of the case and to do it if it is practicable and fair.“
+=Constituencies: how many voters do they represent?=
+==As in 2019==
+[[File: How many voters India’s parliamentary constituencies represent.jpg|How many voters India’s parliamentary constituencies represent <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F19&entity=Ar01906&sk=9B65D005&mode=image  March 19, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''How many voters India’s parliamentary constituencies represent''
+==As in 2024==
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=10_04_2024_013_006_cap_TOI  April 10, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: Lok Sabha seats with the highest and lowest number of voters; Size of constituency- as in 2024; Population figures as in 2011.jpg|Lok Sabha seats with the highest and lowest number of voters; Size of constituency: as in 2024; Population figures as in 2011 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=10_04_2024_013_006_cap_TOI  April 10, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Each vote counts in an election. But not all votes are equal. That is considering the fact that the number of voters is not the same for all Lok Sabha seats, though the understanding is that so far as practicable all seats should have about the same number of voters. The freezing of seats till 2026 (following the yet-to-be-held Census 2021) means that while it takes 21 lakh voters to elect an MP in the likes of Rajasthan and Delhi, the Lakshadweep MP has a constituency that’s only 58,000-strong — the smallest in India.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Corruption, corrupt candidates=
+==Corruption does not bother the voter==
 ''' Is graft really a big election issue? Stats say otherwise '''
@@ Line 78: / Line 607: @@
 Social and political theorist and Centre for the Study of Developing Societies professor Aditya Nigam says though people seemed to have accepted graft as a part of life until recently, this election could be different. “Giving bribes at every step for decades had made people accept corruption as their destiny. But the Anna Hazare-led anti-corruption movement and Arvind Kejriwal’s AAP have changed that feeling. Economic growth is too abstract an idea to attract masses unless someone breaks it down for them.”
-=Funds=
+==Indeed, the perception is corrupt leaders can move things==
-==Funding by the bigger corporates ==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2018%2F04%2F28&entity=Ar02301&sk=9E863CDC&mode=text  April 28, 2018: ''The Times of India'']
-[[File: election funding1a.png|Election funds given by the bigger corporates to the two maor parties. [http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=CAP&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI&Enter=true&Skin=TOINEW The Times of India] |frame|500px]]
-==2012-13: big donors prefer BJP over Congres==
-''' Did big donors pick BJP over Congres? '''
-'' In 2012-13, Saffron Party Collected 83Cr, Its Rival 11Cr, Show Papers Filed With EC ''
-[[File: election funding2.jpg| |frame|500px]]
+‘The perception is corrupt netas can move things’
-Pradeep Thakur TNN [http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2014/05/06&PageLabel=17&EntityId=Ar01701&ViewMode=HTML  The Times of India ]
+Set aside the grandstanding on cleaning up politics, the return of the Reddy brothers, to BJP in Karnataka has turned back the focus on the ‘winnability’ of corrupt netas. Political scientist and senior fellow at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Milan Vaishnav talks to Jayanth Kodnani about the “perplexing cohabitation” of criminality and democratic politics as discussed in his recent book on why parties field the corrupt and why voters elect them, When Crime Pays. Extracts from the interview
-New Delhi: The BJP’s coffers had started swelling much before support for its prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi turned into a wave. The party collected a record Rs 82.82 crore from declared donors in 2012-13, leaving the ruling Congres trailing in its wake with just Rs 11.42 crore in the same period.
+'''Your study shows the tribe of corrupt netas in the poll arena is growing. What explains this'''
-This was revealed in the latest contribution reports submitted by parties to the Election Commission (EC) in which they have to declare donations in excess of Rs 20,000. While BJP’s contribution report runs into 188 pages, and was among the last few to be filed with the EC on March 26, the Congres report ends in 49 pages.
+• The reason is two-fold. First, parties are desperate to identify wealthy, selffinancing candidates. Those involved in criminal activity have both the ability and incentives to deploy resources to winning electoral office. From the voters’ perspective, candidates often use their criminality to signal their credibility... There is the perception that tainted politicians “know how to get things done”.
-These contributions, however, are just a fraction of what the parties actually receive. Up to 90% of the funds of these parties come through sale of coupons and other sources where donors’ names are not disclosed. BSP has claimed year after year that all its donations are less than Rs 20,000 each. Like BSP, other parties such as Trinamool Congres and AIADMK have said they did not receive any contribution above Rs 20,000.
+'''Do voters elect them in spite of knowing their criminal bona fides?'''
-NCP and CPM are among those yet to submit their contribution reports, sources said. CPI declared Rs 37 lakh in contributions and named its donors.
+• Research demonstrates that voters are wellaware of the details of candidates they support. Perversely, they vote such candidates because of, not despite, their criminality. A politician with criminal background manages to create an aura of a “godfather”.
-The income of parties for 2012-13 will be known only after a year when they file their I-T returns. As of now, the 2012-13 contribution reports are the latest available data on parties’ income.
+'''Does the seriousness of criminal charge make a difference in choice of candidates — say, between a white collar crime and one of murder?'''
-A request is pending with the Central Board of Direct Taxes to investigate the accounts of all major parties which have together earned more than Rs 4,900 crore between 2004-05 and 2011-12. The Association for Democratic Reforms, which has analysed parties’ income through their I-T returns, has petitioned CBDT to probe these anonymous donors.
+• The dominant strain in the data is ‘blue collar’ crime, for lack of a better word. These are politicians associated with physical acts of abuse and/or throwing their weight around. While it is true that a large number of politicians are suspected of white -collar offences, politicians exclusively linked with white-collar crimes do not enjoy the same level of popular support, in my view. People ask: what’s in it for me?
-The biggest beneficiary in the eight years has been Congres, having collected more than Rs 2,300 crore, followed by BJP with a total income of Rs 1,300 crore. BSP, which claims all its donors are anonymous, collected Rs 497 crore. CPM collected Rs 521 crore, NCP Rs 201 crore and CPI Rs 10 crore.
+'''Do tainted politicians use additional identity groupings (caste, region or sect) for ‘dabangg’ influence?'''
-=Mandate/ representativeness=
+• Caste and identity are inextricably tied to the dabangg image. Almost all strongmen mobilise their social identity (caste or religion). This allows them to slice and dice the electorate in their favour, at the same time establishing their bona fides with supporters with whom they share fundamental affinity. The politician’s criminality is then cast in terms of protecting the status of his or her community as a defensive. It reinforces the idea of a Robin Hood narrative.
-==The vote share of the party that obtained the majority of seats==
-[[File: percent.jpg| The vote share of the winning party |frame|left|500px]]
-[[File: Strike rate.jpg| Strike rate |frame| 500px]]
+'''Is abusive trolling online muscle flexing?'''
-''' BJP's 31% lowest vote share of any party to secure majority '''
+• It’s a way of asserting presence, much like advertising. The difference is the degree of individual and group targeting, which can be very sophisticated. It is a way for politicians to assert their viability and demonstrate their credibility.
-[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=BJPs-31-lowest-vote-share-of-any-party-19052014001073 The Times of India]  May 19 2014
+=Expenditures=
+==Gujarat, 2017==
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/assembly-elections/gujarat/news/45/voter-was-cap-in-17-gujarat-polls-but-netas-spent-459-tiss-study/articleshow/95519337.cms TNN, Nov 15, 2022: ''The Times of India'']
-TIMES INSIGHT GROUP
+AHMEDABAD: Politicians can indeed exceed expectations when it comes to spending money on voters, splurging 1,000% higher than promised. But that applies only to campaigning, before the netas are elected. A study has shown that in the 2017 Gujarat election, candidates burnt Rs 459 per voter in outreach programmes when the Election Commission of India (ECI) cap implied that approximately Rs 45 per voter could be spent. The figures have been derived using the overall limit of Rs 28 lakh per candidate set by the ECI for campaign expenses in 2017.
-The fact that BJP has won a majority on its own in the 16th Lok Sabha has, inevitably, drawn comparisons with previous polls in which parties won a majority on their own.  (Chart1: The vote share of the winning party; Chart 2: Strike rate)
+The study of poll expenses was the first of its kind and involved researchers from Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai, and from two American institutions, Temple University in Philadelphia and Vanderbilt University in Nashville. The researchers scrutinised expenses incurred by candidates in the previous assembly election in a Walled City constituency in Ahmedabad, and in Kapadvanj.
-What has not quite figured in most of these comparisons is the fact that no party has ever before won more than half the seats with a vote share of just 31%. Indeed, the previous lowest vote share for a single-party majority was in 1967, when Congres won 283 out of 520 seats with 40.8% of total valid votes polled.
+The study analysed poll spending between November 2017 and March 2018. The researchers noted that in Ahmedabad, the Congress candidate had shown expenditure of Rs 13.4 lakh, the BJP candidate had declared Rs 10.5 lakh, while an Independent candidate had reported Rs 2.7 lakh. In Kapadvanj, dominated by dairy cooperatives and rural voters, the Congress candidate submitted expenses of Rs 9.7 lakh and the BJP candidate of Rs 11.8 lakh.
-Far from spelling the end of a fractured polity, the 2014 Lok Sabha poll results show just how fragmented the vote is. It is precisely because the vote is so fragmented that the BJP was able to win 282 seats with just 31% of the votes. Simply put, less than four out of every 10 voters opted for NDA candidates and not even one in three chose somebody from the BJP to represent them.
+Researchers Ashwani Kumar of TISS, Souradeep Banerjee of Temple University, and Shashwat Dhar of Vanderbilt University collated expenses that candidates of both the major parties had incurred in Ahmedabad and Kapadvanj in 14 days before polling. The researchers found that the candidates had spent Rs 16 lakh to Rs 28 lakh each on organising sabhas and rallies, Rs 7 lakh to Rs 14 lakh for allowances for booth managers, and about Rs 10 lakh for printing banners.
-Those who picked Congres or its allies were even fewer, less than one in five for Congres with a 19.3% vote share (which incidentally is higher than BJP's 18.5% in 2009) and less than one in every four for the UPA. Unfortunately for Congres, its 19.3% votes only translated into 44 seats while BJP's 18.5% had fetched it 116 seats.
+The researchers determined that the candidates had spent overall between Rs 57 lakh and Rs 1.2 crore.
-With the combined vote share of the BJP and Congres -the two major national parties -adding up to just over 50%, almost half of all those who voted in these elections voted for some other party . Even if we add up the vote tallies of the allies of these two parties, it still leav es a very large chunk out.
+But how do parties and candidates bypass the official ceiling and underreport aggregate election expenses? The study found that third-party accounts are used to pump money into campaigning. These accounts typically belong to family members and aides of candidates.
-The NDA's combined vote share was 38.5% and the UPA's was just under 23%. That leaves out nearly 39% -or a chunk roughly equal to the NDA's -for all others.
+For the 2022 poll, the ECI is expected to spend Rs 450 crore, which works out to Rs 90 per eligible voter, to get the voter to the booth. The state has 4.6 crore voters this year.
-Is the 38.5% vote share for the NDA the lowest any ruling coalition has ever obtained? Not quite. The parties that constituted UPA-1 had just 35.9% of votes polled and the Congres won just 38.2% of the votes in 1991, when it ran a minority government under P V Narasimha Rao. But, except in 1991, they had to depend on outside support to keep the government afloat, which meant that the total vote share of those in the government or supporting it was higher.
+"Candidates receive an amount to the tune of Rs 50 lakh to Rs 60 lakh from party coffers," the study said. "Small businesses and traders' associations are major sources of candidate funding," the study said. "Real estate, cement and the construction sectors are among the biggest political donors."
-In 1989, the National Front, consisting of the Janata Dal, DMK, TDP and Congres (S) won 146 seats and a vote share of 23.8%. To this were added the 85 seats and 11.4% of BJP and the 52 seats and 10.2% of the Left, taking the total, including those parties supporting from outside, to 283 seats and 45.3% of the votes.
+Pankti Jog, state coordinator of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), said: "There is no effective mechanism to control the use of money during elections."
-In 2004, parties in the prepoll alliance stitched up by Congres had 220 seats and just under 36% of the votes.
+=First-past-the-post system=
-But the UPA then got outside support from the Left, SP and PDP, which between them had 100 seats and about 11.2% vote share. Thus, UPA-1 was formed with the support of 320 MPs and about 47% of votes.
+==Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won==
+===1951-2019===
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=09_05_2024_017_026_cap_TOI  May 9, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: First past the post system in India, Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won, 1951-2019.jpg|First past the post system in India, Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won, 1951-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=09_05_2024_017_026_cap_TOI  May 9, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by DMK, 1977-2019.jpg|Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by DMK, 1977-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=09_05_2024_017_026_cap_TOI  May 9, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by AIDMK, 1977-2019.jpg|Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by AIDMK, 1977-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=09_05_2024_017_026_cap_TOI  May 9, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by BSP, 1998-2019.jpg|Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by BSP, 1998-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=09_05_2024_017_026_cap_TOI  May 9, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by SP, 1998-2019.jpg|Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by SP, 1998-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=09_05_2024_017_026_cap_TOI  May 9, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by BJD, 1998-2019.jpg|Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by BJD, 1998-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=09_05_2024_017_026_cap_TOI  May 9, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by Trinamool, 1998-2019.jpg|Votes cast vis-à-vis  seats won by Trinamool, 1998-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=09_05_2024_017_026_cap_TOI  May 9, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+''' BJP’s gain in 2014 and the collapse of Congress and Left  BJP '''
+From the time of Jan Sangh — 1951 to 1971 — to BJP’s ﬁrst election in 1984, the party had a low conversion ratio of votes into seats. Its vote share was always higher than its seat share. In 1984, it got 7.4% of the votes and 0.4% of the seats. From the next election onwards, when it crossed 11% of votes — which might be near the party’s seat conversion threshold — it saw a dramatic increase in seats.
+ From 1989 onwards its seat share was always higher than vote share. Between 1984 and 2014, the party peaked in 1998-99, when it got around 24-26% of the votes and 34% of the seats. The next dramatic jump came in 2014. From 18.8% in 2009, vote share increased by 12.5 percentage points to reach 31.3%. Share in seats, however, improved by more than 30 percentage points — from 21.4% in 2009 to 51.9% in 2014.
+ Cong Congress, on the other hand, went on a different trajectory. In 2009, the party had got 28.6% of the votes and won 37.9% of the seats. In the next election, its vote share declined by 9 percentage points while seats came down by almost 30 percentage points. Despite getting around 20% votes in 2014 and 2019 – which seems to be lower than the party’s threshold – the party got less than 10% of the seats, indicating that seats alone are no benchmark to understand its ground presence.
+ Left Between 2004 and 2009, the Left’s vote share increased by 0.4% while seats increased by 3.1%, indicating that for that election the party’s threshold was between 7% and 8% of votes. In the next election, the party saw a 0.6 percentage point dip in its vote share but the seat share came down by 6.4 percentage points.
+''' TMC gained 0.4% votes, lost 12 seats... '''
+Trinamool Congress’ vote and seat shares show an interesting trend. Between 2004 and 2009, its vote share increased by 1.1 percentage points while seat share saw a 3.1 percentage point rise.
+ For these elections, which were multi-cornered between the Left, Trinamool and Congress, the party’s threshold might be around 3% votes, and hence a small jump in votes gave a disproportionate gain in seats. Elections in West Bengal kept on becoming two-cornered, which might have pushed the threshold vote share. Between 2014 and 2019, when the election was between BJP and Trinamool, the party’s vote share increased by 0.4 percentage points while its seats dropped by 2.2 percentage points.  Similarly, BJD’s vote share remained the same between 2014 and 2019 but the party lost eight seats as the contest became more bipolar.
+''' ...but BSP lost 0.5% votes, yet gained 10 seats '''
+Samajwadi Party saw a slight increase in its vote share but lost 18 seats between 2009 and 2014 because of a similar reason.
+ BSP, on the other hand, has a slightly different story. In 2014 it got 4.2% of votes and 0 seats. In 2019, its vote share declined but seat share increased. This happened because it contested fewer seats as it had allied with SP.
+''' Fence-sitting voters are the real sultans of swing '''
+ For many parties like DMK and ADMK, the dedicated voters remain loyal as their vote share remains constant but seats might change dramatically. This could be because fence-sitting voters with no committed loyalty to DMK or ADMK switch votes in different elections. For instance, in the 2004, 2009 and 2014 LS elections, DMK’s vote share remained constant at 1.8% while its seats changed from 16 to 18 to 0 in the three elections. In 2019, its vote share increased by 0.6 percentage points while its seats increased by 4.4 percentage points. Similarly for ADMK, between 2009 and 2014, the vote share increased by 1.6 percentage points while the corresponding increase in seat share was more than 5 percentage points.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=‘Inauspicious’ periods=
+==Holashtak days of March==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F20&entity=Ar02110&sk=C368F7C5&mode=text  Sandeep Rai, Pre-Holi ‘jinx’ keeps netas away from filing poll papers, March 20, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+Two days after nominations for the first phase of the 2019 Lok Sabha polls began, not a single candidate from any of the main political parties has filed his papers here. The chief reason: Holashtak, or a period of eight days preceding Holi that is considered to be highly inauspicious. In 2019, Holashtak began on March 14 and will end on March 21, when the Holika fire is lit.
+It is believed that during the period of Holashtak, a host of heavenly bodies, along with the feared astrological quantity called Rahu, undergo transformations that make it inadvisable to hold auspicious ceremonies during this time.
+Said BJP’s former state president Laxmikant Bajpai, “A Hindu contestant will not file his nomination before the culmination of Holashtak as any work done during this period becomes counter-productive.”
+Somesh Kumar, additional district election officer in Meerut, said, “Nomination forms start coming in from the second day, but no form was filed here on Tuesday. Some of them are delaying it for religious reasons.”
+According to astrologer Ashwini Tripathi, “During the Holashtak period, cosmic changes take place that minimise the intensity of rays of the Sun, which is the main provider of energy to Earth. Because of this, the period is considered inauspicious.”
+Indira Bhati, the Congress candidate from Bijnor, cited Holashtak for delaying the filing of her nomination. “I will file my papers after Holi when the time is auspicious.”
+=Indelible ink=
+==Quantities ordered: 2009-19==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F13&entity=Ar00210&sk=818BAB60&mode=text  April 13, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: The amount of Indelible ink ordered by the EC 2009-19.jpg|The amount of Indelible ink ordered by the EC 2009-19 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F13&entity=Ar00210&sk=818BAB60&mode=text  April 13, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''Trinamool candidate Mimi trolled for gloved handshake'''
+Bengal’s actor-turned-politician Mimi Chakraborty was trolled on Friday as a photo of her wearing gloves and shaking hands with people went viral on Friday. Mimi said she had applied some ointment to heal scratches and burns sustained over the past few weeks and had covered her hands to ensure the medicine did not smudge. “The photo was taken when I was returning home in my car from a rally at Sonarpur on Thursday,” she said. “While resting in the car after applying medicine, I found some fans waiting by the roadside and lowered the window to respond to their greetings. The handshake was not part of my campaign. I am astounded at how low the BJP IT cell is stooping,” she said.
+'''Betul candidate files papers first for luck, then for show'''
+Durga Das Uike, the BJP candidate from Betul in MP, will file his nomination twice. On April 10, the schoolteacher and R S S leader filed his papers as the stars were aligned and it was an ‘auspicious time’ for him. On April 15, he will file his papers again for the May 6 polls, this time in the presence of former CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan, with pomp and show. “On April 10, I had just done a formality because, according to priests, the ‘subh muhurat’ for me was between 1pm and 1.30pm that day.” Filing multiple nomination forms is common, but most do it to ensure that if one nomination is rejected due to a technical error, there is another.
+=Independent candidates=
+==1957-2014: electoral performance==
+Independent candidates haven’t fared well since the early elections. The highest number of independent winners was recorded in 1957, when 42 of the 481 such candidates were elected.
+It’s only been downhill from there. Though the number of independents contesting has risen steadily, peaking at 10,635 in 1996, a vast majority not only loses but also forfeits deposits by failing to capture one-sixth of the total votes polled.
+In the 2014 Lok Sabha polls, a total of 3,234 independents contested, but only three won and a whopping 3,218 lost their deposits
+==More Independents win in Karnataka than other big states==
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/more-independents-win-in-karnataka-than-in-any-other-big-state/articleshow/63948937.cms  Chethan Kumar, April 28, 2018: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: More Independents win in Karnataka than other big states.jpg|Of all Members of state Legislative Assemblies, the percentage of those who won as Independents, and not as the candidate of a political party, was very low. More Independents won in Karnataka than in other big states. <br/> The years when the five elections counted took place have not been mentioned, but the time span could be assumed as roughly 1990- 2015 <br/> From: [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/more-independents-win-in-karnataka-than-in-any-other-big-state/articleshow/63948937.cms  Chethan Kumar, April 28, 2018: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''HIGHLIGHTS'''
+Results of 50 elections show that nearly 2% of Independents in Karnataka stand a good chance of winning.
+Barring Rajasthan, no other state has offered more than 1% chance of winning.
+One factor that ups their winnability is the fact they are rebel candidates, says analyst Harish Ramaswamy.
+Disgruntled individuals across parties have sworn to defeat their parties’ official candidates after being denied tickets ahead of the May 12 assembly election in Karnataka.
+While some have already joined rivals, others are likely to contest as Independents, with potential to cause upsets across the state. Over the past five elections, Independent nominees in the state have had a better chance at winning than similar candidates in 10 major states.
+Results of 50 elections — five each in Karnataka, Andhra, Tamil Nadu, UP, Gujarat, New Delhi, Bihar, Rajasthan, Bengal and MP — show that nearly 2% of Independents in Karnataka stand a good chance of winning. Barring Rajasthan, no other state has offered more than 1% chance of winning.
+One factor that ups their winnability is the fact they are rebel candidates, says analyst Harish Ramaswamy. For example, Belur Gopalakrishna, denied a ticket by BJP in Sagar, has said not only would he not back Hartal Halappa (who got the ticket), but would doubly ensure BJP is routed.
+“Independents who make a difference are confident people who believe they have nurtured the constituencies. When they rebel and contest, they also take away a good portion of the party’s machinery,” Ramaswamy said.
+The trend of Independents winning here started in 1983 when 22 such candidates won, says analyst S Mahadevprakash. Strong local leaders, especially at zilla panchayat levels, with about 30,000 to 40,000 votes under their influence can trigger upsets. “This happens every time there is a three-party fight. Local leaders snatch votes when the mandate is already fractured,” he says. UP’s seen the highest number of Independents contesting in the past five elections.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+=Landslides: Major electoral landslides=
+==1951-2015==
+[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=STATOISTICS-Caught-in-a-Landslide-12022015009011 ''The Times of India'']
+Feb 12 2015
+[[File: major.jpg|Major electoral landslides in India:1951-2015|frame|500px]]
+AAP's tally of 67 out of 70 seats in Delhi means it won about 96% of the total seats in the state assembly. An analysis of over 300 assembly elections held since Independence shows that the battle for Delhi was among one of the most one-sided ever. In terms of the proportion of total seats won by the largest party, AAP's sweep is the fourth largest so far. The previous three have all been in Sikkim. The Sikkim Sangram Parishad led by Nar Bahadur Bhandari won all 32 seats in 1989, the first instance of a 100% sweep. In 2009, the Sikkim Democratic Front led by Pawan Kumar Chamling repeated the feat. The SDF had in 2004 come close, winning 31 of the 32 seats
+=Length of polling process=
+==1951-52==
+[[File: The length of the polling process in 1951-52.jpg|The length of the polling process in 1951-52 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F11&entity=Ar01308&sk=09C1D6BC&mode=image  March 11, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''The length of the polling process in 1951-52''
+==Why Indian elections have stretch for weeks since the 1990s==
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/Swaminomics/in-digital-india-why-do-elections-stretch-for-weeks/  SA Aiyar, In Digital India, why do elections stretch for weeks?, March 10, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+In most democracies, polling occurs on a single day, and the counting of votes begins soon after polling ends. In the US, counting of votes in East Coast states can start before polling ends in West Coast states, which are in a time zone three hours behind the east. Typically, counting begins and election results are declared the same evening or next day.
+But India takes ages to hold a poll, and the time between the first and last rounds of polling keeps rising. In the 2004 general election, polling in four phases took 21 days. In 2009, polling over five phases took 28 days. Polling in the 2014 election required no less than nine phases over 37 days.
+Is India too large to organise elections in a day or two? No, even elections in a single state take weeks. The 2015 Bihar election was held in five phases over 24 days. The 2017 election in Uttar Pradesh required seven rounds of polling over 26 days.
+Moreover, we have long gaps between the last day of polling and counting of votes. In the 2014 election, counting started three days after polling ended. A task taking a few hours in other democracies takes three days in India. This is not because of manual counting, as was the case in earlier decades. In recent times, all votes are recorded on electronic voting machines. But these are not digitally interlinked, and after polling, are kept in secure storage, with all political parties keeping guard, to check against hanky-panky. They are eventually all moved to counting centres.
+Why does holding elections and counting votes take so long? In the early decades after Independence, polling was held mostly on a single day, with no violence. The main exception was in snow-bound areas like Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh, where elections took place later.  By the 1960s, violent political clashes at election time caused many deaths. By the 1980s, the capture of polling booths and stuffing of ballot boxes by gangsters of sundry parties became a menace. The police and para-military forces were supposed to check this. But often the ruling party facilitated booth capture by its own goons, who were aided by manipulating deployment of security forces. Democracy was in jeopardy.
+Chief election commissioner T N Seshan finally checked this in the early 1990s. He berated chief ministers and other politicians for booth capturing. He decided that the Election Commission and not chief ministers would control the deployment of security forces to ensure fair elections. He phased polling over several days so that security forces could be shifted from one polling zone to another. In time, this mostly ended booth capture by gangs. When officials or rival parties reported a capture, repolling would be ordered, making booth capture a failure.
+===1952-2014: votes received by the winning party===
+[[File: 1952-2014- votes received by the winning party.jpg|1952-2014: votes received by the winning party <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F14&entity=Ar00209&sk=68A1FBE2&mode=image  March 14, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''1952-2014: votes received by the winning party''
+=Mandate: the representativeness of political parties=
+==The mandate for the ruling party/ coalition: Its size 1952-2014==
+[[File: Mandate- the representativeness of the national ruling party, coalition, 1951-2019.jpg| Mandate: the representativeness of the national ruling party/ coalition, 1951-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F11%2F25&entity=Ar00400&sk=3E120F73&mode=text  Nov 25, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+'' Mandate: the representativeness of the national ruling party/ coalition, 1951-2019 ''
-The NDA does not need any outside support to form the government. Indeed, BJP can form it even on its own. But unless it ropes in others, the party will become the government with the lowest popular support in terms of vote share after the Rao government.
-==The mandate for the ruling party/ coalition: Its size over the years==
 [[File: mandate legend.jpg| |frame| left| 500px]]
@@ Line 158: / Line 868: @@
 When many choose not to vote and only a fraction of those who do opt for the ruling party, those in power could have a `mandate' that involves a really small proportion of all those eligible to vote. As the polity has fragmented, the `effective vote share' for the ruling party or coalition has shrunk.
+==1957-2014: vote share of party that obtained the majority of seats==
+[[File: percent.jpg| The vote share of the winning party |frame|left|500px]]
+[[File: Strike rate1.jpg| Strike rate |frame| 500px]]
+[[File: Strike rate0.jpg| Strike rate |frame| 500px]]
+''' BJP's 31% lowest vote share of any party to secure majority '''
+[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=BJPs-31-lowest-vote-share-of-any-party-19052014001073 The Times of India]  May 19 2014
+TIMES INSIGHT GROUP
+The fact that BJP has won a majority on its own in the 16th Lok Sabha has, inevitably, drawn comparisons with previous polls in which parties won a majority on their own.  (Chart1: The vote share of the winning party; Chart 2: Strike rate)
+What has not quite figured in most of these comparisons is the fact that no party has ever before won more than half the seats with a vote share of just 31%. Indeed, the previous lowest vote share for a single-party majority was in 1967, when Congres won 283 out of 520 seats with 40.8% of total valid votes polled.
+Far from spelling the end of a fractured polity, the 2014 Lok Sabha poll results show just how fragmented the vote is. It is precisely because the vote is so fragmented that the BJP was able to win 282 seats with just 31% of the votes. Simply put, less than four out of every 10 voters opted for NDA candidates and not even one in three chose somebody from the BJP to represent them.
+Those who picked Congres or its allies were even fewer, less than one in five for Congres with a 19.3% vote share (which incidentally is higher than BJP's 18.5% in 2009) and less than one in every four for the UPA. Unfortunately for Congres, its 19.3% votes only translated into 44 seats while BJP's 18.5% had fetched it 116 seats.
+With the combined vote share of the BJP and Congres -the two major national parties -adding up to just over 50%, almost half of all those who voted in these elections voted for some other party . Even if we add up the vote tallies of the allies of these two parties, it still leav es a very large chunk out.
+The NDA's combined vote share was 38.5% and the UPA's was just under 23%. That leaves out nearly 39% -or a chunk roughly equal to the NDA's -for all others.
+Is the 38.5% vote share for the NDA the lowest any ruling coalition has ever obtained? Not quite. The parties that constituted UPA-1 had just 35.9% of votes polled and the Congres won just 38.2% of the votes in 1991, when it ran a minority government under P V Narasimha Rao. But, except in 1991, they had to depend on outside support to keep the government afloat, which meant that the total vote share of those in the government or supporting it was higher.
+In 1989, the National Front, consisting of the Janata Dal, DMK, TDP and Congres (S) won 146 seats and a vote share of 23.8%. To this were added the 85 seats and 11.4% of BJP and the 52 seats and 10.2% of the Left, taking the total, including those parties supporting from outside, to 283 seats and 45.3% of the votes.
+In 2004, parties in the prepoll alliance stitched up by Congres had 220 seats and just under 36% of the votes.
+But the UPA then got outside support from the Left, SP and PDP, which between them had 100 seats and about 11.2% vote share. Thus, UPA-1 was formed with the support of 320 MPs and about 47% of votes.
+The NDA does not need any outside support to form the government. Indeed, BJP can form it even on its own. But unless it ropes in others, the party will become the government with the lowest popular support in terms of vote share after the Rao government.
+==1951-2019==
+[[File: 1951-2019, What percentage of the votes cast were needed to form the national government in India, The representativeness of the national ruling party-coalition..jpg|1951-2019: What percentage of the votes cast were needed to form the national government in India/ The representativeness of the national ruling party/ coalition. <br/> From: |frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+'' 1951-2019: What percentage of the votes cast were needed to form the national government in India/ The representativeness of the national ruling party/ coalition. ''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
 ==One MP for 16,00,000 voters==
 ''' Mind the gap: 1 MP for 16L voters '''
@@ Line 209: / Line 976: @@
 Andhra the worst with only one out of 42 getting over 50% votes
-=Margins of victory: some records=
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
-[[File:MPs who got elected by the highest margins.jpg| MPs who got elected by the highest margins. Source: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=17_05_2014_004_063_002&type=P&artUrl=MARGIN-METER-17052014004063&eid=31808  ''The Times of India'']|frame|left|500px]]
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+=Manifestoes=
+==2004-19: Cong normally released it before BJP==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F06&entity=Ar01722&sk=723053BF&mode=text  April 6, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+'''Cong Beats BJP In This'''
+Congress released its manifesto for the coming polls early this week. BJP is yet to release its list of promises. The saffron party had released its manifesto after Congress in the last three Lok Sabha polls too
+''2004''
+Congress released its manifesto on: March 22 BJP released it on: April 8 Elections began: April 20
+''2009''
+Cong: March 24; BJP: April 3 Elections began: April 16
+''2014''
+Cong: March 26; BJP: April 7 Elections began: April 7
+''2019''
+Cong: April 2; BJP: Likely on April 8; Elections begin: April 11 In 2014, BJP had released its manifesto on the first day of the nine-phased Lok Sabha polls. That had prompted the Congress to complain to the Election Commission that the move could influence voters. So, ahead of these elections, the EC has barred political parties from releasing election manifestos in the last 48 hours before polling
+==The things that are given to voters as bribes==
+[[File: The things that were meant to be given to voters as bribes,  presumably as in 2019 March.jpg|The things that were meant to be given to voters as bribes,  presumably as in 2019 March <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F06&entity=Ar01702&sk=3266EBE2&mode=image  April 6, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''The things that were meant to be given to voters as bribes,  presumably as in 2019 March''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Margins of victory=
+==One vote margins==
+Credit: The Times of India
+'''Every vote counts'''
+The most often heard excuse for not voting in an election is “my one little vote won't make a difference.” Ask Congress leader C P Joshi about the importance of one Vote. CP Joshi, lost to BJP candidate Kalyan Singh Chauhan in Nathdwara, Rajasthan in 2008 assembly elections by just one vote. CP Joshi was not only state Congress President at that time but was also tipped to be the next Chief Minister of Rajasthan. Ironically Congress party came to power after defeating the ruling party BJP but CP Joshi who was considered architect of this victory lost
+==The highest and lowest margins==
+===1951 – 2019===
+[[File: The highest and lowest margins of victory in parliamentary elections in India, 1951 – 2019.jpg|The highest and lowest margins of victory in parliamentary elections in India, 1951 – 2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=13_04_2024_013_002_cap_TOI  April 13, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+'' The highest and lowest margins of victory in parliamentary elections in India, 1951 – 2019 ''
+===1962-2014===
+[[File:MPs who got elected by the highest margins1.jpg| MPs who got elected by the highest and lowest margins. <br/> Source: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=17_05_2014_004_063_002&type=P&artUrl=MARGIN-METER-17052014004063&eid=31808  ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''MPs who got elected by the highest and lowest margins.''
+===1980-2017: in five states===
+[[File: The graphic shows the highest and lowest victory margins in state assembly elections, UP, Punjab and Goa, 1980-2017.jpg| The graphic shows the highest and lowest victory margins in state assembly elections, UP, Punjab and Goa, 1980-2017; [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Highest-lowest-victory-margins-12032017012018 The Times of India], March 12, 2017|frame|500px]]
+[[File: The graphic shows the highest and lowest victory margins in state assembly elections, Uttarakhand and Manipur, 1980-2017.jpg|The graphic shows the highest and lowest victory margins in state assembly elections, Uttarakhand and Manipur, 1980-2017; [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Highest-lowest-victory-margins-12032017012018 The Times of India], March 12, 2017|frame|500px]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDI]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+==Pritam Munde, 2014==
+[[File: Pritam Munde’s record margin of victory, 2014.jpg|Pritam Munde’s record margin of victory, 2014 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F21&entity=Ar01305&sk=EB50026C&mode=image  March 21, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''Pritam Munde’s record margin of victory, 2014''
+==1989, 1998==
+[[File: The lowest margins of victory were recorded in 1989 and 1998.jpg|The lowest margins of victory were recorded in 1989 and 1998 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F25&entity=Ar00205&sk=7F8B986F&mode=image&fbclid=IwAR2SodCJZF5h7GYW0XDJFEw2BoAltx4wJuw2VhvpTDQgfvMJ3B9eLI566ys  March 25, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''The lowest margins of victory were recorded in 1989 and 1998''
+==1977, 2019==
+[[File: Margins of victory in Lok Sabha elections, 1977, 2019.jpg|Margins of victory in Lok Sabha elections, 1977, 2019 <br/> From: [From the archives, June 5, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+'' Margins of victory in Lok Sabha elections, 1977, 2019 ''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDI]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+==As a %age: Jardosh, 2014==
+[[File: Margins of victory as a %age- Jardosh, 2014.jpg|Margins of victory as a %age: Jardosh, 2014 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F31&entity=Ar01606&sk=DF84D21F&mode=image  March 31, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''Margins of victory as a %age: Jardosh, 2014''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+=Muslim (and SC/ ST) representation in Lok Sabha=
+While this section is mainly about the Muslims, it also has statistics about SC and ST representation.  The main difference is that there are no Lok Sabha seats reserved for the Muslims.
+==1952, 2014==
-=Muslim representation in Lok Sabha=
 ''' Lowest no. of Muslim MPs since 1952 '''
@@ Line 245: / Line 1,196: @@
 Pollsters, going by trends of past elections, say the Muslim vote is most effective where it is around 10% of the electorate, big enough to sway the result in a multi-cornered contest, by consolidating for a single candidate.
 Ironically , where Muslim presence is over 20%, their votes have been mostly ineffective. This is because of a multiplicity of Muslim can didates that divide their votes. In such constituencies, say psephologists, there is often counter-polarization of Hindu votes. In a polarized UP, it's the latter that seems to have helped the BJP. “In the future, Muslims will have to change their strategy and keep their options open,“ said M A Khalid of All India Milli Council.
+=NOTA, Use of=
+==2014: state-wise use of NOTA option==
+[[File: 2014- the extent of the use of the NOTA option, state-wise.jpg|2014: the extent of the use of the NOTA option, state-wise <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F27&entity=Ar01810&sk=1D46B85B&mode=image  March 27, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''2014: the extent of the use of the NOTA option, state-wise''
+==2016==
+[[File: None of the above (NOTA) votes casted in the 2016 Assembly elections in five states.jpg|‘None of the above’ (NOTA) votes casted in the 2016 Assembly elections in five states ; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=21_05_2016_018_016_003&type=P&artUrl=NOTA-NOT-A-BAD-HARVEST-21052016018016&eid=31808 ''The Times of India''], May 21, 2016|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''None of the above’ (NOTA) votes cast in the 2016 Assembly elections in five states''
+==Gujarat: NOTA is bigger than the no.3 party==
+[http://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2017%2F12%2F19&entity=Ar00305&sk=E810AE1C&mode=text Notabhai gets more votes than winning margin in 1 out of 6 seats, December 19, 2017: ''The Times of India'']
+The Gujarat elections this time were a lot closer than in 2012, so you might expect that margins in seatswouldbe a lottighter too. Surprisingly, BJP’s average margin is actually higher at 29,970 than last time’s 26,237. The Congress average of 13,354 is slightly lower than the13,577 it averaged in 2012.
+That, in fact, goes a long way towards explaining why the race became so close despite BJP gaining 1.2 percentage points in vote share compared with 2012.
+Nota (none of the above) too made its presence felt, exceeding the margin of victory or defeat in 29 constituencies, or about one in six seats. It cut both ways, with BJP winning 15 of these seats, Congress 13 and an independent one.
+==Maharashtra==
+===Mumbai===
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=06_06_2024_022_002_cap_TOI  VijayV Singh, June 6, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+Mumbai:NOTA (none of the above) emerged as the thirdhighest vote-getter in four of six parliamentary constituencies in Mumbai. In the other two, Vanchit Bahujan Agadhi (VBA), led by Prakash Ambedkar, managed to bag more than NOTA.
+Notably, all third-place vote tallies accounted for less than 2% of total votes cast.
+ The 2024 Lok Sabha polls saw a tight race between the two primary candidates in each of Mumbai’s seats, with minimal influence from thirdparty contenders. In contrast to the 2019 elections, where VBA had garnered between 2% and 8% of total votes cast in all six constituencies, pushing NOTA to a distant position, NOTA did well this time. The two main contenders captured over 95% votes in the six constituencies, leaving about 5% to be shared among smaller parties, including VBA, Independents and NOTA.
+ Across the six constituencies, a total of 75,262 NOTA votes were recorded, with the highest number (15,161) in the Mumbai North West constituency, where Shiv Sena candidate Ravindra Waikar defeated Shiv Sena UBT candidate Amol Kirtikar by a slim margin of 48 votes. In terms of percentage, Mumbai South and South Central had the highest NOTA share, at 1.7 each.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:History|P INDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY,
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDI
+]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:History|P INDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY,
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDI
+]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:History|P INDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY,
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDI
+]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=NRI/ overseas voters=
+==2014, 2019: Keralites are the majority==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F14&entity=Ar00212&sk=27F84F45&mode=text  Rajeev KR, 92% of overseas electors are Keralites, March 14, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: Indian overseas electors, 2019.jpg|Indian overseas electors, 2019. <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F14&entity=Ar00212&sk=27F84F45&mode=text  Rajeev KR, 92% of overseas electors are Keralites, March 14, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+The Malayali’s obsession with politics doesn’t end at the neighbourhood saloon back home. In fact, take Malayalis out of the country and they will still turn up to vote: Expats from the state account for 92% of NRIs who have registered as overseas electors.
+The state witnessed a fivefold increase in the number of overseas electors — from 12,653 in 2014 to 66,584 as of January 30, 2019. Though the number is a small fraction of the country’s total NRI population of 1.3 crore, the fact that an overwhelming majority of the 71,735 overseas electors registered in the country hails from the state reflects the growing enthusiasm among non-resident Keralites to participate in the political process back home.
+Of the total of 66,584 overseas electors from the state, 3,729 are women, as per EC.
+Expat organisations from the state had conducted mass online voter enrolment drives in the Gulf, especially after Lok Sabha passed a bill in August 2018 to allow NRIs to appoint proxy voters who can cast their vote. Between October 2018 and January 2019, more than 40,000 expats registered as overseas electors. But the bill lapsed as Rajya Sabha failed to take it up.
+As of now, NRIs can vote in their hometown after registering as overseas voters. There is no provision for online voting.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+=Polling period=
+==1977-2024==
+[[File: 1977-2024, The polling period and the number of polling days.jpg| 1977-2024: The polling period and the number of polling days <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=17_03_2024_010_005_cap_TOI  March 17, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+'' 1977-2024, The polling period and the number of polling days ''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+=Polling stations=
+==Accessible to disabled persons/ 2019==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F02&entity=Ar01504&sk=6AD9D4FA&mode=text  Anam.Ajmal, Booths without ramps may deny vote to 2L, April 2, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: 2019- The states that have the most Polling stations without assured minimum facilities.jpg|2019: The states that have the most Polling stations without assured minimum facilities <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F02&entity=Ar01504&sk=6AD9D4FA&mode=text  Anam.Ajmal, Booths without ramps may deny vote to 2L, April 2, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Many votes are lost because not all polling booths in India are accessible yet for disabled persons. According to data from the Disability Rights Alliance (DRA), an umbrella body of NGOs that work to make public places more accessible for disabled persons, there are at least 50,000 polling stations that are inaccessible to PwDs because they do not have ramps that would allow the use of a wheelchair for access.
+DRA compiled the list of inaccessible polling stations by analysing EC data on psl.nic.in, a website which provides details of each polling station in India and its location. According to DRA, there are 2 lakh voters with locomotive disabilities who will be unable to vote because their polling stations do not have ramp facilities.
+There are over 10.35 lakh polling stations across India. These should have “assured minimum facilities (AMF) which, as defined by EC, include a ramp, proper signage, wheelchairs and parking facilities for PwDs. But according to DRA, over 2.4 lakh polling stations do not have any information about the availability of AMFs. EC did not reply to a detailed email questionnaire sent by TOI.
+According to Vaishnavi Jayakumar, a rights activist and DRA member, the “most visible” problem in polling stations is the lack of ramps.
+Although Jayakumar admits that there has been a “huge push” towards making voting easier, there is a gap in implementation. “EC has done some ground-breaking work when it comes to pushing accessibility. They have progressive instructions, including the availability of vehicles for PwDs. But the implementation on the ground depends on the CEO of the state,” she says.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+=Polling stations in remote areas=
+==Dodging pythons, crocodiles between island booths==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F15&entity=Ar01311&sk=90F2F1D1&mode=text  Yusra Hussain, In Andamans, sitting by the sea with EVMs for 3 days, April 15, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+Three days after polling concluded in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, poll officers are still waiting for EVMs and VVPAT machines, docked on small boats, to reach the Port Blair headquarters of the Lok Sabha constituency.
+After several dinghy rides, meandering through shallow seas and coral reefs with officers carrying electoral machines and sacks full of papers having crossed sandy beaches and dense forests, the last leg of the precounting electoral process will be completed on April
+. At Port Blair, the presiding officer’s diary will be put to scrutiny and relevant documents will be filled up by officials, four days after polling was conducted. In other constituencies, this process is generally completed on the day of polling itself.
+Polling is conducted in the 31 inhabited islands under nine tehsils of the Andaman and Nicobar parliamentary constituency through 407 polling stations with an electorate of 3,17,878 voters of which around 8% are tribals.
+Many of these islands are situated in areas where it takes three or more days to reach after travelling by different modes of transport, including boat and ship, and even helicopter rides in certain cases. In a huge challenge, polling officials have to trek through large patches of irregular terrain.
+“It takes around three to four days for all EVMs and VVPAT machines to reach us. In some islands, even after the end of polling, officers have to stay back the night, since sailing in unpredictable climatic conditions is not advisable. Next day, they take dinghies to the temporary strong rooms in the nine tehsils of the area. From here, the polling parties bring the machines to Port Blair in ships,” chief electoral officer of Andaman and Nicobar Islands KR Meena said.
+In some areas, officers have to wade through mangroves infested with crocodiles on small canoes or take long routes through hilly patches to avoid pythons in order to reach hamlets in the interiors.
+==Booths with the most and least voters, 2019==
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=06_04_2024_016_005_cap_TOI  April 6, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: Average voters per booth, 2024.jpg|Average voters per booth, 2024 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=06_04_2024_016_005_cap_TOI  April 6, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+There should be a polling booth within 2km-radius of every voter and none should have to deal with more than 1,500 voters, ECI says. In 2019, there was at least one seat where the average number of voters per booth exceeded that number. In UP’s Deoria, there were 1,543 voters on average to each booth. The national average was 879 voters per booth in 2019.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+==Arunachal Pradesh: Malogam==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F18&entity=Ar01202&sk=9D3138B2&mode=text  Poll staff to trek for a day to reach lone voter in Arunachal, March 18, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+Election personnel will hike through the rugged and difficult terrain of an Arunachal Pradesh district bordering China for a day to ensure that the lone voter of a polling station can exercise her franchise.
+Sokela Tayang lives with her children in Malogam, around 39km from Anjaw district headquarter Hayuliang. The area falls under Hayuliang constituency. According to sources, very few families reside in Malogam and all the voters, except 39-year-old Sokela, are registered in other polling stations.
+“The station had two voters during the 2014 elections. Now, for some reason, Sokela’s husband Janelum Tayang has transferred his name to another booth under the same constituency,” sources at the office of the state’s chief electoral officer (CEO) said.
+It will take a full day for the polling party to reach Malogam polling station from Hayuliang on foot, Deputy CEO Liken Koyu said.
+“They may have to be in the polling booth from 7am to 5pm on the day of voting. We do not know when she will come. One cannot be forced to cast his or her vote early,” Koyu said.
+== Dumka’s Upper Murgathali, Amlagadhiya==
+For Dumka’s 400 Pahadiyas, the booth may be 12km too far
+Dumka goes to polls in another 10 days, but about 400 Pahadiyas, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group from Upper Murgathali and Amlagadhiya villages, may not be able to exercise their franchise as the allotted polling booth is 12km away. The administration officials said they were unaware of the accessibility issue, and are too close to the polling date now to take any corrective steps.
+Around 400 Pahadiya tribals live in the two villages under Rajbandh Panchayat and their booth is at a primary school building in Mahuadih, 12km away. “This will be deterrent for many, especially the elderly and women,” said Gaytri Devi, a villager, adding that it will also result in loss of their day’s income. “There are a few booths 2km from here in villages like Heth, Murgathali and Jhopa, but our names do not feature in electoral rolls there,” she said. AGENCIES
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+==Himachal Pradesh, 2019==
+[[File: Polling stations in the remote areas of Himachal Pradesh, as in 2019.jpg|Polling stations in the remote areas of Himachal Pradesh, as in 2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F15&entity=Ar01509&sk=16EF9C9C&mode=image  March 15, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''Polling stations in the remote areas of Himachal Pradesh, as in 2019''
+===Tashigang, HP===
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F19&entity=Ar01105&sk=B3870897&mode=text  Suresh Sharma, April 19, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: SPECIAL 48- This booth will serve 48 voters from Tashigang and Gete villages when Himachal goes to polls on May 19.jpg|SPECIAL 48- This booth will serve 48 voters from Tashigang and Gete villages when Himachal goes to polls on May 19 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F19&entity=Ar01105&sk=B3870897&mode=text  Suresh Sharma, April 19, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+The road to Tashigang, in the forbidding cold desert of Spiti in Himachal Pradesh, is closed for almost the entire year due to snowfall.
+But the road will open early this year, most likely by the end of this week, to allow polling officers and voters to reach this hamlet at 15,256ft, which has been declared as the highest polling station in the world.
+The polling station will serve 48 voters from Tashigang and its neighbouring hamlet Gete, when Himachal goes to polls on May 19 in the last phase of the Lok Sabha elections.
+Initially, the polling station was established at the government primary school in Gete. But officials found that the building was unsafe as it had developed cracks. The booth was then shifted to a tourist lodge in Tashigang.
+“The highest polling station will see 30 men and 18 women from Gete and Tashigang villages cast their votes here,” says deputy commissioner Ashwani Chawdhary.
+Chowdhury, who is also the district polling officer, says PWD is working to make the road to Tashigang motorable by the end of this week. “We are strengthening the electricity infrastructure in the village before the elections. Officers have been deputed to help physically challenged people to ensure their votes are cast.”
+Before Tashigang, Hikkim in Spiti had the distinction of being the highest polling station in the world at 14,567ft.
+Carrying out Systematic Voters Education and Electoral Participation (SVEEP) is a big challenge in Spiti, says nodal officer G C Pathak. All villages in the first phase of the programme were covered except Tashigang, Mudh, Teling and Khar, the highest booths, he adds.
+==Uttaraj (Mt Abu)==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F30&entity=Ar01304&sk=E8ECD020&mode=text  Parul Kulshrestha, April 30, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: Voters in Rajasthan’s Jalore-Sirohi Lok Sabha constituency cast their vote at the highest polling booth in the state.jpg|Voters in Rajasthan’s Jalore-Sirohi Lok Sabha constituency cast their vote at the highest polling booth in the state <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F30&entity=Ar01304&sk=E8ECD020&mode=text  Parul Kulshrestha, April 30, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Voting means braving bears, leopards
+Two Examples From Rajasthan And Maharashtra Show How India’s Poll Machinery Is Virtually Unstoppable
+Uttaraj (Mt Abu):
+Arun Vaghela, headmaster of the government middle school here, climbed atop a water tank and shouted like a town crier of the yore — it was 7am and polling at the village under the Jalore-Sirohi Lok Sabha constituency had begun.
+In his new role as the block level officer of Uttaraj, Vaghela was on duty at the polling centre that stood at 4,921 feet — the highest booth in Rajasthan.
+But none of the 348 voters, including those from the villages of Uttarah and Shergaon 11km downhill, was in a hurry. The five-hour uphill trek from Shergaon to Uttaraj through a mountainous and forested path had exhausted them. “Half the village began trekking in the morning. After we return, the remaining half will start,” said Vijay Singh from Shergaon.
+The journey though is not a touristy trek. Fraught with risks, the meandering pathway cuts through the Mt Abu sanctuary where sloth bears and leopards roam. “Once a bear pawed out a woman’s eye and another almost broke open the skull of a man a year back. Both of them miraculously survived,” said Singh.
+Idyllic as it may sound, life here is tough. Shergaon does not have a school and medical facilities are absent in both villages.
+The polling team, however, had geared up for the polls a day ahead. Four election officers along with security officials trekked 5km downhill from Gurushikhar. But despite the preparedness, polling was halted at 11am when the VVPAT machine malfunctioned. Quick calls were made to authorities at Mount Abu and a replacement was requisitioned.
+==Saputara hill range ==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F30&entity=Ar01312&sk=D0864DD2&mode=text  April 30, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: To reach nine polling stations located in the Saputara hill range in Maharashtra, 60 officials travelled 85km.jpg|To reach nine polling stations located in the Saputara hill range in Maharashtra, 60 officials travelled 85km <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F30&entity=Ar01312&sk=D0864DD2&mode=text  April 30, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Daylong road-river trip for 1,000 voters
+Nashik:
+For large parts of Nandurbar to vote on Monday, polling officials set off on a long journey the previous day, travelling nearly 85km, by road and by barge on the Narmada.
+About 60 polling officials took barges to reach nine polling stations located in the Saputara hill range. Each of these stations have about 120 voters each. The remotest among them is Manibeli, which falls in the Akkalkuwa assembly constituency and Nandurbar LS seat.
+“All these areas are inaccessible by any other route. Mobile connectivity is almost non-existent in these parts,” a senior official from the district election office said.
+The first set of polling parties had to travel from Akrani taluka to Udadya, Bhabri and Bhadal polling stations; second from Akklakuwa taluka to Bamani, Danel, Mukhadi and the third, from Akkalkuwa to Chimalkhedi, Dhankhedi and Manibeli.
+“The farthest route is to Manibeli, where the officials first travelled 67km by road till Gaman barge point. There, they boarded the barge and travelled 8km to reach Chimalkhedi, another 4km to reach Dhankhedi and 5km to Manibeli polling station, which is listed first among Maharashtra’s polling stations,” the official said.
+At three locations in Dhankhedi and Mukhadi, temporary polling stations were constructed in tin sheds for voting day.
+Voters appear to have done the polling staff proud, registering a turnout of around 60.3%.
+Though polling is done, the officials will return only by Tuesday morning. They spent the night in the tin sheds constructed for voting.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Political parties=
+==Number: 1951>2014==
+[[File: The Number of political parties in Indian elections, 1951-2014.jpg|The Number of political parties in Indian elections: 1951>2014 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F13&entity=Ar01900&sk=B68AA735&mode=image  March 13, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''The Number of political parties in Indian elections: 1951>2014''
+===Details===
+[[File: 1951-2019- The number of political parties that contested the General Election to the Lok Sabha, including recognised state parties and other parties.jpg|1951-2019: The number of political parties that contested the General Election to the Lok Sabha, including recognised state parties and other parties <br/> From: |frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+'' 1951-2019: The number of political parties that contested the General Election to the Lok Sabha, including recognised state parties and other parties ''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Political involvement of the public=
+==2018: Indians among most involved==
+[[File: Among major countries, Indians were the most involved in politics,  presumably as in 2018.jpg|Among major countries, Indians were the most involved in politics,  presumably as in 2018 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2018%2F12%2F23&entity=Ar02418&sk=EEE72CE0&mode=text  December 23, 2018: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''Among major countries, Indians were the most involved in politics,  presumably as in 2018''
+=Postal ballots=
+==2004-14: 19.2% were rejected==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F12&entity=Ar01809&sk=2835889E&mode=text  Chethan Kumar, Why one-fifth of postal votes end up in the bin, April 12, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: Rejected Postal ballots, 2004-14.jpg|Rejected Postal ballots, 2004-14 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F04%2F12&entity=Ar01809&sk=2835889E&mode=text  Chethan Kumar, Why one-fifth of postal votes end up in the bin, April 12, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Postal ballots can make or mar the fortunes of a candidate in a closely fought contest. For instance, in the 2017 assembly polls in Gujarat’s Dhokla constituency, Ashwin Rathod lost by 327 votes while the returning officer had rejected 429 postal ballots — the matter is now in court.
+An analysis of postal votes cast in the past three Lok Sabha elections shows that a large number of postal ballots get rejected. In fact, the rejection rate has been increasing with every passing election.
+In 2004, for example, of the 6 lakh postal votes cast, 95,455 or 16% were rejected while in 2009, 19.5% of the 11.5 lakh postal votes got rejected, which went up to 21.5% of the 5.6 lakh votes cast in 2014. In the three elections between 2004 and 2014, a total of 23.2 lakh postal votes were cast of which 4.4 lakh votes were rejected.
+From signatures or dates of birth not matching, to electors not filling their addresses accurately, a variety of reasons have seen a fifth of all postal votes get rejected cumulatively in the past three elections.
+Among the common mistakes made by officials are: Not marking the candidate of choice in the space provided; providing wrong address; writing slogans such as ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’, or their own names in the slot given to mark votes and so on.
+Ironically, a large number of these votes are cast by people responsible for the smooth functioning of the overall elections apart from those in the armed forces.
+“It is disappointing that so many votes get rejected despite many training sessions and clear instructions given in writing in local languages and English that they can read before casting the votes. We’ve taken additional care this time to organise better training,” an EC official deputed to take care of postal ballots, said.
+EC officials say ignorance and irresponsible voting results in a lot of postal votes getting invalidated, and that efforts are being made to ensure that officials are trained properly for the 2019 elections—the first phase of voting is scheduled on April 11.
+However, political scientist Muzaffar Assadi says the reasons found by EC aren’t serious enough to always reject such large number of votes. “What if there is a case like the one in Dhokla, Gujarat. This is of serious concern and the returning officers must follow all procedures correctly.”
+Officials argue that ROs follow guidelines before rejecting such votes. “The voters are given three forms: First, the ballot where they need to cast their vote. Second, a form that needs to be filled with basic details and signed so that the RO can attest that the person claiming to be voting is the same as the one in the records, and three, a complete instructions form in the local language and English. If people do not read instructions carefully and cast invalid votes, the RO cannot accept it,” the official said.
+==Seats in which postal ballots made a difference / 2019==
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=02_05_2024_013_011_cap_TOI  May 2, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: 11 Seats in which postal ballots made a difference, 2019.jpg|11 Seats in which postal ballots made a difference, 2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=02_05_2024_013_011_cap_TOI  May 2, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Postal ballot enables registered voters to submit their votes via mail, bypassing the need to visit a polling station.
+ In the 2019 general elections, the most signiﬁcant use of postal ballots was observed in Arunachal, Sikkim, Himachal, Uttarakhand and Jammu & Kashmir. Given the challenging and remote terrains of these regions, postal ballots played a crucial role in ensuring the inclusion of every vote. Leading the way, Arunachal Pradesh accounted for 3.8% of postal votes (of the total votes polled), with Arunachal East and Arunachal West recording 3.7% and 4% respectively. Sikkim followed with 3.4%, then Uttarakhand’s Garhwal at 2.9%, and Ladakh at 2.5% postal votes. Notably, in nearly 11 constituencies, the number of postal ballot votes surpassed the winning margin.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+= Predicting results (trying to, the Indian way)=
+==As in 2024==
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=02_06_2024_023_011_cap_TOI      Himanshi Dhawan, Ajay Singh Ugras & Rajiv Mani, Additional reporting by Julie Mariappan | And the winner is? From Sangam to satta, how India predicts an election/ TNN/ ''The Times of India'' / 2 June 2024]]
+Pilgrims at Allahabad’s Sangam, bellwether states, the uttar-chadhav (highs and lows) of the satta bazaar, onion prices, parrots who predict winners, crowds at a rally…these are just some of the endless ways that we try to read an election for an answer to that tantalising question: Who is winning? The answer will be revealed on June 4, but patience has never been our strong suit.
+The straws are even more unreliable. Asim Ali, researcher at the Centre for Policy Research, says informal mechanisms, such as gauging a seat by how many people turn up for a rally or satta bazaar wagers, have proved to be unreliable.
+Political scientist Philip Oldenburg has long held that it is a group of elites that included knowledgeable people and local politicians who would create the ‘chunavi mahaul’ and that would filter down to ordinary people. TOI examines what other factors predict the ‘hawa’:
+''' BELLWETHER SEATS '''
+These are constituencies that have consistently elected MPs whose party has formed the government at the centre.
+Clallam County in Washington state has voted for the winning nominee in 11 US elections since 1980. Dartmouth in the UK has been getting it right since 1964, and in India, Gujarat’s Valsad has a similar reputation since Independence.
+In 1998, BJP’s Manibhai Chaudhary won in Valsad, a reserved seat, and his party went on to form the government at the centre. When the Vajpayee-led BJP was up for re-election in 1999, Chaudhary repeated the feat, and NDA went on to form the government again. In 2004, Kishan Bhai Patel of Congress won and Congress-led UPA pulled off an unexpected victory. Not surprisingly, Patel won in 2009 as well. In 2014, BJP won the seat, and has held on to it in the subsequent election.
+Like bellwether constituencies, there are ''' bellwether politicians ''' and parties as well. Described as the ‘mausam vigyanik’ or weathervane of Indian politics, Ram Vilas Paswan of Lok Janshakti Party had the uncanny knack of picking the winning side. PMK’s S Rama doss and son Anbumani were equally inspired with their selection of alliances. Since 1998, PMK has won four out of six general elections in Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu. “It also has to do with S Ramadoss’s selection of allies who have a winnable chance to form the government,” says Kolathur Mani, president of Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam, from Mettur in Dharmapuri. For instance, PMK candidate K Pary Mohan won the seat in the NDA-AIADMK alliance and ‘enabled’ A B Vajpayee to form the government that year. In 2009, Dharmapuri threw its weight behind DMK, and UPA-II followed. In 2014, PMK leader A Ramadoss won the election as part of NDA. The exception was in 2019, when DMK’s S Senthil Kumar won the seat but it was BJP which won at the centre.
+''' BETS ON [[Phalodi]] '''
+A sleepy town near Rajasthan’s Jodhpur has been in the news recently, not just for its soaring temperatures but also because predictions made by bookies here are often eerily accurate. Many in Phalodi, with strong connections and experience in the Mumbai stock market, claim their satta business is underpinned by rigorous research. “This research includes insights from experienced analysts who consider caste equations and regional preferences. They understand the market and remain objective,” claims a bookie. Besides analysts, this bazaar also has its own sources of political information, with people placed across major political centers. The bazaar sets rates based on the inputs it receives. Across the country, people keep an eye on Phalodi through WhatsApp channels.
+''' BULLISH BOATMEN '''
+''' Sangam’s boatmen ''' and pilgrims have been considered prescient about the last eight elections. Former journalist Jawid Liaq says he visited the Sangam at Allahabad (now Prayagraj) for a boat ride and spoke to boatmen about the 1977 election. Reluctant to talk politics at first, they later predicted Indira Gandhi’s defeat attributing it to the “rough Emergency measures.” Liaq, who has visited Sangam eight times, says the pilgrims of all castes and classes who visit the confluence of rivers are a mine of voting opinions. “As they represent a cross-section of the country, their views about election results have turned out to be generally correct,” he adds. This time the consensus has been pro-Modi with boatmen like Jagdish Nishad from Arail village saying, “I am not sure of 400-plus but Modi is coming back.” Somit Dhar, who has travelled with his family of five from Bengal’s Howrah declares, “BJP will perform better than last time in Bengal. We have tested Mamata, and now we want to test Modi.”
+''' ONION INDEX '''
+US political strategist and senior aide to the Bill Clinton election campaign James Carville said one of the keys to winning the 1992 election was “the economy, stupid”. Dozens of elections over several decades have shown that US voters are tempted to react unfavourably to inflation and vote against it. In India, onions have a similar exalted status. This kitchen staple has brought down governments whenever its price soared. Delhi chief minister Sushma Swaraj lost the 1998 assembly poll over this. Yet it is not a foolproof theory, and AAP was insulated from this in the 2020 election. In 2024, Maharashtra’s onion farmers are seething due to export curbs and pose a test for BJP. Let’s see who is left in tears this time.
+''' WILD PREDICTIONS '''
+This anxiety to know has led to some strange situations like the arrest of a fortune teller who kept a ''' kili josiyar (parrot fortune teller) ''' in captivity. It would be useful to mention that the offending pair — human and bird — had predicted a PMK win from Cuddalore constituency in DMK-led Tamil Nadu. We will only know if the parrot is right on June 4, but the belief that animals may know something we don’t goes beyond politics. Like Paul, the ‘octopus oracle’ which had an impressive 87% success rate and correctly predicted all seven of Germany’s matches, including a surprise defeat to Serbia in the group stage in the 2010 football World Cup. Mani the parakeet from Singapore and Achilles the cat had similar successes.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
 =Re-elected parliamentarians=
+==1952-2014==
 [[File: releceted1.jpg| RATE OF RETURN |frame|left|500px]]
-[[File: releceted.jpg|'''GETTING BACK INTO THE HOUSE |frame|500px]]
+[[File: releceted.jpg|'''GETTING BACK INTO THE HOUSE''' |frame|500px]]
 ''' RATE OF RETURN '''
@@ Line 262: / Line 1,744: @@
 BJP has the highest number of re-elected MPs in the 16th Lok Sabha while 70% of Congres MPs managed to duck anti-incumbency. So, those candidates who had a proven record as MP survived the Modi wave. Only in three elections -the post-Emergency election of 1977, 1980 poll that saw the return of Indira Gandhi, and the 1989 election after Bofors -did fewer MPs return to the House (Chart: '''GETTING BACK INTO THE HOUSE)
-=Sensex: on the morning after the results=
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
-[[File: sensex after polls.jpg|Sensex movement after poll results |frame| 500px]]
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Security during the election process=
+==Personnel deployed in 2014==
+[[File: Personnel deployed in 2014 during the LS elections.jpg|Personnel deployed in 2014 during the LS elections <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F26&entity=Ar01305&sk=6896DBD8&mode=image  March 26, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+Personnel deployed in 2014 during the LS elections
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:History|P INDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY,
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDI]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+= Symbols used by political parties during elections=
+==2024: Interesting symbols==
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=27_04_2024_014_008_cap_TOI  Shruti Sonal, April 27, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: Some interesting symbols from the 2024 Parliamentary elections.jpg|Some interesting symbols from the 2024  Parliamentary elections <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=27_04_2024_014_008_cap_TOI  Shruti Sonal, April 27, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Advocate Manish Kumar Dwivedi, 31, had never imagined that one day he’d be contesting a Lok Sabha election. But ahead of the second phase, dressed in a kurtapyjama, he was walking around the lanes of UP’s Gautam Buddh Nagar, greeting people with folded hands. His supporters handed out pamphlets bearing his photograph and a symbol: the humble chai kettle.
+For the last two years, Dwivedi was part of a social campaign that voiced the concerns of small businessmen and entrepreneurs who were trapped in debt as a result of Covid lockdowns “While big corporations often get debt waivers, there are small people who are getting no relief as they struggle to pay back bank loans and credit card bills. Who will speak for them?” Dwivedi asked.
+In order to push for a waiver and extension of time for repayments, Dwivedi and his team wrote to multiple political parties and MPs, but no one responded, he says. That’s when the group decided to enter the arena of politics. In fact, the Akhil Bharatiya Parivar Party had plans to contest all the 543 seats. All of them are first-time contenders, and come from various walks of life. The idea of the symbol, he pointed out, was crowdsourced as they asked people for suggestions. It not only represented a symbol of livelihood, but also was a barb at PM Modi’s ‘chaiwallah’ image, he said. “The symbol was a way of saying: hamein sirf chai nahi chahiye, poori ketli chahiye (we don’t want just the tea, we want the whole kettle).”
+The chai kettle is one of the many symbols that have been adopted by candidates like Dwivedi in the ongoing elections. From daily household items that the aam aadmi uses in kitchens to aspirational gear and gadgets, they’re all in the fray. And while they were first introduced to reach out to the people at a time when the literacy rate stood at a mere 16%, they’re still as relevant, with party factions even going to court to claim them after a split.
+Unlike recognised political parties, Independent candidates choose from a list of ‘free’ symbols that the Election Commission updates frequently. These include the likes of grapes, dumbbells, vacuum cleaners, batter, and more. In fact, for decades, they’ve been drawn by one person. Draftsman M S Sethi was hired by the ballot committee back in 1950 and retired in 1992. Armed with an HB pencil and paper, over the years, he doodled the images, which became the mainstay of Indian elections. While he passed away in the 2000s, his drawings continue to find their way to voting machines, posters, and households.
+The symbols themselves might be minimalistic and resemble hand-drawn sketches, the narratives behind them are much more complex.
+For lawyer Yusuf Ali Khan, contesting from Rajasthan’s Churu, choosing a ‘baby walker’ as a symbol was about making a point. “In Marwari, we call it ‘rerula’, and it represents something using which a baby learns to walk. Similarly, I want to help my community walk on its own feet,” Khan says.
+Khan, who contested the 2003 and 2008 assembly elections, says he had no plans to contest the Lok Sabha polls. Then, he heard that Congress had not fielded a single Muslim candidate in Rajasthan.
+“We are 9% of the state’s population, but have no voice. I want to change that,” Khan points out, adding that increasing access to education and scholarship opportunities are his topmost priority.
+Meanwhile, social worker Niranjan Singh Rathore is using his ‘belt’ symbol to tell people in Taranagar about his intentions. “Koi bhi kaam karne se pehle, kamar kasni padti hai. We need a belt for that,” he says.
+Belonging to a Scheduled Tribe, he says that while govts have come and gone, the benefits of social justice reforms and reservations still haven’t reached certain regions and sections. Armed with data that shows the lack of representation, he is going door to door, telling people to buckle up and demand change. These polls will be his ‘first and last’ election, Rathore says.
+Some are going out of their way to make sure the public doesn’t forget the symbol on the day of voting. In a move that grabbed many eyeballs, Aligarh’s Pandit Keshav Dev walked around in his constituency wearing a garland of slippers, his chosen symbol.
+Chennai South’s V Sivakumar, contesting on the symbol of dumbbells, hasn’t attempted anything similar yet. And for Lakhimpur’s Deba Nath Pait, it might be nearly impossible to parade with a ‘fountain’. But as they say, elections can spring many surprises.
+=Temperatures, daytime, on general election day=
+==Delhi region==
+===1977-2019===
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=23_05_2024_003_010_cap_TOI  May 23, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: The maximum daytime temperature on general election day in Delhi, 1977-2019; turnout 1952-2019.jpg|The maximum daytime temperature on general election day in Delhi, 1977-2019; turnout 1952-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=23_05_2024_003_010_cap_TOI  May 23, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+''' Just 2nd LS polls in peak summer '''
+All general elections in Delhi prior to 1977 were held in Feb-March, when temperatures are much milder.
+: This is the second time general elections are taking place in the capital during its peak summer period of May 16 to June 9. The previous instance was in 1991, when polling took place on May 20. However, as per records, the maximum temperature at Safdarjung was a relatively mild 36.5 degrees C.
+ Weather is just one of several factors that impact poll turnouts. However, if there’s one election where heat appears to have played a role in dampening voting, it’s the last Lok Sabha poll (2019) in Delhi. Held on May 12, when the maximum temperature touched 41 degrees C, the turnout dipped to 60.6%. That was a fall of 4.5 percentage points from the previous LS election, held on April 10, 2014, when the temperature was much more agreeable at 32 degrees C. Both elections produced the same outcome, with BJP winning all seven city seats.
+ ''' ''The Times of India''’s VIEW: ''' National elections should avoid peak summer as they did before 1991.
+TOI looked at LS polling day temperatures in the capital since 1977 and found that the hottest election day so far was in 2004, when Delhi voted on May 10 when the maximum temperature at the city’s base station of Safdarjung was 41.4 degrees C, as per weather archive website Tutiempo.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:History|P INDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY,
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDI
+]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Trends=
+==1952-2014: eight major trends==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01803&sk=84DBB5FE&mode=text  Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+===Anti-incumbency===
+[[File: Ruling party has the edge, 1952-2019.jpg|Ruling party has the edge, 1952-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01803&sk=84DBB5FE&mode=text  Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+There is a widespread belief that most ruling governments are not re-elected by voters. In our analysis of big and medium-sized states, in the period 1977–2002, 70% of governments were thrown out by angry, dissatisfied voters. However, this has changed over the last 20 years. To put it simply, the anti-incumbency era is over. India is now going through what can be called a ‘Fifty:Fifty Era’. Governments today have a 50:50 chance of being re-elected. Governments that perform are voted back. Those that do not deliver are voted out. The angry voter has given way to a wiser, more mature voter.
+===Young voters, old MPs===
+[[File: Youth under-represented in Lok Sabha, 1952-2014.jpg|Youth under-represented in Lok Sabha, 1952-2014 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01803&sk=84DBB5FE&mode=text  Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Our members of Parliament are much older than the average age of voters. Once again, expect older candidates as the average age of members of the Lok Sabha has been rising with every election. Today, 59% of voters in India are young, between the ages of 18 and 40. But only 15% of MPs are between 25 and 40 years old. This means that 85% of MPs are of a different generation from the majority of voters. And it’s a widening age gap.
+===Women of India===
+[[File: Potential NDA seats in 2014.jpg|Potential NDA seats in 2014 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01803&sk=84DBB5FE&mode=text  Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Women’s participation in elections has been rising much faster than men, and the next Lok Sabha elections could be the first time in India’s history that their turnout will be higher than men. But who do women vote for? Traditionally, the BJP has had a higher support base amongst men than women. Which is why the government’s free gas cylinder policy (Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana) was a perfect election campaign idea; it targeted primarily rural, women voters. All parties can now be expected to make similar promises targeting women in these elections. To illustrate how important the male voter is for the NDA, a simple simulation of the 2014 elections threw up two alternative scenarios. First, if only men had voted, the NDA would have won as many as 376 seats (40 seats more than the 336 that they actually won). Second, if only women had voted, the NDA would have won only 265 seats (71 seats lower than their final total in 2014 and 7 seats below the halfway mark of 272).
+===21 million missing women voters===
+[[File: Women denied chance to vote- 2011 census (projected to 2019).jpg|Women denied chance to vote- 2011 census (projected to 2019) <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01803&sk=84DBB5FE&mode=text  Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Early estimates suggest that as many as 21 million eligible women voters will be denied their right to vote in 2019 simply because their names have been excluded... To place this number of missing women voters in perspective: it is equal to 39,000 women missing in every constituency in this country.
+===Disappearing Independents===
+Having understood the unfairness of the first-past-the-post system, voters are increasingly ignoring Independents. The vote for Independents has dropped from 13% in the earlier years to just 4% today. Victims of the system, they will be all but irrelevant in this election.
+===Elections are not national but of federation-of-states===
+[[File: The rise of regional parties- seats won by recognized regional parties, 1952-2014.jpg|The rise of regional parties- seats won by recognized regional parties, 1952-2014 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01803&sk=84DBB5FE&mode=text  Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''No longer a national election; it’s a true federation-of-states election'''
+The number of seats won by regional parties has risen from an average of 35 Lok Sabha seats in the early phase after Independence to over 160 seats now, almost a third of the seats in the Lok Sabha, and the trend is decidedly upwards. Even more significant is the rapid increase in the votes that regional parties are now winning. In the early phase of Indian elections, regional parties won 4% of the vote, this has now risen to 34% of the national vote in Lok Sabha elections. The end of the all-India ‘uniform-swing’ will play a crucial role in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. The importance of strong sub-national parties will create state-level swings and relegate the phenomenon of a national swing to a memory from the past. It’s probably best not to focus exclusively on the ‘Modi-Shah-appeal’ or the ‘Rahul-Priyanka-effect’ or even the ‘Modi-Rahul-contest’ in 2019. Increasingly, it is the ‘state-leader-impact’ that will be more relevant.
+===Opposition unity===
+[[File: A divided opposition- Average IOU (Index of Opposition Unity) in Lok Sabha, 1952-2019.jpg|A divided opposition- Average IOU (Index of Opposition Unity) in Lok Sabha, 1952-2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F17&entity=Ar01803&sk=84DBB5FE&mode=text  Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala, March 17, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+''' What will be more important for victory: votes or dividing the Opposition? '''
+In the past, winning the popular vote yielded more seats than a fragmented Opposition. In fact in every Lok Sabha election victory between 1952 and 2002, the ruling party won about two-thirds of its seats because of a high popular vote and only one-third of the seats were won due to the effect of a divided Opposition. The impact of Opposition unity on seats is rising with every election, from an average of 33% in the first two phases to 45% in the last three Lok Sabha elections.
+===The ‘Bump’===
+''' On vote counting day, watch out for the ‘Bump’ '''
+Do not make the mistake of walking away from your television set on counting day when all the ‘leads’ are in. Major changes happen as more and more rounds are counted. Nothing sinister, it is merely a statistical phenomenon that happens in every election — and benefits the leading party, no matter which party is leading. The party that is ahead when all the leads are in gets an amazing ‘Bump’ in actual seats once all the results are in. For Lok Sabha elections, when all the 543 ‘leads’ are in but counting is still in progress, be prepared to add another forty-five seats to the leading party’s tally and subtract about the same number from the trailing parties’ total. In other words, be prepared for as much as a forty-five-seat Bump, or what could be up to a ninety-seat swing.
+'' Edited excerpts from The Verdict: Decoding India’s Elections by Prannoy Roy and Dorab Sopariwala with permission [for The Times of India] from Penguin Random House India ''
+==2021 Assembly elections==
+[[File: Elections to 5 state legislative assemblies in April 2021, trends.jpg|Elections to 5 state legislative assemblies in April 2021: trends  <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL/2021/05/17&entity=Ar01210&sk=BADB22A0&mode=image  May 17, 2021: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+'' Elections to 5 state legislative assemblies in April 2021: trends ''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDI]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=‘Unopposed’ victors=
+==1951-2024==
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=23_04_2024_012_004_cap_TOI  April 23, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+BJP candidate Mukesh Dalal winning the Surat LS seat unopposed is the first victory of the party in the ongoing seven-phased Lok Sabha elections, reports PTI. Before him, 10 party candidates have won uncontested in the just-held assembly elections in Arunachal Pradesh. A maximum of seven candidates won the general elections uncontested in 1957, followed by five each in 1951 and 1967 polls. While three candidates won uncontested in 1962 and two in 1977, one candidate each won the polls in a similar fashion in 1971, 1980 and 1989.
+Before Dalal, Samajwadi Party’s Dimple Yadav had won Kannauj LS bypolls in 2012 unopposed. Only at least nine, including Dimple, have won bypolls uncontested.
+ Amongst the prominent politicians who have won parliamentary polls uncontested are YB Chavan, Farooq Abdullah, Hare Krishna Mahtab, TT Krishnamachari, PM Sayeed, and SC Jamir. Of the candidates who have entered LS without a contest, the maximum have been from Congress. Sikkim and Srinagar constituencies have seen such unopposed elections twice.  TNN
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Villages on disputed borders=
+==Andhra Pradesh – Odisha==
+See [[Kotia, panchayat ]]
+==Maharashtra- Telangana==
+===14 villages===
+[https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/maharashtra-telangana-border-row-dual-voters-9267739/  Vallabh Ozarkar, April 14, 2024: ''The Indian Express'']
+'' With their villages under two panchayats in both Maharashtra’s Chandrapur and Telangana’s Adilabad, each resident has two voter IDs, Aadhaar cards etc., even as both district administration decide to counsel them not to indulge in ‘unlawful’ dual voting ''
+About 4,000 voters from 14 villages along the border between Maharashtra and Telangana could be the only ones in India to have the “privilege” to vote twice in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections — in Maharashtra for the Chandrapur constituency in the first phase on April 19, and then in Telangana for the Adilabad constituency in the fourth phase on May 13.
+Because of the decades-old boundary dispute between Maharashtra and Telangana, these 14 villages, located in a remote belt, with an aggregate population of over 6,000, have two of every institution and facility, provided by each of the neighbouring states — ranging from gram panchayats and sarpanches to primary government schools (one instructing in Marathi, the other in Telugu) and health care centres.
+The territorial dispute over the 14 villages (called Sade Bara Gaav in Maharashtra) that fall in the Kerameri tehsil of Adilabad in Telangana and Jivati tehsil of Chandrapur in Maharashtra, dates back to 1956, when the state of Andhra Pradesh was formed.
+The 14 villages come under two gram panchayats — Parandoli and Antapur — which are over 30 km apart. The villagers have two voter ID cards each with their names listed in the constituencies of both the states.
+Each of the villagers also have two ration cards, Aadhaar cards, MNREGA cards, caste certificates and other documents — one each from Maharashtra and Telangana, based on their respective classifications — which enable them to avail benefits of social welfare schemes from both states.
+The only difference between the two gram panchayats is that while all villages under Parandoli receive water and electricity supply from both states — although the Maharashtra services are billed — residents of the five villages under Antapur say only Telangana has been giving them water and electricity, that too for free.
+Currently, the two elected sarpanches for the two gram panchyats in both Prandoli and Antapur are from different parties from Maharashtra and Telangana, because of which they also get two separate funds from their respective governments to carry out development works.
+As the villagers, who mostly belong to the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) communities, have ration cards from both states, they can also avail ration benefits as well as other schemes being implemented by both states.
+Parandoli sarpanch Leenabai Birade — a member of the Congress in Maharashtra — and her husband Bharat said, “Yes, we have been voting on both sides in every Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. We have separate voter IDs from both state governments, and different administrations. If the election date is the same in both states, we vote in whichever state is feasible. But if it’s not on the same date, we vote on both sides, since we are getting facilities from both sides.”
+On the issue of the villagers’ dual voting, Chandrapur district collector Vinay Gauda C G said that at a recent interstate meeting of administrative officials of both districts — Chandrapur in Maharashtra and Adilabad in Telangana — it was decided that the teams from both district administrations will counsel the villagers not to vote twice as that is unlawful.
+“Not only are we counselling the villagers not to vote twice, we have also decided to apply the indelible ink on the entire index finger, instead of just a single mark, so that they can’t vote again,” Gauda said. “The administration of both districts will apply the ink on the entire finger so that it is easily identifiable.”
+These are new developments. In the past, these villagers have voted on both sides. But, Gauda said, “Not only two votes, even having two voter ID cards from two places is unlawful. So we are conveying that to the villagers.”
+A Parandoli sarpanch disagreed with the development, saying that the governments should first decide which state their villages belong to. “If voting twice is not according to law, then let the Election Commission ask the states to resolve our issue first. We are voting on both sides. If you have a problem with that, then ask the EC to remove our name from the list of any one constituency. We do not have a problem with that. Our only concern is that the authorities must tell us whether we are part of Maharashtra or Telangana. We do not have a problem in joining any state, as long as they resolve our issue with land ownership pattas (land ownership documents),” said Nimbadas Patange, the sarpanch of Mukadam wada of the Parandoli gram panchayat, who is affiliated with the BRS in Telangana.
+Parandoli’s other sarpanch Leenabai Birade said that while benefit from both states is fine, their biggest grouse is that they can’t get their land registered in their names. “Since the land is designated as forest, it can’t be registered in anyone’s name. The demand of the villagers is to give us pattas (7/12 utara) in our names,” she said.
+When The Indian Express visited Antapur and Narayanguda villages under the Antapur gram panchayat, several residents claimed they were being “neglected” by the Maharashtra government, whereas the Telangana government was providing facilities like water and electricity for free to them.
+“We have everything here. We vote on both sides, but still we do not have basic facilities yet. We are in a state of limbo between Maharashtra and Telangana. At least the Telangana government is trying to help us, but the Maharashtra government is not concerned at all,” alleged Vitthal Rathod, a farmer from Narayanguda village.
+At Antapur village, Vilas Pundlik, on whose land the Telangana government has built a school, agreed with Rathod, saying that he and most of his neighbours wish to be part of Telangana. “The Maharashtra government isn’t concerned about us at all. They are not giving us pattas, whereas the Telangana government has. It also gives us free power and water lines to each house, as well as pensions, rations and other schemes for women, children and farmers, which Maharashtra doesn’t,” Vilas claimed.
+Sahebrao Bhadange’s wife, a BRS member, is a sarpanch of Antapur gram panchayat. “The Telangana government has given us all necessary certificates and documents, including land pattas, without any hassle. We should be allowed to join Telangana,” he said.
+S Chockalingam, Chief Electoral Officer of Maharashtra, told The Indian Express that they have referred the matter to the Election Commission (EC) to ensure that the villagers are voting only in one of the states either in Maharashtra or in Telangana and do not vote twice. He said they have requested the ECI to guide Telangana to ensure that the villagers who have already voted are not allowed to vote again.
+“The issue of these villages is under consideration and standard protocols are put in place. Generally when the voting takes place in Maharashtra and Telangana simultaneously then the villagers are free to go to one of the places and vote. Now this time this confusion is also not there. Election in Maharashtra is going to take place first and so our booths will be put up there,” Chockalingam said.
+=Voter enrolment=
+==1952: a sense of belonging==
+[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=08_04_2024_010_025_cap_TOI  Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: FOR THE PEOPLE- Campaigning in the time of K Kamaraj.jpg|FOR THE PEOPLE- Campaigning in the time of K Kamaraj <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=08_04_2024_010_025_cap_TOI  Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-1.jpg|FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-1 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=08_04_2024_010_025_cap_TOI  Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-2.jpg|FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-2 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=08_04_2024_010_025_cap_TOI  Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-3.jpg|FRAMED- The photographs are of the 1957 election from Madras, and from the magazine Madras Information (1957), Connemara Public Library-3 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=08_04_2024_010_025_cap_TOI  Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+[[File: The estimated cost of State and Union govt elections, 1952.jpg|The estimated cost of State and Union govt elections, 1952 <br/> From: [https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=08_04_2024_010_025_cap_TOI  Asha Prakash, April 8, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+‘A test for all of us’ is how Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru described the first general elections in India, in his radio broadcast on Nov 22, 1951, 8.30pm. “This is our first election on an adult franchise. The standard we set now will act as a precedent and govern future elections.”
+ In Madras, the elections were spread over Jan 1952, and ahead of the polls, instructions to the public on how to cast their votes and the purpose of adult franchise were aired through All India Radio and documentaries in cinema halls, while magazines published articles on how assembly and parliamentary constituencies are structured.
+ So, what was it like then?
+ ''' BALLOTS IN OR BALLOTS OUT? '''
+ In those days, as only about 20% of the population was literate, polling booths had a row of ballot boxes with symbols, says former journalist K Vishwanathan. “The ballot paper merely had to be dropped into the box that had the symbol of the candidate being voted for. But confusion ensued since it was the first election, and some ballot papers were found placed on top of the boxes instead. Fraudulence was rampant, and interested parties would collect these and drop them in their own candidate’s box,” says the 92-year-old.
+ Counting, he says, took several days and people got to know the results only through newspapers. Not many people lived to old age, so there was no question of postal votes.
+ “ Women from Thanjavur-Trichy belt were progressive and made sure they cast their vote. They had been active during the freedom movement as well.”
+''' A SENSE OF POWER '''
+ It was the first election in which anyone could be a candidate and that gave a lot of confidence to the common man and the working classes, says R Raman, principal of Presidency College in Chennai. “Until then local landlords held power and were the presidents of panchayats. The 1952 election was thus a kind of celebration for the masses; they felt the country belonged to them, for the fir st time. It brought people together. Meetings were held all night, till 4am and 5am, often on the beaches of Chennai, as there were no restrictions on the timings.”
+''' BACK UP OR PAY UP '''
+ As quoted in the Madras Information magazine (editions 1951-1952), the rules of campaigning were that anyone who held a public meeting or canvassed on polling day within 100 yards of a polling station even in a private place, or exhibited signs could be arrested without warrant and fined up to ₹250 (more than ₹20,000 today).
+ Any person who tampered with a ballot box would also lose the right to vote in future elections.
+''' PITCHER, TWIG OR CAMEL? '''
+ Party candidates who were qualified to fill reserved seats were distinguished by a black circle around the party symbol. Independent candidates had to specify in their order of preference, any three symbols out of only six options — bow and arrow, boat, flower, pitcher, camel and a twig with two leaves, left after allotment to the All-India parties and state political parties, says T S Krishnamurthy, former chief election commissioner.
+''' MRS AND MISSES '''
+ Many women in northern India did not register in their own names, and instead registered as ‘A’s mother’ or ‘B’s wife’ and some 2.8 million women voters were struck off the list, writes Ramachandra Guha in his book ‘India after Gandhi’. The then chief election commissioner of India, Sukumar Sen, considered the furore over their omission as something good, as it would motivate women to give their own names for the next elections.
+ In his address to the public prior to the 1952 election, chief electoral officer of Madras S Venkateswaran appealed to women to not let their “shyness stand between them and the polling booth”. “Our elections would be unsatisfactory unless our women, who constitute half our electorate, exercise their rights as voters with as much keenness and intelligent appreciation as men voters. Shrewd common sense is good enough equipment for a voter and our women have that in abundance,” he said. He also announced that booths with “appreciable number of gosha women voters (who follow Islamic traditions strictly) will be manned entirely by women staff” and only women voters will be allowed to vote there.
+''' POLL NUMBERS OVER THE YEARS '''
+| 51.5% of the country voted (8.9 crore voted out of 17.3 crore). There were over 2.7 crore voters in Madras State which included parts of modern-day Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh 1957 | only 47.57% voted (9.2 crore out of 19.3 crore)
+| Polling period was reduced to less than a week from the initial 19 days. The number of polling booths were increased to 2.5 lakh, one for 900 voters. No one had to travel more than one mile to vote. Also, a new system of voting was introduced where the choice of candidate was indicated on the ballot paper itself. Until then, each candidate had a different ballot box Source: Madras Information magazine
+==Barely 40% go age 18-19 enrolled as voters==
+[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=EC-uses-FB-to-reach-out-to-young-03072017008038 EC uses FB to reach out to young unlisted voters|Jul 03 2017: The Times of India (Delhi)]
+Barely 40% of the country's newly eligible voters in the 18-19 age group are currently enrolled as voters. In fact, in big states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, 75 lakh and 46 lakh young people have turned 18 but are yet to enlist themselves as voters.
+As per statistics compiled by the Election Commission as part of its special enrolment drive focused on young voters, 3.36 crore people in the 18-19 age group have not registered themselves in the voters list. The difference between electors and projected population in the age group is most prominent in states like UP, Bihar, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh, even as Kerala, Punjab, Andhra Pradesh and many smaller states are better off.
+It is precisely this large gap that has prompted the EC to launch the month-long drive from July 1 to reach out to unlisted voters and persuade them through popular modes like social media to sign up. Elaborating on the special drive, chief election commissioner Nasim Zaidi told TOI, “Focus of the commission is mainly on young voters as we noticed that young voters are enrolled much less in number. In fact, 5-6 years ago, the registered youth as a percentage of eligible youth used to be 10%. In successive years, we have increased this enrolment percentage to 40% or so.But still, a large number of youth are not registered.“
+[[File: vote.PNG ||frame|500px]]
+“In UP , close to 75 lakh eligible young voters are yet to be enrolled. Likewise for many other states. So, we are launching a special campaign for enrolment of these young voters from July 1.This time we are making use of Facebook because young people are on Facebook.Facebook will issue reminders to all young voters between July 1 and 3, reminding them whether they are registered or not registered.If they are not, it will direct them to the National Voters' Search Portal, where they can fill the online application, which will then be pursued (at our end).“
+A national call centre has been launched with tollfree number 1800111950. As part of the enrolment drive through July , the EC has written to all political parties seeking their cooperation to ensure its success.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Vote percentage vis-à-vis seats won/ ‘Strike rate’=
+==1996-2014: BJP more successful than Congress==
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/lok-sabha-elections-how-bjp-beats-congress-in-turning-votes-into-seats/articleshow/68623108.cms  Chethan Kumar, Lok Sabha elections: How BJP beats Congress in turning votes into seats, March 29, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: 1996-2014- Vote percentage vis-à-vis seats won in LS elections, ‘Strike rate’.jpg|1996-2014: Vote percentage vis-à-vis seats won in LS elections/ ‘Strike rate’ <br/> From: [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/lok-sabha-elections-how-bjp-beats-congress-in-turning-votes-into-seats/articleshow/68623108.cms  Chethan Kumar, Lok Sabha elections: How BJP beats Congress in turning votes into seats, March 29, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+Much of BJP's dominance in electoral politics in the past five years has been credited to PM Modi and party chief Amit Shah. While the duo did lead BJP to a sweeping majority in 2014, the ground for that may have been laid much before their time.
+Analysis of election data from 1996 to 2009, including the two terms of the Congress-led UPA, shows that the strike rate of BJP contestants was far better than those fielded by the grand old party. The percentage of BJP candidates winning was higher in all but one election (2009), including in 2004 when the UPA-I assumed office.
+That Congress also fielded more candidates than BJP could have affected its winning percentage, but as experts explain, "BJP's success in building a national narrative had been in the pipeline since 1992".
+Veteran BJP leader BS Yeddyurappa told TOI: "Narendra Modi was a Gujarat CM and was working in that capacity for the party. But from the time of Vajpayee, we worked across the breadth and length of this country with leaders like Advani and Murali Manohar Joshi, and at a time all this was taking a more concrete shape, Modi was projected as the PM candidate and naturally it got converted into votes."
+n 1999, when the BJP-led NDA came to power under Vajpayee, 57% of BJP candidates had won, against 25% from the rival party.
+In 1996, 34% of all BJP contestants won, compared to 26% of Congress candidates; in 2004, when UPA eventually formed the government, 38% of BJP candidates won, against 35% for Congress. In 1998 and 1999, when NDA ruled, BJP candidates had a much higher winnability record compared to Congress.
+"You can map the timeline of how we grew from Gujarat and Rajasthan to Karnataka and the northeast. It was between 1996 and 1998 that the party emerged nationally. In 2014, we did reach the peak as there was 'partial consolidation' because of the spiralling growth of the middle class and youth which came in handy," BJP spokesperson Krishna Sagar Rao said.
+At a discussion last month, psephologists spoke of how the 2014 LS polls were critical in setting the ground for a narrative on New India. "If BJP comes back to power you will see this narrative getting stronger by 2024. But even if the party fails to retain power, the idea won't die, such was the nature of the elections in 2014," said Suhas Palshikar.
+"India Shining may not have worked for BJP electorally in that year (2004), but the exercise of building a national narrative that has engaged people had begun and that was the first attempt. Today, the Naya Bharat campaign is not just a linguistic nuance but a sustained effort at consolidation," Palshikar said.
+=’Vote share’ of the contesting parties=
+==1952-2024==
+[[File: The percentage of votes polled by the BJP and Congress, 1952-2024.jpg|The percentage of votes polled by the BJP and Congress, 1952-2024 <br/> From: [From the archives, June 5, 2024: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+'' The percentage of votes polled by the BJP and Congress, 1952-2024 ''
+==1991-2014==
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/how-smaller-players-gained-at-national-parties-expense/articleshow/68714163.cms  Chethan Kumar, How smaller players gained at national parties’ expense, April 4, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: 1991-2014- National Party voteshare vs state, others; Congress share dips 16 points, BJP up by 11.jpg|1991-2014- <br/> National Party voteshare vs state, others <br/> Congress share dips 16 points, BJP up by 11 <br/> From: [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/how-smaller-players-gained-at-national-parties-expense/articleshow/68714163.cms  Chethan Kumar, How smaller players gained at national parties’ expense, April 4, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+The soaring graph of BJP, which took the party to a record 282 Lok Sabha seats and a voteshare of 31% in 2014 coincides with an inverse trend – the gradual fall in the voteshare of national parties as a whole, touching an all-time low of 60.7% that very year.
+So, where did the disappearing national votes go?
+The 2014 voteshare marks a staggering 20% dip since 1991 when national parties polled 80.7% of the votes. Election Commission data shows the votes lost by the national parties mostly went to unrecognised parties; this is evident as the other potential beneficiary, the state parties, recorded only a marginal increase in voteshare.
+Comparatively, the share of unrecognised parties — including AAP and Trinamool Congress — has jumped to 22.7% in 2014, compared to 2.2% in 1991, fluctuating every year. Other than 2014, the best performance of such parties was in 1998, when they got 10.9% of votes.
+The share of independents has more or less remained flat: From 4.16% in 1991, they got 3.06% votes in 2014.
+To register as a state-level or national political party, an outfit must poll a certain percentage of votes or win a certain percentage of seats contested. All others are termed “unrecognised”.
+“The decline in Congress’ share was not transferred entirely to BJP, or the Janata Party and Dal before that, which is why you see the cumulative dip. Janata Dal has split into several fragments, like RJD, SP, JD(S) and JD(U), all of whom collect votes in their respective states,” psephologist Sandeep Shastri said.
+BJP improved its voteshare every election barring 2009 while Congress has consistently lost out. Even so, BJP’s best performance in 2014 elections (31%) does not overtake that of Congress (35.4%) in 1991.
+Political analyst S Mahadevaprakash said: “Until the early 1990s, Congress had a strong consolidated vote bank. In UP for example, Congress got the votes of both the upper caste Brahmins and Thakurs and the minorities. Post-Mandal and Masjid, this broke. But BJP has not managed to consolidate that fully and no other party has grown in stature.”
+In this period, there were three other major national parties — Janata Dal (JD), CPM and BSP — but none of them individually crossed 12% in any of the elections. With 11.84% of votes in 1991, Janata Dal performed the best among these three parties, while BSP with barely 4.2% was the worst. Compared to 1991, the share of national parties has dipped 20%.
+The gap appears to have been filled by registered unrecognised parties whose voteshare surged from 2.2% in 1991 to 22.7% in 2014. At least 10% of this went to AAP (2%), Trinamool Congress. (5.2), All Jharkhand Students Union (1.4%), JD(S) and other regional parties.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDI]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+=Voter turnout=
+==What does a high turnout signify?==
-=Voter turnout:  what does it signify?=
 ''' High turnout doesn’t signal a wave  '''
-[[File: election surges.jpg||frame|left|500px]]
+[[File: election surges.jpg|The meaning of high voter turnout|frame|left|500px]]
 [[File: election surges2.jpg||frame|500px]]
+[[File: Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the world, Voter turnout in parliamentary elections, 2012-14.jpg| Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the world, Voter turnout in parliamentary elections, 2012-14; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=05_12_2015_010_050_002&type=P&artUrl=STATOISTICS-EXERCISING-CHOICE-05122015010050&eid=31808 ''The Times of India''], December 5, 2015|frame|500px]]
 '' ‘Long Queues Outside Booths Don’t Necessarily Mean Doom For Incumbent, Desire For Change’ ''
@@ Line 287: / Line 2,200: @@
 (The writer is founding trustee, IndiaSpend, a non-profi t data journalism initiative)
+=Wars and election results=
+[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/timestopten.cms   Do Indo-Pak conflicts affect elections? | March 2019 [ ''The Times of India'']
+==Indo-Pak conflicts and elections: 1965-1999==
+''' War and polls: '''
+Indian and Pakistani armies have fought thrice: in 1965, 1971 and 1999. Elections after the 1965 war were held only two years later (Congress’ seat fell from 361 in 1962 to 283 in 1967) and the 1971 war happened eight months after an election that Indira Gandhi had won. Only the Kargil war (fought from May to July 1999) was immediately followed by that year’s Lok Sabha elections (held in October).
+''' Lessons from Kargil: '''
+After the victory in Kargil, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led BJP won 182 seats in Lok Sabha. So, how much of it was the impact of Kargil? Depends. BJP’s 182 seat tally was the same number as in 1998 but its overall ''' vote share fell by 1.84% ''' (which means it got fewer votes than in the previous elections). In politically crucial Uttar Pradesh, BJP’s vote-share went down 9% and its seat tally dropped from 57 (in 1998) to 29. The party also lost seats in some other big states (like Punjab). That means the electoral outcome did not match the outpouring of emotions during the two-month war. Does it mean, Kargil had no impact? A counter view is that the BJP government during the Kargil was only a caretaker government (though war allowed Vajpayee to function as a full-fledged PM) and their retaining the previous poll tally was itself the impact of the war (182 was the best the BJP had ever performed in history till then). Others point out that it wasn’t the war but Vajpayee’s charisma that got the votes for BJP as the opposition then was weak and Congress was turning out to be a party of rebels.
 =Women in the Lok Sabha=
-[[File: women historical.jpg| Women in the Lok Sabha |frame| 500px]]
+==1952-2014==
+[[File: women historical.jpg| Women in the Lok Sabha 1952-2014|frame| 500px]]
 ''' NO ROOM IN THE HOUSE FOR WOMEN '''
@@ Line 297: / Line 2,222: @@
 Women make up 49% of the population but only 7.7% of the total candidates (8,163) contesting in 2014 are female. One third of the 631 women candidates are independents.
 Congres had the largest number (57) while BJP fielded only 37. Women now often outnumber men in polling queues but clearly parties haven't woken up to this new scenario  (Chart: Women in the Lok Sabha)
+==The representation of women in 2014==
+[[File: The representation of women in the Indian parliament in 2014.jpg| The representation of women in the Indian parliament in 2014 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F05%2F05&entity=Ar02012&sk=6F4A69EC&mode=image  May 5, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+''' See graphic ‘'':
+'' The representation of women in the Indian parliament in 2014 ''
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+=Women voters=
+==1951-52: 28 lakh dropped from rolls==
+[[File: In 1951-52, 28 lakh women had to be dropped from the rolls.jpg|In 1951-52, 28 lakh women had to be dropped from the rolls <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F03%2F24&entity=Ar00204&sk=6FEC3DC2&mode=image  March 24, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+'''See graphic''':
+''In 1951-52, 28 lakh women had to be dropped from the rolls''
+===Burqa, ghoonghat, reluctance to disclose names===
+[https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/madhavi-latha-burqa-controversy-9326271/  Damini Nath , May 14, 2024: ''The Indian Express'']
+Hyderabad Police registered an FIR against Latha under IPC sections pertaining to undue influence at an election (171C), obstructing a public servant (186), and intent to incite (505(1)(c)), and Section 132 of The Representation of the People Act, 1951 (misconduct at the polling station).
+''' Voters who cover their face '''
+While face coverings have been increasingly politicised of late, women who wear ghoonghat or niqab have always voted in India’s elections.
+Before the first Lok Sabha election in 1951-52, the Election Commission of India (ECI) worked hard to ensure women became full participants in India’s democratic process — however, many women refused to enrol with their names, and instead asked to be identified in relation to a male member of the family, as the mother of so-and-so or wife of so-and-so.
+“The reason…was that according to local custom, women in these areas were averse to disclosing their proper names to strangers… Out of a total of nearly 80 million voters in the country, nearly 2.8 million eventually failed to disclose their proper names, and the entries relating to them had to be deleted from the rolls,” Sukumar Sen, the first Chief Election Commissioner, wrote in his report on the election.
+Following a sustained campaign by the ECI, the numbers of women increased steadily on voters’ lists. Today, women account for almost 49% of the electorate.
+''' Identifying women in burqa '''
+Conducting free and fair elections is the ECI’s mandate, which includes ensuring no bogus votes are cast. Polling officers are required to verify a voter’s appearance against the photo on the voter card, if needed.
+To ensure this is done while also protecting the privacy of the woman elector in ghoonghat/ burqa/ niqab, the ECI has issued standing instructions for Returning Officers of constituencies and Presiding Officers of polling stations:
+“If sufficiently large number of ‘pardanashin’ (burqa-clad) women electors are assigned to your Polling Station, you should make special arrangements for their identification and application of indelible ink on the left index finger by a lady Polling Officer in a separate enclosure having due regard to privacy, dignity, and decency.”
+“For such special enclosure you may use locally available but inexpensive material,” says the ECI’s Handbook for Presiding Officers.
+The ECI’s Handbook for Returning Officers says: “The availability of female polling personnel should be examined for appointing Presiding/ Polling Officers in polling stations set up exclusively for female voters or where the number of female voters, especially, pardanashin women is large, there must be at least one lady-polling officer who may facilitate and identify the women electors.”
+''' The action of Madhavi Latha '''
+The responsibility and right to verify the identity of voters lies with the ECI, not a contesting candidate.
+Candidates or their polling agents are allowed access to polling stations in the constituency, to ensure that the polling process is conducted without interference. However, they are not permitted to intervene in the voting process.
+Madhavi Latha’s action was viewed as interference and, therefore, at the ECI’s behest, she was booked by the police.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+==1962, 2019==
+Difference between female and male voter turnout not only closed in but also reversed to 0.175 percentage points in 2019 Lok Sabha polls from -16.71 percentage points in the 1962 general election.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+==2014> 2019: a sharp increase==
+[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F02%2F01&entity=Ar00503&sk=3FAFCAB6&mode=text  Bhavika Jain & Siva Kumar, Number of women voters is surging across the country, February 1, 2019: ''The Times of India'']
+[[File: Women voters in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, 2014- 2019.jpg|Women voters in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, 2014> 2019 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F02%2F01&entity=Ar00503&sk=3FAFCAB6&mode=text  Bhavika Jain & Siva Kumar, Number of women voters is surging across the country, February 1, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]
+For a country that suffers from low sex ratios and female literacy rates, the 2019 general elections will herald a level of gender parity giving women voters a greater say. The latest enrolment data from two large states — Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu — shows the gap between the male and female voter base has narrowed considerably in one state, while in the other, the number of women voters has overtaken that of registered men.
+The increase in enrolment of female voters in both states is in keeping with the broader national trend of improved voter sex ratios (number of women voters for every 1,000 male voters). In the 2014 polls, Kerala, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram & Puducherry already had more women in the electorate than men.
+Tamil Nadu has now joined the club: of its 5.91 crore voters, as per the final revised rolls released on Thursday, 2.98 crore are women and 2.92 crore are men. The number of women voters in the state has increased by 11% against a rise of 8.5% for men in the last five years.
+'''Women voters in Maha have increased by 13L'''
+Maharashtra, where the voter sex ratio was traditionally skewed towards men, has shown an increase in women voters by 13 lakh in the latest round of enrolments. As per final rolls, there are a total of 8.73 crore voters in Maharashtra, of which 4.57 crore are male and 4.16 crore are females. The voter sex ratio this year is thus 911 against 905 in 2014.
+“The voter sex ratio before 2014 was 875 or 880. It was then that we undertook a special drive to enrol more women to increase their representation,” said a senior official in Maharashtra. The drive in the states has involved door-to-door verification, contact programmes using educational institutions, and outreach through women self-help groups and networks such as those established by welfare schemes like the aanganwadis.
+Over the past decade, there has been increasing emphasis at the national level to increase electoral participation of women in all states. The all-India sex ratio of voters had, from 715 female voters for every 1,000 male voters in the 1960s, improved to 883 female voters in the 2000s. It was 940 in 2011, the highest since 1971.
+By 2014, all the southern states had voter parity or near parity between women and their male counterparts. Kerala, of course, had more women voters—a reflection of its overall sex ratio-—while TN, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka had nearly the same number of voters of both sexes.
+The increased participation of women — who have made up for 47-48% of the electorate in Lok Sabha elections dating back to 1971— and improved voter sex ratios also denote the success of the Election Commission in countering the impact of migration on electoral rolls. As highlighted by TOI through its Lost Votes Campaign, a large chunk of the potential electorate is unable to exercise its franchise because of changes in address. In the case of women, this is a crucial factor as many move house after marriage.
+=See also=
+[[Chief Election Commissioners Of India]]
+[[Delhi: Parliamentary elections]]
+[[Election Commission of India]]
+[[Election expenditure: India]]
+[[Election laws, rules. procedures: India ]]
+[[Elections in India: behaviour and trends (historical)]]
+[[Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2014)]]
+[[Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2019)]]
+[[Elections in India: behaviour and trends (2024)]]
+[[India: A political history, 1947 onwards]]
+[[Karnataka: caste, mutts and elections]]
+[[Pakistan: Elections, 1937 onwards]]
+[[Uttar Pradesh: Assembly elections]]
+==...and also==
+Indpaedia has
+i) ''' ‘Political history’ '''pages, state-wise, and a page for India as a whole.
+ii) State-wise pages on '''assembly '''elections
+iii) State-wise pages on '''local bodies’ '''elections
+iv) State-wise pages on '''parliamentary '''elections.
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN IND]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Bangladesh|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Government|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:History|P INDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY, 1947 ONWARDSINDIA: A POLITICAL HISTORY,
+]]
+[[Category:India|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Pages with broken file links|ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)
+ELECTIONS IN INDI]]
+[[Category:Pakistan|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Politics|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]
+[[Category:Sri Lanka|EELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN INDIA: BEHAVIOUR AND TRENDS (HISTORICAL)ELECTIONS IN IND
+]]

Elections in India: behaviour and trends (historical)

Latest revision as of 14:20, 13 August 2024

Contents

[edit] History

[edit] General Elections to the Lok Sabha, 1951- onw

[edit] Details 1951 – 2019

[edit] The results: 1951-2024

[edit] 1951: ballot boxes by Godrej & Boyce

[edit] 1951: many did not know how to vote

[edit] The major political parties

[edit] 1952-2014: The two biggest parties

[edit] 2014>2019

[edit] Big data

[edit] 2014-19

[edit] 2019

[edit] The biggest electoral clashes

[edit] 1952-2009

[edit] Candidates

[edit] 1998-2014: no. per constituency; non-serious candidates

[edit] 1996: Nalgonda

[edit] Non-serious candidates

[edit] 1988-2018: Padmarajan lost 170 elections

[edit] Kashyap: every election makes him poorer

[edit] Some famous cases

[edit] Caste, religion: the use of

[edit] The ‘upper’ castes: voting behaviour

[edit] Laws, SC rulings fail to stop election casteism, communalism

[edit] Scheduled caste (‘reserved’) seats in UP: the trend

[edit] Conduct during elections: Model?

[edit] Legality of election-eve promises

[edit] Constituencies: how many voters do they represent?

[edit] As in 2019

[edit] As in 2024

[edit] Corruption, corrupt candidates

[edit] Corruption does not bother the voter

[edit] Indeed, the perception is corrupt leaders can move things

[edit] Expenditures

[edit] Gujarat, 2017

[edit] First-past-the-post system

[edit] Votes cast vis-à-vis seats won

[edit] 1951-2019

[edit] ‘Inauspicious’ periods

[edit] Holashtak days of March

[edit] Indelible ink

[edit] Quantities ordered: 2009-19

[edit] Independent candidates

[edit] 1957-2014: electoral performance

[edit] More Independents win in Karnataka than other big states

[edit] Landslides: Major electoral landslides

[edit] 1951-2015

[edit] Length of polling process

[edit] 1951-52

[edit] Why Indian elections have stretch for weeks since the 1990s

[edit] 1952-2014: votes received by the winning party

[edit] Mandate: the representativeness of political parties

[edit] The mandate for the ruling party/ coalition: Its size 1952-2014

[edit] 1957-2014: vote share of party that obtained the majority of seats

[edit] 1951-2019

[edit] One MP for 16,00,000 voters

[edit] Are candidates elected by at least 50% of the voters?

[edit] DELHI TOPS

[edit] Manifestoes

[edit] 2004-19: Cong normally released it before BJP

[edit] The things that are given to voters as bribes

[edit] Margins of victory

[edit] One vote margins

[edit] The highest and lowest margins

[edit] 1951 – 2019

[edit] 1962-2014

[edit] 1980-2017: in five states

[edit] Pritam Munde, 2014

[edit] 1989, 1998

[edit] 1977, 2019

[edit] As a %age: Jardosh, 2014

[edit] Muslim (and SC/ ST) representation in Lok Sabha

[edit] 1952, 2014

[edit] NOTA, Use of

[edit] 2014: state-wise use of NOTA option

[edit] 2016

[edit] Gujarat: NOTA is bigger than the no.3 party